Take Me to the East River: Bargemusic

John Tenezaca

ENG 1101

Project 4

                                                                Take Me to the East River: Bargemusic

                Down by the East River, next to the Brooklyn Bridge, lies the home of Brooklyn’s very own chamber music venue: Bargemusic. Brooklyn has known to be the home of bands of more modern music and some of the common genres you would find in a warehouse studio would be indie, pop, electronica and maybe rock. But have you ever heard a group of musicians play pieces from Bach, Mozart, Hayden or Beethoven? Chances are you have but most probably in some giant hall like Carnegie Hall or Lincoln Center. What makes Bargemusic quite unique from all the rest, is that this venue floats on the water. The whole idea seemed a bit peculiar but founder Olga Bloom thought otherwise. Although the initial start was quite a task, Bargemusic is now known as a culture icon of Brooklyn.

                According to an article in the New York Times published in 1999, Ms. Bloomed stated herself that starting Bargemusic was a “formidable undertaking”. She was an amateur violinist who would offer violin classes. She soon realized that her violin career was not going to take off so she decided to work on an idea that would give back to her community. Eventually the idea of a “floating concert hall” came to mind.  She had own two barges before settling down with the current one. The definition of barge,according to Merriam-Webster, is “a roomy usually flat-bottomed boat used chiefly for the transport of goods on inland waterways and usually propelled by towing”. The first one was massive but later learned that it was uninsurable because it was made out of wood. This meant that holding concerts in it was prohibited. She had purchased the second barge back in the early 1970s for $10,000 and unlike the first one, this one had a steel hull. From an interview done by WNYC in 2009, she states that when she first saw this barge, she knew it had perfect acoustics on the inside.  Now, the sound quality really depends on the acoustics of the environment. Wood is known to carry sound much better than steel. Knowing this, Ms. Bloom started renovating the inside of this barge with cherry wood she found from a discarded ferry nearby. With the help of her family, she was able to fully refurbish the barge and turn it from an old dingy barge to a well-crafted musical environment. In a WQXR blog post, published in 2011, Olga Bloom also recounted the early days of Bargemusic. She first had put on shows with very little budget and most of the performers were students from music conservatories. She would raise money by renting out the barge for weddings and other parties of that matter through private donation. As the budget grew, she was able to put on shows with more professional musicians. In time, Bargemusic began gaining attention and soon became a popular venue to enjoy classical music.

                Anthony Tommasini from the New York Times stated that Bargemusic is “place where music lovers can experience the intimacy of chamber music as it was in the days of Mozart and Mendelssohn and as it should still be today”. According to Roger Kamien’s Music: An Appreciation, “Chamber music is classical music designed for the intimate setting of a room, rather than for a public concert hall” (176). Bargemusic offers concerts year-round that ranges from jazz quartets to string quartets. The programs are usually a mix of different composers from the ages and they include but are not limited to Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, Hayden, Vivaldi and more. Ms. Bloom’s mission was to “to create at least one small place where people can come together, audiences and musicians, and realize that they have shared values(New York Times, 1999). She believes that in this day and age music is losing its luster. The modern day technology is making music more profitable than enjoyable. Thus, people don’t appreciate the hard word that goes it genuinely crafted music. Mark Peskanov, who is the president and artistic director of Bargemusic, recalls the warm hospitality that he got from Olga Bloom when he first preformed there. According to Peskanov, in a 2010 interview on BlogCritics.com, Ms. Bloom welcomed him with her unique and charismatic personality. “It was an intimate arrangement; people were sitting close to the performers. One could feel the dedication to the music in the space, and that gave it a special atmosphere” (BlogCritics.com, 2009). Since then, Mr. Peskanov and Ms. Bloom have grown to appreciate each other’s passions and later, Ms. Bloom appointed him Mr. Peskanov as president and artistic director of Bargemusic. Peskanov works closely with in the artists that perform there and stated in the interview: “Our artists are of a certain level, and we do want to make them happy. It is the personal approach that is really special. I work closely with the artists, and often perform together with them.”( BlogCritics.com, 2009). Because of the great hospitality the performers receive at Bargemusic, many of them are proud to play again and this how Bargemusic spread and became a mecca of chamber music.

                Bargemusic’s past may have seemed doubtful but now it’s become a prosperous concert venue. From Olga Blooms challenges on renovating an old steel barge and owning one of today’s most popular attraction for chamber music, these two stories have certain similarities and differences. In the first account, it was only Ms. Bloom’s goal and mindset to build a floating concert hall. That idea seemed too farfetched this there already were famous concert halls in the city. It was her passion for music that drove her to pursue her dream of building Bargemusic. It was only Ms. Bloom who thought of such an idea. There was no one else who seemed to share her dream. Later on, once Bargemusic started operating, people took interest in her work. Now, Mark Peskanov shares her passion for Bargemusic as she once did before. Ms. Bloom had to build Bargemusic by herself but now she has a whole team that works with her to expand notion of Bargemusic. Mr. Peskanov and the rest of his team are carrying the torch that Ms. Bloom lit with her passion.

                Olga Bloom passed away at the age of 92 back on Thanksgiving Day of 2011. Her legacy and spirit stayed in Bargemusic and it still continues to attract more listeners every week. She was an innovator and giver. She wanted to give back to music because she felt it was the only right thing to do. Bargemusic receives most of its donation from very generous people and some philanthropist. It goes to show that being passionate about your dreams could end up having great a great influences on others.   

 

Works Cited

“Barge.” Merriam-Webster. Merriam-Webster, n.d. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/barge>.

Garland, Anne. “About Bargemusic.” Bargemusic. Bargemusic, n.d. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. <http://www.bargemusic.org/about.html>.

Kamien, Roger. “The Classical Period.” Music: An Appreciation. 5th brief ed., student ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2006. 176. Print.

Oltuski, Ilona. “Meeting Mark Peskanov of Bargemusic.” Blogcritics. Blog Critics, 11 Oct. 2010. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. <http://blogcritics.org/meeting-mark-peskanov-of-bargemusic/>.

Sound Check. Schaefer, John. WNYC Radio. 2 Apr. 2009. Radio.

Tommasini, Anthony. “Chamber Music as It Was.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 25 June 1999. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. <http://www.nytimes.com/1999/06/25/movies/chamber-music-as-it-was.html?src=pm>.

Wise, Brian. “Olga Bloom, Founder of Bargemusic, Dies at 92 – WQXR.” WQXR Blog. WQXR, 25 Nov. 2011. Web. 27 Nov. 2013. &lt;http://www.wqxr.org/story/172485-olga-bloom-founder-bargemusic-dies-92/&gt;.

 

My story of Metrotech Center

Ryan Yip

Professor Rosen

English 1101

November 2013

Metrotech center has been a staple in my everyday life. For three months now, I have been walking through here to get to my classes at New York City College of Technology (NYCCT). Overtime I have seen many things during my trips to and from Metrotech Center. Originally, this was a place built as a non-profit improvement district and has grown to me a commercial and academic hub. I have seen a number of events and interesting sights that have peaked my interest during my time there. I traveled with one of my friends to the area when we first set off to register for our first classes at NYCCT. I asked him tell me about his experience with Metrotech Center. Unfortunately, he only passes through Metrotech Center on occasion, meaning he does not see Metrotech Center on a daily basis. Nevertheless, his input on the topic was still good and well.

Metrotech Center has been a real help to me over the three months that I have attended classes at NYCCT. Originally Metrotech Center was just a road on my way to NYCCT, but now it has helped me by other means. Now I buy lunch here and I can find a number of train stations nearby. Passing by Metrotech Center has become a staple on my route to and from NYCCT. I would usually go to the Subways restaurant nearby to eat as my lunch. My friend is unlike me in the way that he does not go there to buy food or anything of the sort. When I talked to him about the food I get in the area, he was surprised at the obscene time and money I spent at the aforementioned Subways restaurant. We had a short walk to and from both our classes and the Dekalb Avenue train station. Coming and going through Metrotech Center has been very helpful to my friend and me during our first semester in college. Its location is one feature we both find beneficial.

The location is one of the best benefits about being in Metrotech Center. My commute to my classes in NYCCT requires that I use the Dekalb Avenue train station. The Metrotech Center commons has been the easiest and fastest way to get from the train station to NYCCT. The walkway is void of traffic so anyone can move from one end to the opposite with little to no obstacles. On your way to the opposite sides, you can see new and interesting things in the Metrotech Commons. Unfortunately, I am fairly impatient when it comes to waiting. My impatience also includes waiting for a traffic signal or a car to drive by so I can safely cross the street. The Metrotech Center commons is a straight and wide walkway for people to gget around on foot. I introduced my friend to Metrotech Center since we both used the Dekalb Avenue train station. He would use a different route than me, so the first time we went to NYCCT together was when I walked him through. He found at as helpful as I did. It was a place where someone can easily move on foot. While this is a great route to take, one of the most appealing things about Metrotech Center is the atmosphere it holds.

When someone passes by Metrotech Center they can see many wonderful things. There are a great number of trees, sculptures, and other decorations strewn about. During my two months of college I have seen many events and gatherings such as concerts, charity organizations and many other activities. During my third month, I noticed a pile of large rocks being moved in the Metrotech commons. There were some fairly large rocks that have been dyed several different colors being placed in some sort of formation. The next week, the aforementioned rocks were stacked on top of each other. They have a similar appearance as that of a face of a cliff or mountain. I asked my friend to describe his reaction to it and he stated he has not seen it yet. He said he would go see it the next day we met and we parted ways. When next we met, he thought it was for kids to play on by climbing the rocks. At that moment I pointed out that there was a no climbing sign on the ground. We agreed that we could not understand the artist’s intentions with these. The following weeks, I saw a rather large Christmas tree being placed in the center of the Metrotech commons. As the days go by, I begin to see workers putting lights and red bows on the tree. The street lights were wrapped with fake pine tree branches to compliment the occasion. Christmas decorations were being implemented well before Thanksgiving Day. In an environment with plenty of tall buildings and intense traffic, it was nice to see a more natural sight that is a giant Christmas tree. Everything about Metrotech center makes it feel like I can see the next day of the tireless grind of everyday life.

There are many different stories that different people tell about Metrotech Center. My friend told me about his experience, but it was nothing of real significance. He doesn’t take interest in the events or any other noticeable changes and he would usually take a different route to NYCCT. I however, pass through Metrotech Center and look around and see what is new and interesting. But there are some things that we share in common. We can find a number of conveniences in the area such as our next lunch. The location of Metrotech Center has made our commute to our classes easier. Even if we do not understand the sights and sounds of Metrotech Center we still see them as fascinating projects and events. Metrotech Center has been a great benefit to me and my friend. We both can go there for whatever reason we may have and see a number of interesting events while heading to and from NYCCT. They have become a prominent part of our New York.

 

http://downtownbrooklyn.com/about/metrotech-bid

http://www.forestcity.net/properties/mixed_use/property_listing/Pages/metrotech_center.aspx

Brooklyn Bridge Park

The Brooklyn Bridge Park has been a historical park in New York City for many years it has attracted tourists from all over the world. What used to be old Piers, sold off have now turned into a site that people from all over would love to see. The termination of Old Fulton Street was the site of the original ferry that linked Brooklyn to Manhattan. In 1900, the New York Dock Company consolidated almost all of the waterfront property between Fulton Street and Erie Basin. At its peak, the New York Dock Co. owned or managed over 40 piers and approximately 150 stores and warehouses, making it the largest private freight terminal in the world. But in the 1950’s shipping in the area began a steady decline in use because of competition. By the late 1970’s Piers1-6 were warehouses and generating revenues for the Port Authority.

In Strategies for Enhancing Marine (and Human) Habitat at Brooklyn Bridge Park Matthew Urbanski and Rachel Gleeson state that “Brooklyn Bridge Park, which opened its first completed segment to the public in June 2010, is the first major park to be built in Brooklyn, New York, USA in over a century replacing derelict pier sheds and paved upland areas with new public access amenities and natural landscape elements, the park will bring new social life and ecological vitality to a waterfront that has long been dominated by commercial and industrial uses.”(72) The article explains two studies that were conducted in the 1900’s that focused on fish population in large piers on the lower Hudson River on marine habitat they were influential in placing public policy with respect to new construction structures that were over water in the studies fish counts were conducted to determine specific species distribution throughout a number of years. With the building of the piers they also wanted to make sure that the wildlife had room to spread as well. “In evaluating the potential of the environmental impact of the proposed park, the design team recognized the Brooklyn tidal shoreline ecology was an integrated system, where ecological enhancements in one particular are could produce a net benefit on surrounding habitat systems. This idea led to a plan to permanently remove large areas of existing overwater platforms, where strategically introducing new floating walkways connecting the outboard ends of piers that were designed to avoid the negative environmental impacts that had been observed under large piers.” (72)

Since then the Park has grown immensely located at 334 Furman Street with 85 acres of land and a 1.3-mile water front there are now there are 6 separate piers in which many travel everyday as you can see right now so many people here. The Park now features things such as sand volleyball courts, bicycle and running paths, a dog run, a boat launch where they give free kayaking lessons and a pool. These activities become really popular when the summer strikes, so remember when the weather gets warmer you can come here and enjoy it to the maximum. All provided with a spectacular view of the New York City skyline. The Park also provides over 400 free activities throughout the year ranging from performance arts and fitness classes to children’s education programs to performance arts and fitness classes. The park is a getaway from all of Downtown Brooklyn’s gray buildings with beautiful scenery and green hills, colorful playgrounds and now a pool. It is the perfect place to visit on a hot summer day with a picnic basket and bathing suit or a walk through during the fall or winter. It serves as a year round attraction for its people of Brooklyn and others who wish to visit.

As we can remember that on October 29,2012 hurricane Sandy struck the Northeastern United States also hitting Brooklyn Bridge Park In Update, Brooklyn Bridge Park  The author described the hurricanes attack on the park. “Winds toppled a few trees, but most survived, and the railings, benches, and posts were unscathed. But in exceeding the projected 100-year storm-water surge by nearly two feet, Sandy ruined most of the waterfront park’s electrical system.” The park did stand up to the Hurricane that caused absolute damage to neighborhoods, meaning that it was built very well. That was just one of the problems that the park had to endure, years before there was a debate on housing that was being planned by the park. In Debate Rages on Housing At Planned Brooklyn Park Sam Roberts asks the question “If 1,200 or so high-rise apartments, a hotel and other private buildings occupy about one-tenth of the land reserved for a park project, is it still a park?”  His article views both sides of the argument many didn’t want housing to go up because they didn’t feel like it would be a park anymore. Others felt that it gave the park a sense of life. Many believed it was going to be viewed as an industrial site instead of a city park. With the building of housing some believed that it would be a great addition and the project is now scheduled to begin during the fall of 2015.

Brooklyn Bridge Park is a great site to see whether it is during the day or at night, summer or winter this park has been a very positive addition to Brooklyn and its urban feel to it matches perfectly with its Brooklyn Heights neighborhood. The park is filled with much history and the process of making this breath taking landmark was not easy, but as you can see it was worth it.

 

Works cited

Bates, Sam. “Debate Rages on Housing At Planned Brooklyn Park.” The New York Times, 23rd July. 2006: Pg 26. Print.

Padilla, Dianna K. “Brooklyn Bridge Park: A Win-Win for the People of Brooklyn and the Environment.”Ecological Restoration, 30. 1 (2012): 78–78. Print.

Unknown. “Update, Brooklyn Bridge Park..” American Scholar 00030937, Vol.82. Issue 1 (2013): Print.

Urbanski, Matthew and Rachel Gleeson. “Strategies for Enhancing Marine (and Human) Habitat at Brooklyn Bridge Park.” Ecological Restoration, 30. 1 (2012): 71–75. Print.

Dumbo View

Dumbo covers 2 sections, one located between the Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridges, which connects Brooklyn to Manhattan across the East River and another that continues east from the Manhattan Bridge to the Vinegar Hil area. This  area has emerged as one of New York City’s premier arts districts, with a cluster of for-profit art galleries. There also was chocolate factory and ice cream factory opened as well and different cafe’s. These were the Brooklyn open public touring place where a lot of people will come and see these places and enjoy with their family and friends. The first public place in the neighborhood was Fulton Ferry, followed by Empire-Fulton Ferry State Park. Brooklyn Bridge Park it was launched in 2006.

I remember my first day going to the Dumbo place. It was almost 7 in the evening and my friend and I were really bored so decided to go and take a walk around their. We went their and I was shocked because it was just so beautiful and like the buildings and the street reminded me of the city. When we got to our main destination we saw the merry-go-around area and a park. A lot of people were their as well with their family and friends taking pictures and enjoying their family bonding time.

Back then the western portion of the neighborhood was known as Fulton landing that was back in the 1890’s. The cardboard box was invented in the Robert Gair building on Washington Street, which is now the home of the Etsy. The Dumbo historic district consists of properties bound by John Street to  the north, York Street to the south. Main Street to the west, and Bridge Street to the east. Dumbo, an acronym for Down Under the Manhattan Bridge Overpass is neighborhood in New York City borough of Brooklyn. Now recently this place has changed there are more open spaces. Like for example: the parks, the beaches, and one of the cites has mentioned that their are a lot shops, bookstores, wedding areas, banquet halls. and etc. In the past their was overgrown trees and rolling green lands. The specific interaction of the park were not looked upon carefully. Lots of magazine and reviewers were trying to have their way of selling the park as a a place for those looking around for something reclusive. In one of the magazine it was mentioned that this park is sort of like a getaway for professionals and families to come and enjoy this area. The Brooklyn Bridge Park had a few problems going on so they contacted Jane Walentas. She eagerly took the opportunity to donate money to the park so that it can be beautiful and be fixed in place. Now a carousel is their which is attracting all the tourists to the park. The kids are really enjoying the place. It’s a place to go especially during the summer time because of the nice breeze.

In one of the articles by New York Times, one of the residents said how their were deep wells along the side of the building. if people ever got in their they’re would’ve been no other way out. The holes has been covered and the edges are smooth now. Now train tracks are running in the old uneven streets in the Dumbo. Another person has said how its a beautiful place to live in. For example the environment, the people, the stores around the area, the scenery of the Brooklyn bridge itself.

Everyone has their own opinion about the Dumbo Park. Some don’t like it and some do like it. To gather up all the main details about the Dumbo place, there are good amount of restaurants, cafes and activity stores all connected together. The park itself is pretty big. When you enter the park you would see drastic changes. The interesting thing you will see is street cobblestones to beach cobblestones and rocks spanning the area with wooden park benches dotting the way. At the side you will see mini cute gardens,trees, and plant’s If you go a little deeper then you will see grass area where book lovers can lay down on grass and rest and enjoy the beautiful nature.

In conclusion Dumbo is a place when you can hang out with your family and friends. You can have mini picnics their, throw parties, go for a hang out. When you are really stressed you can just sit by the sea where the benches are and listen to what naure is calling out for you. When I went their and experienced the nature  myself, it was really calm and soothing. My mind was fresh and I was worry free for a good couple of hours.

Cited Work:

The New York Times: “How Noir Looks When It’s Published” Allison Gregor   August 27, 2013

Brooklyn Bridge Park:The Dumbo Park http://expertscolumn.hubpages.com/hub/Brooklyn-Bridge-Park

The Dumbo Brooklyn http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumbo,_Brooklyn

 

 

The B.A.M. Fire

The Brooklyn Academy of Music(most popularly known as B.A.M. for short) is a performing arts center located in the borough of Brooklyn. It was founded 1859, making the B.A.M. the oldest performing arts center in the United states which is still in operation today. The B.A.M. has a long history involving presenting concerts, plays, ballet, and lectures. The original building of the B.A.M. was on Montague street, near Brooklyn City Hall. However, years later, the first building was destroyed by a large fire. Like any disaster, it came completely unexpected.

On November 30, 1903, the first and original B.A.M. building was destroyed by a massive fire. An exact cause for the fire was never determined. According to an article on the fire by the Brooklyn Eagle, “The cause of the fire is still more or less a mystery and the officials have little hope of satisfactorily solving it.” However, it is believed that the probable cause was an electrical accident. The theater was being set up and prepared for a dinner. A few men who had been helping to prepare for the dinner set up a sign in incandescent lights. Unfortunately, a fuse connected to the sign reportedly blew out shortly before a few men were testing the wiring. As a result, a burst of flames appeared over the stage inside the B.A.M. building and it quickly spread onto the draperies. It consumed all the decorations and everything else in the building. Firemen came and prevented the flames from spreading beyond the building to other surrounding establishments. A few hours later, the flames died out.

A handful of different newspapers reported about the events that unfolded from the fire. Each of them reported about the fire in slightly different ways. The Pittsburgh Press was one of the newspaper companies that reported on the events of the fire. According to a November 30, 1903 article by the Pittsburgh Press, the flames destroyed everything in the B.A.M. building and left the walls standing. No lives were lost during the fire. However, one of the fireman received a  slight injury. The flames were strong enough to endanger the establishments surrounding the B.A.M. building. Fortunately, firemen came and put out the flames before any further tragedies occurred. The flames were first discovered shortly before 9:00am by two decorators who were preparing the auditorium of the building for a dinner that was to be held in honor of Senator Patrick H. McCarren, the Democratic leader of Brooklyn at the time. The flames reported to be the result of an electrical accident. Before the decorators were able to leave the building, the flames quickly spread to all the decorations in the building. The firemen came and prevented the flames from spreading to and damaging other nearby establishments. The fire raged on until around 11:00am where it died out by itself. It is believed that the owners of the theater didn’t have any insurance.

A second newspaper company that reported on the events of the fire was the New York Times. According to a December 1, 1903 article by the New York Times, the fire “was one of the swiftest destructions that Brooklyn has ever known, the great auditorium being a seething sea of flame within twenty minutes…” As stated before, the fire was reported to have been started by an electrical accident. Before the fire, a man named John J. Sullivan and his men were decorating the theater for a banquet in honor of Senator McCarren. A big sign that said “Welcome” in incandescent lights was set up as one of the decorations. Unfortunately, a fuse connected to the lights blew out. While a few men were testing the wiring of the lights, a burst of flames appeared and started spreading across the draperies of the stage. Soon, the building became a sea of flames. Firemen came to put out the flames, but they dropped the fire hose and ran for their lives. However, they did contain the fire so that it didn’t spread to other buildings like the Brooklyn Public Library. The police placed an estimate of all the damages from the fire to be $273,000.

Both of the newspaper companies reported on the same story, but they each contain noticeable differences. The New York times article was published a day after the fire. The Pittsburgh Press article was published on the same day of the fire. I believe that it is because of this that the N.Y.T. article contains more information than the Pittsburgh Press article. Also, the N.Y.T. article was able to describe more specific details surrounding the fire than the P.P. article. For example, The N.Y.T. articles gives the name of one of the decorators from the B.A.M. Also, the article describes the firemen who responded to the fire to have quickly dropped the fire hose and ran away. The P.P. article stated that the cost of the damages from the fire wouldn’t exceed $250,000. However, the N.Y.T. article claims that the  police estimated the cost of the damages to be $273,000. The N.Y.T. article also stated that it is rumored that one volunteer from the B.A.M. was killed during the fire, but no bodies were reported to have been found. Just from these differences alone, I believe it is safe to say that the N.Y.T. article was the result of a more detailed investigation than the P.P. article.

Although both of these newspaper companies reported on the same incident, there is a clear difference shown between their articles. It is very likely that the New York Times did more research than the Pittsburgh Press. One fact that further proves my claim is the fact that the N.Y.T. article was published a day after the incident while the Pittsburgh Press was published in the same day of the incident. It is clear that more time was put into one article than the other. Although it was claimed to have been an electrical accident, the cause of the fire was never truly proven. Also, the Brooklyn Academy of Music was threatened by a fire in 1895. It makes me wonder if the fire really was just an accident.

Works Cited:

“The Brooklyn Academy of Music in Ruins.” BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC IN RUINS – Historic Amusement Structure Totally Destroyed by Fire. SWIFT WORK OF THE FLAMES Caterers Preparing for McCarren Banquet Barely Escaped with Their Lives — Adjoining Building Destroyed — One Death Rumored. – View Article – NYTimes.com. New York Times, 01 Dec. 1903. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.

“A Big Fire In Brooklyn.” Pittsburgh Press 30 Nov. 1903: 1. Print.

“Theatre Talks.” Theatre Talks. N.p., 13 Dec. 2011. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.

“Brooklyn Academy of Music.” Infoplease. Infoplease, n.d. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.

Tragedies on the Brooklyn Bridge Collide

The Brooklyn Bridge is the first thing someone might think about Brooklyn and there are various reasons why. When we think of the Brooklyn Bridge all we see are the tangible features that it offers us. The events that occurred while developing the bridge and even after it was built are not visible to us which means many people are not aware of them. Thousands of New York residents cross this bridge every day yet not many would know of controversies that have occurred involving the Brooklyn Bridge. Two distinct stories lie in the death of John A. Roebling and the Stampede of 1883. One story revolves around the architect responsible of the Bridge and his death while the other story revolves a tragedy that could’ve been prevented. Both of these accounts have an aftermath and that can be either similar or different. These accounts provide meaning to what the Brooklyn is in its present day today. Being that we aren’t able to see the past events that occurred on the Brooklyn Bridge when we stand in front of it in person, we would have no idea what the past held. We would have no idea why the bridge is the way it is today, there is always a background story and the Brooklyn Bridge has various stories leading up to what it is today.

The man responsible for the Brooklyn Bridge was John A. Roebling. He planned to make the bridge the biggest suspension bridge during its time due to new ways of building suspension bridges[1]. After construction began, tragedy soon struck. Roebling, while being the architect was also assisting in building the bridge. He was on site one day taking compass readings on some pilings at a ferry slip. He wasn’t aware when the boat banged into the slip, his foot was violently caught on the pilings[2]. He was rushed to his son’s house in Brooklyn Heights, not too far from where the bridge stands today. There the doctors amputated his toes and all seemed to be fine. That was until he passed away three weeks later on due to an illness. The tragedy continued as the project resulted in serious sicknesses and deaths to various workers and Washington Roebling. Washington Roebling was John A. Roebling’s son who took over the project after his father’s death became very ill due to the working conditions of the bridge. He acquired decompression sickness and in 1879 he became completely disabled from it living the rest of his life in pain[3].

The Bridge was alas opened to the public on May 24, 1883. It took just 6 days for a tragedy to happen. The Bridge, being new was asked to be tested on its endurance by a man by the name of P.T Barnum. He proposed an elephant march along with various animals to promote his circus and at the same time prove to the public that the bridge was safe and stable[4]. He was denied this event but on May 30, 1883, a huge stampede was unleashed. On the day of May 30th, a women tripped and rumors spread throughout the bridge that it was going to collapse. This let out a huge fear among people as they rushed to get off the bridge, trampling people without care as their main goal was to save their own lives. No one trusted the bridge so when the rumors spread quickly throughout the bridge, a terrible stampede began. In the end, 12 people were trampled and 36 left injured[5]. The scene was terrible and controversy let out because if P.T Barnum would’ve been allowed to do his elephant march, this tragedy could’ve been prevented. The stampede could’ve been prevented because Barnum’s elephant march would prove to people that if the bridge was able to sustain large elephants and many other animals then it can sustain hundreds of people. After he did the march, the speculations were minimal.

These two accounts are surrounded by death and sorrow as the lives of innocent people were lost. That is what is similar between the death of the man responsible for the Brooklyn Bridge, John A. Roebling and the Stampede of 1883. Another similarity is that both of these events could’ve been prevented. The death of Roebling could’ve been prevented if he would’ve never been out on the work site as he was not a construction worker. The stampede could’ve also been prevented if P.T Barnum would’ve been allowed to perform his elephant march. The accounts differentiate in various ways. The death of Roebling was caused by machinery and the unawareness of his surroundings while the deaths of the stampede were caused by human beings trampling others to death. Another difference is the after math, after Roebling died, his son suffered from a severe life changing illness and workers died while a year after the Stampede, P.T Barnum was able to perform his march to prevent such event from happening again[6]. The difference lies in that the days after John A. Roebling’s death tragedy followed up with son and his employees and no positivity was seen while after The Stampede a man was able to change the mind of others and prevent an event like that from occurring ever again.

Now history can be defined as an argument on how we interpret the past[7]. This mean that many people view these accounts different as they can be viewed differently. Although both of these stories that revolve around the bridge are tragedies which have impacted the Brooklyn Bridge’s future in various ways, they are also controversial and occurred through different events. One had a positive aftermath while another resulted in further tragedies. It can be an example of how history can be found in years after an event occurred no matter how different or indifferent they may seem to be. Although the stampede resulted in positive things and improvements for the safety of people on the bridge, the death of John A. Roebling also allowed Washington Roebling to take over the project and create the beautiful bridge that we see before us today.

 


[1] “Today in History.” : June 12. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

[2] “John Augustus Roebling – Great Buildings Online.” John Augustus Roebling – Great Buildings Online. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2013.

[3] “Smithsonian Civil War Studies: Biography – Washington Augustus Roebling – Civil War Engineer and Professional Civil Engineer.” Smithsonian Civil War Studies: Biography – Washington Augustus Roebling – Civil War Engineer and Professional Civil Engineer. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2013.

[4] “Ephemeral New York.” Ephemeral New York. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

[5] “Topics in Chronicling America – Brooklyn Bridge; Fanfare and Fatalities.” Brooklyn Bridge; Fanfare and Fatalities. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

[6] “Ephemeral New York.” Ephemeral New York. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

[7] Geoffrey, Zylstra, 2013, New York City College of Technology

Works Cited

“Today in History.” : June 12. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

 “John Augustus Roebling – Great Buildings Online.” John Augustus Roebling – Great Buildings Online. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2013.

 “Smithsonian Civil War Studies: Biography – Washington Augustus Roebling – Civil War Engineer and Professional Civil Engineer.” Smithsonian Civil War Studies: Biography – Washington Augustus Roebling – Civil War Engineer and Professional Civil Engineer. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2013.

“Ephemeral New York.” Ephemeral New York. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

“Topics in Chronicling America – Brooklyn Bridge; Fanfare and Fatalities.” Brooklyn Bridge; Fanfare and Fatalities. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

“Ephemeral New York.” Ephemeral New York. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

Geoffrey, Zylstra, 2013, New York City College of Technology

The next stop is…Court St.

The New York Transit Museum, while not has famous has other tourist attractions it could certainly be one because of the different experiences that each visitor gets from it. The New York Transit Museum or the NYC Transit Museum has it is often referred to is a site which displays historical artifacts that relate to the New York public transportation such has buses and trains, the museum is located in Court Street and it is open to the public.

On June 1946 the subway station known has Court St was abandoned due to the lack of ridership and closed its doors to the public, however after being abandoned for years the Transit Authority came up with a bright idea that consisted of using the “now” abandoned Court St station has a exhibition of public transportation, the exhibition was planned to run for a limited time but it has continued until present day. The museum itself belongs to the Mass Transit Authority or the MTA has it is commonly known, it is also considered to be one the most well preserved museums around NYC. When visiting the museum of transit it is not likely for people to have the same experiences has other people do, what I mean is that the experience can vary with each person, such case happened to Edward Rothstein an author of the New York Times who visited the New York Museum Of Transit and wrote of his experiences. Before entering the museum Edward Rothstein begins to wonder why most of the people living in New York do not care about the subway and also why people who ride the subway do not pay attention to things that may seem silly at first but, once they are asked about them they do not know, one example Rothstein offers is a statement in which he says ” We also don’t think much about what makes the trains run.” This quote implies that even though we might know where the energy to make the train move is obtained from, we might not know how it is implemented onto the subways or the rails to make them run. Rothstein then begins to transition into the reasons that he believes why people might think that the museum is nothing sort of the ordinary and states ” We descend the steps almost as if we were ordinary straphangers, as if we didn’t realize this Court Street subway stop… was decommissioned long ago to be used as a museum.” This quote by Mr. Rothstein implies that if a person goes to the museum of transit thinking that it is like any other subway stop or just another day at work then the person is not going to see the wonders of the museum and the artifacts but, ratter a simple abandoned train station that has nothing to offer. In a later part of the reading Mr. Edward Rothstein begins to describe the different exhibitions offered at the museum, he also describes different things that have happened at the location such as the filming of the movie “The Taking of Pelham One Two Three” and the usage of a generator that causes a enormous wheel to move.

Another person who experienced a day at the NYC Transit Museum was an author of the New York Magazine by the name of Melissa Noble. Melissa Noble describes the museum has a underground institution that guides visitors through the evolution of one of the largest transportation systems in the world, not also that but she starts to describe the pictures that she observes throughout her walk around the museum, but there is one picture that she makes stand out and that picture is the one with the line of the first transit workers building the first subway station in city hall in 1904. Noble  Towards the end of the article Melissa Noble states “Complete with garish advertising and uncomfortable seats, the cars leave visitors to muse that the more things change, the more they stay the same.”  she implies that even though some things about the subway change, the subway will still be up and running no matter the changes.

After reading these two accounts we can understand that when an individual visits the New York Museum Of Transit their experiences can vary with what the person wants and is willing to explore.

The Museum of Transit is a place in which people have the opportunity to see the history of one of the most famous systems of transportation in the world, the museum itself has provided a different experience for both first time attenders and returning fellows alike and while not has big and popular has other attractions, it has certainly won over the hearts of those who have visited .

INNOVATION TO THE GLORY

While many historical buildings have been demolished during the growth of New York city there are a few that withstood the test of time and now stand as a reminder of how much value our history means to us. When the Brooklyn historical society was first erected, it was designed by an expert in his field and has continued to evolve beyond his expectations into a modern sustainable building open for all generations to visit and enjoy. Before its renovation in 1999 it stood for over 100 years. Proving the quality of work that went into it has payed off. When renovation started in 1999 changes had to be made to accommodate the changing times while maintaining the historical vibe to the building. Modern technology was integrated into the building to comfort the visitors efficiently. Just like the people with the thirst for knowledge who visit the library the building itself is expanding its reach into the possibilities of modern technology to reach out to the younger generations who wish to experience a piece of history.

The Brooklyn historical society is a library, which connects us to the 400-year-old history of Brooklyn. It was founded as Long Island Historical Society by Henry Pierrepont in 1863.  It is Located in the heart of Brooklyn in the neighborhood of Brooklyn Heights at the intersection of Pierrepoint Street and Clinton Street. It was listed on National Register of Historic Places Listings in Kings County, New York as National Historic Landmark in July 1991. Also the presence of Brooklyn Historic Society in the list of museums and cultural institutions in New York City makes it internationally known Historical and Cultural Monument. At its exhibitions, Brooklyn Historic Society hosts 9000 members of the general public and serves around 120,000 students and teachers by providing the educational tours every year.

George B. Post designed and constructed the Brooklyn Historical Society. The construction was completed in 1881. George B. Post, known for engineering skills like designing open-large spaces and construction of high storyed buildings. The first office building to use elevators “Equitable Life Assurance Society”, was designed by him. He’s also known for enormous sky-lighted hall of New York Produce Exchange. Also the buildings – World building and St. Paul were one of the tallest buildings in New York at the time of construction. Most of his designed buildings have been demolished. NYSE designed by him continues to be one of the intuitive ways to use steel support.

The design, construction and maintenance are three aspects of architecture, which makes the building a National Historic Landmark.  George B. Post completed Brooklyn historical society in 3 years. Post used terra cotta ornamentation on the façade in large scale in Brooklyn historical society building. An innovative truss-system was used to give the support to the ceiling of the central library.  For the first time locally produced terra cotta was used in buildings masonry construction. Olin Levi Warner sculpted the façade. He used the heroic characters of history. Post hired skilled crafts person to enhance the interior of the building. Library is decorated with carved black ash woodwork. Well-known artist Charles booth is believed to be the originator of stained glasses used in the windows of the building. Post himself designed the bronze hardware used in the building. Minton tiles are used throughout the building. An open galleried library was created by suspending the top floor of the building from iron trusses embedded in the roof. A special bridge technique was used to create the part of library.

A complete renovation of the Brooklyn Historical Society took over in 1999-2003 by Jan Hird Pokorny Associates. A climate control system was installed to preserve the historic collections. Restoration of the terra cotta facade and the roof was done.  The original bright red outlook of the facade was retained through cleaning & repair. High speed Internet was installed to enhance the usability of the library. Grandeur of the entrance was restored by the removal of the elevator, present in the middle of entrance staircase. Also the clock tower was renovated. The original gas lighting fixtures from 19th century retains its original decorative aesthetics. The restored Othmer Library maintains the historic essence of its old classic interiors with the introduction of new climate-control system for the preservation of its historical collections.

In 2012, announcement for renovation of the Brooklyn Historical Society was made and Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz, New York City Department of Cultural Affairs, Brooklyn Delegation of the New York City Council and the New York City Office of the Mayor made the funds available.  The architecture firm Christoff:Finio was given the renovation project to improve the visitor experience through redesigning the lower level & first floor of the library building.  The first floor will have new Reception Desk.  Redesigning of the lower level will result in expanded exhibition place.

The monumental main entrance has been redesigned to a tiled lobby with classrooms, information desk for the visitors, commercial retail spaces, and event halls. The event hall will be expanded to include 200 seating arrangements, controllable/programmable new lighting system, new chairs, tables, mobile stage & built-in Audio Video equipment’s. The space could be rented for programs & events. This project will take the Brooklyn Historic Society to a new platform.

Although there were three different individual involved during the renovation process over the couple of past years but they all had a very different kind of mind set and mentality about constructing or making changes to the magnificent place. For example: The Construction done by George B. Post emphasized more about the exterior architecture where as when the renovation in 1997 started the contractor also considered working in the interior part of the building. In conclusion, even though all of them had an distinct point of view on the building but all the changes done were to add more value to this prestigious location.

 

References:

 Brooklyn Daily Eagle(2013, Oct 17).Grande Dame of historical buildings now more seductive to public visits. http://www.brooklyneagle.com/articles/grande-dame-historical-buildings-now-more-seductive-public-visits-2013-10-17-123000

Jennifer Medina (2005, Aug 2005) http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/16/nyregion/16brooklyn.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Brooklyn History under the category About Us http://brooklynhistory.org/

The Sandy Days of Brooklyn Tech

The hurricane of 2012 known as Hurricane Sandy, can arguably be one of New York’s greatest tragedies. Hurricane Sandy devastated the city and left many people homeless and nowhere to live. As a result, Brooklyn Technical High School opened up as a shelter to take in people in need. Brooklyn Technical High School is a 12 story building that covers over half a city block. Each floor is divided into North, South, East, West and Center sections to better help identify rooms.  The first floor of the building is filled with classrooms and it’s also where the renowned auditorium of Brooklyn Tech is located. Every floor from the 2nd to the 6th is filled with numerous classrooms and the 7th floor of the building is used as a cafeteria for students.  From October 29th,2012 to November  12th, 2012, Brooklyn Tech housed over 300 patients from the adult homes Surf Manor and Chai Home. Many of these patients were of special needs. Although both students and patients staying in the shelters were impacted greatly by Hurricane Sandy, the effects were vastly different.
Brooklyn Tech became a full time shelter on October 29th 2012 and took in over 300 people from Surf Manor Adult Home and Chai Home Adult Home. These two adult homes were terribly flooded and the patients living there had to move away. These patients stayed in the first floor of the school and gym and were allowed access to the 1st floor, 7th floor and the 3rd floor for cleaning purposes. According to Daniel  Vladu, a volunteer for the shelter, “The shelter also provided cots, blankets, medicine, pet supplies, diapers, baby formula, and numerous other supplies. A clinic was also set up to treat people and deal with medical emergencies.” However,  the patients were not monitored carefully. ” A schizophrenic refugee from Hurricane Sandy has disappeared from a temporary city-run shelter set up at a Brooklyn high school,” according to an article in the NYDailyNews.  Some patients roamed free without any supervision and some were rumored to use the walls of some floors as restrooms.  The patients that lived at Brooklyn Tech during this time had a horrible experience.

Brooklyn Tech announced on November 5th, despite patients still living there, that students were to return to school the following Wednesday. Students of Brooklyn Tech had a mini vacation because of this storm. Students received eleven days off from October 27th to the Wednesday of November 27th. Brooklyn Tech, being a specialized high school,  is known for its harsh curriculums that students must follow and Hurricane Sandy relieved students of this workload for over 11 days and more. “After w e returned, we  barely got any work for the next week” said Brain Li, a current Brooklyn Tech Senior. The class periods for the next week were also cut by a third of its time and classes started much later than usual, allowing students to catch up on much needed sleep.

The Hurricane of 2012 was a terrible storm that vastly affected New York City but for the students of Brooklyn Tech and the people in the shelters, the effects were much different. The special needs patients that lived in the adult homes of Surf Manor and Chai Home literally lost their homes.  Patients were not monitored carefully during this time and a schizophrenic patient had even gotten lost.  The effect this storm had on students of Brooklyn Tech were the opposite. This storm was a blessing in disguise to many students. This storm gave students a work-free 11 day vacation and because this storm was so close to college early application deadlines, ”  National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC) was working with colleges to grant extensions to students in the hurricane zone.”(School Library Journal article.) The one bad thing that resulted from this storm for students were the disgusting smell that emitted from the 7th floor cafeteria, where the patients were staying. However, Brooklyn Tech students only had to deal with this smell for a few days where as the patients had to live with it for over two weeks. Even the misfortunes of the students were much worse than those of the people in the shelter.

Hurricane Sandy affected New York City greatly but the effects on certain individuals were very different. The special needs patients staying in Brooklyn Technical High School from October 29th to November 12th had a terrible experience. The living conditions were terrible for these patients and they had no choice but to live with it. The students of Brooklyn Tech took one of the greatest storm in the history of New York City to be a boon. Students got days off, less work, less class time and more time to work on college applications. In fact, physical education classes were even cancelled the week of returning to school.  Despite the storm devastating the people at the adult homes of Chai Home and Surf Manor, it helped the students of Brooklyn Tech more than it hurt.

Work Cited
Shapiro, Julie. “All City Schools Reopen for Class, as Some Kids Share Space with Shelters.” DNAinfo.com New York. 7 Nov. 2012. 19 Nov. 2013

SMITH, GREG B. “Mental patient disappears from a Hurricane Sandy evacuation shelter at a Brooklyn high school.” NY Daily News. 7 Nov. 2012. 19 Nov. 2013

Vladu, Daniel. “Http://www.bthsnews.org/2012/12/15/hurricane-sandy-an-interview-with-a-volunteer/.” Interview by Linda Nguyen. Http://www.bthsnews.org/. 15 Dec. 2012. 19 Nov. 2013

MONIHAN, Rachel. “With transit down and many schools damaged, New York City kids won’t be back to school until Monday.” NY Daily News. 2 Nov. 2012. 19 Nov. 2013

Bayliss, Sarah. “Many Return to School in a Landscape Altered by Hurricane Sandy.” School Library Journal. 6 Nov. 2012. 19 Nov. 2013

Li, Brain. “Brooklyn Tech Sandy days.” Online interview. 16 Nov. 2013