Gentrify

Verb

Definition: to change (a place, such as an old neighborhood) by improving it and making it more appealing to people who have money

This is another word that I found in the reading “Who Knows Brooklyn?”

In the reading, I didn’t know what Merlis said by he doesn’t “do neighborhoods that aren’t, like, all gentrified…” I didn’t know what he meant until now.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gentrify

Hearth

Noun

Definition: the floor in front of or inside a fireplace

It was found in the first paragraph of the reading “Who Knows Brooklyn?”

The author was trying to say that Merlis’ new entry was “better in a hearth than upon a coffee table or bookshelf…” I now know that he was basically saying that his new entry belonged in a fire.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hearth

 

Incredulous

Adjective

Definition: not able or willing to believe something

I found this word in the tenth paragraph of the reading “City Limits.” It said, “It saw the bewildermentĀ  on your face as you stepped out of the stolen matinee, incredulous that there was still daylight after such a long movie.”

I didn’t know what Whitehead was talking about until I looked up the word.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incredulous?show=0&t=1387163694

Querulous

Adjective

Definition: complaining in an annoyed way

I also found this on page 26 of “Reading Lucy.”

In the text, “querulous” was one of the difficult words that Lucy would use in her letters to Alfred. She put the definitions of words like that in case Alfred didn’t know what it meant. I didn’t know what it meant until now because the definition wasn’t in the text.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/querulous

 

Missive

Noun

Definition: A letter or other written message.

I found this word on page 26 of “Reading Lucy.”

I had no idea what the author meant by “missives” until I looked it up. Now I know that she was talking about letters.

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/missive

 

Project #5: Letter

Dear next year student,

Before you begin taking Prof. Rosen’s English composition class, I just want to give you a little advice. Most of the assignments in her class are centered around locations in Brooklyn, so it would be a good idea to familiarize yourself with the neighborhood surrounding CityTech. If you don’t live in Brooklyn, then I suggest exploring the area the give yourself a head start. If you already do live in Brooklyn and you are familiar with the area, then there’s a good chance that you won’t have much difficulty choosing a location. I don’t live in the Bronx, so finding and choosing locations for some of the projects wasn’t easy for me. Also, try not to wait until last minute to do your assignments. It can be very stressful waiting to do assignments a day or a few hours before the do date. It’s best to do all the assignments as soon as possible. You’ll complete them with better efficiency that way. And be sure to pay attention in class for potential glossary words. Those are important. Also, everyone in class will have to write a summary of one day in English class. When it’s your turn, make sure you pay extra attention in class so that you can keep a record of what goes on during that day. Well, that’s all the advice I have to give for Prof. Rosen’s class. Good luck.

Samuel

Project #5: Research essay full summary

The research essay that I wrote is about the Brooklyn Academy of Music fire that took place on November 30, 1903. In the essay, I gave two accounts of the fire from two different newspaper companies. One of the accounts was from the Pittsburgh Press, and the other was from the New York Times. A quote from the New York Times article states that the fire “was one of the swiftest destructions that Brooklyn has ever known, the great auditorium being a seething sea of flame within twenty minutesā€¦ā€ At the end of the essay, I compared both of the accounts of the fire to each other. The Pittsburgh Press article gave less detail and a more general account of the fire. The New York Times article, however, did the opposite and gave more detail to the event. For example, the Pittsburgh Press article stated that the firemen were only successful in preventing the fire from spreading, but they weren’t successful in putting it out themselves. The New York Times article stated that the firemen “quickly dropped the fire hose and ran away.” Judging from both articles, it is clear that one newspaper did one research than the other.

Works Cited:

“The Brooklyn Academy of Music in Ruins.” BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC IN RUINS – Historic Amusement Structure Totally Destroyed by Fire. SWIFT WORK OF THE FLAMES Caterers Preparing for McCarren Banquet Barely Escaped with Their Lives — Adjoining Building Destroyed — One Death Rumored. – View Article – NYTimes.com. New York Times, 01 Dec. 1903. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.

“A Big Fire In Brooklyn.” Pittsburgh Press 30 Nov. 1903: 1. Print.

“Theatre Talks.” Theatre Talks. N.p., 13 Dec. 2011. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.

“Brooklyn Academy of Music.” Infoplease. Infoplease, n.d. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.

 

The B.A.M. Fire

The Brooklyn Academy of Music(most popularly known as B.A.M. for short) is a performing arts center located in the borough of Brooklyn. It was founded 1859, making the B.A.M. the oldest performing arts center in the United states which is still in operation today. The B.A.M. has a long history involving presenting concerts, plays, ballet, and lectures. The original building of the B.A.M. was on Montague street, near Brooklyn City Hall. However, years later, the first building was destroyed by a large fire. Like any disaster, it came completely unexpected.

On November 30, 1903, the first and original B.A.M. building was destroyed by a massive fire. An exact cause for the fire was never determined. According to an article on the fire by the Brooklyn Eagle, “The cause of the fire is still more or less a mystery and the officials have little hope of satisfactorily solving it.” However, it is believed that the probable cause was an electrical accident. The theater was being set up and prepared for a dinner. A few men who had been helping to prepare for the dinner set up a sign in incandescent lights. Unfortunately, a fuse connected to the sign reportedly blew out shortly before a few men were testing the wiring. As a result, a burst of flames appeared over the stage inside the B.A.M. building and it quickly spread onto the draperies. It consumed all the decorations and everything else in the building. Firemen came and prevented the flames from spreading beyond the building to other surrounding establishments. A few hours later, the flames died out.

A handful of different newspapers reported about the events that unfolded from the fire. Each of them reported about the fire in slightly different ways. The Pittsburgh Press was one of the newspaper companies that reported on the events of the fire. According to a November 30, 1903 article by the Pittsburgh Press, the flames destroyed everything in the B.A.M. building and left the walls standing. No lives were lost during the fire. However, one of the fireman received aĀ  slight injury. The flames were strong enough to endanger the establishments surrounding the B.A.M. building. Fortunately, firemen came and put out the flames before any further tragedies occurred. The flames were first discovered shortly before 9:00am by two decorators who were preparing the auditorium of the building for a dinner that was to be held in honor of Senator Patrick H. McCarren, the Democratic leader of Brooklyn at the time. The flames reported to be the result of an electrical accident. Before the decorators were able to leave the building, the flames quickly spread to all the decorations in the building. The firemen came and prevented the flames from spreading to and damaging other nearby establishments. The fire raged on until around 11:00am where it died out by itself. It is believed that the owners of the theater didn’t have any insurance.

A second newspaper company that reported on the events of the fire was the New York Times. According to a December 1, 1903 article by the New York Times, the fire “was one of the swiftest destructions that Brooklyn has ever known, the great auditorium being a seething sea of flame within twenty minutesā€¦ā€ As stated before, the fire was reported to have been started by an electrical accident. Before the fire, a man named John J. Sullivan and his men were decorating the theater for a banquet in honor of Senator McCarren. A big sign that said “Welcome” in incandescent lights was set up as one of the decorations. Unfortunately, a fuse connected to the lights blew out. While a few men were testing the wiring of the lights, a burst of flames appeared and started spreading across the draperies of the stage. Soon, the building became a sea of flames. Firemen came to put out the flames, but they dropped the fire hose and ran for their lives. However, they did contain the fire so that it didn’t spread to other buildings like the Brooklyn Public Library. The police placed an estimate of all the damages from the fire to be $273,000.

Both of the newspaper companies reported on the same story, but they each contain noticeable differences. The New York times article was published a day after the fire. The Pittsburgh Press article was published on the same day of the fire. I believe that it is because of this that the N.Y.T. article contains more information than the Pittsburgh Press article. Also, the N.Y.T. article was able to describe more specific details surrounding the fire than the P.P. article. For example, The N.Y.T. articles gives the name of one of the decorators from the B.A.M. Also, the article describes the firemen who responded to the fire to have quickly dropped the fire hose and ran away. The P.P. article stated that the cost of the damages from the fire wouldn’t exceed $250,000. However, the N.Y.T. article claims that theĀ  police estimated the cost of the damages to be $273,000. The N.Y.T. article also stated that it is rumored that one volunteer from the B.A.M. was killed during the fire, but no bodies were reported to have been found. Just from these differences alone, I believe it is safe to say that the N.Y.T. article was the result of a more detailed investigation than the P.P. article.

Although both of these newspaper companies reported on the same incident, there is a clear difference shown between their articles. It is very likely that the New York Times did more research than the Pittsburgh Press. One fact that further proves my claim is the fact that the N.Y.T. article was published a day after the incident while the Pittsburgh Press was published in the same day of the incident. It is clear that more time was put into one article than the other. Although it was claimed to have been an electrical accident, the cause of the fire was never truly proven. Also, the Brooklyn Academy of Music was threatened by a fire in 1895. It makes me wonder if the fire really was just an accident.

Works Cited:

“The Brooklyn Academy of Music in Ruins.” BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC IN RUINS – Historic Amusement Structure Totally Destroyed by Fire. SWIFT WORK OF THE FLAMES Caterers Preparing for McCarren Banquet Barely Escaped with Their Lives — Adjoining Building Destroyed — One Death Rumored. – View Article – NYTimes.com. New York Times, 01 Dec. 1903. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.

“A Big Fire In Brooklyn.” Pittsburgh Press 30 Nov. 1903: 1. Print.

“Theatre Talks.” Theatre Talks. N.p., 13 Dec. 2011. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.

“Brooklyn Academy of Music.” Infoplease. Infoplease, n.d. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.

Retention

Noun

Definition: the ability to keep something

Prof. Rosen used this word during English class on the 16th of October.

I now know that Prof. Rosen was talking about remembering information when she said the word “retention.”

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/retention?show=0&t=1387162495