I have known about wikipedia for many years and I always used it for outside of school research. For some reson for school work, in my trials wikipedia was unreliable. After looking at Baker’s article, i agree with him that freedom of speech has its pro’s and cons when it comes to the internet. Like Baker i feel that people have right to freedom of speech and we all should be mature enough to post only facts on websites where people go to learn. Wikipedia in previous years have been very easy to just go on as a guest and edit a whole document on the page and there was no real review process on the page, however wikipedia is making a big turn because now they have a lock on certain pages/articles to avoid vandalism of commonly looked up information. With freedom of speech comes great responsibility and so we all should watch how we use this freedom.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- December 5 – groups for the online documentation project | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Online documentation project
- Notes from today, and assignment for Wednesday, December 5 | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Online documentation project
- Notes from today, and reading & blogging assignment for Monday, December 3 | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Final Research Paper
- mhernandez55 on Citing and credibility- Miguel Olivares
- Notes from today, and assignment for Wednesday, November 28 | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Final Research Paper
t a g s
Badke baker blogging Copyright Digital Age digital media documentation facebook H.W homework Homework 3 homework one hw HW#7 hw5 Hw6 information_fog internet_searching joey joeysHW Journal LIB1201 library Media My own experience New Techology Online privacy online_documentation_project Pavlik plagiarism privacy producers of digital media public domain readings Research strategies research_paper_writing search engines social media syllabus Technology textbook wikipedia World Wide Web youtube zinesCategories
Archives
Meta