Peer Evaluation
Cristina Masino
Dental Hygiene
Dental Radiology Lab
Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity
In groups, the students did presentations to explain different scenarios for patient management while taking digital radiographs. I created a peer evaluation for the students to complete for each team.
Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?
I aimed to achieve learning the interrelationship between critical thinking and civic engagement with the use of feedback among the students.
Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?
The group presentations happened in the third week of the semester. During the presentations I had each student fill out the evaluation. I also gave them a few minutes after each presentation for them to gather their thoughts and complete the evaluation for each group.
Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?
The evaluations did not need much preparation from the students. I explained to them that in order for us to grow as individuals and promote critical thinking, that honest and kind feedback is necessary. The students were very kind to each other while answering the evaluation forms while giving constructive feedback as needed.
Assessment: How do you assess this activity? What assessment measures do you use? Do you use a VALUE rubric? If not, how did you develop your rubric? Is your course part of the college-wide general education assessment initiative?
This qualitive assignment was assessed using the critical thinking rubric. Reviewing the evaluations and discussing the feedback anonymously with the class, demonstrated how they were all receptive to what each other had to suggest. The assessment of the evaluations created an awareness of their presentations and how the other students learned from them. The evaluations also allowed them to realize how their communication skills are and what they can do to improve by comparing themselves with the other students.
Reflection: How well did this activity work in your classroom? Would you repeat it? Why or why not? What challenges did you encounter, and how did you address them? What, if anything, would you change? What did students seem to enjoy about the activity?
The peer evaluations and assignment promoted critical thinking that led to civil engagement. It allowed the student to apply their knowledge and ability to analyze a social issue while rendering treatment for patient care. This activity worked extremely well in the class. I would repeat it every semester because of the positive impact it created. This assignment gave the students an opportunity to not only promote growth among each other, but also within themselves.
Additional Information: Please share any additional comments and further documentation of the activity – e.g. assignment instructions, rubrics, examples of student work, etc. These can be links to pages or posts on the OpenLab.
This was the assignment handed to students to complete and hand in to me:
Den1218 Group Presentation Peer Evaluation Spring 2024
Student Who is Evaluating:________________________
Group Members’ Names and the
Topic:______________________________________________
Was the assigned topic fully addressed and discussed?
Was there more information that could have been included or discussed?
Do you agree/disagree with how the group handled the management of the patient
care?
What was your favorite part of the presentation and why?
Did the presentation need improvement and what could have been done to improve?
Please list positive feedback for the group to look back on and carry with them
throughout the semester.
Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab