Common Intellectual Experiences – L4: Living Lab Learning Library

May 26, 2025

Reading To Support Architectural Design

Elizabeth Parks

Architectural Technology

ARCH2412 Design IV

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

The reading activity is part of the Lecture portion of the Design IV studio (Lab) class. Students are formed into groups of three or four to analyze and share a selected reading with the class. The activity has three parts: reading with annotation, completion of a Frayer Method Template to clarify a particular concept or vocabulary word, and presentation to the class with discussion. All students in the class are expected to read all of the readings to facilitate discussion.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

The goad of the activity is to engage students with reading about architecture, architects, and the concepts that underlay the design process.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

The activity is completed over four class sessions throughout the semester.
Session 1 in Week 2: Introduction to the activity, selecting or assigning readings to the groups. This is timed to coincide with the research and concept development work the students are doing in the Lab portion of the course.
Session 2 in Week 5: Presentations and class discussion for half the student groups
Session 3 in Week 6: Presentations and class discussion for half the student groups
Session 4 in Week 11: General class discussion of all the readings and their impact on student design projects.
Students are expected to meet with their group members outside of class to prepare the Frayer Method Template for their selected reading. They are also expected to read all the other readings for discussion. The total time required outside of class is expected to be at least 4-8 hours, depending on the number and difficulty of the readings.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

For the Spring 2025 Semester, ten (10) readings were selected from "Imagining the Future Museum: 21 Dialogues with Architects", edited by Andras Szanto, published in 2022. Each reading is a dialogue between the editor and a currently practicing architect, specifically about that architect's approach to museum design. This material was chosen because the students are each designing their own version of a museum in the Studio portion of the class, but the focus of the readings could be adapted to suit other courses.
Students were given access to a shared Miro board with blank Frayer Method Templates, a list of concepts and vocabulary words pulled from the readings by the instructor, as well as space for the students to write a summary of the reading.
Part of the introduction to the activity was a discussion of how to read for comprehension and how to take notes while reading. The instructor's annotated readings were shared with the class as examples.
The following is a link to the completed templates from one of the Lecture sessions for Spring 2025:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/j4opnnl1snk3pyzrj0440/ARCH2412-Lecture-Reading-Session-1.pdf?rlkey=p3k2lplksc2p5dfu95pobd67d&st=8vmuzxb1&dl=0
In the fourth and final session, students were asked to write a brief statement describing how the activity impacted their design process and the design of their project.
The groups present a summary of the reading and a more detailed explanation of the concept or vocabulary word they chose and then lead a class discussion on the reading, ideas and how the information is applicable to the studio activities.

Assessment: How do you assess this activity? What assessment measures do you use? Do you use a VALUE rubric? If not, how did you develop your rubric? Is your course part of the college-wide general education assessment initiative?

The activity was not formally graded, but the results were shared with all instructors. The lecture classes are shared between four instructors, each also teaching a discrete section of the studio. A mixed set of students attend one of two lecture sessions. All instructors were given access to the Miro boards and to scans of the written reflections.
The Studio environment is inherently a High Impact Impact Educational Practice, incorporating Common Intellectual Experiences and Collaborative Assignments and Project. This reading activity was designed to broaden and deepen the students' understanding of the design process by familiarizing them with the words and work of a broad range of current practitioners.

Reflection: How well did this activity work in your classroom? Would you repeat it? Why or why not? What challenges did you encounter, and how did you address them? What, if anything, would you change? What did students seem to enjoy about the activity?

We will repeat the activity and are considering adding a graded rubric to formalize assessment. The degree of engagement with the readings varied between groups and it was clear that very few students had read any of the readings other than the one they were assigned, limiting their ability to contribute in a meaningful way to class discussions. Formally grading the activity may improve attendance and encourage them to read more.
The students were allowed to form their own groups, so generally felt comfortable working and sharing with one another.
It was clear from some of the students' written reflections that the readings did have an influence on their thinking. Students always struggle with the leap from their initial ideas to a building proposal that manifests those concepts, but the more comfortable they become with abstract ideas, the clearer their conceptual work is. And that leap to a "real" building becomes more possible and the ideas more legible.

Additional Information: Please share any additional comments and further documentation of the activity – e.g. assignment instructions, rubrics, examples of student work, etc. These can be links to pages or posts on the OpenLab.

Some written reflections from students, written in class in Week 11 of the semester (edited for clarity):
"The readings provided different ideas and perspective in regards to museum design…they made me think about my design choices more thoroughly." Adrianna Dilillo
"These readings helped me with my design process by understanding 'elevation by context'. Understanding the importance, meaning or status based on its surroundings/context." Daria Tourkova
"One of the ideas [from] the reading was for the museum to be a place for people to escape reality." Bryan Zamora
"Our reading helped me create a narrative for my project." Kelvin Jarama
"The reading helped me get a better understanding of what a museum is and how the museum is an extension of what is being shown in the exhibition. It taught me that circulation plays an important part in the story the building is trying to tell. Lastly the chapter I read defines a museum as a bridge that connects people with art. It is a response to a certain conflict and/or community." Diccia Castro
"The readings have influenced my design by integrating the site with my building by including a plaza that is embedded underground." Marti Tapia
"The readings helped with my design process by demonstrating ways to include everyone. … blending public space and exhibition areas [together makes the museum] engaging for visitors. This idea encouraged me to design my my museum with space for visitors to create something of their own" Thais Garcia

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

May 22, 2025

Menu Ingredient Pricing & Unit Conversions

Alejandro Cantagallo

Hospitality Management, Professional Studies

Food and Beverage Cost Control

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

Groups will be responsible for researching and documenting the pricing of all identified ingredients required for the term project menu, categorized by type. They will create a complete and organized list that accurately reflects purchasing specifications and applicable unit conversions.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

Students will work in groups to research and collect pricing information for a set list of ingredients across various categories in the requisition sheet. The data gathered will be used as the standard pricing for the entire class’s term project. Additionally, students will convert the ingredient costs into consistent units of measurement for inclusion in a collective Excel worksheet.
Broadly speaking students will learn about group work, current pricing for food and beverage items and how to calculate costs related to food and beverage operations.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This is assigned on the 5th week of the semester with a week to complete and with half of the subsequent class time to complete the work in class with guidance anc coaching from the instructor.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

Students will be divided into groups. Each group will be assigned specific categories from the requisition sheet (e.g., Dairy, Produce, Proteins, Dry Goods).

Each group will designate members to the following roles:
Ingredient Collector: Confers with all students in the class to ensure the requisition sheet includes all ingredients needed for their term project recipes. Ensures no required ingredient is missing from the sheet.
Verifier: Confirms the accuracy of the ingredients listed. Checks the pricing data collected for consistency and reliability.
Scribe: Ensures all collected information, including pricing and unit conversions, is recorded accurately in the shared Excel worksheet.
Review the assigned category in the requisition sheet. Identify all specific ingredients you are responsible for pricing. Research current pricing for each ingredient. Use reliable sources such as: Local grocery stores (in-person or online platforms like Instacart or FreshDirect), Wholesale suppliers (e.g., Restaurant Depot, Sysco, or local distributors), CLT price list
Then document the price per unit (e.g., per pound, gallon, dozen) and ensure consistency across items.
This is a low stakes assignement that is not graded, but required because the resulting price list will be the source of truth for pricing that all students will need in order to complete their term project.

I will use the Quantative Literacy Value Rubric
Interpretation: The ability to explain information presented in mathematical representations.
Calculation: The ability to convert relevant information into various mathematical forms, including standardized costs.
Application and Analysis: The ability to make judgments and draw appropriate conclusions based on quantitative data.
Communication: The ability to express quantitative evidence effectively to support the purpose of the project.

I decided to keep this assignment ungraded partly because it was my first time running it and partly because we’re still considering whether to integrate it into the department’s standard curriculum. The assignment was introduced in one class session, and in the following session, we spent half the class troubleshooting, refining, and finalizing the pricing together. This structure allowed students to get started independently, recognize potential challenges, and then work collaboratively—both in small groups and as a class—to resolve any issues. This felt like an almost magical moment, because the students took a lead in correcting their own work and encouraging each other to get the work done well.
A key takeaway from this assignment was that it also served as an introduction to using formulas in Excel. Interestingly, a few students realized they actually enjoy working with numbers, which was exciting and reaffirmed the value of incorporating this type of work into the curriculum.
Moving forward, I’d love to deepen the integration of this process into my future classes and, ideally, see it become a standard part of how this course is taught. Beyond the core learning objectives—such as group collaboration and real-world research—the ability to work with Excel is an essential skill that will benefit students in their careers.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

January 30, 2025

In the Pursuit of Knowledge: Focusing on ‘Lifelong Learning’

Sergio Belich

Computer Systems Technology / NYC College of Technology

Web Programming I (Lecture) & (Laboratory)

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

The activity centers on teaching CST2309 (Introduction to Web Programming) through a structured split format, dividing the 3.5-hour class into equal parts of lecture (1¾ hours) and lab (1¾ hours). During lectures, the instructor presents course topics using overhead projectors and whiteboards, works through practical examples, and actively solicits student feedback to ensure comprehension.

The lab portion focuses on collaborative learning, where students work in groups using a shared Google document to compile course-related resources, including linked definitions and training videos. Students contribute their thoughts and questions while also creating potential exam questions. This dual approach combines traditional instruction with hands-on collaborative work to enhance the Student Learning Outcome of "Reading," specifically targeting students' abilities to interpret, evaluate, gather, and apply information from online sources.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

My goal is to create an engaging learning environment that promotes "Lifelong Learning" through a balanced approach of structured instruction and collaborative work. The primary goal is to enhance students' ability to interpret, evaluate, gather, and apply information from various online sources while fostering an interactive atmosphere that encourages students to actively participate in their learning process. This is designed to not only help students master the current course material but also develop skills and learning templates they can apply to their future academic pursuits.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

The activity will start from the second class till the end of the semester. The first day includes discussing the this new class outline to students, and setting expectations. ] It represents the core structure of the entire semester for CST2309 (Introduction to Web Programming). Each original class session (from last semesters' 3.5 hour length) is now being divided into:
Lecture portion: 1¾ hours
Lab portion: 1¾ hours
Total in-class time per session: 3½ hours

Students will spend some time outside of class reviewing and contributing to the shared resources, including adding definitions and training videos, though the specific time requirement has not been specified, the results of participation will be graded.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

The preparation needed for this activity is as follows:
Setting up shared Google documents for class readings and topics
Preparing lecture materials and practical examples
Creating overhead projector/whiteboard content
Organizing students into working groups for labs

The student instructions is as follows:
During lecture: Students are expected to engage with the material and provide feedback
During lab: Students work in groups to:
Access and contribute to shared Google documents
Add linked definitions and training videos
Share thoughts, ideas, and questions
Create potential exam questions
Collaborate with group members

This activity is relatively low-stakes, focusing on collaborative learning and continuous engagement rather than high-pressure assessment. The approach emphasizes building an "enjoyable environment to learn" where students can:
Get constant feedback
Receive multiple explanations if needed
Build on existing knowledge
Create study materials collaboratively
Develop templates for future learning

The structure is an ongoing evaluation while also leading to assessments via exams and a class project. Students' contributions will factor into their overall course performance.

Assessment Components:
Use VALUE rubric specifically focused on reading
Student contributions to Google documents (20% of final grade) measured by:
1. Number of definition links added
2. Number of video links contributed
3. Number of potential exam questions provided

Implementation Details:
Continuous feedback during lectures ensures ongoing formative assessment
Google document contributions provide measurable evidence of students' ability to "interpret, evaluate, gather and apply information from various online sources"
VALUE rubric on reading provides standardized assessment criteria
The activity supports the "Lifelong Learning" student learning outcome

Integration with Broader Assessment:
Course is part of the college-wide general education assessment initiative
Will be evaluated by AIRE in Fall 2025
Uses standardized VALUE rubric for reading to align with institutional assessment frameworks

This structured assessment approach combines quantitative measures (contribution counts) with standardized evaluation criteria (VALUE rubric) while supporting broader institutional assessment goals.

This activity is structured to work well in a classroom environment because:
It divides class time equally between lecture and hands-on lab work
It incorporates both traditional teaching methods and modern collaborative tools
It creates an "enjoyable environment to learn" through constant feedback and group interaction

Here is the organizational structure:

Initial Structure:
Each of the 5 groups is assigned specific sections of lecture material
Groups have primary responsibility for their assigned sections
Groups can still contribute to other sections they find important

This approach:
Ensures comprehensive coverage of all lecture material
Creates clear group responsibilities
Prevents excessive overlap in initial research
Allows for cross-section insights and contributions
Maintains flexibility for additional perspectives

For each lab session, groups would:
1. Focus primarily on their assigned sections to provide:
5 definition links
5 topic training video links
5 potential exam questions
2. Have freedom to add insights to other sections
3. Monitor and build upon other groups' contributions

This balanced structure combines focused responsibility with collaborative flexibility, helping create a comprehensive learning resource while encouraging broader engagement with all course material.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

August 2, 2024

A Museum of Culture/ Assignment 1A: Museum Research

Jieun Yang

Architectural Technology

ARCH 2412/ Architectural Design IV

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

Part A: Understanding “What is a Museum”

Each student will read articles and/or watch videos focused on Museum design. Additionally, each student will visit a Museum in New York City, document it through photography and sketching, and answer a series of questions to catalog their observations.

A. Learn:

– Read Chapter 01: The History and Theory of the Museum Building from the book Museum Buildings: Construction and Design Manual By Christian Schittich. (see Blackboard)
– Choose one short article (see Blackboard)
– Choose one video or podcast from the below list:
– John Oliver's Last Week Tonight episode on Museums
– Freakonomics Podcast "Stealing Art is Easy. Giving It Back is Hard."

– Deliverables: For each, write a short summary and outline a series of five bullet points identifying the most meaningful takeaways. Be prepared to discuss this in class.

B. Experience:

– Visit a museum in New York from the list provided in class.
– Document your visit through photography, sketching, and diagramming.
– Consider the following questions during your visit:
a. Who are museum users? Consider both visitors and staff. How do they use and move through the museum differently?
b. How does the entry sequence work? How visible is the museum entrance from the street? What is the first thing you see and do when you enter the museum? How do you orient yourself?
c. How are the entry and exhibition spaces arranged? In a linear sequence, clustered, or arranged around a central space? Does the visitor travel from space to space directly or are there areas devoted to circulation?
d. What is displayed in the museum? How is the art/information displayed? How many different types of exhibition areas are there and how are they the same or different?
e. How many people were in the exhibition area while you were there? Was the space crowded? Approximately, what is the area of the exhibition space? What were its proportions? How tall are the ceilings? How far away did the visitors need to stand to view or interact with the works?
f. What were the lighting conditions like? Were there windows or skylights in exhibition rooms? If yes, how were they considered in the placement of the works?
g. Were the exhibition spaces ornate or simple? How does the architecture relate to the content, is there a consistency or a contrast between the two?

Deliverables: One 11×17 sheet, beautifully and thoughtfully layout of document your museum visit and observations, to Include:
– Name and location of the Museum you visited.
– Photographs, Diagrams, and sketches
– Question responses

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

The assignment focuses on how to think critically about Museum Design and develop an understanding of this building typology.

The assignment prepares students for Part B: Topic Research and Concept Development, where each student selects a research topic, reads articles, and documents important information related to that topic to develop an overall theme for their proposed museum and develop their concept.

The assignment asks the students to meet the following objectives:
– Ability to research, gather, and study information to gain an understanding of a building typology.
– Ability to research, gather, and study information to derive an informed project concept.
– Communicate ideas and information both verbally, graphically, and through writing. (Gen Ed)

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This is the first assignment in the semester. During the first class, we watch a museum scene clip from Black Panther, discuss the topic of repatriation through current news articles, read one of the assigned readings together, and share student reflections in class.
The students are then asked to complete the rest of the homework assignments outside class time. They present their completed assignments in the second class for peer discussion and feedback.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

See the note under Timing for the preparation and instructions on this assignment.
This is a low-stakes assignment designed to be used as an icebreaker and to prepare students for the critical thinking, analysis, and documentation required for the upcoming assignments.

The assignment is assessed on the following rubric, incorporating some of the gen-ed assessment categories.

1. Ability to research, gather, and study information to derive an informed project concept (35%)
2. Ability to translate concepts into graphic visual and physical representations (40%)
3. Communicate ideas and information both verbally and through writing (10%)
4. Assignment requirements and deliverables were met (10%)
5. On-time completion (5%)

The assignment helped students think deeply about the role of a museum, its historical conception, and how it may have led to problematic pasts (such as stolen cultural objects). It also set up a discussion on how we can reimagine a museum. Students engaged in lively debates with a wide range of viewpoints. We plan to repeat this assignment/ activity in the upcoming semester.
Students enjoyed different media forms (videos and podcasts) and did not rely solely on reading. Most readings are short articles, which makes the materials accessible to the students.
I want to try the missing links method by assigning specific readings to students, having different article readers come together to teach others through summarizing their lesson, and reporting their summaries to the whole class as a group.

Student Examples on Dropbox:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/n9xxp95mpi9gmzct7y1oy/ARCH2412_Assignment-1_Examples.pdf?rlkey=yikae381871d7dwmk7vy7qjkd&dl=0

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

June 26, 2024

NUR1130 Clinical Assignmemt

Kalliopi Parginos

NURSING DEPARTMENT/City Tech

Living lab

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

Clinical assignment for students

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

Improve the understanding in Diabetes and the administration off different insulins

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

Close to the end of the semester

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

Study of Diabetes pathophysiology
Difference between Type 1 and Type 2
Administration of different insulins

Case study and Multiple choice questions

No challenges were identified

N/A

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

May 31, 2024

The Process Letter

JHON SINGLETON

English Department/New York City College of Technology

ENG 1101- E093

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

The Process Letter is a formal exploration of the student's personal writing process journal within a semester. Think of it as a "love letter" to self and future composition level 2 instructor.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

1. Students will be able to reflect and highlight thoughts and perceptions about the course content.
2. Students will express in writing their understanding of, reflections on, response to, or analysis of difficult writing academic concepts.
3. Students will express in writing their understanding of, reflections on, response to, or analysis of difficult writing moments.
4. Students will express a writing paragraph sample completed during the semester, showing editing and revising prowess that adheres to MLA format.
5. To further their academic writing journey, students have the opportunity to contribute to their future professor's itinerary/discussions for future lessons. This continues with Paulo Freire's "non-banking" system.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

I introduce The Process Letter activity once the research project has been talked about. It occurred during the 10th week of the semester. We went through the 6-paragraph process step by step using a student sample/ example. this takes about a class session. However, students are encouraged and welcome to discuss the parts of the letter during a 15-minute open forum with the remaining class session. Students are entitled to complete two rough drafts before I grade the final draft. 2 hours is expected over 5 weeks is expected. It is due along with the research project.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

The preparation that is required is completing at least 70% of the course material to the student an opportunity to express a full reflection.
As mentioned above, I go through through the 6-paragraph process step by step using a student sample/ example. this takes about a class session.
I will consider this a "middle stakes" assignment because it is worth 10% of their final course grade, Most of the assignment is personalized and only ONE paragraph requires MLA format.

There is a rubric for this assignment. It is based on a 10pt analysis of the student's presentation. Because of college-wide general education assessment initiatives, I believe a rubric is mandatory.

My students love this activity. It allows them to have a pow-wow with their classmates about their triumphs and difficulties during the semester. I even learn how to improve the course for the following semester. The challenges were few but there were about 4 students who kept putting the project off until the last minute even with positive encouragement. They thought the letter was an easy A and completed it late.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

May 31, 2024

Family Life History Paper

Judith Sedaitis

Social Science

SOC 1104 Race & Ethnicity

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

This activity is the capstone of research work in-class and as homework on the 2 main sociological theories and on the role Western imperialism. plays in history of student's cultural heritage. Students describe one of their ancestors home, usually their mother's or father's and analyze the trajectory of their family history from the lens of both individual accountability (cultural theory) and from the primacy of economic and other external forces (conflict theory)

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

The over-arching goal is to teach self awareness through critical analysis. This means several aims are involved. 1) To learn how to critically consider the two competing sociological theories and the historical/ economic role of imperialism in their ancestral country. 2) To use enough interpretation/ evaluation to develop a comprehensive analysis . 3) To successfully argument drawing on their preferred approach. And finally, 4) To acknowledge the other point of view and the complexities of the debate.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

We build the skills necessary for a successful paper from weeks 5- 10 in the semester. Since this is a social science class, most the lectures in this period teach material that students will use in their papers, and is reinforced and expanded in smaller, weekly homework assignments. This assignment weaves together weeks of classroom learning and homework. The actual writing period is about 2 weeks, but the students usually take only a day to write it, using the knowledge they gleaned the 5 weeks prior.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

The paper is 20% of their final grade. The preparation is 5 weeks of lecture and homework assignments.

I use the critical thinking value rubric.

I thought it worked really well. It was clearly a challenging piece of writing that students became personally invested in because they were interviewing and writing about their own family's history.
And they couldn't use AI to do it instead!

Rubric on how to write the paper: https://bbhosted.cuny.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-83761766-dt-content-rid-676728781_1/xid-676728781_1

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

https://bbhosted.cuny.edu/bbcswebdav/pid-83761766-dt-content-rid-676728781_1/xid-676728781_1

May 26, 2024

Studying Linear and Exponential Growth Models using General Education Learning Goals.

Lili Grigorian

Mathematics/ NYC College of Technology, CUNY

MAT1190 Quantitative Reasoning

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

This project has five parts:

Part I:
Students will be asked to record a 5–10-minute video that describes linear and exponential growth and a scenario from their everyday life which they believe can be modeled by linear and/or exponential growth. Including a picture/description/video.

Part II:
Students will learn, apply, and analyze linear and exponential growth by looking at the price of a smart phone and different options (cash, credit card, etc.) a person may buy and pay off for the smartphone.

Part III:
Students will go for a field trip to the Bank with post discussion.

Part IV:
Students will be interviewing people around them to gather information for project's reflection.

Part V:
After completing the project, students formed a view regarding linear and exponential growth and how it affects paying off the balance. They had a chance to examine, analyze, and rethink the financial choices they and people around them make, and how those choices affect them and their community. Students will have a choice to create either of the listed below with a focus on questions provided as a guide.

• Record at least a 10-minute-long video reflection.
• Write at least a 2-page-long (size 12, double spaced) written reflection.
• Present at least 10-minute-long oral presentation in class.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

This project uses various components of General Education Value rubrics that Living Lab Seminar had focused on during our meetings.

The 1st part uses Communication.
The 2nd part uses Inquiry and Analysis using Linear and Exponential Growth.
The 3rd part uses Community and Civic Engagement through Place-Based Learning and Teamwork.
The 4th part uses Integrative Learning through Gathering Information via Interviewing.
The 5th part uses Foundations and Skills for Lifelong Learning through Digital/Writing/Oral Communication.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This project will take about 2-3 sessions of class time and 1-2 sessions of out-of-class time.

Start date: A week before linear and exponential growth models are taught.
Part I is due in 1 week from the start date. To be completed individually or in pairs.
Part II is due in 2 weeks after Part I is due. To be completed in groups during class time. (1 – 2 sessions)
Parts III and IV are due in 1 week after Part II is due. Part III to be completed in pairs or in groups. (1 session for a trip) and Part IV to be completed individually.
Part V along with Parts I, II, III, and IV in 2 weeks after Parts III and IV are due. To be completed individually.
End date: One to two weeks before semester ends.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

This project is high stakes. Students will need to have an electronic device with audio/video recording and internet access. Organization for a field trip.

The following are submission methods for each part:

Part I: Students will have a choice to upload on a platform of instructor’s choice. (Ex. Dropbox, Blackboard, etc.) or on the class channel created on YouTube.
Part II: PDF documents uploaded on a platform of instructor’s choice. (Ex. Dropbox, Blackboard, etc.)
Part III: Documents to be annotated on https://web.hypothes.is/start/ and fieldtrip will be discussed in the group chat using app of student’s choice. (Ex. googlechat, whatsapp, etc.)
Part IV: PDF documents uploaded on a platform of instructor’s choice. (Ex. Dropbox, Blackboard, etc.)
Part V: Students will have a choice to upload on a platform of instructor’s choice. (Ex. Dropbox, Blackboard, etc.) or on the class channel created on YouTube.

This project will be assessed using General Education Value rubrics mentioned earlier as well as my own rubrics I use for Mathematical computations.

I was not teaching MAT1190 this semester to implement this version of the project, but I did get a change to use a similar version during last Spring semester. It worked pretty well, and I am looking forward to being able to use this version of the project with a focus on a General Education Value rubrics. Most of my students enjoyed this project in the past since it is about smartphones that are a big part of their life. I believe my students will be even more attracted to this version, especially that one of the added components will be a field trip.

Main quote for this project:

“The more we prepare students to consider problems from multiple positions, using different approaches and strategies, the better adapted they will be to the struggle of keeping up with a fast-paced workforce.” Davidson, Cathy N., and Christina Katopodis. The New College Classroom, Harvard University Press, 2022.

Grading Policy:

Part I: 10 points. Completed individually or in pairs.
Part II: 50 points. Completed in groups during class time.
Parts III: 10 points. Completed in pairs or in groups.
Part IV: 10 points. Completed individually.
Part V: 20 points. Completed individually.

Entire Project is worth 15 % of the course grade.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/pcorbett-portfolio/research-and-publications/

May 22, 2024

Noticing as a Means of Detailed Writing

Adin Dobkin

English

ENG1101 – Composition I

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

This is a two-class session activity, with a short homework assignment acting as a bridge. On the first day, each student is given one of three photographs from a moment in NYC history. No context is provided to the students, only the photograph itself. They're given twenty minutes to write down as many details as possible from this photograph, taking note of what is there as well as what isn't. Then, they're asked to select from those details the five that they believe best capture that image, and describe why they believe those are the most significant.

Students are then put into groups according to which photos they were given (these groups will be static throughout the semester, but students haven't yet worked in them). Together, the group selects the five details that they agree are the most significant. Next, they put those details into relation to one another. This is open, and can either be written out in paragraph form, relations can be drawn with arrows, etc.

For homework, the group's task is to collectively come up with a description, using these details, of what they believe the photograph shows. I emphasize the importance of deriving this understanding through the details, not by attempting to find the photograph.

The next class session, the photograph is displayed at the front of the classroom. The group shares their description, how they decided upon it, and any struggles they encountered along the way. Then, to each group individually, I pass them a bit of historical information about their photograph: what it actually shows. As the last part of this assignment, I ask them to reflect on any details they see anew, or anything they missed without having that proper context.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

This assignment started with an understanding that attention is something students often struggle with, particularly when reading. The most notable consequence of this is writing that doesn't include details. But I had a hunch that by using visual texts, and by describing this process that I think can be replicated in readings, students might get it.

I hope that students internalize the act of paying attention -> noticing details -> putting those details into relation to one another -> seeking an explanation for that synthesis -> reflecting on their accuracy. This assignment also works to embody a process of engaging with NYC history, working in groups to debate and synthesize details, and think about the ethics of writing.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This assignment took place in the second and third classes of the semester, with about two hours of total time, plus maybe 30 minutes to one hour with homework.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

This is a low-stakes assignment, but a key one in embodying the process that they will hopefully use for their first major assignment. Most work went into identifying photos that weren't too obvious, were detail rich, and spoke to moments of city history. Students don't have the full picture, as it were, until the assignment is through, but each individual step is more or less intuitive and guided by instructions.

As a low-stakes assignment, this assignment is primarily participation-based. I look to see students writing as many details as possible in the time allotted, but also that they get in the habit of answering why to as great of a degree as possible.

This assignment was consistently cited by students as one of their favorites this semester, I think due to its detective-like nature, the environment it quickly brings about in groups, and in the real-world history that it engages with. For these reasons, I would repeat it, though I don't think it as readily translated to their reading assignments (but this is a far bigger problem than any one assignment).

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

May 22, 2024

Critical thinking

Wenhsing Yang

City Tech

NUR 2110

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

Critical thinking through writing assignments-understand the patient care with their needs

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

familiar with priority, delegation, quality of care

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

I used half hours in class and lab for students to think about patient care and how to intervene with their needs.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

students need to be familiar with the disease process and its influence to patients quality of life.
some are low-stakes, some are high-stakes, because it was being use in the simulation

I use Gen. rubric.

i will repeat it but I will use different scenarios because every patients is different

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

Category: Common Intellectual Experiences

Reading To Support Architectural Design

Menu Ingredient Pricing & Unit Conversions

In the Pursuit of Knowledge: Focusing on ‘Lifelong Learning’

A Museum of Culture/ Assignment 1A: Museum Research

NUR1130 Clinical Assignmemt

The Process Letter

Studying Linear and Exponential Growth Models using General Education Learning Goals.

Noticing as a Means of Detailed Writing

Critical thinking

The OpenLab at City Tech:A place to learn, work, and share

Support

Accessibility

Copyright

Creative Commons

The OpenLab at City Tech:A place to learn, work, and share

Support

Accessibility

Copyright

Creative Commons