Single Class Meeting or less – L4: Living Lab Learning Library

May 31, 2025

Co-Creating a Code Glossary

Sandra Lloyd

Communication Design (COMD)

COMD 2451

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

In groups of 4-5, students use a real-time, collaborative spreadsheet (such as Google Sheets) to fill out several terms as part of a glossary of code terms they need to learn. If time, they teach one or two of the terms to the rest of the class. Each group is graded on the accuracy of their entries. Then, the class can use the directory throughout the semester as reference material.

This activity can be used for learning HTML, CSS, or other coding languages or frameworks where students need to learn a large number of basic elements and their behavior.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

Broadly, the learning goals are to build skills in reading comprehension, research, critical thinking, and collaboration.

In my class, I used the activity for the introduction to HTML.

The objectives specific to COMD 2451 are:
1) In order to get acquainted to semantic HTML so that they can create static websites, students will learn and retain:
a) what key HTML elements do
b) when and where to use these elements
c) how to write a line of code using these elements

2) Students will get to know each other and form bonds, while also building collaboration and teamwork skills.

(These learning goals can be adapted for CSS, W3.css, or other appropriate languages or frameworks.)

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

There are three points in the semester of COMD 2451 where this activity can be used:
1) Week 3: HTML & Design DIscovery;
2) Week 4: CSS;
3) Week 7: Web Design & Interaction (introduction of W3.css framework)

However, I only implemented it during Week 3, for the purposes of teaching HTML. This is because it is helpful to have this hands-on activity when coding is new to them.

I devote 1.5 – 2 hours of class time to the exercise. No out-of-class time is expected. The only exception is if a group does not finish their glossary terms in the allotted time, at which point they may opt to finish it outside of class.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

To prepare for this activity, the professor must create a Google Sheet (or similar real-time collaborative spreadsheet) as demonstrated in the HTML Glossary presentation on OpenLab. This must be populated with the desired html elements, along with columns for Definition, Characteristics, Example code, When to Use, and When NOT to Use. The first row will be populated with an example.

Assessment: How do you assess this activity? What assessment measures do you use? Do you use a VALUE rubric? If not, how did you develop your rubric? Is your course part of the college-wide general education assessment initiative?

The activity is evaluated based upon a grading rubric that centers around errors. I assess the number of correct definitions or their quality.
My course is part of the college-wide general education assessment initiative.

Reflection: How well did this activity work in your classroom? Would you repeat it? Why or why not? What challenges did you encounter, and how did you address them? What, if anything, would you change? What did students seem to enjoy about the activity?

The activity worked very well. Students were engaged throughout in their groups. It was also very clear that they quickly learned how to effectively search for information online and to problem-solve. Students tended to do better in my class this semester compared to last semester.

Additional Information: Please share any additional comments and further documentation of the activity – e.g. assignment instructions, rubrics, examples of student work, etc. These can be links to pages or posts on the OpenLab.

See the first post in the OpenLab to see more in-depth presentation deck and the site itself.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Vm4zWUqOLdgNg3SPudPRq6lxSKsf0Bxa22ou3rrkb0g/edit?usp=sharing

June 27, 2024

NUR 1130 Clinical Assignment case study

Kalliopi Parginos

Nursing/New York City Tech College

NUR1130

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

Interactive Case study on Type 1 Diabetes with short answers

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

Top 5 Ways Nurses Can Improve Critical Thinking Skills
Case based approach
Practice self-reflection
Developing a questioning mind
Practice self-awareness in the moment
Use a process

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

The Importance of Enhancing Critical Thinking Behavior
Independence of thought
Impartiality
Perspicacity into Personal and Social Factors
Humble Cerebration and Deferral Crisis

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

review the case study
answer the 4 questions
Choose the correct answer for two multiple choice questions

Grade the questions
Plan to include it future clinical sessions either on the pre or post conference with the students

6/6 students completed the questionnaire
The case study will be repeated on the fall semester 2024
Plan to incorporate it different interactive case studies
Students work as a team

Rubric: Critical Thinking Value Rubric was utilized

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

May 30, 2024

Peer Evaluation

Cristina Masino

Dental Hygiene

Dental Radiology Lab

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

In groups, the students did presentations to explain different scenarios for patient management while taking digital radiographs. I created a peer evaluation for the students to complete for each team.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

I aimed to achieve learning the interrelationship between critical thinking and civic engagement with the use of feedback among the students.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

The group presentations happened in the third week of the semester. During the presentations I had each student fill out the evaluation. I also gave them a few minutes after each presentation for them to gather their thoughts and complete the evaluation for each group.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

The evaluations did not need much preparation from the students. I explained to them that in order for us to grow as individuals and promote critical thinking, that honest and kind feedback is necessary. The students were very kind to each other while answering the evaluation forms while giving constructive feedback as needed.

This qualitive assignment was assessed using the critical thinking rubric. Reviewing the evaluations and discussing the feedback anonymously with the class, demonstrated how they were all receptive to what each other had to suggest. The assessment of the evaluations created an awareness of their presentations and how the other students learned from them. The evaluations also allowed them to realize how their communication skills are and what they can do to improve by comparing themselves with the other students.

The peer evaluations and assignment promoted critical thinking that led to civil engagement. It allowed the student to apply their knowledge and ability to analyze a social issue while rendering treatment for patient care. This activity worked extremely well in the class. I would repeat it every semester because of the positive impact it created. This assignment gave the students an opportunity to not only promote growth among each other, but also within themselves.

This was the assignment handed to students to complete and hand in to me:

Den1218 Group Presentation Peer Evaluation Spring 2024
Student Who is Evaluating:________________________
Group Members’ Names and the
Topic:______________________________________________

Was the assigned topic fully addressed and discussed?
Was there more information that could have been included or discussed?
Do you agree/disagree with how the group handled the management of the patient
care?
What was your favorite part of the presentation and why?
Did the presentation need improvement and what could have been done to improve?
Please list positive feedback for the group to look back on and carry with them
throughout the semester.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

May 29, 2024

Electrification of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Area: Ensuring Safe and Efficient Electrical Distribution

Kim K. Mahase

New York City College of Technology

EET 1122

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

This assignment encourages students to explore real-world engineering challenges in a civic engagement context, emphasizing critical thinking, ethical reasoning, information literacy, and teamwork. Students should aim to provide practical and well-researched solutions to the electrical distribution needs of the NYSE area.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

In this assignment, you will explore the electrified tracks running beneath the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the electrical infrastructure required to operate the NYSE securely. You will conduct research and answer critical questions related to electrical distribution systems, backup systems, voltage levels, transmission efficiency, and power requirements for the NYSE area.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This activity was implemented near the conclusion of the semester. It occupied one classroom session. Additionally, students were allotted approximately 1.5 hours outside of class to complete the write-up.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

Step 1: Research the NYSE (Introduction)
Begin by researching and gathering information about the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).
Write an introduction that provides an overview of the NYSE, its location, historical significance, and its role in the global financial market.
Include any relevant information about the electrified tracks running underneath the NYSE and their importance.

Step 2: Respond to the Following Questions
Answer the following questions based on your research and engineering knowledge:
How to make an electrical distribution system safe: Explain the key principles and measures that should be taken to ensure the safety of an electrical distribution system in an area like the NYSE.
What electrical backup systems should be employed: Describe the types of electrical backup systems that should be implemented to ensure uninterrupted power supply to the NYSE, especially in case of emergencies or power outages.
What voltage levels are best for traction power transmission: Discuss the ideal voltage levels for transmitting traction power efficiently in the electrified tracks beneath the NYSE area. Explain the reasons behind your choice.
At what distance is the most efficient transmission: Analyze and determine the optimal distance for efficient transmission of electrical power in the context of the NYSE area's electrified tracks.
How much power do you think is needed to run the NYSE: Estimate the power requirements of the NYSE to ensure its smooth operation, taking into account its size, trading volume, and the electrified tracks' power demands.

Submission Requirements:
Prepare a well-organized report that includes an introduction, answers to the questions, and any relevant diagrams or figures.
Cite your sources properly and provide references for the information used in your research.
Submit your assignment in both printed and electronic formats.
Be prepared to present your findings and engage in discussions during the class.

Step 3: Personal Reflection on Electrical Distribution
In this step, you will reflect on the concepts you've learned in the previous steps and apply them to an aspect of your own life or an example relevant to you. This reflection will help you connect the engineering principles discussed in this assignment to real-life scenarios.

Task: Choose one of the following options:

Option A: Personal Connection
Think about an aspect of your life where electrical distribution plays a significant role. It could be related to your home, workplace, or any other environment you are familiar with. Reflect on how the principles discussed in this assignment (electrical safety, backup systems, voltage levels, transmission efficiency, power requirements) could be applied to improve the electrical distribution in that context. Discuss any potential benefits or challenges.

Option B: Real-World Example
Research and find a real-world example or case study related to electrical distribution in a critical infrastructure or commercial setting (e.g., hospitals, data centers, public transportation systems). Summarize the example and explain how the engineering concepts discussed in this assignment are relevant to the success or challenges faced in that scenario.

Submission Requirements:
Write a brief reflection (approximately 300-500 words) that clearly explains your chosen option and how it relates to the electrical distribution concepts discussed in this assignment.
If you choose Option B, provide the source or reference to the real-world example you researched.
Reflect on any ethical considerations related to your chosen aspect or example.

This activity was low-stakes.

The rubric utilized was the AACU Civic Engagement VALUE Rubric.

Grading Criteria:
Depth of reflection and connection to engineering principles.
Clarity of explanation and relevance to the chosen aspect or example.
Critical thinking and insight into the application of electrical distribution concepts.
Ethical considerations and awareness demonstrated in your reflection.

Implementing this activity in my classroom was quite effective in engaging students and fostering a deeper understanding of electrical distribution systems, particularly in critical environments such as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The combination of theoretical concepts and practical application provided a comprehensive learning experience for students.

I would certainly consider repeating this activity in future semesters due to its positive impact on student learning outcomes. However, there were some challenges encountered during the process. One challenge was ensuring that students grasped the complexity of electrical distribution systems and their significance in real-world contexts. To address this, I incorporated more examples and case studies to illustrate key concepts.

Additionally, managing the time allocated for the activity was crucial, especially considering the depth of research and analysis required. In future iterations, I would allocate additional time for students to delve deeper into their research and refine their analyses.

Despite these challenges, students seemed to enjoy the activity, particularly the opportunity to apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios. They appreciated the relevance of the topic to real-world situations, such as the operation of the NYSE. Furthermore, the personal connection component added an extra layer of engagement, allowing students to relate the concepts to their own experiences.

In terms of changes, I would consider incorporating more hands-on activities or simulations to further reinforce key concepts and enhance student engagement. Overall, this activity effectively facilitated student learning and engagement, and with some adjustments, it can continue to be a valuable learning experience in future semesters.

Resources and References

To support their analysis, students are provided with academic papers and technical manuals that offer insights into electrical distribution systems and their importance in critical infrastructure settings:

"Electrical Distribution System: An Overview" by Pravin D. Bhavar and Vipul M. Darji provides a comprehensive overview of electrical distribution systems and their components.

"Emergency Power Systems for Critical Facilities: A Best Practices Approach to Improving Reliability" by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) discusses the design and implementation of emergency power systems for critical facilities.

"Electrical Distribution System and Its Importance" by Thamim Sharief and Dr. Pradipkumar Dixit delves into the significance of electrical distribution systems in various sectors.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

May 18, 2023

The use of annotation in reviewing class readings.

Charisse Marshall DSW, LCSW

Human Services-School of Professional Studies

HUS 1101-Introduction to Human Services

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

The use of annotation in reviewing class readings.

What is Annotation?
An annotation is a note or comment added to a text to provide explanation or criticism about a particular part of it (Dictionary.com-2023). In a diverse world, annotation allows students to explore their individual interpretations of classroom materials and assignments, in other words “what does this mean in my world?”. Annotation allows students to explore their perceptions while reviewing reading materials for classroom assignments.

Topic-The History of Advocacy in Human Services
Poverty in 1601 vs Poverty/Social Disparities in 2023
Chapter 3 Woodside, M. & McClam, T. (2019) 9th Ed.
An Introduction to human services. NY: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.

General Education Standards explored:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, and Awareness of Diversity.

The purpose of this lesson was to expose students to the first public laws developed to aid and assist the poor and underprivileged.

-The Elizabethan Poor Laws were passed as a response to the increasing number of poor people in Great Britain in 1601.
*Making the connection between life in 1601 and modern day life in 2023. What do students think social problems were like in England in 1601 versus modern day issues (micro/macro communities)?
• Law passed as the number of poor increased.
• Compulsory taxation to raise funds to help the needy.
• Classification of dependents according to ability to work: children, the able-bodied, and the “impotent poor”.
• Responsibility for those in need was first with the family and then with the government.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

General Education Standards explored:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, and Awareness of Diversity.

The purpose of this lesson was to expose students to the first public laws developed to aid and assist the poor and underprivileged.
Students were introduced during the lesson to the following ideas:
Modern Day Movements
Public Welfare
Private Sector/Non-Profit Support Programs
The role of advocacy in human services in a modern day context.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This is a week 4 assignment. This assignment was given after one full month of the semester in order for students to feel comfortable sharing their views. The assignment The assignment consisted of quiet reading time, completing the annotation independently and then class discussion. A total of 90 minutes. Students were very enthused, especially when cinema was incorporated such as "Bridgerton".

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

This is an interactive low stakes assignment which is used to introduce a high stakes assignment-discussion of the Final Term Paper on a social issue of the students choice. The instructor has to select the reading and any supplemental resources which will be used during the assignment (such as video clips).

Rubric-
Low Stakes Assignment-Level of Engagement
5 Points-Students Did Not pose any Questions
10 Points-Posed some questions but did not evoke discussion.
15 points-Posed Relevant questions during class discussions.
20 points-Posed 2 relevant questions which provoked discussion.

The assignment was well received. I think next time I will ask students to submit a video clip which illustrates their personal perceptions of modern day poverty.

Themes/Perceptions of Students during this lesson:
Students learned the word/term “pauperism”, explored the meaning of poverty.
Treatment of the Poor and Indigent (Public, Private, and Religious Based Social Services) in 1601.
Mental Health Services 1601 vs Mental Health Services 2023
What do you think poverty looked like in 1601?

Living General Education
Spring 2023
Charisse Marshall, DSW, LCSW
Human Services Department

The use of annotation in reviewing class readings.

General Education Standards explored:
Knowledge, Skills, Values, and Awareness of Diversity.

The purpose of this lesson was to expose students to the first public laws developed to aid and assist the poor and underprivileged.

Themes/Perceptions of Students:
Students learned the word/term “pauperism”, explored the meaning of poverty.
Treatment of the Poor and Indigent (Public, Private, and Religious Based Social Services) in 1601.
Mental Health Services 1601 vs Mental Health Services 2023
What do you think poverty looked like in 1601?

Making Modern Day Connections to cinema such as “The Crown”, “Meghan and Harry”, and “Bridgerton”.

Students were introduced during the lesson to the following ideas:
Modern Day Movements
Public Welfare
Private Sector/Non-Profit Support Programs
The role of advocacy in human services in a modern day context.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

May 16, 2023

Student self-assessment that promotes learning

Patricia Childers

Communication Design (COMD)

Graphic Design Principles, Typography

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

A self-assessment activity for reflection and reinforcement.
• low stakes, high impact activity to promote deep learning through engagement
• a mechanism to help focus on specific goals
• a tool to help students track progress towards their goals
• a tool to guide educators in the effectiveness of their communication

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

Inquiry & Analysis
A pedagogical approach to student review that not only reinforces student learning, but reinforces that they have learned. The goals this student classroom experience is to support the analysis of creative and critical thinking through the use of HIEPs,

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This activity can be introduced at the conclusion of any student project. Classroom time in minimal, about 20 minutes based on the amount of material reviewed. There is no out-of-class time.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

The low stakes activity requires the project rubric and copies of the final project. Students self access using the rubric. Student assessment refers to specific examples, footnoted or cross-referenced directly on the copy of the final project.

The rubric development is based on the General Education inquiry of Knowledge and Skills using specific project criteria. This course in not part of a college-wide assessment. The project in itself is not graded. I find that student's responses are a true reflection of the student's understanding. "When the act of self-assessing is given a learning-oriented purpose, students' self-assessments are relatively consistent with those of external evaluators, including professors." [Lopez, R., and Kossack, S. (2007). Effects of recurring use of self-assessment in university courses. Int. J. Learn. 14, 203–216. doi: 10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v14i04/45277]

I do review the activity to insure that student's response indicates that they correctly understand the material. Any discrepancies are reviewed directly with the student to correct misconceptions. In this way, the activity reflects the impact of my communication of the material through the student's response. If student understanding of the material is low, I know that I need to change me approach.

The activity works well and I use it several times a semester. The biggest challenge is the response of a few students to "having" to grade themselves. One student reminded me that grading is my job, not theirs. I explain that periodic, external replay of learned input patterns strengthens synaptic connections—the combination of structural plasticity, synaptic plasticity and self-generated reactivation not only stabilizes synaptic turnover but enhances their connectivity and associative memory. This explanation tends to erode resistance. And generally, many students have stated that they better understand the concept after the self assessment. The assessment is altered to support each different assignment.

https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/pchilders-portfolio/2023/05/16/student-self-assessment-that-promotes-learning/

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/pchilders-portfolio/wp-admin/post.php?post=266&action=edit

May 5, 2023

Walking the Brooklyn Bridge

Patricia Hickey

CityTech CUNY

English 1101 and English 1112

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

The class as a groups walked across the Brooklyn Bridge. The class did some preliminary research about the Brooklyn Bridge’s history. The students paired up. One partner made voice comments while the other took photos. The pairs chose either people, scenery or bridge structure.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

The goals are:
1. Everyone should experience walking over the iconic Brooklyn Bridge!
2. Students learn how to hone their power of observation.
3. Students put their experience into a solid coherent paragraph.
4. Students share their experiences with their classmates.
5. Everyone sees each other in a different light. This will help establish comradery.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

In the Spring semester I did this mid semester for two reasons. Firstly, the warmer weather makes the walk easier. Secondly, a change of pace is good for the mid semester slump.
The entire lesson takes about a full class and a half time. We walked during the class time .I

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

There was no preparation for this activity, although I was concerned if someone felt they were not capable of walking the distance. All felt fine. Before walking we did some preliminary research about the Bridge.
This was a low stakes writing lesson.

The only assessment was participation

This experience was wonderful and I most certainly will repeat this. Everyone loved the activity and I had virtually no complaints. The students loved walking and chatting with their classmates and with me. They loved the views and the feeling that it was “their Bridge” and they were not tourists.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

April 1, 2022

Comprehensive Understanding of Cardiovascular Medications

Dora-Ann Oddo

Dental Hygiene

Principles of Dental Hygiene Care III (DEN 2300 Seminar)

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

This activity will provide dental hygiene students to gain an understanding in cardiovascular medications and how to apply this knowledge to patients’ medical history as part of their assessment process. This activity requires dental hygiene students to gain proficiency in oral communication, information literacy, and the understanding of cardiovascular medications related to their patients’ disease/condition. Students will participate in a collaborative assignment by gathering research on cardiovascular medications. After students formulate their research, students will verbally present this information to the class. In addition, the students will upload their PowerPoint presentation on OpenLab, and review classmates research based upon a rubric scale. The verbal and written discussions of this activity support critical thinking and creates meaningful in-depth discussions among students.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

The aim of this activity is to encourage verbal communication and information literacy about patients with cardiovascular diseases/condition. The learning goal for each student is to aquire an understanding of cardiovascular medications including indication of use, oral implications, side effects, and adverse effects. This activity will enhance students’ learning and the ability to ask critical thinking questions when assessing a patient’s medications. This activity encourages oral communication, information literacy, undergraduate research, working collaboratively and using open digital pedagogy.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This activity will be implemented mid-semester and performed in the classroom for a duration of thirty minutes. The out-of-class time for students can range from one to two hours based upon their research, developing a PowerPoint, uploading the PowerPoint to OpenLab, and writing reflections on one or two students’ post.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

This activity is a low-stakes assignment. The instructor will randomly select students by using the Wheel of Names. Each group will consist of three students. After the students are divided into groups, the instructor will assign each group a cardiovascular medication.
Student will be given these questions to answer:
1. Identify the brand and generic name.
2. What is the indication for use?
3. What are the oral implications?
4. How does medication affect dental hygiene treatment?
5. Does this medication have any drug interactions?
6. What is the pharmacologic category?
The students will work collaboratively with their assigned groups by researching and answering the questions. Each student will be responsible for creating a slide as part of the group’s PowerPoint presentation. The students will have a week to prepare the PowerPoint and gather information to present to the class. The lead of the group will be responsible to upload the PowerPoint on OpenLab.

The second part of this assignment will culminate
a week later when the students present the PowerPoint to the class. Students will have the opportunity to ask their peers questions. Each presentation should be about five to ten minutes. After the presentation, the students write a review on OpenLab based upon a rubric scale.

This activity was developed by Oral Communications VALUE rubric. The students will be evaluate using Oral Communication Value rubric to assess proficiency preparedness, knowledge, and the ability to effectively communicate information to their classmates.

This activity has not yet been implemented.

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

March 28, 2022

Ethical Design: Evaluating Digital and IRL Experiences (and how one might support or hinder the other)

Noreen Whysel

Communication Design/City Tech

UX and UI Design

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

In a Data for Good lecture at Columbia's Data Science Institute, dana boyd of Data+Society told the audience that her proudest achievements are often when she convinces a client not to create something that can potentially do harm.

When does it make sense to NOT make a digital version of something that would be better designed IRL? Are there activities that are more suited to online than IRL? Or are there cases where a combination of both appropriate?

In this exercise, I shared a few articles about online activities that have had an impact on real life. We discussed both positive an negative reviews of online activities, including Pokemon Go, which is often discussed in terms of it's getting gamers to be more social and active to Instagram, which has been shown to have a negative effect on the self-esteem of teenaged girls. A third example was on how social media use is contributing to the political polarization of America by removing the public commons from public space to largely anonymous forums.

After discussing these articles, students formed breakout groups to find a news article about an online activity and discuss the pros and cons of that activity online. And to also discuss how that activity could be replaced by or combined with an IRL activity to improve the experience. Finally, they posted a reflection on the exercise to the class Slack group.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

This activity focuses on three learning outcomes: Reading, Information Literacy and Ethical Thinking. Students are asked to read an assigned text describing Digital vs IRL spaces and then in select an example from the reading of a digital experience that might be better In Real Life or paired with an IRL experience. After discussing in groups, they then share back to the class what they discussed and finally post a reflection on course discussion board about their understanding of the pros and cons of digital vs IRL for the chosen scenario.

To address Information Literacy, students must find one additional example of digital applications where the IRL experience takes precedence over digital. What might someone gain from a physical experience that they can't get from digital? When might a digital application enhance the IRL experience?

And to expand their understanding of who is impacted by their design decisions, they then work in groups to make a stakeholder map showing who is affected by the designed experience of your example. Who is participating in the experience? Who else might be affected by the experience? Or harmed? Who might be left out?

In addition to the reading, information literacy and ethical Thinking student learning outcomes, students gain gain from two High Impact Education Practices: Place Based Learning and Collaborative Assignments.

Place-Based Learning
Students consider the physical and embodied experiences of IRL versus digital experiences

Collaborative Assignments
Students participate in Discussion of the pros and cons of selected digital experiences

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This activity was part of the Ethics and Accessibility lecture in Week 7 of the Spring 2022 semester. It took a little over a half hour to complete. There was no out-of-class time except if a student wishes to post their reflection after class. If we had more time (and were not otherwise online this week) we might have been able to go outside and play Pokemon Go or survey people about their online and offline political activity on campus grounds. We may still try to create an online/IRL activity during a later session and follow up with a stakeholder map, which we did not have time to do.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

The activity was low stakes and ungraded. The only preparation was to find three articles to discuss as examples of Online activities that either replace or compromise IRL experiences.

Because this assignment is ungraded, I plan to use it as part of the participation grade. I do not believe my course is part of the college-wide general educaiton assessment initiative. It is an elective.

Students enjoyed discussing online versus "In Real Life" very much. They are very aware of online activities that are creating unrealistic expectations for their real-life relationships and are concerned about exacerbating these experiences through their design careers. I would like to refine the activity and possibly replace a duller accessibility study that they do for credit and that could be done in class in groups or as a demonstration. Not being able to go outside or actually be IRL was an issue with this activity, though some students mentioned that it made it easier for everyone in their group to search for articles since they were all sitting at a computer anyway.

The activity presentation for the Living Lab course is openly available at : https://cuny907-my.sharepoint.com/:p:/g/personal/noreen_whysel27_login_cuny_edu/EeDP7sDKTAROh1Nle8uKlagB5bMXEem7EM4k6Lvh7nagBA?e=FgnQIx

You can also read about the activity on the course blog at https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/-whysel-comd-3562-he93-sp2022/2022/03/28/ethical-design-evaluating-digital-and-irl-experiences-and-how-one-might-support-or-hinder-the-other/

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

March 24, 2022

Discussion on the newly discovered Salivary Gland

Khrystyna Vyprynyuk

Dental Hygiene

DEN 1112 Oral Anatomy

Activity Description: Provide a brief description of the activity

The activity is a discussion board assignment. Students enrolled in the DEN 1112 Oral Anatomy course are learning about multiple organ systems in the context of how they relate to the Head and Neck anatomy, dental anatomy, and the practice of a dental hygienist. The discussion topic is on the newly discovered salivary gland.

Learning Goals: What do you aim to achieve with this activity?

The goal of this activity is to promote student engagement by improving their reading skills. However, by participating in this activity students will also be incorporating their writing, information literacy, and teamwork skills.

Timing: At what point in the lesson or semester do you use this activity? How much classroom time do you devote to it? How much out-of-class time is expected?

This activity will be incorporated mid-semester as one of the homework assignments. Minimal classroom time is devoted to this activity, only enough time to go over the assignment, expectations, and technicalities (10 minutes). Students are expected to spend 2 to 3 hours out-of-class time over the course of 2 weeks to complete this assignment.

Logistics: What preparation is needed for this activity? What instructions do you give students? Is the activity low-stakes, high-stakes, or something else?

The activity is presented as a low-stakes assignment (4% of the total course grade). In preparation for this activity, students will read a chapter in the course textbook on Glandular Tissues and attend the lecture presentation on the same topic. Additionally, students will be required to read the assigned article "The tubarial salivary glands A potential new organ at risk for radiotherapy" https://www.thegreenjournal.com/article/S0167-8140%2820%2930809-4/fulltext.

The assignment consists of two parts. In the first part, students are instructed to summarize the article in at least 500 words and answer two or more of the following questions. The main post should include at least two references. One of the references should be from the article provided, additional references can be from any other scholarly article on this topic.

Questions:
1. Name one of the reasons why this mysterious gland has not been noted until now?
2. How would you classify this newly discovered gland and why?
separate organ
major salivary gland
minor salivary gland
3. What will this discovery mean in terms of sciences such as head and neck anatomy, oral pathology, radiology, or oncology?

In the second part of the assignment, students are asked to respond to at least 2 (each response is 25 points) of their classmates. A quality response should have at least 200 words. A short phrase, such as "thank you" or “good post”, will not be accepted as a quality response. Explaining why students agree or disagree with their classmates should be presented in a cordial and professional manner.

All posts are going to be available on the Open Lab course site. Incorporating open educational resources during this assignment allows students attending different sections of the same course to participate in the same assignment, which enhances collaboration and student communication.

The assignment is graded as follows: main post 50% of the grade, replies to the classmates 50% (25% each). Since the target of this assignment is to evaluate students’ reading comprehension, the VALUE rubric on reading assessment will be used to grade the main post. I believe the course is not part of the college-wide gen ed assessment initiative. Despite the main SLO of this assignment being reading, other SLOs such as writing and information literacy are also evident in this assignment.

This activity has been presented in a similar format during the Fall 2020 and Fall 2021 semester. It has since been modified and improved and has not yet been implemented in the new format. I am looking forward to implementing this activity in a new format, specifically on the Open Lab platform, the use of open educational resources will allow students from multiple course sections to interact with one another, develop new networking skills, and improve communication. In the past, the challenges that had been encountered were mostly due to students not following the instructions and in some cases forgetting to provide responses to their classmates. This has been modified by adding clarity to the instructions and providing clear breakdown of points distribution. I will definitely add a detailed grading rubric that would allow for more constructive feedback, incorporate main assessment points from the VALUE rubric. Students stated that they enjoyed discussion board post as a writing assignment that incorporated aspects of informal communication, allowed them to voice their opinion towards their classmates ideas in a professional manner, and that it is slightly different that what they had been assigned in the past.

One of the students was able to submit her work from a previously incorporated assignment to the CityTech Writer journal, which was selected for publication in the CTW vol. 16

Please share a helpful link to a pages or post on the OpenLab

Category: Single Class Meeting or less

Co-Creating a Code Glossary

NUR 1130 Clinical Assignment case study

Peer Evaluation

Electrification of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Area: Ensuring Safe and Efficient Electrical Distribution

Student self-assessment that promotes learning

Comprehensive Understanding of Cardiovascular Medications

Ethical Design: Evaluating Digital and IRL Experiences (and how one might support or hinder the other)

Discussion on the newly discovered Salivary Gland

The OpenLab at City Tech:A place to learn, work, and share

Support

Accessibility

Copyright

Creative Commons

The OpenLab at City Tech:A place to learn, work, and share

Support

Accessibility

Copyright

Creative Commons