Fulton Times—the change of Fulton Street

Since I came to New York, I always walked to school; I never take any trains or buses to school, so it is so difficult to me to find the way out of the station and the way to my college. I still remember that was the first day of my school, I took the A train in Fulton Street and stopped at the station at Fulton, Jay street. I thought I lost and never left the Fulton Street in Manhattan, but the train did move in the same direction and pass through a stop. Therefore, I got out of the station and finally I found out where am I?
Brooklyn Fulton Street, the same street name in Manhattan downtown. It is named after Robert Fulton, who owned the monopoly business of steam ferries. In that time, the only way traveled to Manhattan and Brooklyn is by the steam ferries, and these two Fulton Street is where the steam ferries linked with. So as we can see Robert Fulton is the huge character in hundred years ago and his name still remain on today local history. Even though Fulton’s monopoly steam ferries business is no longer exist now, the monopolistic business along the Fulton Street still going on; the national chain stores vs. small local retail stores, and who will be last longer?
On Fulton Street, the 17-block corridor stretching from Boerum Place to Flatbush Avenue features a mix of national retailers like Macy’s, H&M, and the Gap; local chains like Brooklyn Industries, Cookie’s, and Shake Shack; and independent shops like Heart & Sole and Mirage Boutique. The retail business along Fulton Street cannot go without its transportation. From the past century, the road structure has great change and influences the area efficiently. Fulton Street has been a marketplace since early 19th century, “the street is full of pedestrians. A trolley track line was next to the (Orpheum) Theater and an over pass train track as well” (Afo). Today, there are no more train tracks, the MTA subway trains and buses replace the streetcars. And it easier for people come to Fulton Street and shop along the street. The great transportation gathers lots of customers to this street, the store owners have more chance to sell their products; however, too much customers also give the land lords an opportunity to increase the rent.
From the last century, people are more flavors to the local stores on Fulton Street, like the shops that sell hip-hop fashion, cellphone, sneaker and gold jewelry… however, in recent years, those local and independent shops are disappeared, since they cannot afford the high rent in that area and the competition with national chain stores. An associate director at Newmark Grubb Knight Frank Retail, Hymie Dweck said, “rent on Fulton Street were always around $150 to $200( square foot), but they are pushing past that now” (Julie Satow). Rent is one of the important factors that they cannot compete with the national stores. The owner of Stellar European Design, Sam Yung Kim said “driving up rents beyond $200 a square foot that may make it impossible for him to remain when his lease comes up for renewal in a year” (Berger, Joseph). Since the small retailers cannot earn as much as the national chain store did, and they still need to pay the same high rent, many stores closed, in this cruel competition, rent is like the salt, putting on their open wound, and make their situation worse.
The disappearance of those local stores make some people worry that Fulton Street will lose the African-American and Caribbean-American customers, since they like the unique style and bright color clothing, which make them show off their figure. On the other hand, “some small stores are pleased with the chains’ arrival. ‘They bring more people in this area and it’s better,’ said Frank Flower, an Egyptian immigrant who owns a hole-in-the-wall shop that sells gold chains and earrings” (Berger, Joseph). Do the national chain stores join in Fulton Street really change the people’s visit? Vicki Weiner, deputy director of the Pratt Center for Community Development who also worried about the unbalance between national retailers, local retailers and the independent shops did a survey in 2006, asking the architectural significance of the mall’s buildings, testing if the new stores in the mall did change the customers visiting. At the end, she found out that street is still “functioning like a traditional marketplace, where people see people they know and come to network and socialize as well as shop.” Weiner believed Fulton Mall (on the center of Fulton Street) has not lost its character (Berger, Joseph).
From these two stories, we understand the factor of rent influences the competition between the local retail and the national chain stores; and also the view from people about the national chain stores joining in Fulton Street. Because of the great transportation along the Fulton Street, many retailers want to join in this fantastic market; however, on the other hand, the more retailers want to join in, the higher rent they have to pay. And as we know only the large national stores can afford this high rents with ease. In the customers’ views, Fulton Street is still the same amazing shopping pedestrianized mall; but, it is a little painful to the small retailor.
In this monopolistic market, the local stores seem weaker than the national chain stores; however, generally, Fulton Street stills the unique place for the people, a mix of national stores and local retail stores. Even though the national chain stores joining did hurt some of the small businesses, and push them out of the competition; with the loss of some loyal local customers, Fulton Street still stands, continued to expands its fame, and attracts more new customers to here.

Cited Work
Afo (Aqbere, Dawuda), “Vaudeville Project-Orpheum.” What is Vaudeville? The Brooklyn Experience. OpenLAB AT CITY TECH, November 7, 2013. Web. November 20, 2013
Berger, Joseph. “On Fulton Street, Worries about Change.” The New York Times Online 20 September 2013. 20 November 2013.
Downtown Brooklyn. . Historic Downtown Brooklyn Walking Tour. Web. 28 November 2013

Satow, Julie. “National Retailer Discover a Brooklyn Mall.” The New York Times Online 28 August 2012. 20 November 2013.

Project 4

The Brooklyn Bridge is a landmark and one of the greatest everlasting achievements in the history of New York. Its grand opening was on May 24th, 1883 which proudly marks the date this majestic landmark was added to Brooklyn’s line of great historic monuments. But as swell as the Brooklyn Bridge is there a negative portion that follows unfortunately. Its actually quite easily to overlook these events for the worse because in a city like New York what bad could go awfully wrong or unexpected. There are multiple accounts that support this claim such as the rumors that caused the stampede on May 30th, 1883 six days after the grand opening also known as the Stampede of 1883 and other events that include people committing suicide and the death of John A. Roebling the architect who designed the Brooklyn Bridge. These accounts share similarities and differences which will be discussed

On May 24th, 1883 the grand opening ceremony for the Brooklyn Bridge was celebrated, no one would have guessed that not even a week but six days later a great tragedy had occurred on the bridge. There were rumors that claimed the bridge wasn’t steady and it was going to collapse, when word got around people rushed to get off the bridge, trampling on those who unfortunately fell during their attempted escape. The stampede left 12 people trampled to death and 36 were left injured. After the stampede a circus owner who went by the name P.T. Barnum decided to publicize his circus by proving that the bridge was more than just safe and the rumors were just rumors. At first when the Bridge first opened his circus was denied access but after the stampede state officials reluctantly agreed to P.T.Barnum’s offer. P.T. Barnum’s circus: “Jumbo” which consisted of 21 elephants which is approximately 42 tons (84,000 pounds) crossed the bridge and rid the rumors for good. The stampede could have been prevented if the state officials decided to test the stability of the bridge before allowing the people of New York to cross.

During the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge a list of deaths followed one of the most important was the architect himself, John A. Roebling at the time who was taking observations to determine the exact location of the Brooklyn Tower his assistant Colonel William H. Paine was stationed in a transit to deliver the line across to Roebling who was standing on a pile of wood, A ferry was approaching and Colonel was too focused on giving directions to Roebling that the ferry including its passengers crashed heavily into the fender, the fender was forced against the cluster and Roebling’s foot was crushed between the timbers. John A. Roebling who had his toes on the right foot amputated but contracted Tetanus disease and died two weeks later after his death, Roebling’s son took over to complete what his father started, He made several important improvements on the bridge design and further developed bridge building techniques. Thus, he designed the two large pneumatic caissons that became the foundations for the two towers. In 1870, fire broke out in one of the caissons; from within the caisson, Roebling directed his attention extinguish the flames. Working in compressed air in these caissons under the river caused him to get decompression sickness which hindered his health enough to prevent him to visit the construction site. His wife, Emily Warren Roebling, who had taken it upon herself to learn bridge construction, became his nurse and confidant and took over much of the chief engineer’s duties including day-to-day supervision and project management. Another heartbreaking story involves the first man to jump off the Brooklyn Bridge, Robert Odlum in May 1885. His motivations for doing so included the desire to demonstrate that people did not die simply from falling through the air, thus encouraging people to be willing to jump from a burning building into a net. Odlum also desired fame and the chance to help himself and his mother financially. All these accounts relating to death not only saddened New Yorkers but also forced us to rethink our guidelines of safety and how to prevent these events from ever happening again.

After explaining the two accounts to promote my claims, Should we start with the discussion of the similarities of the accounts. These accounts are surrounded by death and sorrow as the lives of innocent people were lost. All the events that were listed above are considered an unexpected twist of events, the stampede that occurred after 6 days due to rumors and the architect himself dying in the field of work, who would’ve guessed? Another similarity is that both these events happened because of human error, People should pay attention to their surroundings and to not get way TOO sucked into and getting “blinded” by this one goal that they are work so hard to achieve. As far as similarities go, there are also some differences between the two accounts that are worth mentioning such as how Roeblings successors, his son Washington Roebling also died due to a disease he contracted from working in the construction site likewise his father, while P.T. Barnum’s attempt to publicize his circus not only got the job done but prevented any more deaths and false claims about the stability of the Brooklyn Bridge.

Finally, the two accounts that I’ve explained have indeed have supported the fact that the Brooklyn Bridge is not all fun and games when we research more in depth about its history, Now these two accounts have ended in different, In P.T. Barnum’s situation he is considered as a hero because of his actions, he made a huge gamble in order to publicize his circus and doing his City a favor to eradicate the fear in the hearts of New Yorkers and to persuade them to trust the Brooklyn Bridge once more while on the other hand Washington Roebling died to the same reason his father did which was being blinded by his work in the site which resulted into getting extremely injured. Its history consists of events that bring out the bridges true colors which are still so easily disregarded by the thousands of people who crossed the bridge because everyone is so blinded by their daily routine, who has time for anything?

Works Cited
“John Augustus Roebling (American Engineer).” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

Wikipedia. “Washington Roebling.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 28 Nov. 2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2013.

Stern, John, and Carrie Wilson. “THE BROOKLYN BRIDGE: A STUDY IN GREATNESS.” (n.d.): n. pag. Print.

CBS Team. “Brookiyn Bridge – Creating Grandeur.” CBSForum.com. CBS Team, 2 May 2003. Web. 01 Dec. 2013.

“Today in History.” : June 12. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Nov. 2013.

The Lank Mark Of New York

The Brooklyn Bridge, One of the most famous landmarks of New York. It extends for 5,989 feet and it is one of the best things in New York. It was the reason why New York became what it is today. The Bridges construction started in 1869 by the man called John Augustus Roebling. It was completed on May 24 1883 and the first day estimate of 250,000 people walked across on the bridge promenade. The bridge connected the two major boroughs of New York City today, the boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn. The Bridge was completed but do people today wonder how the construction must have felt like or the how John Augustus Roebling managed to do this. Well that is what I will tell you guys today how the Brooklyn Bridge was built, who built it and how it has helped New York City.

The man who thought of he Bridge is John Augustus Roebling. He was a great pioneer in the design of steel suspension bridges. He was born in Germany in 1806 and migrated to Pennsylvania and tried to be a farmer but could not be successful so he moved to the capital   Harrisburg, where he found work as a civil engineer. He promoted the use of wire cable and established a successful wire-cable factory. While working he earned a reputation as a designer of suspension bridges, which at the time were widely used but known to fail under strong winds or heavy loads. However Roebling found a solution, a web truss added to either side of the bridge roadway that greatly stabilized the structure. Roebling slowly made his name and with help of this technology he successfully bridged the Niagara Gorge at Niagara Falls, New York, and the Ohio River in Cincinnati, Ohio.  Than in 1867 the legislature approved to of a bridge over the east river of Manhattan and Brooklyn that was proposed to them by Roebling who was popular at that time due to his achievements in making bridges. However when John was inspecting the site he hurt himself and 17 days later he passed away. Than his son Washington A. Roebling, took over as chief engineer. Roebling had worked with his father on several bridges and had helped design the Brooklyn Bridge.

The master mind was not there but his plans were there through his son Washington A. Roebling. He took over and started the construction of the bridge which was going to create history. The biggest challenge of the construction was how it will be held together? How will it be strong enough to hold a bridge that big? Well the answer was the inventive idea of John Roebling to use steel instead of iron. The other problem was digging of the foundation but the idea of caisson work solved the problem. Caissons, enormous wooden boxes with no bottoms, were sunk in the river. Compressed air was pumped into them, and men inside would dig away at the sand and rock on the river bottom. The stone towers were built atop the caissons, which sank deeper into the river bottom. Now the caissons work was tough and risky and the people that took this risk were called the”sandhogs”. These workers were mostly immigrants that earned abut $2 a day.  They used shovels and dynamite to clear away the mud and boulders at the bottom of the river. Each week, the caissons inched closer to the bedrock. When they reached a sufficient depth of44 feet on the Brooklyn side and 78 feet on the Manhattan side they began laying granite, working their way back up to the surface. How ever the conditions in the caissons were not good and it led to illness and this also affected the brain of this bridge, Washington A. Roebling.  He was paralyzed and his wife Emily Roebling took over and helped her husband complete the bride.

When the foundation was completed the other big task was the cables. Spinning the cables was as a big thing since I was no easy thing to cover the whole bridge with cables. The spinning cable began in the summer of 1877 and was finished after a year and four months. However it took another five years to suspend the roadway from the cables and have the bridge ready for traffic. Finally after all the hard work the bridge was completed in 14 years and on May 24, 1883 the bridge was opened to the public. The Bridge cost $15 million double than what John                 A .Roebling had expected.

The Bridge took a lot of money and man power to build it but how did the bridge help New York? Well it basically turned New York City into what is it is today. It turned New York City into the most important commercial metropolis in the United States. It connected the boroughs of Brooklyn and Manhattan.  The bridge increased the population of Brooklyn from 580,000 to one million in the first 15 years opened and solved the problem of lack of house on the small island of Manhattan. The bridge also helped it economically. The Brooklyn Bridge created one of the largest economic centers in the world by facilitating the safe transportation of goods and labor between these two metropolitan areas. Now people can easily live in Brooklyn and work in Manhattan.  At 276.5 feet over high water, the bridge also allows the large commercial ships underneath the bridge.

The Brooklyn Bridge is the symbol of New York City. It is a national monument of New York and it has helped make this city what it is today. The idea of John A. Roebling and the hard work put in from his son and daughter in law Washington a. Roebling and Emily Roebling connected Brooklyn and Manhattan and changed the course of history of New York City. Imagine what the bridge was not built than we would have never experienced the success New York has seen. It helped us in many ways and we should remember all the hard work, the mind used for this and all the money used to build this great landmark, The Brooklyn Bridge.

 

 

 

Reference List

1-“Brooklyn Bridge.” 2013. The History Channel website. Dec 1 2013, 4:20 http://www.history.com/topics/brooklyn-bridge.

2-Economic Effect – The Brooklyn Bridge: A World Wonder.”Economic Effect -The Brooklyn Bridge: A World Wonder. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Dec. 2013. <http://www.brooklynbridgeaworldwonder.com/economic-effect.html>.

3-“Building the Brooklyn Bridge.” About.com 19th Century History. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2013. <http://history1800s.about.com/od/bridgebuilding/a/brooklynbrid01.htm>.

4-“Brooklyn Bridge.” , New York City. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2013. <http://www.aviewoncities.com/nyc/brooklynbridge.htm>.

Test of Time Final

Test of Time

Winston Churchill said “History is written by the victors.” However, it is also true that it is written by those who survive. The survivors are the last witness of real event that transpired and they would tell a different history. Yet over time even this would disappear unless told to others, an oral tradition. Such is the case of the Brooklyn Theater fire: however, even with 700 survivors and bystanders the history of the Brooklyn Theater fire has gotten lost in history. Few know of this tragic event, and to this day there is not even a sign at the location. An event that took the lives of 300 in 1876 passes unnoticed today. The Brooklyn Theater Fire is written in various historical archives ranging from the Brooklyn Historical Society to the New York Times interview with Kate Claxton. Kate Claxton is a primary source as her being an eyewitness to within the theater just prior and all the way through the fire. However the interview was conducted 9 years after the incident. On the other hand the historical files found in the Brooklyn Historical Society about the “Guide to The Brooklyn Theater Fire Relief Association Records, 1876-1879” was started following the event. However there is very little detail on the events inside the theater and what is provided is a paragraph on the whole event. This is seen as a secondary source. Therefore is seen as a slightly less reliable but more credible due to the fact that it should have been checked and confirmed by those involved in making it.

The melodrama, “The Two Orphans” was playing on the stage of the Brooklyn theatre on December 5, 1876 with a full house in attendance. Over a thousand people were packed inside with most of them in the upper gallery seats, comprised of families and large groups of people that came to see the show at an affordable price. The show had become quite popular and had been going on for some time, however that night’s performance at the Brooklyn theatre would be different. At 11:15 PM, shortly after the opening of the last act, a fire broke out, apparently caused by scenery touching the gas lights. A common problem with gas lamps inside structures back in the days of wooden frame and floors, especially a stage with props and backdrops. Much like the Titanic after itself the theater staff and performers were slow to respond to and inform the audience of the danger. Then when the fire started raging so did the people started panicking and running for the only two exits. The building had three levels of seats and only one staircase that ran the height of the building. These factors led to people collapsing down the steps and being trampled, adding to the jam that already existed. Many on the upper level died of asphyxiation or when the building finally collapsed on itself in fifteen to twenty minutes. Over 300 died that night, most of them being families and the not so well off. The top tier had no direct way down and a major jam developed on the second tier staircase. This led to trampling and falls, while the upper tier died of asphyxiation and falling debris. This is validated by historical records found at the Brooklyn Historical Society and “This Day in History” on history.com.

Nine years after the fire Kate Claxton recalled and told her story to the Philadelphia Times which later reach the home of the Brooklyn Theater Fire, New York and The Times. She recalled how the stage was set up and her laying down in character on straw for the play. She went on to say that she “was startled by a rumbling noise, which sounded as if the ceiling of the the theatre was falling”. Then the curtain rose and she did not dwell on the noise and remained in character. Then as she said her lines and the play progressed she heard the voice of Lilian Cleaves who said “save yourself for God’s sake: I am running now”. This news made Kate Claxton gaze up and spot the sparks and “little tongues of fire licking the edges of the drops and borders that hung in the flies”. Nevertheless, she played her part and did not show fear, same as Harry Murdoch and Mrs. Farren followed by Mr. J. B. Studley. However, Mrs. Farren whispered to her “the fire is steadily gaining”. At this time the fire could no longer be “concealed from the audience” as the sparks were falling on stage and yet they played on. Panic had taken full swing and only then did “we saw that it was useless to attempt to proceed”. In spite of this Mr. Studley said to the people: “ The play will go on and the fire will be put out. Be quiet Get back to your seats”. Kate Claxton then saw that “it was madness to delay longer as we were now almost surrounded by flames”. She went and took Mr. Murdoch by the arm to run but he pulled away in a daze and went to his dressing room where he and Claude Burroughs parished. At this time all of the exits were engulfed in flames and all seemed lost. However, it was at this time that Kate Claxton remembered of a subterranean passage built by Mrs. Conway to the box office from the star dressing room. This was Kate Claxton’s dressing room and she took her neighbour Maude Harrison with her through the tunnel and to the box office. After breaking through the door in the office they were safely outside.

This two accounts of December 5, 1876 during the Brooklyn Theater fire have the same beginning and end. The fire that would take the lives of 300 began at the start of the last act and yet none of the actors showed any sign of it to the audience. They played their parts as the fire grew and their chance to escape diminished along with that of the audience. Then when the fire was visible all went into panic and many died while attempting to flee. however; the details and view of events vary. First is a very basic overview of the causes and effects of the Brooklyn Theater fire told after it had come to pass by historical archives. Kate Claxton was in the middle of all of these events when they transpired and so it is more personal. There are a great deal of details that give us a clear understanding of her position and feelings at that time, one of them being her guilt over the fact that she went along with what everyone else was doing, covering up the truth from the audience. “The curtain should have been kept down until the flames had been extinguished or if it had been found impossible… the audience should have been calmly informed that… some unfortunate occurrence behind the scenery compiled a suspension of the performance….Raising the curtain created a draft which fanned the flames into fury”. There is no such notion in the historical database, no looking back at the event in another way only what happened in a very neutral tone. All the emotion was taken away along with the exaggeration that showed that this was viewed by people vs a machine. Like a true war story, people need to hear what the person saw or thought that they saw. Such as a man being swallowed whole by sea of panicking patrones as they dashed for their lives down the steps. Man dragging women and child back so they may be saved themselves. A likely compassion would be the events of the Titanic as all hope ran away with grace, and chivalry from the hearts and minds of all.

The Brooklyn Theater Fire is written in various historical archives ranging from the Brooklyn Historical Society to the New York Times. Nevertheless, what is written in one may be found wanting in the other. Kate Claxton first hand account has detail that is not available in the historical documents and yet it told much later, giving time a chance to warp memories. Yet it is still a primary source from which other sources could be built on. In the end both tell a woeful tale of a great loss of life, yet one is filled with life and emotion. Those who live are the real winners and history is theirs. “the pen is mightier than the sword”.

Robert, S. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://brooklynhistory.org/library/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/arms_1977_049_theatre.pdf

(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/hundreds-die-in-brooklyn-theater-fire

Montrose, M. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.brownstoner.com/blog/2010/06/walkabout-the-b-2/

The brooklyn theater fire . (1885, November 30). The New York Times . Retrieved from http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F50D11FD355A1A738DDDA90B94D9415B8

Richman, R. (2011, June 17th). “the two orphans,” with a new home. Retrieved from http://www.green-wood.com/2011/the-two-orphans-with-a-new-home/

Class Summary 11/25

Today, we had a double session of English. In this double session we took the opportunity to work on our Project 4. During the first half of class, we discussed the assignments of Project 4,5 and the Persuasive Speech more thoroughly and self-evaluated ourselves before our peers got the chance to do so. During this time, Professor Rosen also walked around and gave individual help to those who asked and gave important feedback. We then moved on to the second part of class. In this part of class we had the chance to do peer review. A chance to evaluate and give helpful feedback to our classmates and also take a look at different Project 4 essays. This gave us a view of how our essays compared to others and how ours could change or what we were doing right. We used the guiding feedback worksheet to help us provide feedback to our classmates. This was a very effective time as people received help and also worked on their essay if they were still not finished. Then we began discussing as a class on what we saw during our revisions, what was done right, what needed work. We used examples and learned how to better our essays to strengthen and better our Project 4.

Project 4 New Draft: Tragedies Collide

The Brooklyn Bridge is the first thing someone might think about Brooklyn, there are various reasons why. When we think of the Brooklyn Bridge all we see are the tangible features that it offers us. The events that occurred while developing the bridge and even after it was built are not visible to us which means many people are not aware of them. Thousands of New York residents cross this bridge every day yet not many would know of controversies that have occurred involving the Brooklyn Bridge. Two distinct stories lie in the death of John A. Roebling and the Stampede of 1883. One story revolves around the architect responsible of the Bridge and his death while the other story revolves a tragedy that could’ve been prevented. These accounts have similarities and differences in which we will analyze.

The man responsible for the Brooklyn Bridge went by the name of John A. Roebling. He planned to make the Bridge the biggest suspension bridge during its time due to new ways of building suspension bridges[1]. After construction began, tragedy soon struck. Roebling, while being the architect was also assisting in building the bridge. He was on site one day taking compass readings on some pilings at a ferry slip. He wasn’t aware when the boat banged into the slip, his foot was violently caught on the pilings[2]. He was rushed to his sons house in Brooklyn Heights, not too far from where the bridge stands today. There the doctors amputated his toes and all seemed to be fine. That was until he passed away three weeks later on due to an illness. The tragedy wouldn’t end here as his son took over the project, his son and various workers died to diseases coming from working at the Bridge. This controversy would spread throughout Brooklyn as it was historical tragedies.

The Bridge was alas opened to the public on May 24, 1883. It took just 6 days for a tragedy to happen. The Bridge, being new was asked to be tested on its endurance by a man by the name of P.T Barnum. He proposed an elephant march along with various animals to promote his circus and at the same time prove to the public that the bridge was safe and stable[3]. He was denied this event but on May 30, 1883, a huge stampede was unleashed. On the day of May 30th, rumors spread throughout the bridge that it was going to collapse. This let out a huge fear on people as they rushed to get off the bridge, trampling people without care as their main goal was to save their own lives. No one trusted the bridge so when those comments where made, a terrible stampede began. In the end, 12 people were trampled and 36 left injured[4]. The scene was terrible and controversy let out because if P.T Barnum would’ve been allowed to do his elephant march, this tragedy could’ve been prevented.

These two accounts are surrounded by death and sorrow as the lives of innocent people were lost. That is what is similar between the death of the man responsible for the Brooklyn Bridge, John A. Roebling and the Stampede of 1883. Another similarity is that both of these events could’ve been prevented. The death of Roebling could’ve been prevented if he would’ve never been out on the work site as he was not a construction worker. The stampede could’ve also been prevented if P.T Barnum would’ve been allowed to perform his elephant march. Let’s move on to what differentiates both of these accounts. The death of Roebling was cause by machinery and unawareness of his surroundings while the deaths of the stampede were cause by human beings trampling others to death. Another difference is the after math, after Roebling died, his son and other workers also died constructing the Brooklyn Bridge while a year after the stampede, P.T Barnum was able to perform his march to prevent such event from happening again[5].

Now history can be defined as an argument on how we interpret the past[6]. This mean that many people view these accounts different as they can be viewed differently. Although both of these stories that revolve around the bridge are tragedies, they are also controversial and occurred through different events. One had a positive aftermath while another resulted in more deaths. They are distinct but also similar at the same time. It can be an example of how history can be found in years after an event occurred no matter how different or indifferent they may seem to be.


[1] “Today in History.” : June 12. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

[2] “John Augustus Roebling (American Engineer).” Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

[3] “Ephemeral New York.” Ephemeral New York. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

[4] “Topics in Chronicling America – Brooklyn Bridge; Fanfare and Fatalities.” Brooklyn Bridge; Fanfare and Fatalities. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

[5] “Ephemeral New York.” Ephemeral New York. N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Nov. 2013.

[6] Geoffrey, Zylstra, 2013, New York City College of Technology

Second draft of Project 4- “The Historical History Behind The Brooklyn Bridge”

 

The Brooklyn Bridge, completed in 1883, was a crowning achievement in New York City history. The bridge has placed itself as a National Historic Landmark by the National Park Service and a New York City Landmark by the Landmarks Preservation Commission. The Brooklyn Bridge was the first bridge in history to connect Manhattan and Brooklyn. It took fourteen years to build the bridge which cost close to fifteen million dollars. The Brooklyn Bridge is regarded as the “Eighth Wonder of the World” and is a top attraction for tourists visiting New York City. The bridge spans the East River between Brooklyn and Manhattan and stretches for a length of 5989 feet(about 1.8 km). The span measures 1595.5 feet. The bridge was  the world’s largest suspension bridge for some credible amount of time.

John A. Roebling was a civil engineer who designed the Brooklyn Bridge in the early 1800’s. Even though he came up with the design he never got to see the bridge because he died after crushing his foot in an accident on the bridge.  Roebling learned how to build suspension bridges, like the Brooklyn Bridge, when he was trained as an engineer at Berlin’s Royal Polytechnic Institute. In 1866 a company called “The New York Bridge Company” was founded and they hired John as a chief engineer. He planned the Manhattan and Brooklyn Bridge, as they called it at the time and told them to make the bridge with newly available steel wire, which would allow the bridge to be larger, stronger, and longer than any bridge to be built yet. He was not the only one that died during the construction in total twenty people died during the construction. When John died his son Washington Roebling took after the leadership of the plan of the bridge. Unfortunately though, while working on the pillars of the bridge, he suffered from caisson-disease and was on his deathbed on the day of the opening of the Brooklyn Bridge.

The Brooklyn Bridge was a necessity and in demand during the early 1800’s in New York City, because the vastly populated Manhattan which housed 400,000 residents, twice as many residents as there are today. The resolution to this predicament was the development of the Bridge, the Brooklyn Bridge. People and goods who commuted between the boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn could cross the East River quickly, regardless of weather conditions or any other once interfering circumstances. This was not the first time building a bridge over the East River was discussed, it was talked about as long as anyone could remember, but nothing was executed until the 1800‘s.The bridge had two central purposes which were to bear the weight of four immense cables, and they would hold both the cables and the roadway of the bridge high enough so they would not interfere with traffic on the river. The bridge was designed to have a load capacity of 18,700 tons. They designed two elevated railroad tracks, which were connected to elevated railroad systems in New York and Brooklyn, down to the center of the bridge. On the other side, they designed four lanes, two lanes on two outer roadways. To be used for carriages and horseback riders. Right over the track they provided an elevated promenade for pedestrians and bicyclists. After 15 years it helped unite Brooklyn and Manhattan, Queens, Bronx, and Staten Island to form a larger New York. When the Brooklyn Bridge first opened, it cost a penny to cross by foot, 5 cents for a horse and rider and 10 cents for a horse and wagon.    The Brooklyn Bridge served as an important landmark for New York City and added character. It allowed people to travel from Brooklyn to Manhattan in a very fast and convenient way. It allowed Manhattan to be a very attracted tourist area and as well Brooklyn. It allowed cars, horses, carriages, etc. to travel using the bridge at a cheap rate at the time. The footpath of the bridge allowed you to cross the river in peace by not being bothered by the traffic on the lower life and also offered a great view of the downtown Manhattan Skyline.

The Brooklyn Bridge was the longest suspension bridge in the world at some reputable time. . The bridge spans the East River between Brooklyn and Manhattan and stretches for a length of 5989 feet about 1.8 km. The bridge remained the longest suspension until 1903 when the Williamsburg Bridge overhauls it by 4.5 feet. On May 24, 1883, the opening ceremony of the bridge was described as “the greatest gala day in the history of that moral suburb. The wife of John A.Roebling was given the first ride over the bridge which represented a symbol of victory for her. As soon as the bridge opened 150,000 people poured the bridge. It carried trolley lines, horse-drawn vehicles, and livestock on its opening day. A week after the bridge opened a tragic attack happened on Memorial Day, 20,000 people died in a panic attack which said that the bridge was about to collapse. The bridge inspired more art than another other man-made structure in the United States. The towers of the bridge made the bridge become a national monument in 1964.

The Brooklyn Bridge, completed in 1883, was a crowning achievement in New York City history. The Brooklyn Bridge has many historical values behind it and serves an important factor for people back then. It allowed them to get from Manhattan and Brooklyn in a beneficial way. It was more expensive to use the bridge then it was today. Today the bridge is free to use thanks to New York Mayor William J. Gaynor in 1911, when he said, “I see no more reason for toll gates on the bridges than for toll gates on Fifth Avenue or Broadway.”  There are an immense amount of bridges that are free today but the Brooklyn Bridge is the most convenient one to use because it offers numerous features that are very useful compared to other bridges. The Brooklyn Bridge will always an everlasting change for NYC it led to many great achievements and modifications.

“Brooklyn Bridge.” Brooklyn Bridge. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Nov. 2013. <http://www.nycroads.com/crossings/brooklyn/>.

“Brooklyn Bridge.” , New York City. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Nov. 2013. <http://www.aviewoncities.com/nyc/brooklynbridge.htm>.

“Today in History.” : June 12. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Nov. 2013. <http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/today/jun12.html>.

“Infrastructure.” NYC DOT. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. <http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/infrastructure/brooklyn-bridge.shtml>.

“10 Things You May Not Know About the Brooklyn Bridge.” History.com. A&E Television Networks, 23 May 2013. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. <http://www.history.com/news/10-things-you-may-not-know-about-the-brooklyn-bridge>.

summary for 11/18

Today in English we started class by writing about what we thought about what Tim O’ Brien wrote on his writing The Things They Carried. After that we talked about the reading The Brooklyn Bridge a little by Philip Lopate. Lastly, also talked about project #4 and how we needed to pick a place near City Tech to write about two stories from that place and also comparing and contrasting those two stories. Prof Rosen also said it was better if it was the same topic as the one  you picked for your speech.

Fulton Times—the change of Fulton Street

Fulton Times—the change of Fulton Street
Since I came to New York, I always walked to school, I never take any trains or buses to school, so it is so difficult to me to find the way out of the station and the way to my college. I still remember that was the first day of my school, I took the A train in Fulton Street and stopped at the station at Fulton, Jay street. I thought I lost and never left the Fulton Street in Manhattan, but the train did move in the same direction and pass through a stop. Therefore, I got out of the station and finally I found out where am I?
Brooklyn Fulton Street, the same street name in Manhattan downtown. It is named after Robert Fulton, who owned the monopoly business of steam ferries. In that time, the only way traveled to Manhattan and Brooklyn is by the steam ferries, and these two Fulton Street is where the steam ferries linked with. So as we can see Robert Fulton is the huge character in hundred year ago and his name still remain on today local history.Even thought Fulton’s monopoly steam ferries business is no longer exist now, the monopolistic businese along the Fulton Street still going on;(thesis) and the rent cause and effect the business competition along the street.
The retail business along Fulton Street cannot go without its transportation. From the past century, the road structure has great change and influence the area efficiently. Fulton Street has been a marketplace since early 19th century, for example, the Orpheum Theater between Fulton Street and Flatbush Avenue, “the street is full of pedestrians. A trolley track line was next to the (Orpheum) Theater and an over pass train track as well” (Afo). Today, there are no more train lines and train track, the MTA subway trains and buses replace the streetcars. And it easier for people come to Fulton Street and shop along the street. The great transportation gather the lots of customers to this street, the store owners have more chance to sell their products; however, too much customers give the land lords a opportunity to increase the rent.
From the last century, people are more flavors to the local stores on Fulton Street, like the shops that sell hip-hop fashion, cellphone, sneaker and gold jewelry… however, in recent years, those local and independent shops are disappeared, since they cannot afford the high rent in that area and the competition with national chain stores. According to article “National Retailers Discover Fulton Street Mall in Brooklyn”, an associate director at Newmark Grubb Knight Frank Retail, Hymie Dweck said, “rent on Fulton Street were always around $150 to $200, but they are pushing past that now” (Julie Satow). For the small retailers this is like putting a feather on a horse whose already carries 999.99 kilograms goods on its back—-push it to fall. The owner of Stellar European Design, Sam Yung Kim said “driving up rents beyond $200 a square foot that may make it impossible for him to remain when his lease comes up for renewal in a year” (Joseph Berger). For the small retailers, rent is one of the important factors that they cannot compete with the national stores.
The disappearance of those local stores make some people worry that Fulton Street will lose the African-American and Caribbean-American customers, since they like the unique style and bright color clothing, which make them show off their figure. On the other hand, “some small stores are pleased with the chains’ arrival. ‘They bring more people in this area and it’s better,’ said Frank Flower, an Egyptian immigrant who owns a hole-in-the-wall shop that sells gold chains and earrings” (Berger, Joseph).
Do the national chain stores joining in Fulton Street really change the whole community? Weiner, deputy director of the Pratt Center for Community Development who also worried about the unbalance between national retailer, local retailer and the independent shops did a survey in 2006, asking the architectural significance of the mall’s buildings, and found out that street is “functioning like a traditional marketplace, where people see people they know and come to network and socialize as well as shop.” Weiner believed Fulton Mall has not lost its character.

Cited Work
Aqbere, Dawuda(Afo), “Vaudeville Project-Orpheum.” What is Vaudeville? The Brooklyn Experience. OpenLAB AT CITY TECH, November 7, 2013. Web. November 20, 2013
Berger, Joseph. “On Fulton Street, Worries about Change.” The New York Times Online 20 September 2013. 20 November 2013.
Satow, Julie. “National Retailer Discover a Brooklyn Mall.” The New York Times Online 28 August 2012. 20 November 2013.