We all know of wikipedia but then again this article Charms of wikipedia was very interesting. Nicholas Baker went through some negative and positive points in using this website. It all depends in the way we could use and in my opinion I would rather use wikipedia for random search which has nothing to with my school research, because after reading this article I could tell vandalism has existed for a while. Which does not give me the confidence to use the information posted in wikipedia, but browsing wikipedia with the many topics this web page has, may be interesting and fun to see. Knowing there are different editors with bits of knowledge in Bakers term ” it’s like some vast aerial city wiht people walking briskly to and for on catwalks, carrying picnic baskets full of nutritious snacks.” Full of controversies, opinion, ideas and bits of knowledge.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- December 5 – groups for the online documentation project | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Online documentation project
- Notes from today, and assignment for Wednesday, December 5 | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Online documentation project
- Notes from today, and reading & blogging assignment for Monday, December 3 | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Final Research Paper
- mhernandez55 on Citing and credibility- Miguel Olivares
- Notes from today, and assignment for Wednesday, November 28 | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Final Research Paper
t a g s
Badke baker blogging Copyright Digital Age digital media documentation facebook H.W homework Homework 3 homework one hw HW#7 hw5 Hw6 information_fog internet_searching joey joeysHW Journal LIB1201 library Media My own experience New Techology Online privacy online_documentation_project Pavlik plagiarism privacy producers of digital media public domain readings Research strategies research_paper_writing search engines social media syllabus Technology textbook wikipedia World Wide Web youtube zinesCategories
Archives
Meta