After reading The Charms of Wikipedia, all i could think about was how this website went from an obscure place where people could be editors to a website where millions of people go to research and share information with the world. However, some things just seemed to annoy me while reading this piece. It goes back to something i read in the Badke book. He mentioned this “gatekeeper” idea where one of the questions asked was is the information worthy to be published? This came to mind when Baker talked about other people not deaming his articles on wikipedia to be of importance or relevance. This is why part of the “gatekeeper” idea doesnt sit well with me. To me, all information is important and thus, gives us the right to publish or share with others no matter how irrelevant some might find it.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- December 5 – groups for the online documentation project | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Online documentation project
- Notes from today, and assignment for Wednesday, December 5 | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Online documentation project
- Notes from today, and reading & blogging assignment for Monday, December 3 | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Final Research Paper
- mhernandez55 on Citing and credibility- Miguel Olivares
- Notes from today, and assignment for Wednesday, November 28 | LIB 1201 Fall 2012 on Final Research Paper
t a g s
Badke baker blogging Copyright Digital Age digital media documentation facebook H.W homework Homework 3 homework one hw HW#7 hw5 Hw6 information_fog internet_searching joey joeysHW Journal LIB1201 library Media My own experience New Techology Online privacy online_documentation_project Pavlik plagiarism privacy producers of digital media public domain readings Research strategies research_paper_writing search engines social media syllabus Technology textbook wikipedia World Wide Web youtube zinesCategories
Archives
Meta