Overview: Stereotype in Media
Racial, ethnic, and gender stereotypes have a long history in advertising media, marketing, and visual communications.
Select a historical 19th or 20th-century print or TV advertisement that uses obvious and/or documented racial, ethnic, or gender stereotypes to sell a product and demonstrate how mainstream media intentionally or unintentionally reinforces societal biases. Using rhetorical analysis, examine the meaning of the image and text. Consider the effectiveness of the advertisers’ attempts to persuade and influence the audience at the time and consider how today’s audience might respond.
The advertisement you choose must use photographic or illustrative imagery and must include text. Use the resources provided in Week 10 Agenda > Stereotype in Advertising Media
History of racial, gender, ethnic, and cultural stereotypes in advertisements
- Race and Ethnicity in Advertising
- Latino Images in Film: Stereotypes, Subversion, and Resistance
- Hispanic Stereotypes in Contemporary Film
- T. Burns Collection of Racial Stereotypes, 1880s-1983
- Timeline: Race and advertising in America
- ‘Ethnicity is authenticity’: how America got addicted to racist branding
- Blackface and the Birth of the American Stereotype
- The Racism of 19th Century Advertisements
- The Real and Problematic History Behind Aunt Jemima
- “Ethnic Notions: African American Stereotypes and Prejudice” (Documentary 1987)
- Gender stereotypes have been banned from British ads (some historical ads and context here)
- Gender Advertisements (1979 book by the sociologist Erving Goffman with analysis of hundreds of US ads for gender roles)
- Food Is Love : Advertising and Gender Roles in Modern America, Parkin, Katherine J., 2007. ProQuest Ebook Central, (Book. Use your Library Card to access)
- Gender roles in 1940’s Ads (examples from cinema advertisements)
Audience
You are writing this paper for possible submission to the City Tech Writer, an undergraduate journal for writing and research. Assume that your reader has no background in design theory and is not familiar with the theories and concepts you are presenting. Be sure to explain the theories and concepts as you present your analysis.
Approach
You will be writing a deep analysis of your chosen image-based advertisement using critical perspectives from the theorists we’ve looked at recently: Saussure, Peirce, Barthes, and Hall.
Expanding on your reading response to Roland Barthes’ 1977 essay, “Rhetoric of the Image,” critically examine and deconstruct your chosen historical advertising image using Barthes’ approach. You should employ Barthes’s logic and terminology to deconstruct the advertisement. Include references to Saussure, Peirce, and Hall’s theories. It will also be helpful to review the supporting materials and videos provided in the Week 10 Agenda and specifically the post “Decoding Images and Image Rhetoric — Explained by Lesley Lanir.
Your introduction should present the main research question in your own words: “How do racial, ethnic, and/or gender stereotypes affect the meaning and reception of advertisements of the past and today, and in what ways did advertisers intentionally or unintentionally reinforce societal biases?“
Using Barthes’ rhetorical analysis and close-reading approach, start by contextualizing the advertisement (date, product, country of origin, advertising company/designer, intended audience). Describe the advertisement in as much detail as possible, examining the characteristics of the objects, models/characters, environment, layout, typography, the interaction of picture elements, image quality, and composition of the entire ad. Try to identify all of the signs at work, including the signifiers and the signified.
Using Barthes’, Saussure’s, and Peirce’s semiotic terms, make your best attempt to articulate the meaning of the image and text used in the advertisement. Always refer to the overarching thesis/question: How do racial, ethnic, and/or gender stereotypes affect the meaning?
- Identify the linguistic message(s).
- Identify the non-coded iconic messages.
- Identify the coded iconic messages.
- Identify the denotative and connotative aspects.
- Consider the cultural codes being conveyed in the advertisement.
- Identify if polysemic signs, myths, or naturalization can be observed.
Using Stuart Hall’s theories about reception and representation, consider the effectiveness of the advertisers’ rhetoric and attempts to persuade and influence the audience at the time. In what ways did advertisers intentionally or unintentionally reinforce societal biases?
- Identify the original dominant/preferred reading.
- Explain how the designers of this advertisement tried to ‘fix’ a meaning using stereotypes.
- Identify who the intended audience was during the period when this advertisement was circulated and why they would identify with it.
- Consider what impact this advertisement or similar advertisements had on society and if they served any other purpose besides the sale of a product.
In your conclusion, summarize your answer to the main research question and address how this advertisement would be received today. Is your personal reading of the ad dominant, oppositional, or negotiated? Why?
If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to reach out!
Structure
Title
Showcase the topic using a compelling title.
Introduction / Thesis
- Use an intentional strategy to get the reader’s attention
- Clearly define your thesis and your motive for presenting this essay; why someone might want or need to read an essay on this topic?
- Thesis = argument + evidence (claim 1 + claim 2 + claim 3 + …)
- The thesis should govern the whole essay
- In the last sentence of the introduction, clearly state your position or exposition on the topic
Paragraphs
Provide evidence to support your claim(s). Follow a logical order with transitions between claims. Use analysis to connect your evidence to your thesis; go beyond
observing or summarizing: break it down, interpret and comment on the data. Include cited images of the work you are referencing and any other relevant illustrations.
- Claim 1 – prove thesis
- Claim 2 – prove thesis
- Claim 3 – prove thesis
Conclusion
Refer back to your introduction and clearly restate your thesis.
Citations & Works Cited Page
IMPORTANT: Add MLA-style citations throughout your paper for every fact, visual reference, or quotation that you reference in your paper.
- Use the Google Docs Citation tool > set to MLA to add citation sources to your paper. (See Adding in-text citation at 0:50 in the video for details.)
- When you are finished, add a Works Cited page at the end of your document. This can be done with one click using the Insert Work Cited button. (See Inserting a bibliography at 1:16 in the video for details.)
Due Date
- First Draft is due April 5th
- Final Draft is due April 19th
Formatting
Your paper will be submitted as a 750-1000 word typewritten paper, double-spaced 12 pt. Times New Roman.
- Use Google Docs to write and organize your final draft.
- Use the MLA style to format your paper. See MLA example paper here.
- Cite all materials researched for historical context, any related writings, and image sources.
- Include images of the work you are referencing and any other relevant illustrations.
- Use Grammarly, Google Spell/Grammar Check or similar to review your paper for grammatical and spelling errors before submitting.
Submitting Your Paper
- Create an OpenLab Post.
- TITLE: Research Paper 2 – Your Initials
- CATEGORY: Research Papers
- TAG: Research Paper 2
- TAG: Your Name/Screenname
- Add the title of your paper as a heading.
- Write a brief introduction to your paper.
- Use text to indicate the link to your paper (ie: Research Paper), select your text, and make it a link to your Google doc. (Do not paste the entire Google Doc link in the post)
- Make sure the Google Doc link is set to “Anyone with the link” and Commenter is selected. This will allow others to comment on your paper.
Leave a Reply