F.T. Marinetti, “Manifesto of Futurism”; Aleksandr Rodchenko, “Who We Are: Manifesto of the Constructivist Group”; and El Lissitzky, “Our Book”, Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field by Helen Armstrong, pages 19-31. 

  • Consider if and how these manifestos addressed the concepts of authorship/ownership, universal systems of communication, and social/political engagement.
  • What common views do these artists/designers share, and where might they disagree?
  • Which elements of these texts remain relevant for the present, and which elements are problematic? 
  • How has the communication process changed since the early 20th Century, specifically with regard to “feedback” and “noise”?

What is a manifesto? It is a declaration with intention, motive, or views of the issuer. Manifestos addressed the concepts of authorship/ownership, universal systems of communication, and social/political engagement through their work, whether it be in the form of poetry, paintings, posters, etc.They used their designs to show their opinions and beliefs on whatever topic it may be (whether big or small). A common view these artists/designers share is that anyone can be a designer and spread a message, however they can disagree with how to do it. Everyone has a form of art that they are better at and a way of leaving a statement. Even if the other person doesn’t agree with it. Which elements of these texts remain relevant for the present? I suppose the fact that works of art are timeless and that every designer has an eye for all forms of media. Even though each media is done differently, similarities can still be spotted. At the same time this could be problematic because not everyone agrees with this viewpoint. The communication process changed thanks to the advancement of technology. Many artists can have their voice heard much more often now due to technology being a great help and helping their work develop quicker. The noise representing the meaning of the pieces of work, and the feedback of the viewers consisting of them understanding the intention.