-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Chito2500 on Documentation Purpose
- Jovi on Documentation Purpose
- Jessica on The Life of a Link
- Julissa <3 on Journal Entry 4
- Madi on New knowldege
t a g s
- alternative media
- Badke
- big data
- citation
- copyright
- data
- databases
- digital
- digital age
- documentation
- EBSCO
- Eland
- Flickr
- folksonomy
- Information
- John V. Pavlik
- JOURNAL
- knowledge
- law
- media
- news
- Optimization
- Pavlik
- plagiarism
- privacy
- process documentation
- reading
- reading response
- research
- research journal
- research paper writing
- research process
- research proposal
- Search Engine
- search engines
- social media
- sources
- technology
- terms
- web
- web 2.0
- Wikipedia
- Zine
- zines
Archives
Categories
Meta
Monthly Archives: February 2013
Notes from today 2/28, and reading/blogging assignments for Tuesday 3/5
Today we discussed plagiarism in its many forms. On Tuesday we’ll discuss access: institutional, personal, and the digital divide. Please read the following two articles: Martin, The Politics of Research Samuelson, Aaron Swartz: Opening Access to Knowledge Julissa, Carlos and … Continue reading
Posted in blogging, readings
Tagged access, digital divide, plagiarism
Comments Off on Notes from today 2/28, and reading/blogging assignments for Tuesday 3/5
Plagiarism and Questions
Plagiarism is when someone copies another person’s work and tries to pass it as their own. Though it is not a crime, plagiarism is still a serious, immoral offense that can get you expelled from academic institutions or fired from … Continue reading
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is when you take other writers or author’s original work and say it is your work. In the first reading “Plagiarism: a lie of the mind” by Isserman, he said, “Plagiarism is a form of fraud. You plagiarize if … Continue reading
Blog 7: Plagiarism
After reading the articles I realized plagiarism isn’t as obvious or easy to avoid. Even saying commonly used cliches like “I lost track of time” or “what goes around comes around” can be considered plagiarism. The problem is no one … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged copyright infringement, plagiarism, problems, reading response
Comments Off on Blog 7: Plagiarism
Privacy
In reading of Facebook’s Privacy Trainwreck, boyd discussed that not every facebook user is happy about the News feed and how facebook expose user’s privacy. Anyone can see user’s status and profile. I believe that once we post things online, … Continue reading
Plagerism
I enjoyed how Maurice Isserman defends others who may have committed plagiarism unintentionally. Thoughts and reactions have a limited horizon. For example, if I say something in my blog post that sounds very similar to what a colleague of mine … Continue reading
Is Plagiarism Really Plagiarism?
What’s really considered plagiarism? Everyone seems to have their own interpretation. We all know there’s flat our bold stealing-your-work type of plagiarism, which consists of copying word for word of ones work without giving credit, but there’s an interesting point … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged life, my society, questions, who's right, who's wrong
Comments Off on Is Plagiarism Really Plagiarism?
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a serious matter in collegiate instances. Presenting words from someone else in your own work is plagiarism. However, if you were to quote the words you “borrowed” and accredited the owner, then you get away clean. I think … Continue reading
Plagiarism vs common knowledge
The most interesting feature of Isserman’s article was the statement that all people plagiarize. Most “coined expressions” that we use were originally said and/or written by a scholar, writer, or thinker from the past. These sentences and ideas formed into … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Common knowledge, plagiarism
Comments Off on Plagiarism vs common knowledge
Plagiarism: a Lie of the Mind
This article made me re-evaluate the way I looked at plagiarism. I believed that those who committed this transgression were simply lazy, unethical or unimaginative people. To use another person words and thoughts without contributing your own ideas makes you a intellectual … Continue reading