Daguerreotype-Digital Photography Comparison

The format between daguerreotype’s differ from digital photography today as we have a wide variety of options in our camera’s today. The quality is better and we have the option of taking photos in either black and white or color. The process is also not even close to as long to develop photos. With digital camera’s we can transfer them directly to a computer and print them on paper. This compared to daguerreotype’s where the process involves different chemicals and placing images on silver plating. The daguerreotype process could only produce one image at a time while today we can make multiple copies of a photo if needed.

Taking digital photographs today allows us to capture images anywhere compared to only being able to take a photo in a studio. Camera’s are also more mobile as daguerreotypes were often bigger in comparison. While we are offered different ways of viewing our photos, the daguerreotype was limited to images viewed on silver plates. Due to this you would be unable to display photos as well as we can today. Daguerreotype lenses are also much slower than digital camera’s today so you were limited to taking still life photos. Today you can capture different photos in motion or still and they would both come out clearly.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Greenwood Cem.

I enjoyed the history of Photography. Seeing the first type of photos and seeing how they were captured and rendered.  Looking backwards in time gave me a new perspective, because modern day we can capture a scene with an unlimited size, and previously the size was determined by the size of a cooper plate that the image was on. another very interesting point was how gentle I had to be when handling a daguerreotype, after a 150+ years, we must use gloves to prevent the oils from our skin and pores from contaminating the historic piece. I especially like the framing that the daguerreotype a nice wood and/or metallic frame, with a glass or mirror. Something that interests me now is how complex it was to print a photograph, having to go through a darkroom and chemicals, as a general printing process, when today the system consists of; Camera-Capture-Edit-Print, and generally print using a inkjet printer. In my opinion  im not sure which is nicer. I enjoy working with my hands very much, but in terms of connivence the ink jet printer is nice but in a different way. Between my captures and a daguerreotypes is that they are in the roots art, weither the procedure changes or not, the fundamental roots are still to express. To say the least I would like to take a modern daguerreotype, just because I would not like to smoke mercury vapors, I feel there are better hotboxes.

Posted in LL3-BHS | Leave a comment

LL3 BHS – Hernandez

The photograph I chose to describe the difference in comparison to a daguerreotype is an image that I took at the Brooklyn Botanic Garden. In the black and white image above you notice the contrast of light and dark which kind of reminded me of the way the daguerreotype image looked. Similarities about the two types is the fact that it is black and white other then that the way the image is made is totally different. The real reason I chose this photo is because I feel it might look really nice as a daguerrotype image.

Posted in Learning Logs, LL3-BHS | Leave a comment

Brooklyn Botanical Garden – Crystal Pena

http://www.flickr.com/photos/103305859@N08/sets/72157635886776894/

Posted in LL3-BHS, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Exposure

9928347404_5909c95086_b

I chose this photograph because it’s a good example of exposure. I use a window overlooking plants to create this visual effect. The window itself is dark to contrast with the background that’s a bright green. The branches on the window also gives them a feel that the picture was taken outside and in nature.

On this photograph I use a 1/80 exposure and a compensation of +3 to give extra contrast and a depth of feel.

 

Posted in LL2-exposure | Leave a comment

Brooklyn Botanical Garden

http://flic.kr/s/aHsjJHt4T9

Posted in Homework | Tagged | Leave a comment

LL3-Brooklyn Historical Society

Write a post of at least 200 words comparing the daguerreotype that you handled today at the Brooklyn Historical Society and any digital photograph that you have taken this semester.  How does the format change the experience of both taking and viewing photographs?

Posted in Learning Logs, LL3-BHS | Leave a comment

HW#3: Midterm Project Component – Brooklyn Botanical Garden

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jenramoscakes/sets/72157635860295523/

Posted in Homework | Tagged | Leave a comment

Exposure – Brooklyn Botanical Garden

911 memorial

Memorial at the Brooklyn Botanical Garden

This photograph was my most successful photo from the Brooklyn Botanical Garden that uses the contrast of light and dark. This photograph shows a memorial for 9/11 that surrounds a tree in the park. I used the cast shadows to my advantage to help create the mood. The focus is immediately on the white candle and your eye naturally follows the path of the rocks.

My shutter speed was set to 1/125, ISO 100, and aperture at f/20.0. I decided against using any exposure compensation because it made my photo either too bright – or too dark.

Posted in LL2-exposure | Leave a comment

LL2 – Exposure

IMG_4881

It was beautiful, sunny day as we entered the gates to the Brooklyn Botanic Garden. This lighting was perfect for the class’s assignment to capture the many flowers with the right amount of exposure. Using an iPhone camera did not allow me to express the contrast between light and dark as well as I wanted to, but overall, it did get the job done. I chose the above photograph because the way the shadows of the tree meets the light reflecting off the water really makes the picture bold. The way the top half mirrors the bottom half causes a sense of symmetry in the contrast and brightens the photograph.

Posted in LL2-exposure | Leave a comment