I liked the opening that I used for this article because it was very detailed, that is, giving such a clear introduction that at the same time leaves you with the intrigue of what else is next.
The first part of the investigation is in the following paragraph giving an insight into the subject, including a personal experience.
I found the nut graph in the third paragraph of this article, giving more detailed information and statistics on the subject. And now, lastly, I changed what I was going to write, which is based on a sport that I practiced in my country, which is cycling mountaineering. In this part, the author’s point is very much based on how this sport is sometimes underrated compared to others and how much it can give us.
He uses the research in the second paragraph and compares it to his personal experiences.
At least the structure of these is that it gives an introduction and supports it with some idea, anecdote, or even quotation and answers it.
At least this one uses images of landscapes and people riding bicycles and adds one at the beginning and one in the middle of the article.
The conclusion that leaves is very good, showing all the positive aspects of mountain biking leaves and inviting people to do it too, not only for health reasons but also because it takes you to beautiful places and knows good people through sport.
Good analysis. Thank you. I didn’t completely understand why you changed what you were going to write.
Prof. E