Early education and art lacked the ability to show artists both skills and information. Unable for an artist to grasp the concepts they are learning just from reading or vice versa, unable to know the background information if the artist is just physically doing the art. Having both taught as a blend allows for a deeper understanding for the student. Language is the bridge between art and design because it’s a way of making images and art concepts blend to allow artists to put down their visions through written material. Artists now can be mindful of recording the present arts to be relevant for the future. Such as how Bauhaus’s to this day is still relevant since it has an emphasis on function before form. It’s seen and referenced from furniture to graphic design. A good example is the minimalism trend. Bauhaus began having the design world stray from ornate designs in the early 20th century to favoring sleek and functional. This is also how most ideas from Bauhaus’s ideas could remain relevant in today’s times, such as picking an idea and shaping it into a new thing. Reinventing is an easy way to go since it can always catch on as a new trend and have a unique twist to it put to it.
Tag: Reading Response #4B
The Bauhaus was a school in Germany that operated from 1919 to 1933. It was created by German Architect Walter Gropius. The goal of the school was to teach and produce young artists in different fields. They focused on the relationship between art and technology and what it could become. The Bauhaus wanted individuals to study art, and it was assumed that they would understand it and become artists in whatever field they choose. “The academy trained a myriad of minor talents in drawing and painting, of whom scarcely one in a thousand became a genuine architect or painter,…”. The academy’s way gave false hope to people. In reality, they were severing a very important tie for the students, which was their connection to their community. “It shut off the artist from the world of industry and handicraft, and thus brought about his complete isolation from the community.”
Typography is a service art which was changed throughout its time. “The essence of the New Typography is clarity. This puts it into deliberate opposition to the old typography whose aim was ‘beauty’ and whose clarity did not attain the high level we require today. “Back then, typography was used as a beauty asset to make things look good, but now it’s used to clarify a message. I believe new art needs typography and the role it is playing now is acceptable to its purpose because in this day and age there’s so much interpretation and assumptions one can make about an art piece, by having some sort of typography it can help push the viewer in the right direction.
The Bauhaus was a very influential design movement that changed how designers thought and created new artwork. The Education system was divided into two sections, theoretical studies (the basic laws of design) and “Instruction in form of problems” (understanding ideas and their functions).
Although the Bauhaus instructors taught the basics in theory and led individuals into artistic paths such as (painting, art, film, type, etc) they lacked education in the sense of emphasizing that “art comes from within”. “Whether the finished product is an exercise in ingenuity or a work of art depends on the talent of the individual who creates it”.
Instructors can teach and guide future artists, but it depends on the artist whether they take steps further or get left behind. Like Walter Gropus stated, “Human achievement depends on the proper coordination of all the creative faculties.” Yes, we need to be educated and understand the theory. We must learn the Design language in order for others to understand us.
I think the authors believed that the art-proletariat, lulled into a dream of genius and enmeshed in artistic conceit, was being prepared for the ‘profession’ of architecture, painting, sculpture, or graphic art, without being given the equipment of a real education. That its abilities, finally, were confined to a sort of drawing-painting that had no relation to the realities of materials, techniques or economics. Lack of all vital connections with the life of the community led inevitably to barren esthetic speculation. The fundamental pedagogic mistake of the academy arose from its preoccupation with the idea of the individual genius and it’s discounting the value of commendable achievement on a less exalted level. Since the academy trained a myriad of minor talents in drawing and painting, of whom scarcely one in a thousand became a genuine architect or painter, the great mass of these individuals, fed upon false hopes and trained as one-sided academicians, was condemned to a life of fruitless artistic activity. Unequipped to function successfully in the struggle for existence, they found themselves numbered among the social drones, useless because of their schooling. With the development of the academies, genuine folk art died away. The authors believed that every factor that must be considered in an educational system which is to produce actively creative human beings is implicit in such an analysis of the creative process. That human achievement depends on the proper coordination of all the creative faculties. It is not enough to school one or another of them separately: someone must thoroughly train them at the same time. Its chief function is to liberate the individual by breaking down conventional patterns of thought in order to make way for personal experiences and discoveries which will enable him to see his own potentialities and limitations.
The role of typography and photography has the flexibility and elasticity to bring with them a new reciprocity between economy and beauty. That typography materials themselves contain strongly optical tangibility through which they can render the content of the communication in a directly visible—not only indirectly intellectually. Photography is highly effective when used as typographical material. It may appear as illustration beside the words, or as “photo text” in place of words, as a precise form of representation so aim as to permit of no individual interpretation. The typographic revolution was not an isolated event but went hand in hand with a new social, political consciousness and with the building of new cultural foundations. The artist’s acceptance of the machine as a tool for mass production has had its impression on aesthetic concepts. Since then, an age of science has come upon us, and it has motivated the artist more than ever to open his mind to the unknown forces that shape our lives.
Bauhaus was an art style and art school that came about in 1919 by German architect Walter Gropius. This style and school help to change and evolve art taking it to the next level. This is shown by the three reading’s written by Walter Gropius, Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, and Herbert Bayer. In all these readings they all agree that what was lacking from art in the past was the use of text as a part of the illustration being expressed in the design. Instead of text simply used as a way of explaining something.
In design, every part of it has a role to play as shown in the Bauhaus art style. Typography and photography’s role is to express the ideas of the design. They do this through visual communication to the audience that is watching the design. Language and communication play the role of expressing what is being in the design. This gives the reader an easier time understanding what is being said in the design.
According to the reading on Bauhaus as I have understood art is something that is going to keep evolving. To evolve along with it and create new forms of art, artists must incorporate those new ways of doing art into their art style. This will allow a new style to be born allowing them to stay with what they like but not have to completely change how they do art. This is why teachers should be willing to teach artists how to incorporate other styles of art into their own. This will allow them to continue to grow as artists.
In today’s day and age, art has changed and the way it is done has changed as well. To survive today Bauhaus would have to include using imagery inside of the images to help it grow. It could also use digital programs to help create the art to improve on the work being done in the style. Digital programs would allow them to correct and evolve the Bauhaus art style. It could do this due to the many tools that are inside of it that are meant to help the artist.
The Bauhaus, a school that combined the philosophies of many people to create its own iteration,-blending art and technology – with its core aim to reimagine the material world to reflect the unity of all the arts. New structural elements develop slowly, for the architectural form of art requires the cooperation of many individuals, whose work reflects the attitude of the entire community. However, the “academy” shut off the artist from the world of industry, and thus brought about his complete isolation from said community. It was taught to artists that art is a profession that can be mastered if studied. It needs to be known that schooling alone can never produce art. Art is the synthesis of techniques, many or few, to create a meaningful whole that is aesthetically, emotionally, or entertainingly pleasing for the spectator. This transition into the role that communication plays in art and design. Without communication, there is no connection between artist and audience, thus leaving a major fundamental aspect of art hollow.The finished product depends on the talent of the individual that creates it. However, the problem with this is that this quality cannot be taught or learned. It has to be up to the individual whether they wish to take the steps to mastering that quality.
To the Bauhaus, they conceived typography as both an empirical means of communication and an artistic expression. To Herbert Bayer it’s a “service art, not a fine art…” Typography is not self-expression, it is conditioned by the message it visualizes. It, along with pictures, conveys a direct form of communication from the artist to the viewer. Developed and progressing over the years, typography continues to adapt to the changing art world. The crucial role it would play is to help establish a much needed connection between artist and viewer.
In Bauhaus’s text, we can see how he explained that the academy didn’t produce artists, that this only give false hopes to people. the techniques and methods they were applying weren’t giving the future artist enough practice or knowledge. I feel like this was one of the reasons why a lot of people wanted to modernize life once and for all back in the day. They didn’t really try to make an effort into making classes or workshops to teach accordingly what art really was. The academy build this system of failure so people would divert from wanting to be artists and lean towards the more futuristic ideas they had in mind. He, later on, explains the way we have to interpret work and this is by using our brain and hands, by touching and analyzing. This is very important because it is the only way to know how we connect with the work we do, we have to see it and try it to understand it.
In the other second and third readings, we explore how this new method called type photo was typed and images are combined together. This new technology reinvented the way we looked at typed and photography back in the day. these two play so a big role in the artistic world that without them we wouldn’t be where we are at today. It is used to send messages across and it makes us understand and perceive things in very different ways and this is why typography is so strong.
Typography and photography play a big role in the new art. Combining both of them is a big change for art. This type of art is called Tophet. Invented in a Bauhaus school by Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, this was a big innovation in art. Images and words in the same place help people understand the art that they are looking at more and it helps them appreciate it. This can create powerful images, therefore political cartoons are powerful because they combine both words and images to explain an event that is happening in the world.
Herbert Bayer said that typography is a service art, but what does this really mean?. Since anyone can use any form of typography, then that makes it a service art. Because of that, typography cannot be a form of fine art because everyone can use it. Herbert also said that one way that the revitalization of typography will come with the creation of a new alphabet. Although it might revolutionize because it is something different for everyone, the creation of a new alphabet will change how we have done things. This would make typography worse instead of making it a fine art and people would not like it.
The manifesto clarified, Bauhaus intended to achieve the unity of the crafts in serving architecture. Architects, painters, sculptors, all returning to being handicrafts. The spirit of the academy shut off the artist from the world of industry and handicraft and accordingly brought approximately his complete isolation from the community.
The artist enriched all the arts and crafts of a part in his own vocational life, and gained through actual practice as much adeptness and understanding as another worker began at the bottom and worked his way up. Unfortunately, the artist has been misled by the fatal and arrogant fallacy fostered by the state that art is a profession and can be mastered by study. That is completely wrong. Manual dexterity and the thorough knowledge of paintings as a necessary element for many creative efforts, whether by the people or the artists, can be taught and learned. For this art-proletariat, lulled into a dream of genius and enmeshed in inventive conceit. Being organized for the `profession` of architecture, painting, sculpture, or photograph artwork, without being given the equipment of a proper education. Which alone could have assured it of economic and esthetic independence. The amazing mass of those people fed upon fake hopes and educated as one-sided were condemned to a lifestyle of fruitless artistic activity.
The printer’s paintings are a part of the inspiration on which the brand new international could be built. One man invented printing with movable type, any other images; another screen printing, and stereotypes. Photography is the visual presentation can be optically apprehended. Typophoto is the visually most exact rendering of communication composed in type. The intervention of the photographic process has extended images to a new dimensionality and is recognized nowadays as total. In the future, every printing press will possess its own block-making plant, and it can be confidently said that the future of typographic methods lies with the photomechanical processes. Herbert, as an instructor at the Bauhaus, strove to revolutionize typography the use of alternative bureaucracy appropriate to machine-pushed present day society. It highlights advances made in typography in the 1920s and looks to a radical new destiny, effectively foreseeing the widespread reshaping of typography imposed by new media.
A pressured extrude in search of a “New style” can only convey superficial, made through innovative typographers of the 1920s. The typographic material turned into discovered to have distinctive optical properties of its own, putting the spotlight specifically typographic expression. Only typographers of the typographic material, and itself.
Typography is a service art, more significantly a paid artwork. Not a fine artwork, however pure and elemental. The photograph designed nowadays appears to sense that the typographic means a wish for new excitement is in the air. “New styles” were eagerly awaited. The truth that nothing new has developed in current decades, a big question for today!
Recent Comments