Category: Homework assignment

Reading Response discourse

 

Overview

You will be reading and annotating a text written by Katherine McCoy and David Frej “Typography as Discourse” 1988 found in our main text Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field by Helen Armstrong.

Before reading, review the graphic design history videos from the Week 11 Agenda, especially those related to New Wave, Punk, and Postmodernism.

Key Themes and Takeaways

Katherine McCoy and David Frej “Typography as Discourse” 1988

In this essay, McCoy and Frej present the evolution of postmodern typography from New Wave / Swiss Punk Typography to the New Academy to focus on the experimental designers who “value expression over style” and where typographic design is positioned to be deconstructed using the theory of the day.

Rejecting the modern constraints of Swiss typographic systems, Katherine McCoy and her contempoaries ushered in a period of complexity, ambiguity, and subjectivity. Going beyond the more formal radical experimentation of Wolfgang Weingart and the New Wave/Swiss Punk Typography, McCoy explored “new relationships between text and image.” The resulting multilayered, personal work consciously provoked interpretation from the audience. Modernism’s emphasis on form gave way to a highly individuated study of expression. Typography became discourse to be evaluated and discussed within the dense cultural context of philosophy, linguistics, and cultural theory.

HELEN ARMSTRONG

Instructions

Following the instructions below, read and annotate the text with your classmates in our Hypothesis group. After reading and annotating the text, create a rough draft of your response in your Research Journal. Your response should be about 200 words and checked for spelling and grammar errors. Lastly, create a new post and publish your response.

1. Open the readings

In a new tab open the text Armstrong, Helen. Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field, Princeton Architectural Press, 2009. Navigate to page 81.

2. Enable Hypothesis

The reading links above will automatically open Hypothesis. Login to your account and select our group.  (IMPORTANT!) from the dropdown to make sure your annotations and highlights will be recorded in the group. See Using Hypothesis for details.

3. Consider these questions.

Here are the questions to which you should respond in your reading response:

    • Find 2 examples of the work of postmodern graphic designers from the 1980s.
    • Deconstruct the work. Explain which visual elements are associated with postmoderism of the 1980s and why.
    • What does the author mean by “Typography as discourse”?
    • What does the author mean when she states that “…no longer are there one-way statements from designers. The layering of content, as opposed to New Wave’s formal layering of collage elements, is the key to this exchange. Objective communication is enhanced by deferred meanings, hidden stories, and alternative interpretations”

4Read & Annotate.

Consider the questions/prompts listed above. Start to formulate the answers to these prompts while you practice close reading with annotations. This will be part of your grade. Share at least 3 annotations in the Hypothesis group, including your questions, definitions, and ideas with your classmates. Add the tags: Postmodernism and Reading Response 10 to your annotations.

When you annotate be sure to define or break down any words or concepts that you do not understand.

5. Draft your Reading Response.

In your Research Journal, write a draft of your 200-word response. Check for grammar and spelling errors. Use the word count tool. Use the Grammarly app or something similar to improve the clarity of your writing. Use visual examples to supplement your reading response. Consider looking back at the Week 11 Agenda, Learning Graphic Design History videos, or the Course Resources to see if there are historical examples that will help support your ideas.

6. Post your Reading Response.

When ready, create a new post titled “Reading Response10– YourInitials.”

At the top of the post copy and paste the following: Katherine McCoy and David Frej “Typography as Discourse” 1988 pgs 81-83 found in our main text Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field by Helen Armstrong.

Copy and paste the questions/prompts listed above. Paste your reading response from your Research Journal. Add links to your annotations in the Hypothesis group at the bottom of your post. Always add links and attribution for any images that you use in your post. Adjust any formatting issues that may have occurred while pasting. Use the Reading Response (Example) as a guide.

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

    • TITLE: Reading Response 10– Your Initials
    • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
    • TAG: Reading Response #10
    • TAG: Your Name

Due Date(s)

Your reading response is due the day before the next session Monday, May 9, at 6pm to allow time for review.

Resources

Texts

 Print this page

 

Final Research Project-V.L

I go into detail about prescription bottles and their bad design from the past and the current. How design and accessibility go hand in hand and how without accessibility a design is poorly made.

Youtube Video :

Research Project Outline w/ Bibliography and Images:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qP51c1yIYM8DngVsBhmfdFNsj7K464oOH0lTrL2YzlM/edit?usp=sharing

Script:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/17TexODoTMx_H0Hi9ug8JwivALWzO2hq6mqORcx-GeOE/edit?usp=sharing

Reading Response 10, week 12

‘First Things First’ original manifesto from 1964

1. Research Project Presentation Planning

Research Project & Presentation, 

Research Project and Presentation Example

Details Research Project and Presentation

 

Review the following milestones.

    1. May 3: Complete presentation outline and script
    2. May 10: Revised outline, bibliography, and graphics.
    3. May 16: Share in-progress slideshow presentation with voiceoever, get feedback from peers and professor
    4. May 23: Submit Presentation to OpenLab site

 

Presentation Tips & Tools

Review the project guidelines to make sure you are clear about what the expectations are for the Research Project & Presentation. Specifically, take note of the requirements for Your Annotated Bibliography and Your Presentation Format.

Below find some helpful links for tips and tools you can use to assemble and record your Research Presentation.

Presentation examples:

Examples with different criteria:

2

1

For next week

In your Research Journal, create one document with your detailed outline. (see example below)

Make sure that your journal allows edits

Submit a link to your Research Journal to OpenLab

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

        • TITLE: Research Journal – Your Initials
        • CATEGORY: Research Journal
        • TAG: Research Journal
        • TAG: Your Name
Research Project Outline example
1. Introduction

Explain in detail the topic you are examining and why it is significant.

Diversity (gender, LGBT.etc)  in Korean video game design impacts the people who play them without stereotyping the designs. 

2. Background/Review of the Literature

Include a summary of the basic background information on the topic gleaned from your literature and sources review (you can include information from the readings and class, but the bulk should be outside sources).

      • Creating diverse design that is based on past experiences creates a more authentic experience 
      • Using Roland Barthes’ essay “Rhetoric of the Image” to define what an image represents
      • Using Alice Rawsthorn’s, 2011 NYTimes,  Design Gets More Diverse to define how to create diversity
3. Bibliography

Include a list  of all your sources

4. Images

Include images and captions

 

2. Evaluating Online Sources

When searching for sources for your Research Project, it’s important not to take all sources at face value. Think critically about the sources your find online, the context in which the sources are created, and the context in which you are using the source.

Watch this interactive 5-minute video tutorial created by the City Tech Library which goes over how to evaluate online sources.

When evaluating sources, ask the following questions:

    1. What kind of source is this? Be as specific as possible.
    2. Is it a reliable source? How can you tell?
    3. What is the purpose of the source?
    4. Is the source biased?Do you think the author was paid to write this source? Why or why not?
    5. Do you think you’d have to pay to read the full text of this source? Why or why not?
    6. If a text is free to read, but an author is paid to write, where does the money to pay the author come from?

 

3. The Digital Revolution – 1980s-1990s Design History (3 min)

In 1984, Apple released the Macintosh computer.  It would revolutionize the entire industry. I was in art school in the early 1990s and we used the first release of Photoshop 1.0. It was slow, clunky, and honestly painful to use (we would run a filter and go out for coffee!) but the results were nothing like we had ever seen before.

Let’s watch this video from Graphic Design History on LinkedIn Learning to gain an overview of the time period, the advent of the personal computer, and its effects on the design industry. Watch from 1:57:58 – 2:01:49 on LinkedIn Learning via your Library Card or the YouTube video below.

Activity: As you watch, take note of the dates and designers who experimented with these new tools. Also, note how once again changes in technology radically altered the field of design and the role of a designer.

4. Reading Report 10: Authorship & the Social Responsibility Movement of the New Millennium

…Designers who devote their efforts primarily to advertising, marketing and brand development are supporting, and implicitly endorsing, a mental environment so saturated with commercial messages that it is changing the very way citizen-consumers speak, think, feel, respond and interact. To some extent we are all helping draft a reductive and immeasurably harmful code of public discourse.

There are pursuits more worthy of our problem-solving skills. Unprecedented environmental, social and cultural crises demand our attention. Many cultural interventions, social marketing campaigns, books, magazines, exhibitions, educational tools, television programmes, films, charitable causes and other information design projects urgently require our expertise and help…

FIRST THINGS FIRST MANIFESTO 2000

In a 1994 essay in Eye magazine, Andrew Howard reminded designers about the 1964 manifesto entitled ‘First Things First’ signed by British designer Ken Garland and a group of 21 colleagues. The manifesto’s aim was to “reject the ‘high pitched scream of consumer selling’ and omnipotent lure of the advertising industry in favour of what was defined as socially useful graphic design work.”

Several years later, thirty-three designers renewed the original call for a change of priorities and published ‘First Things First Manifesto 2000‘ in AdbustersEmigre,  Eye, Blueprint, Items in the Netherlands, and Form in Germany.

In 2014 – on the 50th anniversary of the manifesto – over 1600 designers across the world renewed their commitment to the manifesto.

In 2020 an updated version, FTF 2020, was published online and included a focus on the climate crisis and racial justice. “Our time and energy are increasingly used to manufacture demand, to exploit populations, to extract resources, to fill landfills, to pollute the air, to promote colonization, and to propel our planet’s sixth mass extinction.” 

Check out this short 2:30 min video of David Berman, author of Do Good Design. Berman’s main thesis is: “Rather than sharing our cycles of style, consumption, and chemical addictions, designers can use their professional power, persuasive skills, and wisdom to help distribute ideas that the world really needs: health information, conflict resolution, tolerance, technology, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, human rights, democracy …”

David Berman on Design And Social Responsibility – 2 mins 30 secs

Let’s take a look at Rick Poynor’s 2021 Eye on Design essay The Evolving Legacy of Ken Garland’s First Things First Manifesto, examine the later versions in 20002014, and 2020, and consider how technology and graphic authorship have influenced social responsibility in design.

Instructions

Following the instructions below, read and annotate the text with your classmates in our Hypothesis group.
We will not be writing reading responses this week, but rather adding comments and peer feedback to this post.

1. Open the readings

In a new tab open the essay The Evolving Legacy of Ken Garland’s First Things First Manifesto. For reference, open the original ‘First Things First’ from 1964 and the later versions in 20002014, and 2020.

2. Enable Hypothesis

The reading links above will automatically open Hypothesis. Login to your account and select our group. IMPORTANT!)

3. Consider these questions.

Here are the questions to which you should respond in this reading discussion:

      • When you compare the original version of FTF from 1964 with the later versions in 20002014 and 2020, is there a central message/call to designers that hasn’t changed? What are the authors of the manifesto rejecting in the design field?
      • What stood out to you in the newest version of the First Things First manifesto, FTF 2020?
      • How did technology affect the authorship of the ‘First Things First’ manifesto over the decades?

4Read & Annotate.

Consider the questions/prompts listed above. Start to formulate the answers to these prompts while you practice close reading of the essay with annotations. This will be part of your grade. Share at least 3 annotations in the Hypothesis group, including your questions, definitions, and ideas with your classmates. Add the tags: Social Responsibility and Reading Report 10 to your annotations.

When you annotate be sure to define or break down any words or concepts that you do not understand.

5. Draft your Comments.

In your Research Journal, add the links to The Evolving Legacy of Ken Garland’s First Things First Manifesto by Rick Poynor in Eye on Design, the original ‘First Things First’ from 1964 by Ken Garland, and the later versions in 20002014, and 2020.

Compose your thoughts about the questions/prompts above.

6. Submit a link to your Research Journal to OpenLab

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

      • TITLE: Research Journal – Your Initials
      • CATEGORY: Research Journal
      • TAG: Research Journal
      • TAG: Your Name

Due Date(s)

Your comments and follow-up feedback on the reading discussion are due the day before the next session Monday, May 9th, at 6:00 pm.

Texts

Assignment: Research Paper 2 for April 25

Due: The finished paper is due on April 25 by 6 pm

1953 Alcoa Aluminum advertisement

Overview

You will be reading and annotating an excerpt from Roland Barthes’ 1977 essay, Rhetoric of the Image.”

Rhetoric is the ‘technique of using the means of expression to persuade’.
The hallmark of all rhetoric is that it involves at least two levels of language,
the proper or denoted and the figurative or connoted.”
Aesthetics of Photography

This essay is challenging, but it contains important tools for deconstructing advertising using a semiotic approach and for the “close reading” of visual images.

Assignment

The second 2-3 page paper, due April 25, will be a response to this article.
In this paper, you’ll critically examine a contemporary advertising image in a manner similar to Barthes’ approach. You will be expected to employ the logic and terminology that Barthes uses in this text.

Stereotypes have a long history in advertising media, marketing, and visual communications.

Select a 20th or 21st-century print or TV advertisement that uses obvious and/or documented racial, ethnic, or gender stereotypes to sell a product and demonstrate how mainstream media intentionally or unintentionally reinforces societal biases.
It should be a recent full-page print advertisement organized around a single photograph.
Using rhetorical analysis, examine the meaning of the image and text.
Consider the effectiveness of the advertisers’ attempts to persuade and influence the audience at the time and consider how today’s audience might respond.

NOTE: The advertisement must use photographic or illustrative imagery and must include text. Use the resources provided in Week 9 Agenda > Stereotype in Advertising Media

Approach

1: Read

Because this can be a difficult text with many new terms, consider reviewing some or all of the following before reading the text:

Key Themes and Takeaways

Roland Barthes was a prominent French thinker associated with the field of semiotics and the Structuralist movement. This essay was written in response to a series of articles that Barthes had been following in a well-regarded linguistics journal. In his essay, Barthes attempts to demonstrate that images contain most of the same semiological elements, ie, signs, signifiers, signifieds, as a spoken or written language.

        • Semiological elements are present in an image, yet they differ from language in that they imitate nature, and are non-linear.
        • Every image, especially photographs in advertisements, consist of 3 messages:
          (1) a linguistic message,
          (2) a non-coded iconic message, and
          (3) a coded iconic message
        • The linguistic message of an image is the textual component that works alongside representational aspects of an image (most advertisements combine text and image)
        • A linguistic message can direct the viewer toward a clear interpretation, or invite unexpected interpretations
        • The non-coded iconic message of an image is the objective, denotational, literal, perceptual, innocent meanings that can be understood from the image.
        • The coded iconic message of an image is the subjective, connotational, cultural, symbolic, ideological meanings that can be understood from the image.
        • Images are rhetorical in the sense that coded elements perform functions similar to those of persuasive linguistic devices

2: Write

Step 1:  As you read, make notes to include with your submission

      1. make note of all important terms
        (ie. polysemy, linguistic sign, connoted, denoted, etc.)
      2. make brief notes that answer these questions:
           • How do images hold and convey meaning?
        • What are they trying to say?
        • How do they persuade and influence us?

Step 2:  When you’re finished your notes: Paper 2

Write a deep analysis of your chosen image-based advertisement using critical perspectives from the theorists we’ve looked at recently: Saussure, Peirce, Barthes, and Hall.

Expanding on your notes for  “Rhetoric of the Image,” critically examine and deconstruct your chosen historical advertising image using Barthes’ approach. You will be expected to employ Barthes’s logic and terminology to deconstruct the advertisement. Include references to Saussure, Peirce, and Hall’s theories covered in the Week 3 and Week 10 Agendas.

It will also be especially helpful to review the post “Decoding Images and Image Rhetoric — Explained by Lesley Lanir.

Audience

You are writing this paper for possible submission to the City Tech Writer, an undergraduate journal for writing and research. Assume that your reader has no background in design theory and is not familiar with the theories and concepts you are presenting. Be sure to explain the theories and concepts as you present your analysis.

 

Process

1. Open the reading

2. Enable Hypothesis

Login to your account and select our group (IMPORTANT!) from the dropdown to make sure your annotations and highlights will be recorded in the group.

3Read & Annotate

    1. make note of all important terms
      (ie. polysemy, linguistic sign, connoted, denoted, etc.)
    2. make brief notes that answer these questions:
         • How do images hold and convey meaning?
      • What are they trying to say?
      • How do they persuade and influence us?

This will be part of your grade.
Make at least 3 annotations in Hypothesis, including your questions, definitions, and ideas
Add the tags: Barthes and Reading Response 9 to your annotations.

4. Write Paper 2

The second 2-3 page paper, due April 25, will be a response to this article.

    • Critically examine a contemporary advertising image in a manner similar to Barthes’ approach.
    • Select a 20th or 21st-century print or TV advertisement that uses obvious and/or documented racial, ethnic, or gender stereotypes
      to sell a product and demonstrate how mainstream media intentionally or unintentionally reinforces societal biases.
      It should be organized around a single photograph.
    • Write a deep analysis of your chosen image-based advertisement using critical perspectives from the theorists we’ve looked at recently: Saussure, Peirce, Barthes, and Hall.
    • Expanding on your notes for  “Rhetoric of the Image,” critically examine and deconstruct your chosen historical advertising image using Barthes’ approach.
    • Use the logic and terminology that Barthes uses in this text.
      Include references to Saussure, Peirce, and Hall’s theories covered in the Week 3 and Week 10 Agendas.
      It will also be especially helpful to review the post “Decoding Images and Image Rhetoric — Explained by Lesley Lanir.

Audience

You are writing this paper for possible submission to the City Tech Writer, an undergraduate journal for writing and research. Assume that your reader has no background in design theory and is not familiar with the theories and concepts you are presenting. Be sure to explain the theories and concepts as you present your analysis.

Structure

Your introduction should present the main research question in your own words: “How do racial, ethnic, and/or gender stereotypes affect the meaning and reception of 19th and 20th-century advertisements at the time and today, and in what ways did advertisers intentionally or unintentionally reinforce societal biases?”

Using Barthes’ rhetorical analysis and close-reading skills, start by contextualizing the advertisement (date, product, country of origin, advertising company/designer, intended audience). Describe the advertisement in as much detail as possible, examining the characteristics of the objects, models/characters, environment, layout, typography, the interaction of picture elements, image quality, and composition of the entire ad.

Using Barthes’, Saussure’s, and Peirce’s terms, make your best attempt to articulate the meaning of the image and text used in the advertisement. Try to identify all of the signs at work. Using semiotic terms, identify the signifiers and the signified.

        • What is the linguistic message?
        • What are the non-coded iconic messages?
        • What are the coded iconic messages?
        • Identify the denotative and connotative aspects.
        • Are the signs icons, indexes, or symbols? Explain why.
        • Consider the cultural codes being conveyed in the advertisement.
        • Do you observe polysemic signs, myths, or naturalization?

Using Stuart Hall’s theories about reception and representation, consider the effectiveness of the advertisers’ rhetoric and attempts to persuade and influence the audience at the time.

        • What was the original dominant/preferred reading?
        • How have the designers/creators tried to ‘fix’ a meaning using stereotypes?
        • Who created this advertisement, and who was the intended audience during the time period when it was circulated?
        • Why would the intended audience identify with this advertisement?
        • Did the advertisement serve any other purpose besides the sale of a product?
        • What impact has this advertisement or similar advertisements had on society?
        • Finally, is your personal reading of the ad dominant, oppositional, or negotiated? Why?

If you have any questions, don’t hesitate to reach out!

Formatting

Your paper will be submitted as a 750-1000 word typewritten paper, double-spaced 12 pt. Times New Roman.

        • Use Google Docs to write and organize your final draft.
        • Use the MLA style to format your paper. See MLA example paper here.
        • Cite all materials researched for historical context, any related writings, and image sources.
        • Include images of the work you are referencing and any other relevant illustrations.
        • Use Grammarly or similar to review your paper for grammatical and spelling errors before submitting.

Citations / Works Cited Page

Use The Citation Tool
        • Use the Google Docs Citation tool > set to MLA to add citation sources to your paper.
        • IMPORTANT: Add citations within your paper for every fact, visual reference, or quotation that you reference in your paper. (See Adding in-text citation at 0:50 in the video for details.)
        • When you are done, add a Works Cited page at the end of your document. This can be done with one click using the Insert Work Cited button. (See Inserting a bibliography at 1:16 in the video for details.)

5. Edit with Easybib

6. Submitting Your Paper

    1. Create an OpenLab Post. (Example Post)
      • TITLE: Research Paper 2 – Your Initials
      • CATEGORY: Research Papers
      • TAG: Research Paper 2
      • TAG: Your Name
    2. Add the title of your paper as a heading.
    3. Write a brief introduction to your paper.
    4. Use text to indicate the link to your paper (ie: Research Paper), select this text, and make it a link to your Google doc.
      (Do not paste the entire Google Doc link in the post)
    5. Make sure the Google Doc link is set to “Anyone with the link” and Commenter is selected.
      This will allow others to comment on your paper.

Due: The finished paper is due April 25,  6 pm

Assignment Reading Response 8 for April 11

Updated assignment details for this week

  1. This week, please proof in EasyBib before posting.
  2. You must have at least 200 words and at least 2 paragraphs
  3. You must include a Screenshot of your text in Easybib with any corrections that are suggested.
  4. Include your screenshot with your post
  5. See “Draft your Reading Response” below for details

Overview

Our next reading will be from the media theorist Marshall McLuhan. For this reading, you have two options. Please read one of the following:

The Introduction, Chapter 1 and Chapter 7 from McLuhan’s influential 1964 book Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man.
This is a fairly straightforward text. McLuhan_UnderstandingMedia_excDownload

-or-

Selected paged from The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effect, co-created by McLuhan and Quentin Fiore in 1967. This is an experimental text that relies heavily on image-text interactions. Here is a PDF: McLuhan_Fiore_Medium IsTheMassage_1967Download

Please take a look at both, to get a sense of the material, then choose one or the other to really focus on.

Consider the following:
McLuhan describes technology and media as “extensions of man.”
How do media extend human beings, or humanity in general?
What hazards might technological progress bring for individuals and society?
If “the medium is the message,” what role can artists and designers play in creating new messages?
How is the work of a designer subordinate to the media they use to create or distribute information? 

You have two options for this response.

You can write 3-4 paragraphs.

Or you can respond in a “typophotographic” manner, combining images and text.
To understand what we mean by typographic, please look at McLuhan’s work

1. Open the readings

As before, after annotating the text, create a rough draft of your response in your Research Journal. Your response should be about 200 words and checked for spelling and grammar errors. Publish your finished response on the class site, using the guidelines provided.

2. Enable Hypothesis

Login to your account and select our group (IMPORTANT!) from the dropdown to make sure your annotations and highlights will be recorded in the group.

3Read & Annotate

Consider the questions/prompts listed above.
Start to formulate the answers to these prompts while you practice close reading with annotations.
This will be part of your grade.
Make at least 3 annotations in Hypothesis, including your questions, definitions, and ideas
Add the tags: Medium and Reading Response 8 to your annotations.

4. Draft your Reading Response

  • In your Research Journal, write a draft of your 200-word response.
  • You must use at least 2 paragraphs and 200 words in your response
  • Use Easybib app to check for grammar and spelling errors. Use the word count tool.
  • Take a screenshot of your document in Easybib and add it to your post
    screenshot on a mac: hold shift and command while you press “4”
  • Use visual examples to supplement your reading response.
  • Consider looking back at the Learning Graphic Design History videos
    or the Course Resources to see if there are historical examples that will help support your ideas.

5. Post your Reading Response.

At the top of the post copy and paste the following: McLuhan

Paste your reading response from Easybib

Be sure to add your final copy to your Research Journal.

Add links to your Hypothesis annotations at the bottom of your post.

Always add links and attribution for any images that you use in your post.

Adjust any formatting issues that may have occurred while pasting.

Use the Reading Response Example (in resources) as a guide.

Add the following title, category, and tags to your posts.

For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

    • TITLE: Reading Response 8 – Your Initials
    • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
    • TAG: Reading Response #8, McLuhan
    • TAG: Your Name

 

In addition

Outline for Final Report

Post an outline of your final report

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts.
For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

    • TITLE: Final Report Outline– Your Initials
    • CATEGORY: Research Paper Assignment
    • TAG: Final Report Topic
    • TAG: Your Name

 

 

Due Date

The next session Monday, April 11th, at 6pm to allow time for review.

  1. Texts

    • Selected paged from The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effect, co-created by McLuhan and Quentin Fiore in 1967. This is an experimental text that relies heavily on image-text interactions. Here is a PDF: McLuhan_Fiore_Medium IsTheMassage_1967Download

 

2.  Final Report Outline

Assignment: Reading Response 7, due 4/4

Topic for Final Report

Post topic for your final report

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

    • TITLE: Final Report Topic – Your Initials
    • CATEGORY: Final Report
    • TAG: Final Report Topic
    • TAG: Your Name

Next week: Post an outline for your final report

Reading Overview

You will be reading and annotating two texts: Paul Rand’s “Good Design Is Good Will” 1987 and Steven Heller’s “Underground Mainstream” 2008. In these texts, we will compare Paul Rand’s point of view as a corporate advertising designer and Steven Heller’s critique of the complex relationship between the underground and mainstream.

Read and annotate Paul Rand’s “Good Design Is Good Will” in  Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field page 64-69
Steven Heller’s Underground Mainstream” in Design Observer using our Hypothesis group.

Your response to the prompt should be about 200 words and checked for spelling and grammar errors.

Key Themes and Takeaways

Paul Rand “Good Design Is Good Will” 1987

Paul Rand was one of the most influential American graphic designers of the 20th century, known for the clear aesthetics that he adopted from European Modernism. Rand was prompted to write this article in response to what he considered poor design decisions from major corporations.

    • The relationship between designer and client should be a reciprocal one, at the highest level of management.
    • Neither the field of design nor that of marketing require any accreditation, which can lead to the proliferation of poor design that does not work well
    • Design is “a calling” rooted in the “creative impulse of an individual” and “self-realization.” Thus designers must dedicate themselves to uncovering good ideas based on instinct, aesthetics and taste.
    • The contrast between the modern surroundings of an office and the traditional setting of most homes confuses notions of quality and good design
    • Contributions of good design build the reputation and integrity of a company, which in turn has a “cultural responsibility” to “help shape its environment” and to develop goodwill toward consumers.

Steven Heller, “Underground Mainstream,” 2008

Steven Heller takes a look at the advertising industry as he delves into the complex relationship between underground and mainstream design.

    • Mainstream, corporate culture steals ideas from underground counter-cultural movements
    • ‘The avant garde is usurped when its eccentricity is deemed acceptable.’
    • Psychedelia is one example of an ‘alternative code’ that spread through youth culture before it was commodified and diluted for the mass marketplace
    • Culture-jamming appropriates the visual language of the mainstream to critique or undermine mass culture
    • In contemporary advertising, underground and mainstream have been folded into one

Instructions

Following the instructions below, read and annotate the text with your classmates in our Hypothesis group.

After reading and annotating the text, create a rough draft of your response in your Research Journal. Your response should be about 200 words.

Check for spelling and grammar errors.

Create a new post and publish your response.

1. Open the readings

In a new tab open the text Armstrong, Helen. Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field, Princeton Architectural Press, 2009. 

Navigate to “Good Design Is Good Will” on pages 64-69. In another tab open Underground Mainstream” in Design Observer.

2. Enable Hypothesis

The reading links above will automatically open Hypothesis.

Login to your account and select our group. (IMPORTANT!) from the dropdown to make sure your annotations and highlights will be recorded in the group. See Using Hypothesis for details.

3. Consider these questions.

Here are the questions to which you should respond in your reading response:

    • Is the concept of mainstream vs. underground relevant in advertising of 1950’s / 1960’s and is it relevant today?
    • What is “culture jamming”?
    • Provide a visual example and description of early avant-garde culture jamming.
    • Provide a visual example and description of culture jamming today.

4Read & Annotate.

Consider the questions/prompts listed above. Start to formulate the answers to these prompts while you practice close reading with annotations. This will be part of your grade. Share at least 3 annotations in the Hypothesis group, including your questions, definitions, and ideas with your classmates. Add the tags: Mainstream Modernism and Reading Response 7 to your annotations.

5. Draft your Reading Response.

In your Research Journal, write a draft of your 200-word response. Check for grammar and spelling errors. Use the word count tool. Use the Grammarly app or something similar to improve the clarity of your writing. Use visual examples to supplement your reading response.

Consider looking back at the Learning Graphic Design History videos or the Course Resources to see if there are historical examples that will help support your ideas.

6. Post your Reading Response.

When ready, create a new post titled “Reading Response 7 – YourInitials.”

At the top of the post copy and paste the following: Paul Rand “Good Design Is Good Will” 1987 from  Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field page 64-69 and Steven Heller “Underground Mainstream” in Design Observer 2008.

Copy and paste the questions/prompts listed above. Paste your reading response from your Research Journal. Add links to your annotations in the Hypothesis group at the bottom of your post. Always add links and attribution for any images that you use in your post. Adjust any formatting issues that may have occurred while pasting. Use the Reading Response (Example) as a guide.

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

    • TITLE: Reading Response 7 – Your Initials
    • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
    • TAG: Reading Response #7
    • TAG: Your Name

Due Date(s)

Your reading response is due the day before the next session Monday, April 4th, at 6pm to allow time for review.

Texts

Assignment: Reading Response 6, due March 28

Overview

As we start to wrap up the “groundwork” of design theory (where revolutionary ideas evolved into mainstream modernism and corporate commercial design), let’s take moment to consider that in the history of design, not every story gets told. Why?

You will be reading and annotating three essays written by Madeleine Morley, Silas Munro, and Alice Rawsthorn looking at the lack of diversity in the design field and relatedly, design history.

Read and annotate

Celebrating the African-American Practitioners Absent From Way Too Many Classroom Lectures by Madeleine Morley, Eye on Design, 2018,

Typography as a Radical Act in an Industry Ever-dominated by White Men by Silas Munro, Eye on Design, 2019

https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/celebrating-the-african-american-practitioners-absent-from-way-too-many-classroom-lectures/

Design Gets More Diverse by Alice Rawsthorn, NYTimes, 2011

As you read, consider these questions

  • How do we change the commercial design field to include a diversity of voices and visions?
  • What will the commercial design field and the study of design history look like in 20 years?

 

If you want to watch Helvetica, see it here Helvetica

 

Assignment: Reading Response 6 (2+ Hours)

Follow the assignment guidelines and prompts: Reading Response 6

You will be reading and annotating three essays written by Madeleine Morley, Silas Munro, and Alice Rawsthorn looking at the lack of diversity in the design field and design history.

 

1. Open the readings

In new tabs, open the essays

Celebrating the African-American Practitioners Absent From Way Too Many Classroom Lectures by Madeleine Morley, Eye on Design, 2018,

Typography as a Radical Act in an Industry Ever-dominated by White Men by Silas Munro, Eye on Design, 2019

Design Gets More Diverse by Alice Rawsthorn, NYTimes, 2011

As before, after annotating the text, create a rough draft of your response in your Research Journal. Your response should be about 200 words and checked for spelling and grammar errors. Publish your finished response on the class site, using the guidelines provided.

2. Enable Hypothesis

The reading links above will automatically open Hypothesis.
Login to your account and select our group (IMPORTANT!) from the dropdown to make sure your annotations and highlights will be recorded in the group.

3. Consider these questions.

Here are the questions to which you should respond in your reading response. Be sure to reference and cite the three essays, but form and share your own opinions too.

    • How do we change the commercial design field to include a diversity of voices and visions?
    • What will the commercial design field and the study of design history look like in 20 years?

4Read & Annotate.

Consider the questions/prompts listed above. Start to formulate the answers to these prompts while you practice close reading with annotations. This will be part of your grade. Share at least 3 annotations in the Hypothesis group, including your questions, definitions, and ideas with your classmates. Add the tags: Diversify Design and Reading Response 6 to your annotations.

5. Draft your Reading Response.

In your Research Journal, write a draft of your 200-word response.

Check for grammar and spelling errors. Use the word count tool.

Use the Grammarly app or something similar to improve the clarity of your writing.

Use visual examples to supplement your reading response.

Consider looking back at the Learning Graphic Design History videos
or the Course Resources to see if there are historical examples that will help support your ideas.

6. Post your Reading Response.

When ready, create a new post titled “Reading Response 6 – YourInitials.”

At the top of the post copy and paste the following:

Celebrating the African-American Practitioners Absent From Way Too Many Classroom Lectures by Madeleine Morley, Eye on Design, 2018,

Typography as a Radical Act in an Industry Ever-dominated by White Men by Silas Munro, Eye on Design, 2019

Design Gets More Diverse by Alice Rawsthorn, NYTimes, 2011

Paste your reading response from your Research Journal.

Add links to your annotations in the Hypothesis group at the bottom of your post.

Always add links and attribution for any images that you use in your post.

Adjust any formatting issues that may have occurred while pasting.

Use the Reading Response (Example) as a guide.

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

    • TITLE: Reading Response 6 – Your Initials
    • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
    • TAG: Reading Response #6
    • TAG: Your Name

Assignment: Reading Response 5

Overview

Our next reading assignment includes 3 texts from designers who employed systematic approaches to their work.
According to Jan Tschichold, Karl Gerstner, and Josef Müller-Brockmann, How should one design?
For this one you can answer with 3-4 paragraphs, as usual, or you can create a visual response, incorporating text with design elements.
If you choose the visual response, use the systematic approach outlined in these texts to create your design, then upload a jpeg or pdf file.

The focus of these texts is the evolution of the International Style from the New Typography movement and the Bauhaus of the 1920-1940s to Swiss Typography and the embrace of European modernism of the 1950’s.

 

 

They are as follows: Jan Tschichold, The New Typography (1928):

Karl Gerstner, Designing Programmes (1964):

Josef Müller-Brockmann, Grid and Design Philosophy (1981):

Read Jan Tschichold, “The Principles of the New Typography” pg35-38,
Karl Gerstner, Designing Programmes pg55-61,
Joseph Muller-Brockman, “Grid and Design Philosophy” pg62-63

These are found in our main text Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field by Helen Armstrong.

Key Themes and Takeaways

Jan Tschichold, “The Principles of the New Typography” 1928

Tschichold possessed a deep knowledge of traditional graphics and type, but rejected virtually all pre-modern conventions after visiting the first Bauhaus exhibition in 1923. He published The New Typography three years later. In 1933 the ruling Nazi party imprisoned him for spreading Communist ideas. Shortly thereafter Tschichold fled to Switzerland, where he remained for the rest of his life, continuing to design, but rejecting the modern typographic principles of his early work.

    • The new typography is defined by clarity and economy of expression, as opposed to ideas of beauty and ornamentation
    • Typography must not arise out of preconceived ideas, but by developing form from the function of the text
    • Asymmetry is optically effective, as it establishes definite, logical relationships within the text
    • Standardization of type achieves clear and objective forms, as standardized building materials are necessary for architecture
    • For the typographer ‘the most important requirement is to be objective’

Karl Gerstner, “Designing Programmes” 1964

Karl Gerstner’s approach to design embodies the International Typographic Style, aka the Swiss Style, in its systematic methods and formal rigidity. In Designing Programmes, Gerstner describes the quasi-scientific technique of establishing a programme to address design problems.

    • There is no ‘absolute solution’ for design problems, only ‘programmes for solutions’
    • ‘The creative process is to be reduced to an act of selection.’
    • Systematic tools such as the ‘morphological box of the typogram’ provide the necessary components for the selection process
    • The grid can be a ‘proportional regulator’ but is not a programme onto itself

Joseph Muller-Brockman, “Grid and Design Philosophy” 1981

Grid Systems is a practical manual for grid-based design solutions, a theoretical treatise, and a brilliant example of the grid system at work. Müller-Brockmann’s strict rule-based methodology anticipates the digital workspaces that would come to dominate design in subsequent years. The short excerpt defines this philosophy.

    • The grid is ‘an expression of a certain mental attitude’
    • The designer’s work should be a ‘contribution to general culture’
    • Design should be ‘objective, committed to the common weal…the basis of democratic behavior’
    • The grid represents a ‘will to systematize, to clarify’

Consider these questions.

    • How do each of these designers/authors think you should approach design?
    • Include an example of contemporary typography/layout that embodies each of these three design systems or philosophies. And explain why!

 

Instructions

Read and annotate the text  in our Hypothesis group.

After reading and annotating the text, create a rough draft of your response in your Research Journal.

Your response should be about 200 words.

Check spelling and grammar.

Lastly, create a new post and publish your response.

1. Open the readings

In a new tab open the text Armstrong, Helen. Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field, Princeton Architectural Press, 2009. 

Navigate to pages 35-38 and 55-63.

2. Enable Hypothesis

The reading links above will automatically open Hypothesis.
Login to your account and select our group  (IMPORTANT!) from the dropdown to make sure your annotations and highlights will be recorded in the group.

3. Consider these questions.

Here are the questions to which you should respond in your reading response:

  • How do each of these designers/authors think you should approach design?
  • Include an example of contemporary typography/layout that embodies each of these three design systems or philosophies. And explain why!

4. Read & Annotate.

Consider the questions/prompts listed above. Start to formulate the answers to these prompts while you practice close reading with annotations. This will be part of your grade. Share at least 3 annotations in the Hypothesis group, including your questions, definitions, and ideas with your classmates. Add the tags: International Style and Reading Response 5 to your annotations.

5. Draft your Reading Response.

In your Research Journal, write a draft of your 200-word response.
Check for grammar and spelling errors. Use the word count tool.
Use the Pro Writing Aid or Grammarly app to improve the clarity of your writing.
Use visual examples to supplement your reading response.
Consider looking back at the Learning Graphic Design History videos or the Course Resources to see if there are historical examples that will help support your ideas.

6. Post your Reading Response.

When ready, create a new post titled “Reading Response 5 – Your Initials.”

At the top of the post copy and paste the following: Jan Tschichold, “The Principles of the New Typography” pg35-38, Karl Gerstner, Designing Programmes pg55-61, Joseph Muller-Brockman, “Grid and Design Philosophy” pg62-63 from Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field by Helen Armstrong.

Paste your reading response from your Research Journal.
Add links to your annotations in the Hypothesis group at the bottom of your post.
Always add links and attribution for any images that you use in your post.
Adjust any formatting issues that may have occurred while pasting.
Use the Reading Response (Example) as a guide.

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

    • TITLE: Reading Response 5 – Your Initials
    • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
    • TAG: Reading Response #5
    • TAG: Your Name

Due Date(s)

Your reading response is due the day before the next session Monday, March 21, at 6pm to allow time for review.

Resources

More info

Texts

Research Project & Presentation

Overview

The Research Project and Presentation is designed to facilitate independent research in contemporary design and design theory. Your goal will be to consider the ideas and theories we discuss in this course, and the contexts in which they emerged. You will identify a design project, designer, or style that puts these ideas into practice and formulate a clear research topic or question. Your findings from this research will be shared with the class through a 10-15 slide audio-visual presentation (ie: a video slideshow with narration) posted to this site.

Your Research Project should be conducted in a rigorous manner. In addition to assigned readings, you must cite at least 10 sources, including proper citation information, and an annotated bibliography in MLA format. You will post an annotated bibliography, along with a link to your video presentation, to our OpenLab Course site Week 14 (Dec 14) to allow time for feedback from your classmates.

Due Dates

    • Initial topic ideas are due Week 7
    • Project outline and proposal are due Week 9

Defining Your Research Topic

Use this Research Project to bring awareness to the issues that matter to you as an individual, a global citizen, and a designer. Your research should explore the relationship between specific theories that we cover in class and a specific contemporary design project, aesthetic, or approach within the last 40 years that puts these theories into practice. Begin with a particular writing, concept, or design project that you find compelling and draw connections between it and the theories we’ve discussed.

Start broad and then focus in. 

You might start broadly with a general area of interest.

    • Design + Gender
    • Design + Diversity
    • Design + Protest
    • Design + Gaming
    • Design + Health
    • Design + Politics
    • Design + Identity
    • Design + Technology
    • Design + Music
    • Design + Social Justice
    • Design + Film
    • Design + ?

Check out AIGA’s Eye On Design for numerous examples that would make interesting design theory research topics. You will need to define your own topic, but these should give you some ideas.

Embracing the past

It’s difficult to look at our current time to clearly see what will be influential to the next generation (which styles or trends or political or cultural influences will have a lasting impact), but we can look to the past to see what, how, and why those influences are visible today, whether as reaction/rebellion or as influence/nostalgia. We are always asking WHY?

Here are two examples where a designer, design movement, or graphic style was influenced by the past (pop culture, politics, technologies, social conflicts). When exploring these types of topics, historical sources should play a big role.

Rejecting the past

We can also look at current social-political movements to look deeply at our design field and our culture to consider how these events are influencing the present design field. In these examples, current social-political changes are informing/changing our approach to language, communication, design, and how we relate to each other. When exploring these topics the theories of communication, meaning, psychology, signs & symbols, etc. play a big role.

Again we are always asking WHY?

Defining Your Research Question

Once you have narrowed down your research topic. Start to ask some questions in order to define your research question or thesis statement. Here are some tips.

Developing a Research Question – City Tech Library

Choosing a Research Topic: Purdue Online Writing Lab

Writing Strong Thesis Statements: Purdue Online Writing Lab

Finding Sources

This 5-minute video tutorial goes over the basics of using the City Tech Library databases.

Database Detectives

Research Resources

Preparing your research

  1. Create and submit a detailed outline of your Research Project & Presentation using Google Docs. Make sure your research question/statement is clearly presented with relevant subtopics and a conclusion.
  2. Develop each section of your presentation with cited sources to support each of the ideas you are presenting. Include images and video to support your ideas.
  3. In addition to referencing our assigned readings, you must cite at least 10 sources with proper citation information in an annotated bibliography in MLA format. Create your annotated bibliograpy as your do your research.

Your Annotated Bibliography

Writing an annotated bibliography is excellent preparation for a research project. Just collecting sources for a bibliography is useful, but when you have to write annotations for each source, you’re forced to read each source more carefully. You begin to read more critically instead of just collecting information.

OWL PURDUE “WHY SHOULD I WRITE AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY?”

  • Use Google Docs to write and organize your sources and annotations.
  • Use the MLA style to format your Annotated Bibliography.
  • Cite all materials researched for historical context, any related writings, and image sources.
  • Review this guide to understand what and why of Annotated Bibliographies.
  • Refer to this guide with samples when formating your annotated bibliography
  • City Tech Library also has an Annotated Bibliography Tutorial

Your Presentation Format

Your Research Project will culminate in a 10-15 slideshow with your voiceover narration. The presentations should be no more than 10 minutes long. You may use any method you prefer to construct your slideshow (Powerpoint, Google Slides, Adobe Presenter, Preview slideshow, Presi, etc.) and any method for recording your voiceover and saving your video file (Zoom Recording, Screencast-o-matic, Yuja, etc). Your finished presentation should be uploaded (unlisted) to YouTube.

    • Your presentation and corresponding visuals should start with a title slide and an introduction that includes the main points of your presentation. And it should end with a conclusion that ties together all of the ideas presented.
    • You thesis questions, the main idea you wish to communicate, should weave throughout your presenation.
    • Visuals should present clear, coherent information, in a logically organized manner.
    • Viewers should be able to readily identify your research questions, your method of inquiry, the literature employed, and your overarching thesis.
    • It should be clear that original research has led to a synthesis unique to your subject.
    • Your visuals should be neat and professional, utilizing design standards consistent with the topic at hand.
    • Relevant images should be carefully selected and placed within your layout, with considerations made for reproduction quality.
    • Organization and care in assembly will be taken into consideration.
    • Presentations should be equally clear, with ideas confidently articulated.
    • Presentations should be rehearsed, and should adhere to a planned narrative or script
    • Pace and diction should be stimulating for your peers, offering information in a manner that can be grasped and processed in a thought-provoking manner.
    • Your presentation slideshow should be designed to reflect the style, designer, movement, or theory you are presenting. Be creative and have fun!

Presentation Tips & Tools

Below find some helpful links for tips and tools you can use to assemble and record your Research Presentation.

UPLOAD TO YOUTUBE

    • Follow these guidelines to upload your finished Research Presentation video to YouTube.
    • Set your video as Unlisted and copy the Video Link
    • Paste into your OpenLab Post.

ALTERNATE METHOD FOR VIDEO UPLOAD:

If you have trouble uploading your video to YouTube, use the method below.

    • Upload your video to Dropbox or GoogleDrive
    • Make the file public/anyone with link and copy the URL
    • Take a screenshot of your title slide or video frame
    • Upload and embed the screenshot image in your post
    • Turn your image into a link by select the screenshot image in your post and click the chainlink icon
    • Click on the pencil icon to edit the link and paste the Dropbox or GoogleDrive URL into the “Paste URL” box.
    • Press the Apply arrow.

 

Submitting Your Presentation

    1. Create an OpenLab Post. (Example Post)
      • TITLE: Research Project Presentation – Your Initials
      • CATEGORY: Research Project
      • TAG: Your Name
    2. Add the title of your Research Project as a heading.
    3. Write a brief introduction to your Research Project.
    4. Embed your presenation in the post by pasting the YouTube link below the introduction.
    5. Use text to indicate the link to your Annotated Bibliography (ie: Annotated Bibliography), select this text, and make it a link to your Google doc. (Do not paste the entire Google Doc link in the post). Make sure the Google Doc link is set to “Anyone with the link.”
    6. Publish your post!
    7. Refer to this Example Post to see how the post should be formatted.

 

Additional information

More Details: Research Project and Presentation. 

Research Project Openlab Post (Example)

Assignment: Research Paper 1

Overview

Select a design or design object created after 1971 in which the influence of the theories considered thus far can be seen.

      1. Begin with a brief description of the object, the designer who created it, and the historical circumstances under which it was made.
      2. Considering these factors, examine the ways in which the creator was responding, directly or indirectly, to theories related to linguistics or semiology, avant-garde art movements, or the psychological perception of forms (ie. any of the ideas that we’ve covered).
      3. Discuss the manner in which the design you’ve chosen embodies these theories. Provide direct references to relevant passages from our readings. Locate additional writings using library resources to substantiate your comparisons.

Your goal is to provide a critical examination, not an account of historical details.

This response will be submitted as a 750-1000 word typewritten paper, double-spaced in 12 pt. Times New Roman, with a bibliography.

Include images of the work under consideration and any other relevant illustrations.

Cite all materials researched for historical context, any related writings, and image sources.

All sources, references, and quotations should be cited in MLA format. You must upload your paper as a PDF, attached to a new OpenLab Post.

Note: You do not need to address this week’s texts in the paper if they are not directly relevant to your topic, but you must be prepared to discuss them in class.

Due Date

The finished paper is due Monday, March 15 at 9 pm

 

Get started

    1. If you’d like some inspiration, try the following links:

Cooper Hewitt Design’s Museum’s Blog …you can also just browse their collection.

AIGA Eye on Design

Filter by Graphic Design or Design in MoMA Collection

or browse the MoMA Design Store

Exhibitions and the Collection at Museum of Art and Design

Designboom for a wide variety of design

Design Observer also features conversations and articles

or Print Magazine

2. Use the links in Course Resources

3. Use your Research Journal to define your ideas before you start writing.

Add an image and begin with a brief description of the work, the designer who created it, and the historical circumstances under which it was made.

Consider the ways in which the creator was responding, directly or indirectly, to theories related to semiotics & signs, ways of meaning, models of communication, the avant-garde art movements of the Futurists, Constructivists, and/or the Bauhaus.

Start collecting resources to support your ideas.

Example

Suppose you found this poster on the Cooper Hewitt Design Collection: “THE BEST OF JAZZ” for the New York Public Theatre, 1980, created by designer Paula Scher.

This poster shares some graphic elements from the early avant-garde designers we’ve looked at. The use of primary colors, bold geometry, san serif fonts, lack of ornament, etc reminds us of the Russian Constructivists and the Bauhaus. You might then dig deeper into the influences of the designer herself, the time period in which this work was made, and the client. You might then look for primary sources where the designer talks about her influences?

You would also refer back to our readings by Constructivist designers and find relevant passages, comparing the principles and ideas presented by the avant-garde designers with your example design. Next, you would find additional resources via the City Tech Library, the COMD Theory OER Bibliography, and other scholarly sources to support the connections you’ve made.

Remember you will be providing a critical examination of the image/object and its relationship to the theories we’ve discussed, not an account of historical details. These should be YOUR observations and YOUR ideas supported by published sources.

Formatting

Your paper will be submitted as a 750-1000 word typewritten paper, double-spaced in 12 pt. Times New Roman.

      • Use Google Docs to write and organize your final draft.
      • Use the MLA style to format your paper. See MLA example paper here.
      • Cite all materials researched for historical context, any related writings, and image sources.
      • Include images of the work you are referencing and any other relevant illustrations.
      • Use the Google Docs Citation tool set to MLA to add citations to your paper as you write.
      • When you are done, add a Works Cited page at the end of your document. This can be done with one click using the Insert Work Cited button.
      • Use Pro Writing Aid or  Grammarly or similar to review your paper for grammatical and spelling errors before submitting.

Submitting Your Paper

    1. Create an OpenLab Post. 
      • TITLE: Research Paper 1 – Your Initials
      • CATEGORY: Research Papers
      • TAG: Research Paper 1
      • TAG: Your Name
    2. Add the title of your paper as a heading.
    3. Write a brief introduction to your paper.
    4. Use text to indicate the link to your paper (ie: Research paper),
      select this text, and make it a link to your Google doc.
      (Do not paste the entire Google Doc link in the post)
    5. Make sure the Google Doc link is set to
      “Anyone with the link” and
      Commenter is selected.
      This will allow others to comment on your paper.

 

example of your post:

Research Paper Title (Heading H2)

Your Name

Brief introduction. Sed porttitor lectus nibh. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vestibulum ac diam sit amet quam vehicula elementum sed sit amet dui. Curabitur aliquet quam id dui posuere blandit. Mauris blandit aliquet elit, eget tincidunt nibh pulvinar a. Sed porttitor lectus nibh. Mauris blandit aliquet elit, eget tincidunt nibh pulvinar a. Sed porttitor lectus nibh.

 

assignment: Reading Response 4B, Due: 3/8

Assignment: 4B, due 3/8

Please note: your first 2-3 page paper is due on March 15.
Start thinking about this assignment.

Texts from architects, designers & artists affiliated with the Bauhaus.

Instructions

    1. Open the reading with Hypothesis
    2. Be sure that you post in our group
    3. Consider the questions below
    4. Read and Annotate
    5. Draft your response in your Research Journal
      • 200-word response, use the word count tool.
      • Use visual examples to supplement your reading response.
      • Consider looking back at the Learning Graphic Design History videos or the AIGA Archive to see if there are historical examples that will help support your ideas.
    6. Check for spelling, grammar, and sentence clarity
      Use Grammarly, Pro Writing Aid, or other similar tool
    7. Post your reading response on OpenLab with a link to your hypothesis annotations
    8. Include the following

TITLE: Reading Response 4B– Your Initials
CATEGORY: Reading Responses
TAG: Reading Response #4B
TAG: Your Name

 

Texts from architects, designers & artists affiliated with the Bauhaus.

Some ideas and questions you might consider:

    • According to these  authors, what was lacking in art and education from the past?
    • What role should typography and photography play in shaping a new art?
    • What role does language or communication play in art and design?
    • How should artists approach the creation of future art forms?
    • What should education or “the academy” teach artists about their field?
    • How might Bauhaus ideas be updated to remain relevant in the 21st century?

Key Themes and Takeaways

Walter Gropius; The Theory and Organization of the Bauhaus (1923)

The architect Walter Gropius, founder and first Director of the Bauhaus composed this text to articulate the ideals of the institution.

    • Individuals must orient their attitude to the spirit of the times to create solutions for bettering society
    • The traditional art ‘academy’ fails by isolating artists, detaching skill from reality and ignoring traditional folk arts.
    • Creative work should ‘give form to space’ meaning artists should be able to express inner visions through their materials
    • The goal of the Bauhaus is to unify training in fields of art and design
    • Preliminary training should ‘break down conventional patterns of thought.’ As students progress they should take on more advanced form problems and incorporate theory, eventually understanding ‘all processes of creation.’

László Moholy-Nagy; Typophoto (1925)

The artist and Bauhaus instructor articulated his vision for a new form of art that would incorporate a range of media.

    • Artists must participate in society’s ‘collectivity of interacting events.’
    • Printers, Photographers, and all artists must consider ways that art can connect people
    • ‘Typophoto’ is a new form of making, combining typography and photography for ‘the most exact rendering of communication.’
    • The combination of these printing technologies will create new possibilities for visual expression, thereby creating a ‘new visual literature.’

Herbert Bayer; On Typography (1967)

Bayer was first a student then an instructor at the Bauhaus before emigrating to the U.S. This text, written later in his career, is a reflection on the ambitions and ideals that Bayer held for a new form of typographic expression; one that would simplify language and create new possibilities for improved communication.

    • Typography is a ‘service art’ that provides the means for expressing ideas through mechanical techniques
    • Traditional book forms and writing techniques lack principle and structure, thereby limiting the expressive power of type.
    • A typographic revolution will come from (a) increased demand on perception, (b) a new alphabet, and (c) physical forms for typography
    • Universal Communication might come about from improved typographic form and ‘true text-picture integration.’

______________________________________________________________

First Paper – Due March 15

Question and requirements:

Select a design or design object created after 1972 in which the influence of the theories considered thus far can be seen.

Begin with a brief description of the object, the designer who created it, and the historical circumstances under which it was made.

Considering these factors: examine the ways in which the creator was responding, directly or indirectly, to theories related to linguistics or semiology, avant-garde art movements or the psychological perception of forms (ie. any of the ideas that we’ve covered).

Discuss the manner in which the design you’ve chosen embodies these theories. Provide direct references to relevant passages from our readings. Locate additional writings using library resources to substantiate your comparisons.

Your goal is ultimately to provide a critical examination, not an account of historical details.

Criteria:

Submit a 750-1000 word typewritten paper, double-spaced in 12 pt. Times New Roman.

Include images of the work under consideration and any other relevant illustrations.

Cite all materials researched for historical context, any related writings, and image sources.
See resources below on citation

All sources, references and quotations should be cited in MLA format.
See resources below on MLA format

Upload your paper as a PDF, attached to a new OpenLab Post.

Add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. 

        • TITLE: Research Paper 1 – Your Initials
        • CATEGORY: Research Paper
        • TAG: Research Paper 1
        • TAG: Your Name

Preparation

Research Paper 1 Prep

    1. Select a design or design object created after 1971 in which the influence of the theories we’ve studied so far can be seen.
      See the resources listed below for inspiration
    2. In your Research Journal, add an image and begin with a brief description of the work, the designer who created it, and the historical circumstances under which it was made.
    3. Considering these factors, examine the ways in which the creator was responding, directly or indirectly, to theories related to:
      • semiotics & signs, ways of meaning, models of communication, avant-garde art movements (ie. any of the ideas that we’ve covered).
      • Discuss how the design you’ve chosen embodies these ideas.
      • Provide direct references to relevant passages from our readings and locate additional writings using library resources and other sources to support your comparisons.
    4. Provide a critical examination of the object and its relationship to the theories we’ve discussed, not an account of historical details.
      These should be your observations, your ideas supported by published sources.
    5. Use the links provided under Help > Course Resources  to find your design source (advertising, graphic design, industrial design objects, motion graphics, etc.) for your paper.
    6.  

 

Research Project Prep

The first paper is a jumping-off point for your research project. You don’t have to lock yourself into a topic yet, but your should by now have started to define your aesthetic and theoretical interests based on the ideas we discussed so far. If nothing has piqued your interest yet, ask you self “What do I feel passionate about?” “What do I love to talk about?” “What makes me feel angry, sad, depressed?” “If I could be doing anything right now that would make an impact on the world, what would it be?” “How could I use my skills as a designer to change the world?” “What graphic style, design movement, decade, or typeface is my favorite?”

Visit the Grading Policy page for an overview of the Research Project.

 

Inspiration: explore the following sites . . .

https://openlab.citytech.cuny.edu/comdtheoryoer/bibliography/#additional_theory_history

https://arthistoryproject.com/essays/

Cooper Hewitt Design’s Museum’s Blog …you can also just browse their collection.

AIGA Eye on Design

Filter by Graphic Design or Design in MoMA Collection

or browse the MoMA Design Store

Exhibitions and the Collection at Museum of Art and Design

Designboom for a wide variety of design

Design Observer also features conversations and articles

Print Magazine

 

Resources

 

 

 

Assignment 4 for 3/1

Our reading assignment includes three short manifestos written by avant-garde artists in the early decades of the 20th century. They are as follows:

Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, The Founding and Manifesto of Futurism (1909):

Aleksandr Rodchenko, Varvara Stepanova, Aleksei Gan, Who We Are: Manifesto of the Constructivist Group (c. 1922): 

El Lissitzky, Our Book (1926):

Here are the questions to which you should respond in your reading response:

    • What sort of possibilities did these authors envision for their immediate futures?
    • What role did they imagine technology would play in shaping those futures?
    • In what ways did these artists anticipate the art and design that would follow?
    • What common views do these authors share? Where might they disagree?
    • Which elements of these texts are relevant for the present?
    • Which elements are problematic?

1. Open the readings

2. Enable our Hypothesis group 

3. Consider these questions.

Here are the questions to which you should respond in your reading response:

  • What sort of possibilities did these authors envision for their immediate futures?
  • What role did they imagine technology would play in shaping those futures?
  • In what ways did these artists anticipate the art and design that would follow?
  • What common views do these authors share? Where might they disagree?
  • Which elements of these texts are relevant for the present?
  • Which elements are problematic?

4. Read & Annotate.

5. Draft your Reading Response.

6. Spell and grammar check

7. Post your Reading Response.

When ready, create a new post titled “Reading Response 4 – YourInitials.”

  • TITLE: Reading Response 4 – Your Initials
  • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
  • TAG: Reading Response #4
  • TAG: Your Name

Assignment: Reading Response 3, due 2/21

due: February 21

LinkedIn Learning with your Public Library Card

Some of the videos we will watch today and in the future are accessible via LinkedIn Learning. You can access LinkedIn Learning for free with a New York, Queens, or Brooklyn Public Library Card. Note: The Bronx and Staten Island are part of the New York Public Library system.

Use the links below for easy access to the site and the LinkedIn Learning App:

If you don’t have a Library Card, don’t worry, anyone who lives in New York State can apply for a New York Public Library Card for free and start accessing online content immediately.

Having trouble? Don’t wait until Sunday night! Reach out to me at pchilders@citytech.cuny.edu with questions.

 

Reading Overview

Our second reading assignment is an introduction to semiotics and models of communication. These two topics directly relate to how we understand communication design from a theoretical perspective.

…what is semiotics, and why is it important? Semiotics is defined as the theory of signs. The word “semiotics” comes from the Greek word semeiotikos , which means an interpreter of signs. Signing is vital to human existence because it underlies all forms of communication.

HALL, SEAN. THIS MEANS THIS, THIS MEANS THAT : A USER’S GUIDE TO SEMIOTICS, LAURENCE KING PUBLISHING, 2012.

We will be reading Hall, Sean. This Means This, This Means That: A User’s Guide to Semiotics, Laurence King Publishing, 2012 (Chapters 1 & 2). You can also take a look at an excerpt from the book that Sean Hall references: de Saussure, Ferdinand.  Course in General Linguistics  Trans. Wade Baskin, New York, Philosophical Library, 1959

Key Themes and Takeaways

sign is composed of a signifier and a signified. The signifier is the sound-image that we see, speak or hear to refer to the sign. The signified is the concept that our mind conjures in relation to the sign. The sign is the whole of these parts.

The sign is arbitrary. We do not actively choose the components of language. The sign emerges from collective behavior, with no motivations or natural connections. Signifiers are linear. Meaning develops over time as we speak to one another.

Signs can take different forms: icon = signifier resembles the signified, index = signifier is caused by the signified, symbol = arbitrary relationship between signifier and signified.

Messages take different paths between the sender and receiver and back again via different mediums: presentational, representational, mechanical. Analysis can help us to understand when communication works and when it doesn’t and why.

Noise is the distortion in the meaning of a message, whether intended or not. It affects whether or not the message has successfully reached its destination.

Truth in communication. Where a message says it is from may be very different from where it is really from. It can sometimes be hard to determine the intention of the sender and that can affect how we receive the communication.

Non-literal forms of communication use simile, metaphor, metonym, synecdoche, irony, lies, impossibility, depiction, and representation. These devices are important for design, advertising, illustration, filmmaking, fashion, and journalism because they help with the transmission of meaning.

Instructions

NOTE: Prior to starting this assignment, make sure you have set up your Hypothesis.  

Following the instructions below, read and annotate the text with your classmates in our Hypothesis group. After reading and annotating the text, create a rough draft of your response in your Research Journal. Your response should be about 200 words and checked for spelling and grammar errors. Lastly, create a new post and publish your response.

1. Enable Hypothesis

Because this week’s readings are not hosted on a website, you will need to adjust the Hypothesis Chrome Extension or use Firefox to annotate in our group.

    • Open Chrome > Setttings > Extensions
    • Locate Hyposthesis > Details
    • Make sure “Allow access to file URLs” is switched on.
Hypothesis PDF Magic

Refer to this Annotating PDFs Tutorial for instructions on how to set up the Chrome Extension to allow for PDF file annotations in the browser.

Alternatively, you can use Firefox. Just make sure you have added the Hypothesis Bookmarklet to your bookmarks, and enable it. See Hypothesis in Reference for details.

2. Open the reading.

In a new tab open the Week 2 Readings > Google Drive folder and download the three PDFs enclosed:

    • Signs and Signing: This_Means_This,_This_Means_That_Ch1.pdf
    • Ways of Meaning: This_Means_This,_This_Means_That_Ch2.pdf
    • Saussure_CourseGenLing_Exc.pdf (For Reference)

Next, drag the first reading (or choose File > Open) into Chrome or Firefox.

Click on the Hypothesis extension icon ( h.) or the Bookmarklet to enable Hypothesis.

Login to your account and select our  group (IMPORTANT!) from the dropdown to make sure your annotations and highlights are recorded in the group.

You should now be able to add annotations to our group when reading these downloaded files. Pretty cool.

3. Consider these questions.

Here are the questions to which you should respond in your reading response:

    • How has language shaped design historically?
    • Can visual design accomplish things that language cannot? Why?
    • How are signs, signifiers, and the signified employed in visual communication? Provide examples from contemporary or historical advertising.
    • How are non-literal devices used to convey meaning in advertising? Provide examples from contemporary or historical advertising that use simile, metaphor, metonym, synecdoche, irony, lies, impossibility, depiction, or representation.

NOTE: Please use historical or contemporary examples, not just those from the readings.

4Read & Annotate.

Consider the questions/prompts listed above. Start to formulate the answers to these questions while you practice close reading with annotations. This will be part of your grade. Share at least 3 annotations in the Hypothesis group, including your questions, definitions, and ideas with your classmates. Add the tags: This Means This and That and Reading Response 2 to your annotations.

5. Draft your Reading Response.

In your Research Journal, write a draft of your 200-word response. Check for grammar and spelling errors. Use the word count tool. Find some visual examples to supplement your reading response. Consider looking back at the Learning Graphic Design History videos from the Week 2 Agenda to see if there are historical examples that will help support your ideas. Additionally, check out the Design Archives & Collections on the Course Resources page, specifically AIGA’s Eye on Design to find out what contemporary designers are working on.

6. Post your Reading Response.

When ready, create a new post in this OpenLab Course titled “Reading Response 2 – YourInitials.” At the top of the post copy and paste the following: Hall, Sean. This Means This, This Means That: A User’s Guide to Semiotics, Laurence King Publishing, 2012. pgs 21-67. Copy and paste the questions/prompts listed above. Paste your reading response from your Research Journal. Add links to your annotations in the Hypothesis group at the bottom of your post. Adjust any formatting issues that may have occurred while pasting.

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

    • TITLE: Reading Response 2 – Your Initials
    • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
    • TAG: Reading Response #2
    • TAG: Your Name

7. Post your definition of design

  • TITLE: Design – Your Initials
  • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
  • TAG: Reading Response  aside
  • TAG: Your Name

Due Date(s)

    • Your reading response is due the day before the next session Monday, Sep. 21 by 6pm to allow time for review.

Resources

More info

Texts

Assignment: due February 8 & 14

Overview

Our first reading assignment consists of an introduction to the primary text we will use in this course, Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field compiled and edited by Helen Armstrong. This introduction briefly mentions many of the designers, movements, and texts included in the collection while also describing the author’s own interest in the theoretical aspects of the design process.

Key Themes and Takeaways

Revisiting the Avant-Garde: Armstrong believes that the ambitions of avant-garde artists from the early 20th century should be questioned but should inspire designers of today 

Collective Authorship is a constantly evolving aspect of design, in which the producer-consumer relationship plays a key role

Universal Systems of Connection have been envisioned as a means of uniting people through design, but remain restrictive in many ways

Social Responsibility must be a part of the design process, as designers play a key role in shaping society

We should ask what role the avant-garde of the new millennium will play

Preparation

NOTE: Prior to starting this assignment, complete the Week 1 Agenda tasks: setting up Hypothesis, create your Research Journal, and creating an OpenLab Post.

Process:

        1. Read and annotate the text in our Hypothesis group.
        2. After reading and annotating the text, create a rough draft of your response in your Research Journal. Your response should be about 200 words and checked for spelling and grammar errors.
        3. Lastly, create a new post and publish your response.

1. Open the reading.

In a new tab open the text Armstrong, Helen. Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field, Princeton Architectural Press, 2009. Navigate to pages 9-15 to read “Introduction: Revisiting the Avant-Garde.”

2. Enable Hypothesis.

The reading link above will automatically open Hypothesis. Login to your account and select our COMD3504_s22 group (IMPORTANT!) from the dropdown to make sure your annotations and highlights will be recorded in the group. See Using Hypothesis for details.

 

—————————————————————

Week 1 assignment

1. Readings

2. Consider these questions.

Here are the questions to which you should respond in your reading response:

    • According to this author, what role should design play in society?
    • What distinguishes the field, or fields, of design from other creative occupations?
    • Why should designers concern themselves with unsolvable theoretical questions?
    • What role does technology play in shaping design?
    • What are the most urgent problems facing designers today?
    • How, and why, is a designer responsible for solving these problems?

3Read & Annotate.

Consider the questions/prompts listed above. Start to formulate the answers to these questions while you practice close reading with annotations. This will be part of your grade. Share at least 3 annotations in the Hypothesis group, including your questions, definitions, and ideas with your classmates. Add the tags: Revisiting the Avant-Garde and Reading Response 1 to your annotations.

4. Draft your Reading Response.

In your Research Journal, write a draft of your 200-word response. Check for grammar and spelling errors. Use the word count tool.

5. Post your Reading Response.

When ready, create a new post in this OpenLab Course. At the top of the post copy and paste the following: Armstrong, Helen. “Introduction: Revisiting the Avant-Garde” Graphic Design Theory: Readings From the Field, Princeton Architectural Press, 2009. Pages 9-15.

Copy and paste the questions/prompts listed above. Paste your reading response from your Research Journal. Adjust any formatting issues that may have occurred while pasting.

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

    • TITLE: Reading Response 1 – Your Initials
    • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
    • TAG: Reading Response #1
    • TAG: Your Name

Here is an example Reading Response post for reference:

Due Date(s)

  • Your reading response is due the day before the next session.
  • Please post your responses by February 7 before  6 pm to allow time for review.

  • And please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or issues. Email: pchilders@citytech.cuny.edu

 

—————————————————————

Week 2 assignment

1. Readings

Beatrice Warde, The Crystal Goblet, or Why Printing Should be Invisible (1930): Warde_CrystalGobletDownload

A selection from György Kepes’ Language of Vision: Painting, Photography, Advertising-Design (1944): Kepes_Language_of_Vision_excDownload

2. Consider these questions.

Respond in your reading response. Your answer is the start of your first paper:

    •  Select a design or design object created after 1971 in which the influence of the theories considered thus far can be seen.
    •  Begin with a brief description of the object, the designer who created it, and the historical circumstances under which it was made.
    • Your goal is to provide a critical examination, not an account of historical details.

If you’d like some inspiration, try the following links:

3Read & Annotate.

Consider the questions/prompts listed above. Start to formulate the answers to these questions while you practice close reading with annotations. This will be part of your grade. Share at least 3 annotations in the Hypothesis group, including your questions, definitions, and ideas with your classmates.

Add the tags: Crystal Goblet or Language of Vision and Reading Response 2 to your annotations.

4. Draft your Reading Response.

In your Research Journal, write a draft of your 200-word response. Check for grammar and spelling errors. Use the word count tool.

5. Post your Reading Response.

When ready, create a new post in this OpenLab Course. At the top of the post copy and paste the following:
Warde, Beatrice. The Crystal Goblet, or Why Printing Should Be Invisible Princeton Architectural Press, 2009. Pages 39-43., Kepes, György. Language of Vision: Painting, Photography, Advertising-Design, Paul Theobald, 1949. Pages 200-221

Copy and paste the questions/prompts listed above.

Paste your reading response from your Research Journal. Adjust any formatting issues that may have occurred while pasting.

Please be sure to add the following title, category, and tags to your posts. For help with adding Categories and Tags, see OpenLab Help.

      • TITLE: Reading Response 1 – Your Initials
      • CATEGORY: Reading Responses
      • TAG: Reading Response #1
      • TAG: Your Name

Here is an example Reading Response post for reference:

Due Date(s)

    • Your reading response is due the day before the next session.
    • Please post your responses by February 14 before  6 pm to allow time for review.

    • And please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or issues. Email: pchilders@citytech.cuny.edu

 

—————————————————————

Resources

More info

Texts

 

Viewing Highlight
Loading...
Highlight
Close
Add Comment
Loading...
Cancel