Author Archives: Jovens

Plagiarism Addiction

I just finished reading “The Plagiarist Tale” the story was pretty crazy. Rowan spent decades getting away with plagiarism, what really struck me was that he was stealing from over 15-20+ pieces of work. I can’t believe he was getting away with this for so long. This article got me upset because he made a whole career & good living through plagiarism while there’s students like me or aspiring writers who put their all into into writing a piece. Whether it’s to get a good grade or in hopes of attaining a valuable career we put in the effort, whereas Rowan just pieced together the efforts of dozens & dozens of authors. Now as unethical as his actions were I have to give Rowan credit where credit is deserved. He has a a great mind, its no easy task to take hundreds of different passages/sentences throughout different periods of time and being able to seamlessly integrate them into one story, a “literary mash up” as the article says. Being able to do this is a talent within itself, its unfortunate he had to use this talent for bad. I believe if he had a conscious back then he’d be able to find a way to use this talent for something beneficial other than stealing people’s work.

Open Data The Gift & The Curse

In reference to the open data argument I think that can be considered the gift and the curse. Open data would serve as a positive because it would give everyone access to the information they need. For example a young scientist testing out his/her new hypothesis for an experiment would be able to access all the previous research in whatever field he/she was in. This makes advancing civilization as a whole much more easier. Also if a student such as myself is doing a paper I’d easily be able to access scholarly works without all of the financial hassle. The downside to this is that with all the reproducing of data it would be hard for the original author to receive credit because it’d be hard to distinguish who’s the original. Also with all this data going around it’d give people less of an incentive to create something because they know someone(s) going to take it and claim it as there’s. I think what we need is semi open data, data would be open but would have basic copyright restrictions intended to give the original author credit.

Transparent Truth

I know there were multiple readings but in this post I’m going to focus on the first reading by Eland. This article captured my attention because this is something I had to sadly learn by my own critical thinking and personal research. Mostly everything in this world we know has been manipulated by the “filters” of the government we live in today. A cop clearly wrongfully shoots a kid and kills him, what do we see that as? Cold blooded murder right? But unfortunately it won’t take long for a news corp to dig up all the negative facts and exaggerated truth about the kid so it can give us a “filter” that shooting the kid was the justified thing to do. This is an extreme case as to which these filters are used but sadly it’s not even close to the extent of these filters. Ads and propaganda make us believe that one brand is better than the other when in reality both brands are the same essentially. An example of this is Ralph Lauren polo and U.S. polo, people (I can’t lie including myself) through word of mouth have justified that Ralph Lauren polo is of superior quality to the U.S. polo and that U.S. polo is fake polo. But if some simple research is conducted, you will learn that U.S. polo is a branch off of Ralph Lauren, it just costs less. Due to the world we live in we automatically assume that if it costs less it must be of low quality. This is the assumption that marketing companies want to put in our heads so they can take our money. A brand new monster hdmi cable was $59.99 plus tax claiming to be superior and stuff, I had bought a similar hdmi cable which was non name brand for $0.87 plus tax and shipping (total of about $3.14). The cable was the same as the monster cable and after almost 6 ½ years is still standing strong and providing HD picture to my TV. This is just to show you how these automatic assumptions are used to blind us from the reality of things.

Evolution Of Music

Reading the online article was really nostalgic because back when the digital music age started i was probably around 6 or 7, same for when the first iPod came out. Back then I didn’t know how big of deal both of these technologies were/going to be. Services such as iTunes/Pandora have to thank Napster for breaking open the digital music era, since people were downloading music illegally all over the place that opened up the door for these digital music services because someone/thing had to step in and create a legitimate online music business, and the rest is history from there. I make music so it was interesting to learn the history of the MP3. As an artist you always want the highest quality sound, everything to me matters whether it’d be hearing a pin drop in the background or the booming bass itself. I never knew MP3 stripped so much information even though this is great for making the file size small it kind of takes out some of the things a music lover like me likes. Which is all those close to quiet sounds. Although you can barely hear these sounds but I love it when I’m listening to music on headphones on full blast and i can hear those little sounds, it adds some spice to the beat/song. But in the end though MP3 is revolutionary so those little sounds is a small price to pay for this amazing compression.

Blog #2 Past & Present

The Cobweb was an interesting read to me because it was talking about how delicate a web page can be. From when I was younger till now I would always find dead links from time to time, naturally i just thought probably the web page from the 90’s or something and that the page was dead because the link was so old. Now don’t get me wrong I never thought a web page could last forever but I also didn’t think the average lifespan for a web page was 3 months & change (100 days) I always it would be longer than that. But another thing that caught my attention in the article was the Wayback Machine, the Wayback Machine to me is kind of like a virtual time capsule filled with web pages (and sites) that’ll live on forever but probably won’t ever see the light of day again.
The Reading Brain was particularly interesting to me because this was something I used to think about on my own. Although I don’t like reading for fun but I’ve always preferred physical texts because I felt the physical text was more easy to follow and flipping through the pages felt like walking through an adventure. Basically what I’m trying to say is that flipping through pages in a book is what makes reading reading. I have nothing against reading digitally, I love technology it’s what I major in, I can read an article or two digitally but when it comes to extensive reading eventually my eyes start to hurt and i forget ⅓ or more of what I just finished reading. Reading digitally just isn’t as effective to me as reading a paperback, even though it satisfied my laziness. Now these were my thoughts on digital vs physical reading before the article, so after reading it was a little weird that the article was reiterating my thoughts. It was like the author was reading my mind as I read along.

The Evolution of Information

The New York Times reading as well as chapter 1 in the book were great readings. What really fascinated me about both readings was the fact that chapter 1 was sort of echoing the message from the NY Times article which was from almost 33 years ago! The article spoke of how traditional life (TV nights, vacations, outdoor activities, etc) would be different due to teletext and videotex. I’m guessing this teletext and videotex they speak of are our phones/tablets & computers of today. The article said both of these technologies would change the way we gather information & interact with each other. Most of the things in the article came true such as home businesses( “The home will double as a place of employment, with men and women conducting much of their work at the computer terminal.”), social networking sites (“There will be a shift away from conventional workplace and school socialization. Friends, peer groups and alliances will be determined electronically, creating classes of people based on interests and skills rather than age and social class.”) and online shopping (“Home-based shopping will permit consumers to control manufacturing directly, ordering exactly what they need for ”production on demand.””) the article warned that even though these technologies may be useful it could possess negative side effects. Which brings me to chapter 1 in the book, it was reiterating some of the points from the 32 year old article, saying that even though technology has these positives it’s also taking away from our traditional way of living (the way we pass information on from generation to generation). Overall I think the chapter is right, we’re in the middle of an informational/technological revolution and how we as humans proceed with these technologies will greatly impact our future as a society.