I used both EBSCO and Google Scholar or well tried to at least and some of the phrases I searched were “print media”, “broadcast media” , “fair use in reporting”, “creating the news” and “media’s truth”. I didn’t find similarities between the results with the two different search methods, but differences I did find EBSCO didn’t really provide me with accurate articles non of which lead me to something useful for my paper. I feel as though Google scholar is more user friendly because it easily understood my key terms and found some useful articles where as EBSCO didn’t find any it doesn’t understand the natural spoken language or well how I type like Google scholar does in my opinion.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Chito2500 on Documentation Purpose
- Jovi on Documentation Purpose
- Jessica on The Life of a Link
- Julissa <3 on Journal Entry 4
- Madi on New knowldege
t a g s
- alternative media
- Badke
- big data
- citation
- copyright
- data
- databases
- digital
- digital age
- documentation
- EBSCO
- Eland
- Flickr
- folksonomy
- Information
- John V. Pavlik
- JOURNAL
- knowledge
- law
- media
- news
- Optimization
- Pavlik
- plagiarism
- privacy
- process documentation
- reading
- reading response
- research
- research journal
- research paper writing
- research process
- research proposal
- Search Engine
- search engines
- social media
- sources
- technology
- terms
- web
- web 2.0
- Wikipedia
- Zine
- zines
Archives
Categories
Meta
I had similar problems like you did. I didnât really like using the database or Google scholar. My biggest problem is that it doesnât understand natural language, I would put in âeducational gamesâ, âgames in the classroomâ and I would get nothing, whereas if I type it in Google. The database isnât user friendly because I believe itâs old in the sense where it comes to the use of language now. With Google on the other hand you can type just as how you would speak to your friend which is much easier.