Wau: The Most Amazing, Ancient, and Singular Number
In this video Vi Hart talks about a number that was discovered in East Asia and in many other ancient societies. She describes the different mathematical relationships, usually infinite fractions, that included Wau (some that just included Wau and others were equal to Wau). She related the special number to nature and other fields of study like physics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsOXvQn3JuE
Why Every Proof that .999… = 1 is Wrong
In this video Vi Hart goes through some of the many proofs that are used to show that .9 repeating is equal to one. She goes on to prove or attempt to prove these wrong to say that the two are different numbers that are independent of each other. She invalidates these proofs and then briefly talks about why mathematicians believe it is so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CfJzrmS9UfY
Doodling in Math Class: Stars
In this video Vi Hart talks about drawing stars and connects this activity to math. She talks about stars with different numbers of points and how the number of points relates to the number of sides in each of the polygons that make up the star. She then makes this star drawing into a “game”.
I was a little confused, especially during Hart’s “Doodling in Math Class: Stars” video not because I did not understand what she was saying just because I felt that she was going a little to quick while speaking and the video recording was also sped up so while trying to process what she had just said she was already on to the next part of her speaking and all throughout her hand was moving very quickly on the paper. She did show what she was saying at the same time that she was saying it. For this reason I had to pause the video multiple times to reassess what she said. There was not anything in the video that particularly bewildered me or made me say wow except for when Hart started drawing the much larger stars with many points (when she began using the protractor): I thought that the stars that she made were beautiful and they also require a lot of talent to make. I learned that a star with p points can be drawn with 2 p/2- gons; this was a mathematical relationship that I had not been aware of. In fact I have not ever looked into the math behind stars before. I also learned that even with a set number of points in the star and a set number of polygons formed within the star, there are still multiple ways of drawing the star even with the restrictions. Although I did have to pause the video ever so often so that I did not fall behind on what Hart was saying, I for the most part understand everything that she said. So the only question I have after watching the video, is not directly about the math or the drawing in the video, it is: how does Hart discover the relationships between things like the sides of the stars and the number of polygons in the star; or rather: how is she so successful at finding things like the “game” in this video, that still relate to math, but that a majority other people would not be able to discover?
I think the video could really help me with my own math teaching, even though I did not really enjoy the fast pace of it. What I can learn from Hart is that I need to implement creativity in the classroom at least every once in a while especially in order to keep the students engaged. As Hart emphasizes in the beginning of the video while talking about how she was bored during her math class while learning about factoring, classes that are only lecture can get boring and can cause students to become distracted. So rather than have my students lose focus like Hart did from what the class was actually about: I will give my students an activity to do in class that directly relates to the topic of the day. This way they have something fun to look forward to and are then more inclined to pay attention during class so that they can preform well during the activity. This way they get the fun that they want in class, without losing focus from the actual class and making fun for themselves. Hart’s video really helped me come up with this idea for my own classroom because she expresses that class can get boring, which is true for any student at one point or another and that there are fun and thought-provoking activities to do during class that can still be mathematical and related to class. Kids have a hard time focusing on school work especially for note-taking and problem solving but they are often all for interactive activities, and so I have come to realize after watching this video that combining the two ways of learning can help to take away some of this lack of focus.
Yes I certainly agree with you. Hart is able to bring creativity into Math which is somewhat lacking these days. This creativity is able to inspire others since it shows how something simple can be made fun and entertaining. Teachings of this sort would make any math class more entertaining than boring. This perhaps would make students outside of class to begin to delve into math since we mostly just use it then continue on with our day as if it never happened.
I also find myself watching these videos in a different way than I watch other youtube videos – I pause a lot, too! – so in a sense I’ve had to learn a new way to watch in order to really appreciate them.
I think the way you’ve channelled this into your teaching ideas is wonderful!
This is from an exam question I'm trying to understand - I've got the following english-language sentence: There are (one or) two students such that if they pass the exam, then every student passes the exam. The task is to formalize the sentence and give either a proof or counterexample. Now, I can see that […]
Using the given symbolization key, translate the following English sentences into PLE. UD The set {people in Brandon} Cxy x is a child of y Fxy x is a friend of y Exy x is an enemy of y Yxy x is younger than y Mxy x is married to y Px x is a […]
This seems obviouly. A proposition P may have many many necessary conditions, even infinit. Some of these conditions are also sufficient, and we don't consider them. For ALL rest of necessary conditions, do they universaly identifies the P? I mean, If there is another proposition Q, which has exactly the same necessary conditions as P, […]
This is the rule of Existential Elimination: ∃xAx ⊢ B Can Ac be inferred directly from ∃xAx, given c is assumed to have the property A? For qS-tree proofs, it is a valid rule to infer Ac from ∃xAx and for fS trees, Ac can be inferred from ∃xAx given the assumption Ec. In both […]
In his Analysis I book, Terence Tao defines two functions $f,g:X\to Y$ to be equal if $f(x)=g(x)$, for all $x\in X$. After giving some examples of this concept, he then says: This notion of equality obeys the usual axioms (Exercise 3.3.1). It is quite easy to show that this relation defined on the class of […]
Is my statement correct in logics? The statement “exist A such that if A, then not B” is equivalent to “A and Not B”. This is because “exist A such that if A, then not B” means that there exists an A such that if A is true, then B is false. This can be […]
I am reading these slides about unifiers and most general unifiers (MGUs): https://artint.info/2e/slides/ch13/lect3.pdf In particular, an MGU is defined as follows. A substitution $\sigma$ is an MGU of $e_1$ and $e_2$ if $\sigma$ is a unifier of $e_1$ and $e_2$ and If a substitution $\sigma'$ also unifies $e_1$ and $e_2$, then $e\sigma'$ is an instance […]
Consider a Horn clause theory $\mathcal H$ over some propositional atoms $\mathcal A$. Call a function $f : \mathcal A \to Bool$ an assignment. If $f$ and $g$ are assignments, write $f\leq g$ when $\forall{A\in\mathcal A}.f(A)\Rightarrow g(A)$. It is not hard to see that this is a partial order. Call $f$ a satisfying assignment when […]
I came across the notation $\renewcommand{vec}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}$ $$\text{flow}(\vec{x},\vec{y},t) \equiv \bigwedge_{j=1}^{n} \exists \vec{z}\in I : y_j-x_j = t\cdot f_j(\vec{z}).$$ equation when reading the paper Light-weight hybrid model checking facilitating online prediction of temporal properties in preparation for my master's thesis, but I have never seen the triangle symbol (with the $n$ on top) in front of the […]
I don't understand why there are 5 propositional connectives (conjuction, disjunction, implication, negation and equivalence) that are regularly given a priori in propositional calculus? If the goal was to minimize the number of them why was equivalence given a priori even though it can be defined as a conjucture of an implication and its reverse […]
Yes I certainly agree with you. Hart is able to bring creativity into Math which is somewhat lacking these days. This creativity is able to inspire others since it shows how something simple can be made fun and entertaining. Teachings of this sort would make any math class more entertaining than boring. This perhaps would make students outside of class to begin to delve into math since we mostly just use it then continue on with our day as if it never happened.
I also find myself watching these videos in a different way than I watch other youtube videos – I pause a lot, too! – so in a sense I’ve had to learn a new way to watch in order to really appreciate them.
I think the way you’ve channelled this into your teaching ideas is wonderful!