As I reread the passage it wasn’t much different, but I think it’s because I had already given up and trying to look deeper into it. I read and read. I will say that the areas of stories of procrastination and examples of it stood out more than before I didn’t see it as the author just talking at that point.  I myself procrastinated just to read it and write so I can relate to the examples of procrastination.  and looking back at the reading I feel as if the experiment of procrastination is more appealing to read.  when I planned to reread, I would look at things more carefully and I did. Didn’t find much but the statistics and interest in the experiments is what I found more appealing to read. I can see myself doing an experiment like that for whichever reason. The passage isn’t something I would read on my own but after rereading it isn’t that bad after all.