Prof. Jessica Penner | OL02 | Spring 2021

Amani Nassar, Critique on Leguin

This was definitely a story I had to give another read to because I came into it with an assumption of human characters and it made me a bit confused. Despite that, I liked how Leguin let the story build up with good detailing because it created an intense feeling that made me want to continue reading to find out what finally happened. The diction in the story was good as well, there was a southern flare to it and that’s a style of writing you don’t often see. Having the story be about a family that we come to find out later are creatures was a nice twist as well. Some questions I have is why did Leguin choose to use animal characters, while having one turn human, and why were the characters given human thoughts? Also what was the turning point that made the husband change?

1 Comment

  1. Will

    I’m also curious about why he chose to have animal characters having humane thoughts. It reminds me of a movie I had seen recently (it was called The Call of the Wild if you’re interested), but the animals in that film had communicated in a interesting form as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *