this story was very interesting to see. I liked the way that this was set up. The writer set up a back story, which makes her point of view more reliable. Even though there is a bias, because it is one side of the story. But by providing examples of how her husband was before these strange behaviors started happening, proves what kind of relationship they had. They had this relationship which allows the reader to recognize a trust. Just like when you’re talking to a jury, you have people to convince. I think this was smart. Then after giving the back story she continues to explain the events in sequential order. She also adds the detail of her daughter being scared of her dad. Which further exemplifies her point of view. Overall i thought this story, was excellently written. I do wonder if the writer added the missing details about her husband, what kind of effect would that have on the reader?