Category: Source Entry RD (Page 7 of 13)

My 2nd and 3rd source entry That I used is from a Movie called American sniper. There is also a book wrote by Chris Kyle. The book name is American sniper this book was written on January 2, 2012, the genres used in this book and in the movie are biography and autobiography.

Kyle, Chris. “American Sniper Movie Review & Film Summary (2014): Roger Ebert.” Movie Review & Film Summary (2014) | Roger Ebert, William Morrow, 2 Jan. 2012, 

In this video, I saw a soldier shooting at an eight-year-old boy. It wasn’t just a shooting as I saw the video I observed and I felt very deeply how a soldier fight with him on self to decide should he kill the boy or let that boy kill my soldier Buddy’s. As I was watching the video I put myself through the same situation and imagined that what should have I done in that situation. And to be honest it was very very hard to even decide what to do. A soldier before becoming a soldier Took Oath that he Will protect his soldier brothers and his country he would sacrifice himself or will kill any kind of threat to my motherland. 

In my third source Entry, I also used a video by the same movie but a different scene. In this video, I saw that a man pointing an RPG at owner American soldier convoy however he got shot by an American sniper as soon as the Man falls down a boy just run and pick that RPG as a sniper was watching him he was saying that drop it. I really felt that scene that how A soldier fights with him on self because I know that the soldier doesn’t like to kill boys our children’s in the war. Although they have to protect their country and their soldier buddies therefore they have to take some insane decisions. As I continue to watch I saw that the boy drop that RPG and run away as soon as the sniper saw that he took a big breath it was like a relief to him His “UGH” that came from his mouth was really miserable and it sounded as he came back to his life again.

Part 1:

A smooth exit from eternal inflation? S.W. Hawking & Thomas Hertog Jornal of High Energy Physics volume 2018

Part 2:

This jornal talks about the idea of the multiverse, abundant of universes that exist at the same time but are far away from one another. They talked about eternal inflation how our universe emerged, space-time expanded at an fast rate. All of these to prove that the theory might be true, but with exceptions on how the multiverse might be if this was something that exist. They also talked about eternal inflation, the Euclidean dual theory the transition in the evolution of the multiverse with equations and measurements  on how it works from the beginning of the creation of the universe and how it’s to be today.

Part 3:

I found this journal fascinating because of the different ways they tried to prove this theory. Stephan Hawking says “Our conjecture strengthens the intuition that holographic cosmology implies a significant reduction of the multiverse to a much more limited set of possible universes.This has important implications for anthropic reasoning.“Stephan Hawking and Hertog wrote this to illustrates that the multiverse might not be a infinite number of universe on the contrary a certain number of universes that exist in the galaxy. I didn’t realize how much is yet to be known. Since the multiverse isn’t something that is proven yet their is so many ways it can be interpret. Many known astronomers or scientist spend their time on proving this theory because it’s one way to explain how our galaxy is and understand how our universe is and works.  Stephan Hawking is one who seems to believe this to be very much true; however,not all people think this way there doesn’t seem to be anyway to disprove or prove it. Which I find breathtaking because how one concept can have the whole science, math, physicist world fighting, arguing, researching what should be consider truth or just fiction.

The rhetoric factors of the genre and the authors credentials is that the jornal was published and Stephan Hawking one of the writers is one of the best known scientist in the world who made important discoveries. I felt the authors writing styles was a little hard, well at least for me to understand I had to search most of the words to really understand what he was trying to say. I believe since this is such an advance journal is mostly for the science department astronomers, theoretical physicist audience. His purpose to writing this was to talk about the multiverse and how it might not be something so vast, but smaller. This choice of  genre affect the meaning and  credibility of the document because they used local, global, geometrically, formulas etc to prove their point.

 Part 4:

“However, the above calculation implies a general argument suggesting that the amplitude of large
deformations of the conformal boundary geometry is highly suppressed in the holographic measure both in higher-spin and in Einstein gravity.“

“This transforms the probability distribution for the amount of inflation and leads to the prediction that our universe emerged from a regime of eternal inflation [12, 13]. Thus we must understand eternal inflation “

Part 1

https://omny.fm/shows/startalk-radio/cosmic-queries-the-multiverse

Part 2

This podcast with host  Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist, co-host Chuck Nice, comedian, and guest Paul Steinhardt, theoretical physicist and cosmologist. This podcast talked about the multiverse answer questions about cosmology as well as quantum physics  trying to better make us understand how the universe moved from a quantum state to a one driven by general relativity. They talked upon and explaining a variety of topics like cosmic inflation, quantum tunneling, and whether gravity is extra-dimensional. Another intriguing theory Paul Steinhardt has between the Big Bang and what he calls a Big Bounce, what he believes in since he isn’t really a fan on the multiverse. Lastly many other concepts which was discussed about such as the universes where space and time existed forever, distance and the limitations of the speed of light and a fabric of spacetime.

Part 3

This podcast was funny to listen to and interesting I learned a lot sometimes it was hard to grasp what they were trying to tell us since some of the things they talked about was sometimes confusing. For example, in the podcast Neil deGrasse Tyson said”this not a universe in some other dimension this is all one universe are or volume whatever in a meta universe and we thinking is our own it’s our thing.” Neil deGrasse is telling us that this is just one patch of the multiverse and the multiverse has so many different concepts and so many other patches around this theory. So, basically we aren’t aware that we are in this gigantic universe we think we are one of a kind in this universe and that other galaxy’s exist but that’s in a different universe when it isn’t like that from what I understand. With the theory of the  multiverse it says we are in one humongous universe with different patches that exist which is very amazing, if it’s true, we are just a small part of a bigger picture. Paul Steinhardt says,”The multiverse is a sign of breakdown of this inflationary idea it’s a failure made of the theory something we didn’t expect it wasn’t designed to produce a multiverse it’s something we discover after the fact and the problem is that because it produces an infinite number of patches of every possible variety if you ask what the theory predicts the answer is of nothing or everything.” Paul Steinhardt tell us that the multiverse theory wasn’t something they thought of creating it’s something that just occur. This theory is just another way that can perhaps explain how the universe works because being such a big galaxy we wonder what the universe holds in many mysteries waiting to be discover and with the multiverse it can do just that if it comes out to be true.

Neil deGrasse Tyson is very well known amoung the astronomers on sea and sky so he has very good  credentials. I feel the podcast really interacted with it’s audience because first they got question from their audience that they answered on the show. So they were very much aware what points and topics they should talked about. The purpose for this podcast it to answer some of the wonders on the multiverse but they also brought other topics to talk about with Chuck Nice who is a person who doesn’t really know about astronomy it really helped the audience to better understand this podcast and be intrigued with it. Lastly, since it had many people who know of this topic like the professor of Princeton and Neil deGrasse I will consider as a reliable source.

Part 4

” There would be no way to synchronize it compared to our time one patches will be born at different times so the time they would have transpired since the creation of our patch to reach the point where there’s earth and people”