|
Criteria |
Grading Rubric |
||
|
3 |
2 |
1 | |
| Context | The student clearly defines his/her main idea. | The students main idea is not clear in his/her piece. | There is no main idea in the piece. |
| Supportive
Evidence |
The student uses ample evidence (quotes) from the text to support the main idea. | The student uses some evidence from the text to support the main idea. | The student uses little to no evidence to support the main idea. |
| Conventions | The student created the piece with the customary format it is known for. | The format lacks some of the features that it is known for. | The customary format was no taken into consideration. |
| Grammar | There are little to no grammatical errors. | There are some grammatical errors. | There are far to many grammatical errors for someone who has access to spell check. |
Group 2:
Robert Lovelace, Mickael Lall, Dagoberto Guerra, Avinash Singh, Timothy Taylor
Grading – Our group agreed that it was a good idea to count the Business Letter and Email with more weight than the other platforms.
- Business Letter 30%
- Email 30%
- 3rd Platform 20%
- 4th Platform 20%
Context – How well does the student conveys his/her main idea?
Supportive Evidence – Does the student use evidence (i.e. quotes) from the text to support the main idea?
Conventions – How well does the student follow the format normally used for that particular platform (i.e. using hashtag for twitter)?
Grammar – Are there any grammatical errors?
