Category Archives: Uncategorized

Assignment #4B: Classification

Although classification refers sometimes to categorization, the term carries more complex forms in terms of research. While it seems simple to search online and find relevant results on what we are searching for, a lot of details go into interpreting or finding those results. As suggested in the book and the article, when we search, we search different ways depending on the search engines we use, sometimes we get more results than we need, sometimes we get irrelevant results or sometimes we do not get any results, as underlines Badke in the book, “-search is a messy thing, often leaving us with far more results that we don’t need than the few we do”. Noting that all the information from the search is already classified in databases, this classification can be proper to specific search engines. However, the classification used in the databases is important because it determines the efficiency of the results we get and their organization, for instance, as recommends Badke, adding metadata helps categorize data, narrow and specify our results, which results in a much-sophisticated retrieval capability. He states that “any database is only as useful as its retrieval capability”. The article “Folksonomy: a game of high-tech (and high-stakes) tag” and Badke both highlight the difference between a classified information where someone decides the different classifications, which results in a better search (controlled vocabularies); and a more flexible way of organizing the information using tags where everyone can create their own classification. In the later one, there is no organization, for example in Flickr, people use different tag names for the same category of photos.

Assignment 2W

Seaman:

  1. Before this article was posted, why was it not properly reviewed and discarded if it is considered trash “in terms of journalism ethics?”
  2. Does unpublishing the story prevent the publishing company executive from suing Gawker?
  3. This article explains a lot about journalistic credibility, but was the story untrue or just in bad taste?

Newman:

  1. Does the “right to be forgotten” apply only to individuals or does it also include corporations?
  2. Is the “right to be forgotten” not applicable to records such as criminal offenses? Or can that information also be deleted if the person who was charged had enough money to be able to delete the information?
  3. Since there is clear data and information about the lack of actual privacy on the internet in the US and countries associated with the US, why is the general populace still kept in the dark about this information?

Assignment 3B

I think that in certain situations people should have the right to be forgotten. For example someone who had something bad posted of them online should not pay the consequences for one wrong action later in life. Like get rejected from job opportunities because the company finds something of them on the internet or get into relationship problems. Yet a criminals actions online like an identity stealer should pay the consequences. I don’t think our first amendment clashes with the right to be forgotten because there is a difference between free speech and the right to know every ones information. The first amendment protects freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly and petition. It does not mention the freedom to allow one person to post about another online or keep unwanted information on the internet. By digital identity we mean information on an entity (person, organisation, application, or device) used by a computer system to represent an external agent. Obviously big companies control digital identities because they have money. They can get information on people to benefit their companies and make products in the consumers most interest. Websites also control digital identity because they are the ones that track the internet users and make a profile of them in order to recommend the websites.

Assignment #3B

I think every people has a right to be forgotten, if that’s what they truly want. I don’t believe the right to be forgotten and freedom of speech clash. Being forgotten can be considered a form of free speech. Being free speech is a form of expression. Digital identity to me means, every piece of information whether social media pages, articles, government information anything accessible by the internet shows a basic understanding of who you are as an individual. It gives a face to the name, it expresses you ideas, your address, connects to others and so much more that you yourself have put in world view. I think you, yourself are an aspect to what are seen on the web so you have some control. As to the places and site you give your information to. The other aspect is the giver they also control, parts of your life a that are accessible and can pull information from all over to make your identity.

Assignment 3B

I believe that people do have a “right to be forgotten” in certain cases. For instance, one person might have posted something that could be a source of embarrassment like an unflattering picture of themselves. Some cases are not as forgiving, such as a criminal record. Something like that should not be information that can be deleted, instead it should be helpful in seeing a person’s background for certain actions like flying out of the country or purchasing a firearm. For the smaller details that are of no consequence, people should have the “right to be forgotten.”

The “right to be forgotten” does not clash with the 1st Amendment’s “Free Speech” rights because the two ideals are distinctly different from each other. While the 1st Amendment seeks to protect the ability to have your own opinion and share it with others, the “right to be forgotten” seeks to protect the ability to maintain privacy and be able to delete information about oneself. If anything, these two ideals work in tandem with each other rather than clash.

Digital identity is who a person is based off of the information that can be gained online about them. The information ranges from the websites they visit, the content they post, their online usernames on social media sites and video games, and even the items you buy online. Your digital identity is controlled by a number of factors, the main ones being yourself and the websites you visit. You are partly in control because you are normally the one that is visiting websites, posting things, and buying things online. The websites you visit also have a hand in forming your digital identity because they all share information about you.

Assignment 3B

I feel very strongly that we all have the right to be forgotten. I don’t think ones story shouldn’t be said but in cases of foreclosures and personal information then that should be able to be removed. To not have the right to be forgotten is a breach of privacy.
In order to have ones information on the web for anyone to see is a major invasion of privacy. when one removes their information then that would keep them at ease.

I don’t believe that it clashes with our first amendment because it is ones right to remove his personal information. its not as if one is asking the removal of anyone else’s info nor to have a story removed but in the case of financial or so then he/she should have that right.

when we talk about digital identity then we are referring to all the information that you display or show simply by just doing some searches or entering certain websites. after watching the Ted Talk by Gary Kovacs it showed a new light of who controls your digital identity. it seems its not fully understood exactly who controls it, but its very clear a lot of information is displayed to any site looking to follow your every move.

Assignment 3B

I believe that people do have the right to be forgotten because there is a lot of negative, inaccurate, and outdated information stored on the web that gets mixed in with the significant ones and it can lead to misinformation on what or who gets searched. There is also the issue that some acts that may have been committed in a naĂŻve, ignorant, or childish period in someone’s life has the possibility to be dredged up again. Although time had passed and the situation became insignificant in a person’s life, if someone looks enough, the situation can come to light once again and unnecessarily affect a their life negatively.

The “right to be forgotten” does not clash with our first amendment rights, in fact, I believe they go “hand-in-hand.” The reason why is because it should one someone’s liberty to withhold their own personal information, just like it is one’s liberty to say whatever they feel they want to share. For example, if Person A says something incorrect about Person B, Person B has the right to correct Person A and change what they previously thought. That idea is trickier online because one does not exactly know what is being put out there until it directly affects them. The “right to be forgotten” protects that idea.

Digital identity is the information that can be found about you based on your browsing habits and interactions. In other words, it is like a profile of who a person is bases on what that person searches. It also includes the devices that that user accesses. Whenth person’s information is accessed by other sites, it is used to suggest advertisements and redirects for the user. Other organizations are able to figure out who you are and your interests.

Assignment 3B

I believe that the right to be forgotten is a tricky subject because of how it can theoretically be taken advantage of. Is anything related to past crimes or other incidents where the person is clearly at fault allowed to be deleted with ease? Yes, there will still be police records, but that type of information should be left online as a means of informing others of their misdeeds. In my opinion, being able to freely delete such data will cause the person who committed those acts to feel as if they can do whatever they please with almost no repercussions. They will probably learn nothing and continue to do the same thing over again;  an especially bad message for children.

In my opinion,  the right to be forgotten conflicts with our right to free speech because a person can remove anything that is directed towards them, including incriminating articles placed on blogs, websites,  and forums. For example, a blogger may post how unappealing someone’s clothes, food, attitude or food is. Yes, the person being on the receiving end of these insults will be angry, but the blogger has the right to free speech. Deleting these posts without the bloggers consent definitely goes against the 1st amendment.

Digital identity can be defined as the persona we create for ourselves online. It includes our username, attitude, typing habits, posted videos, articles, tweets, posts, and more. Based on these factors, we may present ourselves as a serious, fun, or angry person. However, it’s impossible to be completely in charge of our digital identity as people will always have differing opinions about our persona. There may also be information online that cannot be removed for whatever reason. Because of this, it’s best to look past such negativity and present yourself the way you feel best.

Assignment 3B

I believe that people have the “Right to be Forgotten”. Every individual should be given the right to chose what they would like to share with the public. Anything that an individual did not agree with presenting to the internet and is exposed is a violation of ”rights to privacy”.

In my opinion the “Right to be forgotten” doesn’t clash with our 1st amendment which is “Freedom of Speech” because just as you can say people commenting on your personal life/information such as what bloggers do is ”freedom of speech”, I can also say ”freedom of speech” is expressing myself without it being broadcasted to people I don’t want to share with.

Digital identity is basically the person you are characterized on the internet. You can be characterized anywhere from positive to negative because your identity is not controlled by you but by the viewers, cyberbullies, or bloggers. You identity is based on what they think.

Assignment 3B

I think people do have the right to be forgotten because if someone doesn’t want to give or share information about their personalities then they have the right to request to taken off information. So 1st amendment “free speech”, people have the “right to be forgotten’’ if the information is very personal and still exist on some websites, unfortunately your information still on those websites.

Digital identity is a collection of the each person information. Basically, if people use Facebook, Twitter, or some personal websites, these websites can save people basic information and may be tracked each time. There is no way to control these websites because when people sign up those websites, in their agreement letter it actually stands there and we accept it before reading through. Therefore, nobody can control it. In addition to that, people have to be very careful what they share or what they post because it may cause something in the future.

I am hundred percent sure the government controls everyone’s digital identity because in these days everybody share their ideas through their social media accounts and the government track each chosen words. If people post those words on their accounts they might get tracked by the government. Therefore, they basically monitor our lives.