BP Post 1: Bryan Jimenez

In “American SF and the Other” Ursula criticizes gender biases, social inequalities, and lack of diversity in the realm of science fiction. Ursula advocates pushing science fiction in a world where there is no bias and where the genre can spread positively with good progressiveness in the future instead of focusing on the past. One of her main points is the representation of women in science fiction. Furthermore, within the genre, women are depicted stereotypically whether they’re the victims or loyal companions to male heroes. Moreover, Ursula argues about the lack of diversity in science fiction and how it is either a specific gender or race and ethnicity. Ursula argues about the rejection of people who are perceived as different or “Aliens.” She argues that denying equality and the human reality of “The Other” leads to dehumanization. Therefore, This essay helps my frame of mind by critically thinking about the portrayal of gender, race, and gender in science fiction. It will allow me to see the biases present in the genre.
In “What is Science Fiction” Ursula argues against how simplistic the genre is and how predictive or extrapolative it can be. She argues that writers tend to take current trends and project them into the future. Furthermore, She says this mostly leads to pessimistic outcomes. Moreover, Ursula views the future, as presented in science fiction, as a “metaphor” rather than a prediction. This examines future possibilities is a means of metaphorically discussing present-day issues and challenges in society. Ursula argues that authors provide unique takes on the present through their use of fiction, disputing the idea that they predict the future. Furthermore, she explains that using symbolisms and metaphors conveys deeper meanings and perspectives on the human experience. Therefore, this essay helps my frame of mind by making me reevaluate what I think by contradicting popular opinions about science fiction, which will give me a broader perspective on the genre.