Prof. Jessica Penner | OL12 | Fall 2021
Read the student samples again.
Professor: Jessica Penner
Email: eng1121.citytech2@gmail.com
Office Hours: Tuesdays and Thursdays, 11:30 AM – 1 PM. I’ll be available through Zoom and will send an invitation via email that you should keep all semester. Try to join my meeting at the start of the hour, not at the end—since I may be talking to other students or have another appointment after the hour is up. If those times don’t work with your schedule, we can schedule a different time. This means you’ll have to schedule an appointment in advance via email. I suggest you have multiple times in mind, since your schedule may not mesh with mine!
© 2024 ENG1121 English Composition 2, FA2021 OL12
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑
The OpenLab is an open-source, digital platform designed to support teaching and learning at City Tech (New York City College of Technology), and to promote student and faculty engagement in the intellectual and social life of the college community.
It looks complete because it follow the guidelines very well. It is well organized. This shows me that I will have to put in a lot of work in order to make my work presentable.
example 1 is better formatted and consistent.
While going through this, I observed for every source there is a summary, a reflection, a quote, and a citation. This is a format that i will like to adopt while working on my project.
Both samples are formated perfectly, and those samples give me an idea of how and what I should focus on while doing my paper.
° The work is outlined. Each section is specifically labeled which makes is look well thought out. Each example is also very long which shows how much research each person did.
° The work needs to be heavily researched to explain about it
The example 1 look finished because he or she followed the right way to write an annotated bibliography. Start with the summary. I didn’t include details, only the main points, and evaluated the information and the authors. In conclusion, reflect on the usefulness of this source:
The formatting and technological features appear to be well-organized and professional. I think example 1 will help me improve my work in terms of placing the citations correctly and also the formatting.
What makes Sample 1 look professional is the arrangement of the sections, by using questions and answers. Also, the spellcheck, grammar and format seem perfect. Sample 2 has a very interesting topic, but it needs improvement in the consistency of the grammar and format.
This tells me that I have to pay attention to these details and make sure to double-check the spelling.
Sample 1 is much better than sample 2. sample 1 looks very standard. it looks like it has meet all the guidelines.
The samples definitely look professional. Example 1 looks more organized with how it’s organized into four sections, creating an easy labeled reading experience for the viewer.
This tells me the work I need to complete should be similar in this formatting style, and should have this neat look to it as well.