Jeremy Eisner Trip to the Local Fair

“All of this was advertisement, read by those who could and heard by those who could not, and the fact
that none of it was true did not extinguish their appetite a bit.”(57-58)

This passage is quite interesting because it portrays the fact that many slaves could not read, so their hype surrounding the carnival was based on hearsay that was rarely true. In addition, it shows Paul D as someone who did not mind that the attractions he was anticipating were a lie, perhaps being blissfully ignorant, or somewhat optimistic. This may actually relate to the feelings of real slaves at the time where they would attempt to find light among the darkest of situations. The slaves would have to blindly believe many of the things that were passed on around them as fact considering they were not as able to find out the answer themselves. At the same time, belief gave them hope that everything will be okay and gave them incentive to keep living day by day.

Jeremy Eisner Group 1 Connect

 

The narrator of “At the mountains of madness” describes the large city that the explorers find at over the foothills with an awe inspired voice of amazement and fascination. He describes the city by saying “ for above all my bewilderment and sense of menace there burned a dominant curiosity to fathom more of this age-old secret—to know what sort of beings had built and lived in this incalculably gigantic place, and what relation to the general world of its time or of other times so unique a concentration of life could have had” . The narrator experiences a sense of awe from being in a seemingly endlessly large space and wonders just how life was like long ago when these creatures used to live there. The narrator has just experienced the sublime in the way he talks about the city that is very similar to how we look at the cathedral found in the Castle of Otranto. When we think about the churches founded in the Gothic times, we try to imagine being inside the church. The size of us compared to the size of the church creates a dynamic that creates an awe inspiring feeling of being in such a gigantic space. The narrator looks back at a time in history when some sort of beings lived in such a vastly humongous civilization in the same we as we look back to Gothic times to understand how Manfred and all the other characters were living in such a large space as well. 

Jeremy Eisner Group 1 Create

After Witnessing such a horrible tragedy, I could not help but think about poor Madam Mina that my hand holds dear. It kept me thinking all night thinking that very soon it would be the last time I will be able to do such an act. Of course there is the thought of her young lover, how will he press on after the evils that have taken his wife against the name of God? We can’t do another transfusion knowing what we know, and the only known cure is death. Why God? Why must you have let another young, innocent soul be tainted by the unholy abominations that spawn from below? If only you were a little bit sooner to ward off the foul creature that preys on our purest of hearts. As much as I am saddened by the events that transpired before my eyes, I still believe in you God. For with your divine arsenal of holy artillery, we can put an end to this unspeakable evil and save our world from future invasion. The two lasses may be too late to save, but their souls will ascend to heaven where they can be eternally happy. It will be how God repays these poor souls for the tragedy that has harmed them.  

 

Van Helsing almost seems too reliant on the powers that may be. He tends to believe that God will make everything right in the end, yet he may not come right away. Van Helsing has this almost internal struggle with God as he is still losing these innocent people to a demon, but still believes that God will make things right in the end.

Jeremy Eisner Blog Group 1 Clue

In chapter I of Dracula, Stoker makes several remarks through Harker’s account of his journey through the Eastern European Countryside that give a sense of English Superiority. On page 5(in the physical edition), Harker records that ” With some difficulty I got a fellow-passenger to tell me what they meant; he would not answer at first, but on learning that I was English, he explained that it was a charm or guard against the evil eye”. Harker describes the fact that being English made it easy for him to learn about the charm that the villagers were telling him about. This lead me to think why being English would suddenly change their attitude about speaking with Him. It took me to another passage about Harker’s judgements of the common folk he comes across on his journey. He ends up using two words to describe the majority of the people he meets in the first chapter, “Commoner” and “Peasants”. Now he says these words about several groups of villagers because of the way they are dressed and the way they act around his presence which leads me to believe he thinks of himself as higher than these people. Stoker might have written Harker’s dialogue like this as that was the viewpoint of Eastern Europeans at the time the novel was written. At that time, Britain had a more lavish lifestyle than that of other countries in Europe at the time. They made classy paintings, rich literature, and expensive clothing, so seeing people with home-made clothes, dirty and more rugged individuals was not the normal. With that said, seeing that image from Harker’s or even Stoker’s perspective did not inspire thoughts of the wealthy, more civilized culture that they were living in. Personally, I do not believe that Stoker consciously thought the English people were superior as he only really wrote comments about other countries’ people in an ignorant way given that he was never really exposed to other kinds of people before. With that said, I believe that Harker’s description of the villagers may be a form of English superiority, but Stoker’s inclusion of these comments makes the story all the more eerie and uncanny.   

Jeremy Eisner(Group 1)- Clue

The story behind Fredric’s past seemingly represents a negative perspective of royalty and kingdoms as a whole. While Fredric himself, fights for his honnor and his bloodline to have his daughter returned to him, we learn that Isabella’s relevance to Manfred was completely built upon a dark temptation. At the beginning of chapter three, specifically on pages 57-58, we learn that Isabella had guardians that we’re bribed by Manfred in order to get closer to Isabella. He wanted to tempt her into marrying his son, but for more than believing his son was his prodigy and successor. We learn that he knew that Isabella’s father was the true Heir to the throne as he was directly related to Alfonso himself. So he intended to have his son marry her so he may take over the rule of all of Otranto, and by extent, Manfred would have all the power he wanted. Presumably, the author made this fixed wedding as a parallel to how he saw royalty at the time. He must have seen them as one rich family trying to sway those beneath them to do their biding in a quest for everlasting power. From a modern day perspective, his interpretation seems like a cliche of a pure evil villain that wants nothing but power and world domination. Overall, the brief details about the arrangements for Isabella’s wedding to Conrad actually adds a whole new layer to how the author felt about the political ruling at the time of writting the novel.