Writing for the Public

Category: Unit 2 Final Draft (Page 6 of 7)

Unit 2 Final Draft

We have all seen or heard stories about police brutality on television and social media, that African Americans are the most famous race targets of police brutality. However, we don’t see or hear the word “disabled”, but what does that mean? According to statistics reported by BBC, The Guardian, and most news outlets, half of the police brutality victims are disabled.
The police violence has long been a significant concern in the United States and other nations, with the majority of victims being disabled, and it is not a recent problem. According to Alem Maqbool, author of a BBC report from 2013, there were real cases of injured people that were either attacked or killed by law enforcement in the world in 2013, as well as debates around the terms “disabled” and “mental disorder” that were not widely discussed in the press. He quotes, “Hundreds of people are killed by police In the u.s. each year and much attention has been paid recently to the high proportion that is black. But there’s another disturbing trend that is rarely discussed”. Every year, a US citizen is killed by police in the United States, and the black race has been receiving more attention in the media. He’s pointing to a troubling pattern in which the media fails to reveal that a police brutality victim has a mental illness. An author, Mary O’Hara who wrote an article about the issue in The Guardian and her article stated that “Also, according to the foundation, almost all well-known and widely reported cases of police violence involve a disabled person”. O’Hara presents data from a Massachusetts-based foundation founded by a disabilities rights non-profit organization to show that while police brutality incidents involving a disabled individual are well-known and frequently documented, the term “disabled” when discussing a victim is barely used, and most cases get no attention.
Things go tragically wrong when police respond to a mental health emergency. According to Maqbool’s post, on January 12th, 2013, 26-year-old Evan Saylor, who has Down syndrome, was restrained at a movie theater in Maryland and was face down and unable to breathe. He and his caregiver were watching Zero Dark Thirty the night of the incident, and when the film ended, he refused to leave the building and demanded to see it again. Three off-duty officers working as security guards discovered Saylor enter the auditorium without a ticket for the next showing when he left and returned without his carer. The officers told him he had to “leave or he would be arrested”, and then when he refused, they forcefully removed him, and Saylor was face down, not breathing, and dead. On May 25th, 2017, 22-year-old Adam Trammell had a psychotic breakdown, and police rushed to try to stabilize him to get emergency attention, but only ended up shooting 15 times with taser guns at him. He was pronounced dead at a hospital. According to police, they were attempting to restrain him but went too far. Trammell did not seem to be hostile or in possession of a knife. In the wake of the attack, there was no media coverage and protests, proving that disabled victims of police brutality go unnoticed.
Although disabled adults have been killed or assaulted by the police, children, and teenagers with disabilities have also been killed or assaulted. According to a New York Times post, a police officer shot a 13-year-old boy from Salt Lake City who had a special needs condition. The teenage boy had been diagnosed with autism. Police were called to a report of a “violent psych issue,” which pointed to the boy having a mental breakdown. The boy was shot while fleeing, and he was taken to the hospital in critical condition. Christian Hall, a 19-year-old Pennsylvania teenager, was shot and killed by state police on the bridge in February of this year, according to a Yahoo article published by Bryan Ke. Hall was in the midst of a mental health crisis, according to his mother, who said, “He needed help, he was looking for help, but instead of getting help, he was killed by those who were supposed to help him.” This was the only incident that received more coverage this year, and all previous events should’ve received similar coverage. I have a feeling that police violence against people with disabilities is attracting more attention, but this isn’t the case yet.
Unfortunately, we expect police officers to assist in situations like this when they respond to a mental health crisis but instead, they harm the person who is suffering from a mental illness that is having an episode by seriously injuring or killing them. This is because police officers are not qualified to be mental health providers. How are we going to address the issue of police brutality? Several suggestions can help in this regard. We ought to defund the police, for example, some may interpret this definition to mean abolishing the police, but defunding the police means diverting funds from the police to mental health organizations so that, in the event of a crisis, mental health professionals, rather than the police, respond. Mental health providers can assist in cases where someone is having an episode by calming them down. Police reform is another option for resolving the problem. Extra training and workshops on how to deal with mental crisis issues are needed so that we don’t have to deal with this in the future and so that it can be corrected since these incidents are breaking families apart and impacting communities. It will also teach other officers and prospective officers how to deal with them when they begin to work in law enforcement. These workshops and training will give officers experience in mental health.
Another suggestion for ending police brutality against people with disabilities is to spread the word, raise awareness about police brutality, and attract political figures. We need to raise awareness by sharing and airing PSA advertisements on social media and television. We should also share this in public places like billboards, building signage, and public transit so that people notice and consider what happens when they see a video of police brutality and realize the victim is impaired. We need to attract the attention of activists and news organizations such as CNN, NBC News, and others, as well as local news outlets so that they can make people aware in news reports. We can do this by sending emails, petitions, calling social media tags, and direct messaging. Finally, by writing letters and sending emails to lawmakers and politicians, we will persuade them to propose and enact legislation that reduces police brutality and misconduct against citizens while simultaneously protecting disabled and non-disabled people by passing a disability rights bill. It can be a councilperson, state or district representative, mayor, governor, senator, or someone that is running for public office that has the same ideas. We can also attract activists and celebrities.
Consider a situation where a teenager with autism is having an and the police are called to assist, but the teenager is killed by police because the officers used excessive force. This issue of people with mental illnesses being attacked or killed by police is troubling and tragic because, while police are supposed to protect us, they use force on people who might go too far and end up seriously injured or killed. Since the news media seldom reports it, the fact that the majority of police brutality victims are injured or killed goes unnoticed. Since you never know what will happen, this issue can affect and happen to you or anyone you know with a mental disability. Who can we trust if someone suffering from a mental disorder needed support and was instead abused or murdered by someone they expected to help them? You’re aware of police violence because you have seen videos and read accounts of officers abusing citizens, but you are unaware of a disease that they face. This should be concerned because it is a civil rights violation. You should be concerned about this and take action to stop it because it could happen to you or anyone you know who is suffering from a mental illness.

References:
Epperson, Matthew. “Where Police Violence Encounters Mental Illness.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 13 Jan. 2016, www.nytimes.com/2016/01/13/opinion/where-police-violence-encounters-mental-illness.html?searchResultPosition=2.
O’Hara, Mary. “Up to Half of the People Killed by US Police Are Disabled | Mary O’Hara.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 29 Mar. 2016, www.theguardian.com/society/2016/mar/29/media-must-report-police-violence-towards-disabled-people.
Maqbool, Aleem. “Don’t Shoot, I’m Disabled.” BBC News, BBC, 4 Oct. 2018, www.bbc.com/news/stories-45739335.
Fortin, Jacey. “A Police Officer Shot a 13-Year-Old With Autism in Salt Lake City.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 9 Sept. 2020, www.nytimes.com/2020/09/08/us/salt-lake-city-autism-shooting.html.
Ke, Bryan. “Pennsylvania Teen Had Hands Up When Police Shot and Killed Him, New Video Shows.” Yahoo! News, Yahoo!, 4 Feb. 2021, news.yahoo.com/pennsylvania-teen-had-hands-police-220540745.html.

How Does the History Of Gun Control Correlate With Gun Violence (In Metropolitan Areas)?

Origins – creation of the first firearms:
In the 9th century, Chinese invented black powder as a means to use fireworks. This invention soon found its way into weaponry. The first firearms trace back to the 10th century. During the Yuan Dynasty, the Chinese invented what historians deem the first ever firearms. The first guns were made from a tube of bamboo filled with gunpowder to fire a spear.

Around the 13th to 14th century, firearms made its way to Europe and the Middle East. The Silk Road trading system gave European and Middle Eastern regions the ingredients needed. Overtime, the spread of gun technology allowed guns to evolve into the fierce, dangerous and controversial weapon we know it as.

Origins and history of American gun culture:
America’s traditional hunger for guns dates all the way back to America’s frontiersman days. The American frontier era was rough and rugged period. Almost everybody during the Frontiersman era carried a firearm of some sort. Knowing how to hunt and shoot was a necessity for survival due to the wild and dangerous agrarian environment. Before the American Revolutionary War, the U.S government did not have a full-time army, thus being an armed civilian was more necessary.

There is no question about it. Americans venerate guns. Guns are, after all, glorified in American cultural traditional. In fact, it may be venerated to an alarming degree due to the many civilians that own them, and how easy it is to obtain them, including through nefarious means. One concerning example of how Americans traditionally love guns is data revealing there are more guns in America than there are American people. In America, there are 120.5 guns per 100 residents. America also owns a large amount of handguns. The total number of handguns in the world is 857 million. America owns 45 percent of those handguns.

American gun control – history and how it began:
The term “gun control” is described as laws that regulate the manufacturing, modification and possession of guns. Gun control came fruition 143 years after the ratification of the 2nd Amendment (right to bear ‘arms’, meaning guns). As a response to the St. Valentine’s Day massacre in 1929, President Franklin D. Roosevelt passed the first gun control legislation known as the National Firearms Act (NFA) in 1934. It was a means to decrease gun violence by taxing the manufacturing and distribution of guns, restricting people with a criminal background from getting a gun, and requiring gun shows to have a federal firearms license to sell weapons.

Following the assassination of president John F. Kennedy, the FFA was replaced by the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA). The GCA are a series of federal laws that examines and regulates who can buy or sell firearms. Such regulations include prohibiting gun distribution to people who are felons, below the age of 21, and mentally ill, along with restricting obtaining guns overseas.

Reality check – the true nature of gun control in the United States:
Unfortunately, there are many loopholes around legally purchasing a gun. For starters, gun sellers, including sellers with a Federal Firearms License (FFL), can sell guns privately under the Firearms Owners Protection Act (FOPA). The FOPA Act, signed by president Ronald Reagan, is a federal law that allows FFL sellers to distribute guns to people with less restrictions. This opened the following slippery slope of loopholes for individuals that are unfit to carry guns:

Background checks – Before one can purchase a gun, it is required to have a background check examined. The seller must run the background check through the federal system, which evaluates factors such as criminal and mental health history. However, background check enforcement is extremely weak. They are infamously underfunded and underresourced. The FBI can take days to complete a background check to give authorization to buy a gun. By that time, a gun is already sold. This results in misinformation or reports taking too long which results in the customer being allowed to purchase a gun. Another issue is the appetite for some sellers host a private gun shows where one, usually a friend or family member, evades a background check, thus the private seller makes fast and easy cash as well as making it easier to obtain a gun.

A great example of slipping through a background check is the Charleston Church shooter, Dylann Roof. Despite failing a background check due to a history of substance abuse, Roof managed to obtain a handgun. The FBI did not receive his background check in time, giving Roof the opportunity to kill nine and injure one church attendees with a Glock.

Legal bias – America is a historic racially divided nation that glorifies guns. Gun control has a history of being presented in the form of prejudice, targeting minorities. One example is the Mulford Act that targeted the Black Panther Party. The Black Panther Party, who resided in Oakland, California, was a Black organization that patrolled their neighborhood by practicing their right to publicly carry a firearm. This was act was efficient in protecting the areas they occupied. However, it did not bode well with the government who viewed the Black Panthers, or any seemingly power Black person, a threat. In an act to strain the Black Panther’s power, California Governor Ronald Reagan passed the Mulford Act. The Black Panthers protested this unfair bill by marching to the Capitol with loaded guns. Unfortunately, this did not help prevent their right to bear arms from being usurped.

How Gun Control correlates with gun violence (in metropolitan areas):
The basis of gun control is to prevent someone who should not have a gun from obtaining one to curtail gun violence, right? This may be true to an extent. For example, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act prevented 2.1 million purchases from 1994 to 2014. An estimation of those preventions were given to one million people who had a criminal history.

Studies show states with stricter gun control have fewer cases of gun violence. This includes both city and rural states (this article will however focus mostly on metropolitan areas). New York State is considered strict with gun ownership. For instance, carrying a handgun in the open is forbidden and purchasing assault rifles is prohibited. In 2019, NYC’s crime rate reached a record low of an estimate of 95000 incidents.

California is considered to be the state with that has the toughest gun restrictions out of any state. To manufacture, sell or obtain a gun requires 5-year Firearm Safety Certificate along with a monitored written test. If there is any violation of a firearm in the state of California, one can receive a 10 year ban. On a federal level, it can also result in a lifetime gun ban. In 2019, the crime rate in California decreased from the previous year to 2272 per 1000 residents.

Possible solutions – what the US can do and how other rich countries’ gun control policy fare well compared to the United States?:
Can control work? Yes. But there is still a lot of work to be done. To grasp a better understanding of the efficiency of gun control, here is a look of how other rich countries fare well with gun control:

[Canada] – Canada’s gun control policies are similar to the United States but is regulated with major restrictions. Obtaining a license to carry a firearm is a strict process. When applying for a license in Canada, you go through a series of background checks. This includes 18 years of age (some exceptions allow 12-17 but must be under supervision of a licensed owner), criminal history, mental evaluation, cases of domestic violence, and addiction. They also prohibit certain guns such as sawed-off shot guns, short barreled handguns and certain military guns.

Once you obtain your gun license, it must be renewed every five years. Once you get a gun, you must, by law, keep it in storage unloaded when not using it.

In 2019, the total number of gun homicide in Canada, a population 37.59 million, was 263.

[United Kingdom] – The United Kingdom has some of the most strict western gun control policies in the world. Its policies contradict the reason many Americans want a gun: self-defense. In Britain, self defense is considered not a good reason to own a gun. Generally, handguns are banned from the public and reserved only for police and militiamen.

In order to get a license to own a gun, you must have a reason that is validated by the local police chief. The few exceptions where a civilian can own a weapon include job requirements, shooting vermin and sport. Background checks include evaluation of age (must be 18 and above), criminal history, mental illness, drug addiction, home state and attitude towards firearms. Once one is given a firearm, you must renew your license every 5 years and keep your gun in storage unloaded when not using it. Any unlawful use of a firearm can result in 5 years in prison.

In 2019, the total number of gun homicide in the United Kingdom, a population of 66.65 million, was 33.

So what can help curtail American gun violence? It is a complicated multistep solution. America’s gun violence problems stems from simply having too many guns that are poorly supervised. However, because studies have shown strict gun control decreases gun violence, it is time for the U.S to practice more strict gun control.

“Hell yes, we’re going to take your AR-15, your AK-47.” – Beto O’Rourke

Unit #2 – Final paper

“Humankind seems to have an enormous capacity for savagery, for brutality, for lack of empathy, for lack of compassion.” This is a quote from Annie Lennox,  known professionally as Lola Lennox, is a British singer, songwriter, and model. This is how I feel every time i see police officers using unjustified abusive force against others. Many lives are taken by officers because of the usage of brute force it’s like life is something which they have the right to take away or play with, when the reality is that you only live once and once it’s gone there is nothing which can make up for it. Unfortunately police brutality keeps taking many lives especially when it comes to black people or people of color. It is no wonder that Racial bias and police brutality are connected since this is something which has been going on for many years and it is still alive to this day.

What is the source of police brutality?,What are the reasons for such terrible things? This  Are questions which i constantly ask myself, although i have yet experience police brutality in a personal level i have seen it more times that i can count through the news, social media, and even in person but the worst thing about it is that while all of that is going on it is hard to take action because even if the right thing is to help the victim you could potentially become a victim yourself. An example of police brutality that had the biggest impact in society would be the sad death of George Floyd and the reason for this was according to CNN.com “Chauvin kept his knee on Floyd’s neck for nearly eight minutes, the statement said, and he continued kneeling on Floyd’s neck for two minutes and 53 seconds after he became unresponsive.” The policeman kept using brute force against George Floyd even after going unconscious, this event led people to believe that it was an act of racism since the victim George Flyod and the policeman was a white officer. 

when taking a step back and really thinking about what police brutality means you can get ideas like violence, abuse of power and even murder. Some people just brush it off their shoulders in order to stay out of it and think things like “that’s not my problem” which is wrong, although we can not help in a big scale on our own, we can make a difference if join in as a community because believe or not this affects everyone no matter who you are or where you come from, today could be me but tomorrow this could happen to you because this is out of control. This reason why this topic is so important to everyone and their communities is because police brutality affects everyone not just blacks or hispanic. The police officers believe they can get away with all of this which makes the situation even worse.

it’s been well proven that there is racial bias in policing and the biggest factor in police brutality is racism, After researching i found something which proves that racism plays a big part in police brutality would be “Black men are nearly 2.5 times more likely than white men to die at the hands of law enforcement.” According to Desmond Ang, an  Assistant Professor at  Harvard Kennedy School Of Government, black men have a much higher rate of dying by the hands of police officers than the white men. And this is because “racism” speacially racial discrimination has been the the source to so many tragedies throughout history and it still keeps affecting us to this days, this been a reason of police brutality affects a lot of people especially the people of color, living in fear of not knowing if they can trust in police officers or if they are who they should be running from i have already seen this happen multiple times where people of color would refuse to call the cops because they believe that they run a bigger risk when cops are around as well as innocent kids/teens and even adults would run out of fear from the cops because they fear what could happen.

Also According to Desmond Ang, “Roughly 1,000 people are killed by American law enforcement officers each year. While whites make up the majority of those killed” this may lead to some people arguing that the amount of white victims that have died in hands of police officers are higher and so it has nothing to do with racial bias but the point of my argument is unjustified killing behind this incidents, while the black and hispanics numbers of victims are not so different compared to white victims, Desmos Ang also stated that the numbers of unarmed in the black and white victims is about 40 percent, “Nearly half of the people killed by police in 2019 were Black or Hispanic and about 40% were not armed with a gun.” This is one of the biggest problems that we are facing today. 

I myself believe that if this keeps on we will have no one of whom we can count to protect us. A American rapper and occasional producer from Bronx, New York named Lawrence but better known by his stage name Krs-one quoted “You were put here to protect us. But who protects us from you?” This goes to show that we trust officers to protect us and they are the ones we go to when in need of help but when we fear them we stop thinking of them as our protectors.

Racism in police brutality is not something which can be completely eliminated or stopped. Sadly we have been trying to stop racism or to be equally treated no matter the color of our skin or our background but it has yet to completely disappear, although it keeps changing for what i think is the best i do not believe that things like this can be stopped. Although it close to impossible to stop police brutality, we can still do the best that we can in order to minimize the victims/make such a big problem like police brutality smaller and in order to do this we must first take care of the source of the problem and begin with racism, it is too late to change the present but we start looking at each other as been the same no matter the way we look and recognizing that no matter where we can from we can have a lot of things in common as well as differences, i think that really trying the best we can on teaching the young ones about the problems of racism and teaching them to do better will help make a better future and maybe one day stop police brutality even if it is close to impossible.

Finally to review everything which i have stated in my paper. Police brutality is a problem with many roots, which would also includes racism and there is no possible way to get rid of it in a 100 percent but there are ways in which we can work on to minimize this problem so that we may have a better future in which police brutality becomes so small that people will not have to talk about it but in order to do that we must first take care of racism this way we can solve the problem from one of its sources and potentially the biggest one of all.

« Older posts Newer posts »