Category Archives: Uncategorized

Assignment 1B

Both Jabr and Badke explain the differences between digital books and printed books. In “ The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens” by Ferris Jabr, he explains his ideas and the progress of the digital books. In these days, young generation finds ebook is much easier than reading through the printed books. In addition, there are many options to read ebook through Iphones, ipads, kindles, nooks etc. It is easier to read because people are watching text in the same manner as watching an onscreen video, it is refreshed and faster than people’s eyes can detect. The brain may catch the missing letter easier. On the other hand, I can’t read it ebook and something else because I need to feel it physically but I can read only news online. The reason is I feel more focused when I touch to the book. In conclusion, Jabr is trying to show us how technology has grown, and affect us.

Assignment 1B

Digital vs Print

Both Jabr and Badke discuss the differences between reading digital and print can be. It was such a coincidence that this assignment popped up while I was in the middle of reading a novel I could only get online. The novel titled, Danganronpa Zero, only came out in Japan with noDangan_Ronpa_Zero English translation or localisation coming out in the United States. Here it was clear to me how these two different mediums can be. Thanks to the internet, a book that I would’ve needed to not only import and learn a whole new language for was easily accessible.

Reading a novel on a computer screen can be such a different experience. You lose the tactile feel of a page and it becomes nothing but a set of clicks or swipes. The device, be it a phone or computer, also allows you to do more than just read so it can be easy to be distracted.  The words on a screen, depending on the size of your monitor or device, can extend beyond the boundaries of a normal page and make the text feel longer. Even the light of the screen can affect your eyes after extended periods of reading.

However, I personally felt no difference in the enjoyment of the novel. It is still easy to get lost in what you are reading as if it were a regular physical book. There is even a myriad of new affordances brought by digital text. We don’t have to carry them around, we can still take notes and highlight, we can access them through multiple methods, we can choose to listen to them if we don’t have the time to sit down and read it, we can still enjoy a book as normal just perhaps with a different mentality. While we may lose a more personal connection to the book, the medium in which we access our texts shouldn’t affect how we read.

Paper Text vs. Digital

Although I’m always used to reading text on paper I figured I would give a try to read in digital form in order to see the difference. For this assignment I read an article in the New York Times “Clinton and Trump Each Lay Claim to Military Brass” and at first I was extremely against doing so due to the fact that I’m usually against digital print. I was being bias, and to tell the truth it was mostly due to the fact that I don’t have a tablet or any device with a large enough screen. I usually use my phone for quick reads.so I used my laptop to read the article and found that it wasn’t as bad as I predicted. it would still take some getting used to, but surprisingly I didn’t find it as dreadful as I thought it would be. I now look at digital print in a different perspective. Though not as good as paper print at least I now know that I’m able to read some text in digital form. its good knowing it wasn’t a nightmare after all.

Assignment 1B

Both Jabr and Badke, explain the differences between digital books and printed books. In “The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens” by Ferris Jabr, Jabr describes his share of information regarding the evolution of digital books pertaining to generations. Generally youngsters of our generation only know iPhones, iPads, kindles, nooks etc. Whether it is a device for communication or reading, technology has advanced. I find digital reading to be much more convenient when I’m on the train or ferry. Its simple to grasp any reading material through smartphones on apps. As such digital devices have become increasingly popular, it may be notable to wonder if electronics are as helpful as printed paper. I have found holding a printed book may sometimes hurt my hand after awhile. However through digitally, reading is not tedious. Lastly I believe reading through a screen does not affect your memory. In my opinion I can read online lectures, and maintain the information just the same as through a printed physical copy. Jabr is trying to show us how technology has changed digitally through reading, however printed books will not be forgotten.

Blog Post #1

Badke and Jabr both write about the way reading can differ depending on the format (digital vs. print) you choose. For this blog I chose the post “NASA is about to launch a spacecraft to an asteroid to learn more about life on Earth” by Loren Grush. OSIRIS-REx mission will launch a spacecraft to the near-Earth asteroid named Bennu in order to collect a small sample and, if successful, this sample can tell us how our Solar System was 4.5 billion years ago. “Researches believe that life’s building block may have been brought to Earth by asteroids.” If we can unlock this time capsule, it may help researches know what building blocks are needed for life and perhaps find them in a distant place. I chose to read this blog because, science has always caught my attention and I wanted to know more about the mission. I felt that in reading this blog in digital format, the information about this mission was more appealing to read, since I usually read in print format for homework. The blog also had an animation  I wouldn’t be able to see had I read it in a printed format. This animation helped me better understand how the spacecraft will land on the asteroid.

Assignment 1B

I’ve read all the articles and personal not based on generation, I found I prefer both ways. Based on the article written by Jabr, “The Reading Brain in the Digital Age” he explains the difference between digital books and print. I find if I’m on the go digital works best as where I can have it downloaded on my iPad or on my phone, it’s convenient. There’s an app where I can underline the text, bookmark so I don’t lose the page I’m on and even write things in the column. Yet, if my iPad or phone is dead or is broken I’m done for. On the other hand I love printed books. From the feeling of the pages as I turn them, the smell of the books in the library. As the memories that come along with them. Yet, they also can be destroyed and Im done for. Either, a books a book an I love them either way.

Assignment #1B Reading Response Blog: Digital versus Print, Badke and Jabr

Badke and Jabr both write about reading and the ways that reading differs depending on format (digital vs. print) and context ( what we’re reading and why).In terms of digital text versus paper text, I can say that I use both formats frequently for different reasons though.  When it comes to very lengthy  journals, articles, or books I prefer to use paper text, as there is less strain on the eyes and it does not hurt your eye sight. Also with longer readings on a tablet or other electronic devices there is a possibility of loss of power which can cause a loss of my place in the reading.  As for shorter readings, digital text works better as the amount of time focusing on the screen is lessened.  In the article “The Reading Brain in the Digital Age:  The Science of Paper versus Screens” by Ferris Jabr published on April 11,2013, the author states  that most studies conducted before 1992 show that people read slower and paid less attention to readings done on a screen rather than on paper.  I agree with this because I often lose track of what I am reading when reading online rather than on paper. I feel like if I read something in print, I get a better understanding of the text and I can fully grasp what I am reading. If I read a digital book I might lose track of what I am reading and have to scroll up and down to read it again.

There is a high chance that you might get distracted while reading something on your kindle or Ipad. Staying long hours and staring at the screen it is not good for the eyes. If the text is shorter, then reading something on your kindle, Ipad, etc. wouldn’t be that bad.  I usually prefer print when it has to do with schoolwork, because I like to be able to take notes and highlight/underline what I’m reading.  Now, I know that that is an option on digital formats also, but I still feel more comfortable with highlighting and note-taking on paper. I like to write little notes on the side of the paper which helps me grasp the information better. If I am reading a short novel, digital text would be a good option especially when I am taking the subway and I feel like reading a novel on my Ipad, kindle, etc.

Sometimes when a person is reading a digital text, they might end up going on social media and that distracts you from what you are reading. The person didn’t grasp what they just read so they have to read the text all over again.I chose my textbook “Principles of Macroeconomics” by Gregory Mankiw. I read the beginning of the first chapter as a PDF on my phone. I found the pdf version online for free so that is why I got the digital version because the teacher said that she wasn’t going to use the book that often and it saved me money from buying the physical copy of the book. I also did not want to carry a book to school if the book was only going to be used only certain days. I caught myself getting tired of looking at the screen. I also noticed that I would accidentally scroll up and down and lose track of where I last read. Now everyone uses their kindle especially on the train. So both print and digital texts have advantages and disadvantages. In conclusion, if the text is shorter I prefer digital but if it is long then I prefer print. Everyone has their own preferences. Both print and digital books are convenient for certain things. When you have the book in your hands, you get to feel the texture of the book, while in digital you can enlarge the text and so on.

The future of the book

The text I chose to read is an article in The Economist titled From Papyrus to Pixels, the article focuses primarily on the on going debate and arguments about the “future of the book.” I read a digital copy of the article online. I find that digital copies are easier to find and easier to get access to. However, if I am studying or taking notes I have to have a printed copy of the material in front of my eyes to further grasp what I am reading. If I just read an article on my phone or iPad I can’t remember the last two sentences. As opposed to a printed article where I can fold the page or highlight it myself with a traditional highlighter. It all depends on what I am reading. I love to read various fanfictions online. I normally dislike reading of any sort but I can spend hours reading good fan-fictions on my phone. In my case I am a bit contradicted on my views of printed text and digital text. The article emphasizes that many people are worried about what technology has and will continue to do for the future of books. We are in a digital age where some people may prefer to read traditional hard copy books, whilst others may just stream books on their devices. I agree with the following quote, “books are not just “tree flakes encased in dead cow”, as a scholar once wryly put it. They are a technology in their own right” (The Economist). I don’t think that books will ultimately disappear into thin air or that people will just do away with it. Books serve to be a prominent aspect of our history and there will always be someone who just prefers the smell of a new book or the feeling of turning a page.

 

From Papyrus to Pixels

In the article “From papyrus to pixels; The future of the book” written by the Economist. One is pulled back into the ancient Egyptian era when information was written and kept not in modern printed book format as is known, but scribes painstakingly wrote on papyrus- the paper of that time. I especially like the way in which the author of the article described the evolution of “book”. The illustration of how Cicero was influenced and how his words stood throughout time was profound as the author of the article emphasis “The book’s words have not changed; their vessel, though, has gone through relentless reincarnation and metamorphosis.”

One is then taken onto the journey of the passage that books went through from being written on scrolls to bounded books as we know it- Guttenberg surely started a revolution with his moveable type. Further still, the journey of books didn’t stop there. As knowledge increased and man’s invention grew, the digital format of books came into being. E-books, Kindles just to name a few. The author of the article challenged the reader to see the various formats of books for what they are, for each serves a specific purpose that ends with the same result-information is accessible to all, regardless if it’s printed text or digital. So hence I say this using the author’s words “The private joys of the book will remain; new public pleasures are there to be added.

What is the future of the book? It is much brighter than people think.”

 

Assignment 1B

I read a chapter from the book “Networked: The New Social Operating System of Networked Individualism” by Lee Rainie and Barry Wellman. I read the text in print because it is my preferred method of accessing information. Someone who is interested in this book most likely already knows what it will be about based on the title alone. The first chapter starts by sharing a story where social media started and helped to fix a problem. The story itself was realistic enough that it can happen to anyone. That alone drew me in as a reader. The format wasn’t an academic overflow of information. The story stayed relevant to the book’s topic without feeling like it may be a waste of time. As for the text itself, I can tell that it is going to meaningfully adapt whatever information it contains to what happens in our everyday lives. This format is definitely good for the intention of drawing readers in.