Category Archives: Uncategorized

Assignment 2B

Corporate interest will always affect the information we receive as it can effectively censor certain topics or bits of information. Corporations will usually think from a financial standpoint rather than in the best interest of others. The information being presented needs to be profitable for them and something that isn’t too controversial, unless it’s unintended or an oversight, and can bring upon more views, more advertisement, or more clicks, basically, more revenue for them. Simply think back to when cigarettes were being advertised as healthy and research studies were concluding that were, in fact, healthy. Even though at the time it was known to be the opposite, as long as corporations could still get more money into their pocket, they would do whatever to manipulate or fabricate results.

In terms of an example of something not being covered, I remember a video I watched last semester when researching a similar topic, where a big new corporation was interviewing a reporter. In this interview, they were discussing all the issues and problems that were occurring in the Middle East. The reporter then when on to tell them of all the good things that were going on in the Middle East and asking why these things were not being reported on. Why had all the news outlets omitted anything positive going on and only focused on the negative? The interviewer simply tried his best to avoid speaking on the subject and would try to steer the conversation back to the negative.

Blog Assignment #2B

The news we hear daily comes from big corporations and this information can be skew depending on the corporate’s interest. Corporate bias news are stories that are selected or slanted to please corporate owners in the media world. The news and stories will emphasize one point of view instead of providing ethical journalism which is unbiased.

Looking at an article in therealnews.com which is an independent news source, we can see how this news is covered differently by mainstream news sources. The article, ” Dakota Access Pipeline Protests Face Pepper Spray, Attack Dogs” by Jaisal Noor talks about how Energy Transfer Partners have a project to build a pipeline carrying crude oil daily from North Dakota to existing pipeline in Illinois, where shippers can access the markets.  Noor himself states, “While the mainstream media has been largely silent on this issue.” His statement talks about how only recently has mainstream media talked about the issue and it’s only because video caught guards using pepper spray and dogs against protesters. ABC News was the only mainstream news that wrote an article about this topic. ABS News article, “What is the Dakota Access Oil Pipeline” by The Associated Press does not inform about the protest, it mainly talks about the facts of the Dakota Pipeline. Noor talks about the actions and testimonies from both sides while The Associated Press talks about politicians and lawsuits.

 

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ap-explains-dakota-access-oil-pipeline-41969030

http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=17190

Assignment 2B

Corporate interest affects the information we receive because they are never going to tell us the truth neither the whole truth on a news story. The benefit of their company is their priority and if that means lying to us then that is what they will do. If large corporations such as the news make their stories uninteresting they will begin to loose views therefore loosing profit. There goal is to manipulate viewers via the media which includes them saying whatever reaches their goal. Companies such as Comcast, news corporation, the Walt Disney company etc… pay these large company’s to put them in favor and to persuade any viewer of what they want them to think its all about commercialism. One dependent news site I found was therealnews.com the title of the news is deadly wildfires to grow more intense,burn longer due to global warming. In this article not only do they tell you about the fire happening in San Bernardino and that it killed 8 people and destroyed hundreds of homes, they talk about how wildfires have changed throughout the years on the level of extremity. Then they jump into climate change and statistics of how the climate has changed since 1970 and due to this in August and September its tinder-dry causing more fires to occur. Then they talk about how the government is allowing people to buy/build homes in harmful areas where fires are more prone to be caused. This is very different from mainstream news stories such as univision, CNN, New 10 which just pass a 30 second clip of a burning forest and tell us the location and that’s it. I’ve seen it on the news and then they focus more on other things like the elections and how new research shows that something you eat can cure many diseases. This is pure propaganda.

Assignment #2B

I recently viewed two news sources online one alternative news source and one mainstream.  The alternative news source that I chose is from a website known as Labor notes.  The mainstream news site that I chose to compare it to was our famous New York Times.  Initially I viewed the New York Times because I knew off the bat that a majority of the press would be based on corporate businesses and not middle class, low income workers.  Unfortunately, our press is run by capitalists as Mr. Thomas Eland simply puts it, in his article “Critical Thinking Deviant Knowledge“. Eland explains, “The business section is consciously aimed at the upper-middle and upper classes of American society, and a lifestyles section targets people with significant disposable income.” (pg 5). Currently in the New York Times business section I see stories such as the well known company Apple dealing with back taxes regarding Ireland and a article based on other major companies known as Amazon and Pandora offering music streaming for as low as $5 a month.

Although these stories may be interesting to read, where are the articles on low income workers and those struggling to find decent or even high paying jobs in today’s economy? When I viewed labornotes.org, I saw multiple articles based on the struggle of our lower classes in today’s society. For example, an article that I chose from this alternative press site was “Organizing gets fashionable: Zara workers beat the odds” by Sonia Singh. This article speaks of the strike that occurred in Manhattan against this particular highly recognized clothing store. The employees from different Zara locations complained about their unfair treatment and demanded to be unionized. According to Singh, “Retail organizing has drawn national attention with the Fight for 15 movement and Walmart worker strikes. But despite the slogan “$15 and a union,” the goal of widespread unionization seems far off”. So see, it is stories like these that are just as important but are least to hardly recognized at all thanks to corporate and capitalist domination.

http://labornotes.org/2016/08/organizing-gets-fashionable-zara-workers-beat-odds

Main stream media/vs/independent news

Corporate interests have a major influence on our lives. We may not realize this, however a majority of the information or “news” that we receive on a daily basisis controlled by big corporate news outlets. Some major names include CBS, Fox5, CNN etc. Most people get their news from watching these news channels, and are given information in a way that may be tweaked or mis conceived in a way to make people think a certain way. For example. Fox 5 is highly criticized for portraying African Americans in a bad light, or any person of color in a bad view. If a young black make commits a crime Fox 5 calls it violence, if an Arab or Indian male commits a crime its automatically an act of terrorism. But, if a white male has committed the same if not worse crime he is troubled or comes from a troubled up brining. This is unfair to the public and not ethical in my opinion.

There is an article posted on an independent news site (naturalnews.com). The article is titled, The 13 most evil U.S. government experiments on humans. I chose this particular article because I know that the government has an enormous control over what gets sent out into the news and what people can and should not hear about. I know that a big corporate outlet like CNN would not publish an article about the many ways the government has tortured humans. CNN would probably publish an article on why the government chooses to go about torture and how torture can prevent further attacks on the USA. But, CNN would not punish an in depth article on the horrors of government torture on people. I have actually googled CNN and government torture article, and the second thing that pops up is an article of Donald Trump explaining why torture may have prevented attacks on Brussels. (http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/donald-trump-torture-brussels-abdeslam/)

Assignment 2B

Corporate interest effects the information we receive by controlling what information gets published and by targeting a specific audience to generate profit.  Therefor, their ability to reach the masses is great and they are able to influence how many people think.  The companies that make up mainstream media are the big corporations with the most well-known names and the most assets and money  in the media industry that deliver news to the public.  Some of these entities include CBS and The New York Times.   These corporations play a major role in determining the focus of society’s attention because they are putting the information out there.  They have the most profit and can advertise as well as control what gets advertised.  They also effect smaller and less known media organizations, sometimes referred to as alternate media, because the topics they discuss trickle down to them.  The topics that are discussed in mass media are often political in nature and have underlying motives not in favor of the general public, and focus to attract the more elite population.

An example of a topic that may be portrayed differently by a mainstream organization than by an alternate organization is the violence surrounding  J’ouvert, a party celebrating Caribbean heritage that takes place in Brooklyn, New York during Carnival before Labor Day’s West Indian Day Parade every year.  In an article published by New York Amsterdam News (an independent news publisher centered on news pertaining the African American community) titled, “Electeds say blame violence, not carnival,” Stephon Johnson discusses how Brooklyn elected officials disagrees with mainstream depictions of  the continuation of J’ouvert as the root cause for the stabbings and shootings surrounding the annual event.  Brooklyn officials and some Brooklyn residents don’t see J’ouvert as a negative, violent-ridden event, but believe in its cultural value and think the party should still continue every year.  They clearly view the violence and the carnival as two separate entities.  New York City Council Member Laurie Cumbo states, “Gun violence in New York City is an epidemic, and it has been an issue for some time.”  However, J. David Goodman’s  article “Violence Casts a Shadow Over a Celebration in Brooklyn,” (published by The New York Times) focuses primarily on J’ouvert as “plagued by violence,” discussing the death of one of Governor Andrew Cuomo’s former aide’s, Carey Gabay,who was shot and killed when a gun feud between rival gangs took place near the J’ouvert party in 2015.  The article provides examples of violence that took place in J’ouvert’s area over several years and seemingly waters down the prevalence of gun violence in New York City.  Goodman states, “…shootings are at near-record lows, 969 people have been shot this year.”

Assignment 1B

Badke and Jabr state that we translate information differently depending on what format we choose to read in.  Some may prefer to use physical books because they want to feel a book’s texture and size. Perhaps these individuals are physical learners (defined as the ability to retain information using ones hands) and automatically gather knowledge differently depending on how heavy a text is. Others may be more interested in reading information digitally via their E-books or tablets. Unlike readers of print, digital enthusiast may consider the weight of a book to be a nuisance and simply like having it at their disposal at all times.

I personally prefer to read any text digitally because it is more convenient. For example, carrying a 1000 page textbook to college everyday gets tiring quickly and becomes more of a chore within the first few days. I rather turn on my tablet, choose the textbook I need to read, and swipe across the screen to flip its pages. The same can be said about books that contain only 500 pages as I often find myself carrying enough weight as is.

However, after reading The Non-Designers Book by Robin Williams in print and digital, I learned that it is about more than just convenience. In print, I would get distracted easily and stop reading after a few sentences. But in digital, I read the text thoroughly with ease. I also retained information better and was more engaged with the text as I asked myself questions about what it discussed. In addition, unlike in print,  I gained the ability to listen to music while reading. I often listen to music on my tablet while reading on it because it allows me to focus on the task at hand.

Overall, reading The Non-Designers Book by Robin Williams in print and digital allowed me to see how differently I translate information. I learned more about myself as I found out that I prefer to read text digitally. With digital text, I can process information quickly and not get distracted.

Assignment 1B

After reading the articles I realized that I prefer reading the old fashioned way. Although technology has more advanced ways of reading an article or a book I prefer the printed paper. When reading online the screen light seems to tire my eyes out. I also tend to lose concentration and lose track of the line I was reading . The idea of scrolling up and down instead of turning pages doesn’t maximize my reading ability. The reason why reading an article or book online seems more interesting because you are able to use it on your everyday devices like your ipad, kindle, laptop, and even phone. They even give you the option on how to receive the information, it can be in auditory form. Instead of you reading it out loud or in your head the computer can read it to you. In reading the article “Papyrus to Pixels” I selected the auditory option. I had difficulty retaining the information because the voice was going faster than my mind was able to comprehend. When I read it for myself two times I was able to pay attention and focus on the article. Something that I read in the article that I found very interesting was the fact that a book called “De Offices” which was created in 44BC can be read online today. This just goes to show you how far technology as come and that it is only getting better. I must say though that I will be sticking to my paper books until I no longer have the choice.

Assignment 1B

The article, From Papers to Pixels, by Jabr had a convincing argument that reading from paper is more beneficial for comprehension, remembering the text, and for eyesight. However, after reading what Badke wrote in his book about the ease of access that getting information from online sources provide, it was difficult for me to really choose which format is better to use. I used to only be able to read from books because I love the feel of turning the page and the way the text looks on the paper. Then at some point in my life I started to get into novels that I could not get access to in book form such as foreign books written in another language. I had to rely on reading those books from my tablet because there was no other way for me at the time, also my room was filling up with books and I had nowhere to put them. After getting a while of reading on a screen I noticed that I did not miss reading from paper books anymore. I don’t mind an actual book and I still love the feeling of it, but my enjoyment of the actual story was more important than the format in the end. Having an ebook makes the novel easily accessible and more convenient to use even in the tightest spots, such as the subway trains during rush hour. I will admit that my eyes start to burn after hours of intense reading, but I just end up taking a break at that point. I conclude that although reading from a paper book is the best way to obtain information and keep your eyesight at 20/20, the accessibility of novels in this age and in this bustling city is more important.

Assignment 1B: Jabr and Badke

 

Both Jabr and Badke’s perspective on printed books versus the progression of digital books also known as e-books are very similar. Referring back to Chapter 1 in the book Research Strategies Badke explains, “While some readers will allow you to do note-taking and highlighting, etc., the e-paper book readers lack the ability to function easily within the world of the Web the way an Ipad or Android device can”.  For example, when I read the article “From papyrus to pixels; the future of the book” I began reading it on my android device while riding on the train.  Like any other day I would look around and see others on their Kindles or Nooks and think to myself, how do they read their books with the screen being as dark as it is and not being able to use any features such as highlighting, note-taking, etc., as Badke plainly put it.

Although I do find it handy to highlight and add any additional notes while using my play books application on my phone to read. I constantly think to myself everyday how can people read all their books and article selections on these technical devices? The reason I say this is because I find it easier to read something in front of me such as the printed book rather than try to focus and grasp information from any other device or computer. Jabr clearly explains this in his article, “As far as our brains are concerned, however, text is a tangible part of the physical world we inhibit”. As part of human nature we all tend to gravitate and absorb information a lot more efficiently when we can physically get our hands on it, rather than what we can see (or in this case read) at any given moment. At the end of the day, after the first paragraph or so I chose to print the article “From papyrus to pixels; the future of the book” and read it that way. I found it so much easier to just jot down any notes anywhere on the page and simply breeze through the reading without any straining to my eyes or taking on a major migraine from trying to navigate through an app. or internet source on a computer.