Citation-

Abstract Under international human rights law, States can limit the exercise of most human rights if it is necessary to protect the rights of others or collective interests.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239178

Summary-human rights law in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. It highlights the exceptional circumstances of the pandemic, leading to more extensive and longer-lasting restrictions on human rights. The article introduces the concept of derogation, emphasizing that states have the specific right to limit certain human rights during public emergencies, as outlined in Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

The European response to the pandemic is explored, with the European Commission’s initiatives and the criticism of the EU’s perceived lack of action and solidarity. The article points out the limitations of the EU’s role in public health and the resulting diversity in national strategies among European countries.Overall, the article underscores the significance of derogation in international law, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 crisis, while emphasizing the need for such measures to be proportionate and necessary.

Reflection-public health and safeguarding individual rights during a global crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. It highlights the principle that under international human rights law, states can limit certain rights when it’s essential for collective well-being. The COVID-19 pandemic indeed pushed the boundaries of these restrictions, as the scope and duration of measures intensified.The critical voices regarding European solidarity and the debate on state sovereignty reveal the complexities of navigating international cooperation in times of crisis. This article provides valuable insights into the legal and ethical dilemmas faced by governments when addressing public health emergencies while emphasizing the need to protect the most vulnerable.

Quotation-Under international human rights law, States can limit the exercise of most human rights if it is necessary to protect the rights of others or collective interests.”

This time of emergency also questions the protection of fundamental rights.”