Compare New York and Brooklyn Urban Growth and Planning

New York and Brooklyn both went through urban growth and development at different paces. These two properties were both owned by Native Americans who sold it to the Dutch. The British later gained ownership of the land.

London designs heavily influenced Manhattan construction. Manhattan has developed at a quicker paced then Brooklyn. Manhattan was a key area ship used to port and dock their cargo. Manhattan utilized both pathways and waterways as a trading route to transport goods. Manhattans foundations consisted of bedrock making it easier to construct buildings. As a result, Manhattan has many commercial buildings. In 1811 John Randall developed a grid plan for lower Manhattan and then upper Manhattan.

Brooklyn architecture designs were also influenced by London’s ideas in 1776. Brooklyn developed at a slower pace than Manhattan. Brooklyn area consisted of a land with apple trees, peach trees, wetland areas, and rough terrain filled with hills. Brooklyn did not receive a grid plan and was forced to rely on routes based on property lines from farmers. The wetland areas and hills hindered urban development and planning because traveling routes were made longer. Later, a grid was created in Brooklyn and Manhattan to help develop a better urban design. Brooklyn has a Square Water symbol landmark that is currently still there.

New York and Brooklyn both underwent urban growth and planning at different rates. The speed of progress and development depended on various components like foundation and the area.