My question dictates use of information for users that need critical thinking about peace and war. Economics in digital reporting can foster a theory that is unjust for users knowledge, because their monopolies of new stations seek top news that have more profits. And non-for-profit companies can theorize to ethically improve news based on the user, because their theorist value reports that are missed giving a better communicating report. How will “Democracy Now” change the lives and critical thinking of people? How hard is it to focus the research question around facts that would solve a problem for misguided audiences who watch news. I’ve been studying the theory in the interviews and stories on “Democracy Now’s” interactive website to help solve the big problem. It seems to me that hard facts and bloody cases about Afghanistan politics and American politics are never missed and peace is very is to locate.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Michael.M on realizations
- evortega on Badke Appendix 1
- Michael.M on In the Know
- ibn4course on In the Know
- ibn4course on Making the Most Out of Search Engines
Archives
Categories
Meta
t a g s
- assignment
- assignments
- badke
- blogging
- blogs
- copyright
- Digital Media
- document
- fair use (copyright)
- future
- Gatekeepers
- government
- information
- information_evaluation
- Internet
- keywords
- knowledge
- Martin
- media
- online_documentation_project
- openlab
- Pavlik
- plagiarism
- privacy
- process_documentation
- reading
- readings
- research
- Research Strategies
- Right of
- right of privacy
- scholar
- search engine
- search engines
- Searching
- search_engines
- Social Media
- social networking
- technology
- Video
- wiki
- Wiki's
- wikipedia