Category: Discussions (Page 7 of 103)

From Annoying Ways people use sources by Kyle D. Stedman I learned that Sometimes an author can put their work in a way where readers can really understand the point of view the author is trying to show. For example an argument essay you can just put the evidence and explain that evidence. the right way to put it is first to Write something that introduces the evidence then where is that evidence coming from who it’s quoted by and then what is the purpose of that evidence and your explanation behind it and the importance. You have to follow the steps Otherwise is going to be very frustrating plus confusing for the readers. Sometimes authors can have problems Writing or explaining what are they trying to explain in order to make sure what part they trying to prove or trying to say Is perfectly stated Sometimes they could mix up the evidence and their own opinion together. In   Annoying Ways people use sources by Kyle D. Stedman States that “I understand that I couldn’t tell the difference between your ideas and your source’s because we quite naturally patch write all the time. That’s fine with me. Party on!” They’re much more likely to imagine that you plopped in a few extra citations as a way of defensively saying, “I swear I did some research! See? Here’s a citation right here! Doesn’t that prove I worked really hard?” To sum up, The idea is when it really hard to understand the Source and your own opinion. And makes your argument very less Understandable also very weak. I personally believe this is the mistake that I personally made a lot and based on the article in order to fix this problem in order to make sure that you’re following those one thing that you could do is to someone else that could give you feedback about your work but sometimes we don’t really have to read it to someone I believe you could read it louder to yourself or to someone that could give you your comments about your work.