There is always debate on whether something should be preserved. Whether something should be preserved depends on a couple of things. Some are whether it is neccesary, whether the majority want it, or its histroical value. I believe that if something or original it should be preserved, since it is a prime example of an original idea. Mostly whether something is preserved is based on opinion, and majority of opinion. If one says something should be preserved, another might say it doesnt have to, so the debate is who is correct. Most of the thins that are preserved today are because of sentimental value or neccisity. Overall the idea of preservation and what should or should not be preserved is based on majority opinion.
ENG 1101 – 5363
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Carlos Mo Wu on Burj Khalifa -Austin Felix
- Stephanie.S on Formal Description: One World Trade Center
- Rob Daley on Burj Al Arab description – Carlos Mo Wu
- Austin Felix on Formal Critique
- Stephanie.S on Burj Al Arab description – Carlos Mo Wu
Archives
Categories
Meta