https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PxSm0M6RRAJzk9Zey62MNxv835RPHf9pZhoc6kWyPWE/edit?usp=sharing
xx Monroe Street xx
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PxSm0M6RRAJzk9Zey62MNxv835RPHf9pZhoc6kWyPWE/edit?usp=sharing
Our goal is to make the OpenLab accessible for all users.
Our goal is to make the OpenLab accessible for all users.
Thesis- Protests should be happening because it is one of the ways to get our voices heard but there could be better ways of protesting during a pandemic.
One supporting reason- People must keep a distance while protesting.
Counter claim- Can you be more clear on that?
Thesis: We should be protesting because it’s the start of a change ,but there is always a better way of doing it .
Supporting reason :People must social distance ,black people are at a higher risk for COVID.
Counter argument: I’m not sure what the argument is ,but one can be we don’t know if protesting will change anything
Thesis: We ought to dissent since it’s the beginning of a change ,yet there is consistently a superior method of doing it .
Supporting reason: people should be have maintain social distance because coronavirus is spreading all the way.
Counter argument: it’s not clear. Can you be make more clear on that?
1) Thesis- protest should be happening…there could be better ways to protest during this pandemic.
2) Supporting reason- provide protestor testing stations so we can hep one another stay safe and in a way if we are at risk of our citizens feel ill then they’ll know they must stay home.
3) Counter argument- I don’t see what’s your argument. I think you’re missing that part in your writing.
Thesis: people should raise voice against racism and do not stop protesting because of pandemic.
Supporting reason: Black people are in more danger other than any race, protest should be continue by taking precautionary measures.
Counter argument: I don’t see counter argument you should be more specific and clear about it.