Each semester, I have received the highest overall evaluation from my peer observer. In the table below, I list the overall evaluation assessments. Click here for some highlights from the peer observation report comments.
All observation reports can be reviewed in my personnel file
Associate Professor, 2018-present
| Observer | Course/Semester | Overall Evaluation |
| Monique Ferrell | ENG 2180/Fall 2023 | Report pending |
| Lucas Kwong | ENG 3407/Fall 2022 | Excellent |
| Patricia Rudden | ENG 1101/Spring 2019 | Excellent |
| Julian Williams | ENG 2400/Fall 2018 | Excellent |
Assistant Professor, 2012-2018
| Observer | Course/Semester | Overall Evaluation |
| Jody Rosen | Eng 1101/Spring 2018 | Excellent |
| Robert LestĂłn | Eng 2180/Fall 2017 | Excellent |
| Richard Hanley | Eng 1101/Spring 2017 | Excellent |
| Annette Saddik | Eng 1101/Fall 2016 | Excellent |
| Carole Harris | Eng 3407/Spring 2016 | Excellent |
| Julian Williams | Eng 1101/Fall 2015 | Excellent |
| Caroline Hellman | Eng 092W/Spring 2015 | Excellent |
| Carole Harris | Eng 2000/Fall 2014 | Excellent |
| Patricia Rudden | Eng 1101/Spring 2014 | Excellent |
| Monique Ferrell | Eng 2000/Fall 2013 | Satisfactory* |
| Nina Bannett | Eng 2000/Spring 2013 | Excellent |
| George Guida | Eng 1101/Fall 2012 | Excellent |
* In Fall 2013, the college temporarily instituted a new peer observation report form that asked observers to assess teaching as “Unsatisfactory” or “Satisfactory.” For all other semesters, the assessment scale asked observers to assess teaching as “Unsatisfactory,” “Satisfactory,” “Very Good,” or “Excellent.”
