Arbor

Arbor – Noun

Definition:   a shelter of vines or branches or of latticework covered with climbing shrubs or vines.

Source : http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arbors

Found in :  The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman

Quote:  “I always fancy I see people walking in these numerous paths and arbors, but John has cautioned me not to give way to fancy in the least. (3rd page, last paragraph)

In this quote the narrator who is looking out of her window starts daydreaming about people walking along the vine paths and how her husband thinks daydreaming of that kind is not good for her.  I  understand that how her husband made her believe even to think about beautiful path ways are dangerous for her treatment.

PassĂŠ

PassĂŠ – Adjective

Definition: no longer fashionable or popular

Source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pass%C3%A9

Found in: There Was Once by Margaret Atwood

Quote: “Forest? Forest is passĂŠ, I mean, I’ve had it with all this wilderness stuff.  It’s not a right image of our society, today. Let’s have some urban for a change.” (1st page, 3rd line)

Throughout this short story, the narrator tries to breakdown the stereotypical fairytale of Cinderella. Back then maybe this might have been the case where the typical Cinderella story might have taken place in a forest but in today’s society people in poverty are known to be in urban areas. This is a way of the narrator’s attempts to demolish how stereotypical we can be.

Martyr

Martyr – Noun

Definition:a person who is killed or who suffers greatly for a religion, cause, etc.

: a person who pretends to suffer or who exaggerates suffering in order to get praise or sympathy

: a person who suffers greatly from something (such as an illness)

Source:  http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/martyr

Found in:  Woman Hollering Creek by SANDRA CISNEROS

Quote : “Oh, and her name’s if Cleofilas.  I don’t know. One of those Mexican saints, I guess. A martyr or something.”

When the doctor asks one of the nurses on the phone to give Cleofilas a ride to San Antonio to help her escape her abusive husband, he tell her Cleofilas’ name. He says her name is meant  a saint. Then he spells it for her to write it down.

Telenovelas

The telenovelas describe the love and life many girls anticipated as they grow up to be young women.  Clefilas enjoyed watching telenovelas.  Although often in the telenovelas, hearts were broken and betrayal was common, they depicted the perfect life to live. She has an image that women from the telenovelas possess wonderful lives. She would do her hair and wear her make just like they do. This shows that she is not content with her looks and appearance.  They were also her guide for learning about love. She fantasized of finding her true love, “the great love of one’s life” as she stated.  When she married Juan Pedro, she thought her life would shift and be like the ones from the telenovelas. She dreamed of living a life similar but she finds out that life does not always turn out the way she wants it to be.   Telenovas can also been seen as an escape for Cleofila from the reality of her own life in which the “kind of the books and songs and telenovelas describe when one finds, finally, the great love of one’s life and does whatever one can, must do, at whatever the cost” (page 280, paragraph 1).  She constantly evaluates her love for her husband to that of a soap opera.  She finally realizes that marriage is not always like a fairytale or as it is portrayed on soap operas.  After that she gets the courage to leave her abusive husband for a simpler life back at home and possibly live with her father and six brothers.

The Bell Jar Book Covers

PART 1

Cover 1  Parody book cover of The Bell Jar              Cover 2 Sirca_Fanus_Turkish

COVER 1

Publication date: 3/1/2013

Press published with: Faber and Faber

Location: United Kingdom

Any other identifiers:  50th Anniversary Edition

 COVER 2

Turkish Cover

Publication date: 2009, 6th Edition

Press published with: Can Publishing

Location:  Istanbul, Turkey

Translated by:  Handan Sarac

The Bell Jar written by Sylvia Plath follows Esther Greenwood, the main character, who although is a striving young writer, finds herself spiraling downward into depression and eventually a suicide attempt.

There are many cover designs for the book that have appeared in many languages since 1963. The two covers I chose relates to many aspects of the novel.  The 50th Anniversary Edition book cover published by Faber and Faber features a photograph of a young woman, powdering her face and looking into a mirrored make up compact. She does not look at the camera. We can see her face in profile and reflected back at us by the mirror.

I believe this book cover captures the essence of the protagonist’s dilemma perfectly. At the beginning of the book, The Bell Jar’s protagonist Esther Greenwood is working as a writer on a New York magazine; she and the other girls are given numerous freebies which include make up and lipsticks; they are living and working in an environment concerned with glamour and fashion.  In the beginning of the story Esther says, “ I still have the makeup kit they game, fitted out for a person with brown eyes and brown hair, an oblong of brown mascara with a tiny brush, a round basin of blue eye-shadow just big enough to dab the tip of your finger in, and three lipsticks ranging from red to pink, all cased in the same little gilt box with a mirror on one side. I also have a white plastic sunglasses case with colored shells and sequins and a green plastic starfish sewed onto it.”  Her reminiscing about the makeup kit she got years ago lets us know that she survived the story she’s about to tell us. Even though this cover doesn’t really shows the dark side of Esther’s life, it may be suggesting that even a “normal” looking woman, putting on make-up and trying to look good can experience mental health problems.

This cover also relates to one of the symbols Plath used over and over through the novel. The mirror!  One of Esther’s problems is that she does not really know who she is. She has no firm sense of identity. It is noticeable how often she looks into a mirror, or sees a reflection of herself  but does not recognize the image as herself. It shows us how Esther is increasingly withdrawing from herself, with her failure to identify with her reflection in a mirror.

For example, in the reflection in the elevator in New York,  she remarks; “I noticed a big, smudgy-eyed Chinese woman staring idiotically into my face.” (pg. 18). Then, on the train going home, she said; “the face in the mirror looked like a sick Indian.” (pg. 113). Also when she first looks in a mirror in the hospital, after her suicide attempt, she is so disfigured that she does not recognize herself saying “It wasn’t a mirror at all, but a picture.”   Another quote from the novel where we can see how Esther is not able to identify herself with her reflection in the mirror is when she said, “I moved in front of the medicine cabinet. If I looked in the mirror while I did it, it would be like watching somebody else, in a book or a play. But the person in the mirror was paralyzed and too stupid to do a thing” (pg. 147-148).    What these examples suggest is that Esther’s feelings of inadequacy lead her into a dislike of her own appearance and a feeling that she is not really being herself. This is because her failure to recognize her own reflection stands for the difficulty she has of understanding herself.

The Turkish book cover published by Can Publishing in 2009 “Sirca Fanus”, meaning “The Bell Jar” in Turkish, features a portrait of a glamorous woman wearing lots of make up with a dull and emotionless expression in her face.  With very short hair, the lifeless stare in her eyes and shape of her head reminds of a human cadaver head.  In connection with the novel, the image of the cadaver head occurs on the first page of the novel.  Esther says “I kept hearing about the Rosenbergs over the radio and at the office until I couldn’t get them out of my mind. It was like the first time I saw a cadaver. For weeks afterward, the cadaver’s head–or what there was left of it–floated up behind my eggs and bacon at breakfast.  I felt as though I was carrying that cadaver’s head around with me on a string, like some black, noseless balloon stinking of vinegar.”  In another words, her inability to get a cadaver’s head out of her mind points out to death.

Furthermore, the woman on the second book cover looks stiff, immobile and inhumane looking, just like how she felt about the cadavers.  She said;  “These cadavers were so unhuman-looking. They didn’t bother me a bit.  They had stiff, leathery, purple black skin and they smelt like old pickle jars.” (p. 63).

Later in the novel, Esther is put into a mental institution and is given electroshock therapy.  On the cover of the Turkish translated version of the novel, we can notice two white bandages on the sides of her head above her ears. This takes us back to Esther’s first experience with Electroshock therapy. She says “Doctor Gordon was fitting two metal plates on either side of my head. He buckled them into place with a strap that dented my forehead, and gave me a wire to bite”. (pg. 143).  This shows us how her first experience with Electroshock therapy was horrifying to her.

Both covers may be making reference to societal pressures of the time. In the 50s and early 60s women’s behavior was governed by certain social mores and they were valued mainly with regard to looks rather than ability.  Both covers demonstrate a woman wearing lots of make up.  We can suggest that make up covers imperfections and the way make up is used in these covers can tell us that how Esther is trying look on the outside; perfect skin and bright colors.  Since the entire book deals with appearance and reality I believe Esther’s outward appearance belies what is happening within. Excessive use of make up for example shows us Esther’s struggle to cover-up her imperfections in her own life. Both covers represent how Esther always struggles to keep the outward self she presents to the world united with the inner self that she experiences.

Also, the women’s face on both covers almost wears a sneer. On the 50th Anniversary cover, the woman sneers at herself and is reflected right back at us and on the Turkish edition cover, an upside down frown is lightly drawn on the sides of the woman’s lips.  Both the half reflected image from the mirror and the sneer can demonstrate Esther’s inability to unify herself and the splitting of her selves and Esther’s breakdown where she got admitted to a mental institution.   In the first book cover, she seems more comfortable with herself, calmly fixing her makeup, almost like getting ready for a night out. However on the second book cover, her makeup is done in a way of applying makeup on a corpse for viewing, overly done.

PART 2

.2

I chose the above image to design my book cover.  I wanted to focus on the two reoccurring themes in the novel.  First theme is the bell jar and for Esther the bell jar symbolizes madness. She feels as if she is inside an airless jar that distorts her perspective on the world and keeps her alienated.

Second reoccurring theme is the fig tree. Early in the novel, Esther reads a story about a Jewish man and a nun who meet under a fig tree. Their relationship is unfortunate just as she feels her relationship with Buddy is unfortunate. For Esther, Buddy Willard is a symbol of her deflated expectations. Later in the novel, the tree becomes a symbol of the life choices that face Esther. She imagines that each fig represents a different life. She can only choose one fig, but because she wants all of them, she sits paralyzed with indecision and the figs fall to the ground. She says: “I saw myself sitting in the crotch of this fig tree, starving to death, just because I couldn’t make up my mind which of the figs I would choose. I wanted each and every one of them, but choosing one meant losing all the rest, and, as I sat there, unable to decide, the figs began to wrinkle and go black, and, one by one, they plopped to the ground at my feet.”(77). Her problem is that she has too many options, but no satisfying option that can conform to what is traditionally expected of her.  Furthermore, Esther’s inability to make decisions about her future has to do with her negative perception of self and her belief that she is unqualified to make such a decision.

In the above image, the sapling (young fig tree) in the bell jar represents Esther who is still yet to grow and have all the expectations a young woman has. The sapling is trapped inside the bell jar, just like Esther feels. As the sapling grows, the bell jar will be too small for it. As it grows it needs bigger space, more soil, more water and nourishment.  If the sampling stays trapped inside the bell it will not grow and eventually die. This can be a symbol of Esther being imprisoned within her own mind.  Even her choices and her thoughts are stuck inside the bell jar because figs symbolized her choices and a sampling can’t produce figs unless it grows.

If you look closely the bell jar is almost in the shape of a woman’s shadow.  Her head and shoulders are visible as if she is standing on top of the sampling. The darkness and the blur represent Esther’s mental breakdown and the way she sees her life through the bell jar.

 

 

 

Shock Therapy a/k/a Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)

In the 1960s at the time of The Bell Jar, so little was fully known that Esther is simply considered to be “insane.” She stays in an “insane asylum” where she is not so much treated but managed and controlled. It was not until the 1990’s many of these expansive asylums were completely overhauled into modern medical centers or closed because of underuse, underfunding or scandal. (Pelayo, C.).  The insane asylums of this time became the psychiatric hospitals of today.

Esther receives a series of shock treatments which was very common back then and used much more recklessly than they are today. The ‘shock treatment’ referred to is known as ECT or Electroconvulsive therapy, a form of psychiatric treatment (usually for major depression) which was developed during the 1930’s. It involves the inducing of seizures in a patient through the administration of electric shock to the brain via electrodes placed on either side of the head.  (Wikipedia). Ester says “Doctor Gordon was fitting two metal plates on either side of my head. He buckled them into place with a strap that dented my forehead, and gave me a wire to bite”. (p. 143).

Nowadays, patients receiving ECT are given a short-acting anesthetic and a muscle relaxant to prevent a full-blown seizure occurring. However, during the 1940’s through 1960’s, ECT was often given in its ‘unmodified’ form without anesthesia or muscle relaxants. (Wikipedia). It is this primitive form of ECT which Esther received. Later in the reading we get a sense that these treatments weren’t quite administered with accuracy and purpose. When Esther told Dr. Nolan how she did not like Dr. Gordon because of “what he did to her” (p. 189) referring to the ECT, Dr. Nolan replied by saying “That was a mistake and it is not supposed to be like that”. (p.189). It seemed more as though Dr. Gordon tried to shock and shake Esther back to the world of the sane. We can understand her experience when she says, “Then something bent down and took hold of me and shook me like the end of the world”. (p. 143). Sadly, people didn’t really know enough about the brain, mental illness, and psychiatry to truly be helpful back then. Electroconvulsive therapy does exist today, however it’s not like the shock treatments to which Esther was subjected to.

Article Reference :  Pelayo, Cythia, Retrieved from  http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/abandoned-insane-asylums

Midterm – Passage 2

“She didn’t know. Couldn’t tell. But there was, she knew something else.  Happiness, she supposed. Whatever that might be. What exactly, she wondered, was happiness. Very positively she wanted it. Yet her conception of it had no tangibility. She couldn’t define it. Isolate it, and contemplate it as she could some other abstract things. Hatred, for instance. Or kindness.”

 

 

 

  1. Quicksand
  2. By Nella Larsen
  3. In this passage it is made clear that Helga becomes plagued with feelings of doubt, insecurity, and alienation once again. Helga, born of a white mother and a black father, has not been able to identify herself as either white or black. Since her sense of self is always censored by society’s restrictions and expectations she does not feel happy. As a result, she is constantly fleeing from place to place in search of a society wherein she can fit in. Because she does not belong to one race completely, she never truly finds a place where she belongs. Helga is questioning her own identity and her connections to the community around her. She can’t even identify her feelings as hatred or kindness.
  4. As a half black half white educated women Helga’s inner conflict and peace and her loneliness connects to a larger issue experienced by many biracial people. Race and gender are the forefront of Quicksand. Although it appears that the biracial person may have the best of both worlds, there will always be questions regarding their belonging and acceptance to their environment. Helga did not feel completely as a part of a certain community. She fled from her surroundings every time she thought things didn’t go well for her. Self identity crisis, acceptance issues, and not being able to identify oneself under one group as black or white becomes an issue in this case.

Midterm- Passage 1

“When she abandoned herself a little whispered word escaped her slightly parted lips. She said it over and over under her breath: “free, free, free!” The vacant stare and the look of terror had followed it went from her eyes.  They stayed keen and bright.  Her pulses beat fast, the coursing blood warned and relaxed every inch of her body.”

 

 

 

 

1. Story of an Hour

2. Kate Chopin

3. In this passage Louise alone in her room begins to realize that she is now an independent woman after her husband’s death.  This realization excites her.  By the excitement of this joy her heart starts beating fast and she feels relaxed and relieved to be free and ready to welcome a new beginning.

4. Chopin suggests that all marriages, even the kindest ones, are inherently oppressive. Louise, who readily admits that her husband was kind and loving, nonetheless feels joy when she believes that he has died. In some marriages independence is a forbidden pleasure that can be imagined only privately. Chopin shows us the oppressiveness of all marriages, which by their nature rob people of their independence.

My Manifesto and Justification

My Feminist Manifesto

Amazing that a woman was comfortable with settling to be simply a homemaker. Amazing that a woman though housework ruins ones hands and makes her unattractive. Amazing that “hands” would be a part of one’s body to show inequality. Ask any man if they would agree to pitch in to keep their women’s hands beautiful and functioning. Any man who agrees, will give a start to what is to become a partnership and not a traditional marriage.

Ask any woman who has just decided to have or has just had a baby what is more important to her? Raising her family or rising up the corporate ladder. It really should not be about either or. Women can have both. Think about it. Little girls love their dolls and boys just want to kick that ball. Does this mean men can’t take care of babies or women can’t play sports. Of course not! It just means each gender has its own energy that flows in a specific direction. Let it flow!

Guess what? No one can win this battle. Excepting the fact that men and women are equal but different makes things more clear.

Why not just enjoy the feast full of unique qualities that men and women bring to the table. Why not just mix and match those qualities without being stereotypical. And as for the “cooking”… Men can cook as good as women and women can enjoy a meal that is cooked by men. But unfortunately, this is one area that women have long been associated with…being in the kitchen. “Biological role” one can say. The question is “Is cooking for a man a good way to win his affections?” If this was indeed true, then all men would only want to marry women who are chefs. It has to expand beyond that. It must!

Justification

My manifesto was written based on the “The Cottagette” written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman. In her short story, Gilman touches bases on the stereotypical concept that the role of women in marriage is to be a homemaker.  When the young woman Malda expresses an interest in a young man Lois’s advise is eye opening.  She says “What they care for most after all is domesticity. Of course they’ll fall in love with anything; but what they want is a homemaker.” This shows how woman were comfortable just to be recognized as a homemaker. Let alone to say that men, will fall for “anything” does not hold women in too high a regard.  But Malda externalizes that she wants to do other things like needlework and that housework ruins ones hands for needlework.  The hands, in my opinion, are the first item that shows inequality in this work. The men in the story agree that they should pitch in to keep their women’s hands beautiful and functioning. This gives us the first spring of what is to become a partnership and not a traditional marriage. Gilman reveals that is not the only thing women are capable of but women also has intelligences.

For a long time women have never been urged to follow their dreams nor do as they pleased.  I believe that only now in the modern ages have women felt the need to become so outwardly independent as their self-worth was not properly shown through the role of a domesticated house-wife. However I feel that this ‘role’ was created or if not created encouraged by women themselves. When growing up mothers would push for their little girls to learn to cook and clean because that is what women are made of or of the thought that that’s what will find them a good husband, but that gives a man the advantage to expect it. Most men refuse to partake that role because in their eyes that’s what the woman is there for, but the statement made by Ford I think gives enough light to us women. He says “It is not true, always, my dear, that the way to a man’s heart is through his stomach; at least it’s not the only way.”  This shows that all men don’t want to marry someone who is only skilled in house work but someone with smarts, and other skills. By Ford asking Malda to marry him only if she gives up cooking and continue to do what she loves to do and that he would take on the role of cooking shows true love and equality in a marriage.

Quicksand: Helga’s disapointments

In Quicksand, Helga Crane who is a 23 year old teacher in school in Naxos, Georgia, is born of a white mother and black father. Deeply lonely as a child, she has not been able to identify herself as either white or black. Helga then leaves Naxos and move to Chicago because she is tired of the racial politics of the school. She announces her resignation to the school’s principal, Dr. Anderson, to whom she becomes attracted to later in the reading. She breaks her engagement to a teacher named James Vayle, and leaves Naxos feeling relieved.

In Chicago, her mother’s brother Uncle Peter has a new wife, who rejects Helga due to her mixed race. Helga, alone and broke, finds work with an educated and wealthy woman named Mrs. Hayes-Rore, who asks Helga to edit her speeches on racial equality. After taking the job, Helga decides that she will relocate to New York and start a new life. Helga feels empowered by her decision and feels as if she had been “reborn”. She has a need to be in control of her own destiny and to feel like she is in control of the situations she finds herself in. Freedom was happiness for Helga and in Harlem she had a place to live, a stable job and good friends where she felt free.   But it didn’t last, this happiness of Helga Crane’s. We can see this change in the following passage.

“Little by little the signs of spring appeared, but strangely the enchantment of the season, so enthusiastically, so lavishly greeted by the gay dwellers of Harlem, filled her only with restlessness.  Somewhere, within her, in a deep recess, crouched discontent. She began to lose confidence in the fullness of her life, the glow began to fade from her conception of it. As the days multiplied, her need of something, something vaguely familiar, but which she could not put a name to and hold for definite examination, become almost intolerable. She went through moments of overwhelming anguish. She felt shut in, trapped. (390).”

By reading the above passage we can see how “old” Helga resurfaced and she was plaqued with feelings of doubt, insecurity and alienation. Where once felt connected to the heart of Harlem, Helga soon became disconnected. After receiving a note from her Uncle Peter urging her to reconnect with her Aunt Katrina who “always wanted” her in Denmark, Helga begins to look at Harlem differently. She says that “She didn’t, in spite of her racial markings, belong to these dark segregated people. She was different. She felt it. It wasn’t merely a matter of color. It was something broader, deeper, that made folk kin. (395). Then she felt free once again.

I also want to include that the epigram at the beginning of the novel by Langston Hughes seems like an appropriate introduction to Helga’s struggle to find her place in the world where she is questioning her own identity and her connections to the community around her.