Mina Loy’s Feminist Manifesto Brain storm (Late)

In Mina Loy’s “Feminist Manifesto”, she rejects the fact that women are equal to men. In her writing she encourages women to basically dehumanize themselves to fit into society and to claim power. “Woman must destroy in herself the desire to be loved” This basically implies that in order to be taken seriously by a man, a woman must not be soft and avoid loving relationships. It also implies that it will rid men of the notion that women are of objects for sex. She continues to state that although women should stay emotionally detached in order to maintain respect, sex isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It should only be used for reproduction purposes. If I was to write a feminist manifesto, I would write about the objectification of women all around the world. Women everywhere are sexually objectified based on their bodies/looks whether it be in the middle east or even in some place like miami. All around us there are billboards, posters, magazines, and movies telling women how they should look, starting from a very early age. It’s very rare to come across such things for men. They are so many unrealistic expectations for women to look a certain way that it can cause a lot of issues within themselves, get in the way of building their characters and confidence. Women are told from a young age that they need to look beautiful or presentable in order to find “Prince Charming.” Society pressures women to act a certain way, in order to satisfy the needs of men, mostly. This often keeps them from being their true selves because a lot of women are afraid of being judged. Mina Loy encourages women to get rid of that fear and embrace themselves by first stripping themselves of emotions towards men, which will lead to them not caring about what other men want or need which is an essential part of being a human being first.

A Room of One’s Own

At the thought of all those women working year after year and finding it hard to get two thousand pounds together, and as much as they could do to get thirty thousand pounds, we burst out in scorn at the reprehensible poverty of our sex. What had our mothers been doing then that they had no wealth to leave us? Powdering their noses? Looking in at shop windows? Flaunting in the sun at Monte Carlo? There were some photographs on the mantelpiece. Mary’s mother — if that was her picture — may have been a wastrel in her spare time (she had thirteen children by a minister of the church), but if so her gay and dissipated life had left too few traces of its pleasures on her face. She was a homely body; an old lady in a plaid shawl which was fastened by a large cameo; and she sat in a basket-chair, encouraging a spaniel to look at the camera, with the amused, yet strained expression of one who is sure that the dog will move directly the bulb is pressed. Now if she had gone into business; had become a manufacturer of artificial silk or a magnate on the Stock Exchange; if she had left two or three hundred thousand pounds to Fernham, we could have been sitting at our ease to-night and the subject of our talk might have been archaeology, botany, anthropology, physics, the nature of the atom, mathematics, astronomy, relativity, geography. If only Mrs Seton and her mother and her mother before her had learnt the great art of making money and had left their money, like their fathers and their grandfathers before them, to found fellowships and lectureships and prizes and scholarships appropriated to the use of their own sex, we might have dined very tolerably up here alone off a bird and a bottle of wine; we might have looked forward without undue confidence to a pleasant and honourable lifetime spent in the shelter of one of the liberally endowed professions. We might have been exploring or writing; mooning about the venerable places of the earth; sitting contemplative on the steps of the Parthenon, or. going at ten to an office and coming home comfortably at half-past four to write a little poetry. Only, if Mrs Seton and her like had gone into business at the age of fifteen, there would have been — that was the snag in the argument — no Mary.” (Line 1 Paragraph 14)

I think this passage contains the main idea from the reading. The narator and her friend Mary Seton discuss their college, the women’s college, which required a lot of effort to fund when it was first being built. She realizes that the men’s colleges have always been funded generously and she imagines what it would be like for her if women were to leave money for future generations like men did. She thinks of the endless possibilities she could’ve induced. However she realizes if that was the case then there would be sacrifices that women would have to make. “Only, if Mrs Seton and her like had gone into business at the age of fifteen, there would have been — that was the snag in the argument — no Mary.” The point of the passage is to convey the restrictions women go through because of their place in society. It connects to the overall text because she notes the different things she would be able to with some more funding. Throughout the text, the idea that women can only progress with a sufficient amount of money and their own space in order to expand their creativity and intellect is repeated. In the reading, the narator is constantly being interrupted from being herself. At first it was at the turf when she was exploring an idea, then at the library when she wanted to look something up. It shows an example of how women are being restricted from developing and how it takes a toll on their freedom as well.

 

Gesticulation

Gesticulation

noun

a gesture, esp. a dramatic one, used instead of speaking or to emphasize one’s words.

Nor did I at first understand that the gesticulations of a curious-looking object, in a cut-away coat and evening shirt, were aimed at me.”

Paragraph 3 sentence 3 in A Room of One’s Own by Virginia Woolf

Now that I understand this word, I understand that he was making outraged gestures at her because she didn’t belong on the turf, it was for men only.

Erroneous

Erroneous

adjective

wrong; incorrect.

“Our assumption that only married people and their immediate relatives have any right to live in comfort and health is erroneous.”

Paragraph 7 in Women and Economics.

Now that I understand this word, I understand that Gilman believes this isn’t the only way people are capable of living in comfort.

 

Women and Economics.

In the selection from Women and Economics, Gilman makes an argument about housework. What is it? Does the short story “The Cottagette” present a solution to the issues raised in Gilman’s non-fiction Women and Economics? Explain your stance.

“Women and Economics,” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman states that housework and the whole foundation of marriage keeps people from being in their natural state. It insists marriage isn’t necessary and it shouldn’t dictate the way we live our lives. Housework isn’t needed to make a solid foundation between individuals whether it be two or more. Yes, the Cottagette does present a solution to the issues in Woman and Economics because it proves housework isn’t necessary and in the story Ford is willing to accept Malda whether she cooks or not. He wants her to be herself without sacrificing her talents in order to meet his basic needs. 

Utopia or Dystopia?

uto·pia

noun \yu̇-ˈtō-pē-ə\

: an imaginary place in which the government, laws, and social conditions are perfect

: a place of ideal perfection especially in laws, government, and social conditions

dys·to·pia

Noun \(ˌ)dis-ˈtō-pē-ə\

: an imaginary place where people are unhappy and usually afraid because they are not treated fairly

: an imaginary place where people lead dehumanized and often fearful lives

All about up here were the lovely small things I needed; and not only
these, but the lovely big things that make one feel so strong and able
to do beautiful work.” “The Cottagette,” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman is definitely a utopian story. The narrator, Malda, describes her new home as a “fairy land of sun and shadow.” At first she is very content with her living conditions but soon her utopia starts to disintegrate when she tries to impress a man that has caught her attention. She begins taking her friend’s advice to pursue this man by cooking for him which takes up most of her time. Although she is good at it, she has no interest in it. In the end of the story, Ford encourages her to give up her cooking and to instead continue embroidering which makes her very happy. He asks her to marry him and I assume this was the final touch she needed for her new home.

The Wallpaper,” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman is my favorite reading so far. The narrator is a distressed woman who is obviously unsatisfied with her surroundings and her domestic life. Her husband is not very supportive of her and tries to convince her otherwise every time she voices an opinion of her own about matters pertaining to their new home or anything that has to do with her inner feelings . In order to escape her reality she buries herself in her secret diary in which she writes about her fixation with the yellow wallpaper in the home which she describes as “menacing.” “There are things in that paper which nobody knows but me, or ever will. Behind that outside pattern the dim shapes get clearer every day.It is always the same shape, only very numerous. And it is like a woman stooping down and creeping about behind that pattern. I don’t like it a bit. I wonder—I begin to think—I wish John would take me away from here!” I believe she sees herself in the wallpaper and so she is basically figuring herself out through it. As the story goes on she seems more and more miserable with her life and soon drives herself into insanity with the help of her oblivious husband. In the end of the story, she tries to set the trapped woman in the wallpaper free by biting and scratching it off and her husband finds her in this state and I believe by then it is far too late for her. This story is definitely dystopian because the main character is completely dehumanized by the end.

 

Freshman Year

Hi, my name is Farhana Haque and I’m from Bangladesh. I chose this class because I love books and an introduction to women writers seemed like an interesting course to take. My favorite female poet is Maya Angelou and favorite novelist is Marjane Satrapi. During my free time, I enjoy cooking, traveling and dancing. I travel a lot, and so far I’ve been to Bangladesh, the U.A.E., parts of the Caribbean, and plan on exploring Europe with my best friend this Spring Break. I love the feeling of traveling to a new country and learning about different cultures along the way. I believe it is the single best way to learn about our fellow human beings. I finally decided this year that I want to major in Psychology. I’ve always enjoyed analyzing people and situations and also love helping people get to the core of their problems and so it seemed fit to choose this profession. I am currently working on a book of my own in the meantime inspired by the show, Girls. I am very much in touch with my own culture and love visiting my country every chance I get. Most of my family members live there and I am very family oriented. My favorite quote is, “Where you invest your love, you invest your life.”