In the social networking community people create just enough here say to develop attraction from people who crave undivided attention.
The social networking allows conflict that jeopardize freedom of speech, decision making, and interest. It develops an attacking, manipulating, and compulsive observer to act out. It puts cognitive attentions of abuse into a believers head. And the return of here say usually breaks the speaker’s heart. Like when you give a trainer your calories burned over a networking site, then later on you see your friend from that site blogging about how fat you are… with bold print. The person who listens and observes to the here speaker’s invades and challenges the actions of that speaker.
The undivided attention in the rss feed is cognitive abuse’s gasoline; a metaphor that produces out of the thoughts that ideas are what make fire. When you entertain people with secrets it allows them to minupulate you and abuse you causing anxiety and psychological disorders. So it is very sensible to avoid the characteristic of rss feeds or “respect secret rights feeds”.
I would also like to add that Face book is not really for those of us who have a really low self esteem . A negative post on their page or a poke can have a disatrous effect on them, in some cases resulting in suicide. Some of us for the slightest missunderstanding, are quick to de friend others. And some not tailored to handle rejection can also take this personally and become stalkers. I wonder if the developers at Face book took these facts into consideration. Or was their development solely driven by profits. Was there ever a thought given to the psychological profiles of their users or are they confident that there is enough in the coffers to settle any legal claims against them by crafty lawers ?