In the article “The History and Characteristics of Fanzines” by Fred Wright common folk like you and me write, illustrate, and review comic works of science fiction and other literature like media, films, and music. We articulate and display gratitude toward other authors work to the community. The pleasure principle is not the means of survival so aggression and sex are not the characters instincts of the article, therefore it is not a literally piece of mind that causes people to dream. Yet the fanzine would not promote the id of a character in the article but portray the joy that was received from the piece that is being criticized. Special interest about a character, beat, or scene would be invented to promote the dislikes and like of a piece. The Fanzine is not apiece itself but a vivid response. The cases insinuated the author of the fanzine as a critic who lust for writing is more like imaginative response and or disagreement and agreement with the experience of another authors work. Fanzines writers communicate with there community and readers are usually writers. The development is more social than economical even more verbose about criticisms and appreciation than economic survival.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Michael.M on realizations
- evortega on Badke Appendix 1
- Michael.M on In the Know
- ibn4course on In the Know
- ibn4course on Making the Most Out of Search Engines
Archives
Categories
Meta
t a g s
- assignment
- assignments
- badke
- blogging
- blogs
- copyright
- Digital Media
- document
- fair use (copyright)
- future
- Gatekeepers
- government
- information
- information_evaluation
- Internet
- keywords
- knowledge
- Martin
- media
- online_documentation_project
- openlab
- Pavlik
- plagiarism
- privacy
- process_documentation
- reading
- readings
- research
- Research Strategies
- Right of
- right of privacy
- scholar
- search engine
- search engines
- Searching
- search_engines
- Social Media
- social networking
- technology
- Video
- wiki
- Wiki's
- wikipedia