in the first reading it talks about the different between the old and new typography. The new  typograghy  is about clarity and the old is about beauty and how it did not attain a high level that we a require today. the reading also talks about pseudo constructivist do not like the new typography. In the second reading it said instead of solution programmes for solution. it also talks about reason and an morphological box that the author made. In the third reading it talks about math and also having clearly intelligible, objective, functional, and  aesthetic  quality thinking. I believe that the authors are saying that we need clarity the morphological box and a grid with math to make a good design