Law In Culture- Laila Clarke

“The Following” created by Kevin Williamson first aired in 2013 was about a serial killer ( Joe Carroll ) that ran a cult while in prison. He would get many visitors from people who fantasize over the books he would write. What he would do is, he will give each person ( someone who visited him) a chapter, this chapter would be about someone he wants to seek revenge on, The person assigned was the designated person that had to kill whoever the chapter was about. Eventually, he escaped from prison which led to a wild hunt for him as well as the cult he created. This show is about three seasons long towards the end of the third season he was captured and sentenced to the death penalty.

This show accurately portrayed how the legal system works in many ways that show will give all is watching is an insight into how difficult it may be interviewing suspects or witnesses many people have this concept that solving murder cases will be easy however the show shows the month criminal criminals will go through to cover up the crime they committed. Not only does it show the professional side of the legal system it also shows the emotional strain that is allotted to these people who have to perform such jobs, such as holding extremely heinous cases. The number one reason I would recommend watching this show is that it shows how long a case could take to solve. Many people don’t believe that it may take years to solve a cold case or a murder case or a rape case. This affected my view of long because when I did watch it I wasn’t sure which field in law I wanted to professionalize in. Quite frankly, I thought the law was boring.  However, this show made me notice how intriguing law can be if you allow it.

 

 

Law in Culture Review – In The Dark Podcast

     In The Dark is a podcast series hosted by Madeleine Baran and produced by APM Reports. The podcast has three seasons with Season 2 focusing on the controversial case of Curtis Flowers. The first 17 episodes of the season were released in 2018, with an additional 3 episodes being released in 2020. According to the APM Reports blurb found here, the case involves Curtis Flowers, “a Black man from Winona, Mississippi, who was tried six times for the same crime. Flowers spent more than 20 years fighting for his life while a white prosecutor spent that same time trying just as hard to execute him.” 

     The topic of the podcast is the case of Curtis Flowers, who in 1996 was accused of shooting four people in a furniture store he had previously worked at called Tardy Furniture. That was just the beginning of his journey as Flowers spent 20+ years in jail in a cycle of trials and appeals all while being on death row. 

     A lot of different terms we learned came into play in the podcast. First of all, it does involve a trial, a defendant (Curtis Flowers), a prosecutor (District Attorney Doug Evans) since it was a criminal case, judges, a jury, a writ of certiorari was filed at one point, and a lot of appeals took place with the Mississippi Supreme Court and a few with the US Supreme Court. As we learned, if an appeal is overturned the case goes back to court and is able to have a re-trail. So since the conviction was overturned during the appeal process multiple times as well as a few of the trials resulting in a hung jury, Flowers went to trial six times for the same crime. Going off of that, since the original trial court found him guilty, he was able to be tried again and again. Double jeopardy only applies if he had been found not guilty in trial courts. Essentially, Flowers “had a first trial – six times” (quote from the APM article here).

     The case eventually made its way to the appeals court, Mississippi Supreme Court, and US Supreme Court because of all the flaws and unjust acts brought to light through the decades Flowers was on trial and in jail. Through the investigation and during the appeal process, it was brought up the various ways Evans catered things, including jury picking, in order to guarantee an unfair trial for Flowers. One of the biggest examples was Evans used almost all of his strikes on African American potential jurors (striking them at almost 4.5 times the rate than white potential jurors). In an odd point also made, Evans was able to be the prosecutor on all six trials against Flowers.

     It is an extremely compelling podcast and story; I suggest everyone give it a listen! I listened to it on Spotify but it is also available on iTunes and Google Podcasts. Normally I am not a podcast person but the way Baran and her colleagues handle the investigation is really amazing. Just by listening, you can tell they are determined for the truth and to expose things that went wrong with Flowers’ case. They push for justice and put in hours upon hours, completely immersing themselves in the case. They spend months in Mississippi speaking with countless people, those from the area and even Flowers’ family. I think it does accurately portray the corrupt and immoral side of the legal field and prison system. So many times we hear about cases where innocent people are on death row or in jail for crimes they did not commit. Or even in jail and serving an insane amount of time for a crime that should not be given that amount of sentencing. Although we all hope for the best and want to expect the best in people, these things happen. It also shows the side of the legal system that will fight for justice and fight for those who are being overlooked or even taken advantage of. 

Court Observation

I found going to the court house a few weeks ago to be very interesting and an experience to remember. It was interesting to see how different attorneys responded to the judges and how assertive they were when the spoke. The judges were very straight to the point and didn’t have time to waste. I also noticed how the judges were well aware about the case before hand and seem to know what they would be asking the attorney. It was a very educational moment to watch with my own eyes.

Court Observation

Witnessing the arguments at the Appellate Division Second Department courthouse was a thrilling and unforgettable experience. We observed the judges perform their jobs with competence and firmness. The passive aggressive way they handled every appeal case was surreal, the Justices knew exactly what they were doing. Honestly, they could not be more prepared, I was astonished about the back and forth between attorneys and Judges, it felt just like a movie scene. I found surprising how the Judges kept track on every detail about those cases. Since those were appeals, I thought they were going to be more like general disputes.

Court Observation!

The court observation a few weeks back was very interesting and eye-opening! As Professor Coughlin mentioned, it was definitely as if walking into a movie halfway through but overall I had a great experience. It was exciting to witness scenarios we have discussed in class and watch the lawyers in action defending actual cases. I did not expect the tension between Justices and attorneys at certain points but it makes complete sense. The Justices are hearing case after case all day, every day. If their time is being wasted, they will (and should!) make it known. It was entertaining to be able to witness a “hot bench” and watch them all interacting with each case.

Currently, in the program at City Tech, my goal is to be a paralegal rather than a lawyer. This experience did not change that much, I still think being behind the scenes is more appealing for me! Although it made me realize that if I end up being a lawyer that heads to court I will need to make sure I am as prepared as possible for the courtroom. There is no room for error!

Grade ME!!

Dear Students,

Now is your chance to give ME a grade!  Please complete the Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) surveys for each of our courses.  They only take a few minutes, and you can access them through emails sent to your City Tech address, from “NYC College of Technology Course Evaluations,” SPSSurveys@scantron.com.  You should have received a separate email for each course.

At the end of class on Tuesday, Dec. 7, Peer Mentor Oliver will help you complete the surveys, or you may complete them on your own anytime until this Friday, Dec. 10.  PLEASE do complete them!  They are extremely helpful to me, to the department, to the college — and especially to future students!

Thank you!

Prof. C.

 

CHANGE in assignment for tomorrow’s class! (Tu. Dec. 7)

Dear Students,

I hope you all enjoyed the weekend and the beautiful Spring-like weather today!  I have “downsized” the assignments for tomorrow’s class (Tue. Dec. 7): YES please still email me your first draft demand letter by 8am, and bring paper copies of your final summons and verified complaint to class to do “legal arts & crafts,” and study for 1101 quiz 4; NO need to read C&W or the Wells Fargo case.  Please see Assignments tab for details, and for major assignments due Thursday, don’t forget!!  Law in Culture and Court Observation assignments to be posted on OL, each worth 5% of LAW 1101 final grade.

Also just a reminder, tonight (Mon. Dec. 6) at 6pm, hear the Chief of Gang Prosecutions for NYC’s Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor speak to Prof. Terel Watson’s class on Zoom.  See my earlier post (in the “home” tab) for the link and other details!

Have a pleasant evening, see you tomorrow (Tues.),

Prof. C.

Meet the Chief of Gang Prosecutions! Mon. Dec. 6, 6-8pm on Zoom

Hello Students!

Prof. Terel Watson graciously extends the following terrific invitation to you — I encourage you to attend if you can, and if you do, let me know!

This Monday, December 6 from 6-8 pm, I am having a guest lecturer visit my Senior Seminar Class.  His name is Nigel Farinha. He is a friend, and more importantly, serves as the Chief of Gang Prosecutions for the Office of the Special Narcotics Prosecutor here in NYC. He notably tried a complex and serious conspiracy/ murder matter involving rapper Bobby Shmurda and some of his companions. I want to open it up to whatever students may be interested in attending. He is a very dynamic speaker. Below is Zoom information should anyone wish to join.

Join Zoom Meeting

https://us06web.zoom.us/j/86389270392?pwd=eGJZVzRMZk9ja2MzQWdONzRHOGpudz09

Meeting ID: 863 8927 0392

Passcode: capstone

 

OOOPS!! No quiz tomorrow — SORRY!!

Hello Students!

I am SO sorry for my prior post (which I have now deleted), there is NO quiz in either of our courses tomorrow (Th. Dec. 2)!  Rather, as we discussed last week, 1101 Intro quiz #4 is Tu. Dec. 7 and 1103 Civ Pro quiz #4 is Th. Dec. 9.  I’m sorry for the confusion!

For tomorrow (Th. Dec. 2), please still read M&M ch. 9 (Legal Writing) pp. 251-268 for 1101, and C&W ch. 6 (Statute of Limitations) for 1103.  It would also be great if you could please review this “Demand Letter” assignment that we’ll discuss in class tomorrow.

I’M SORRY again!  See you tomorrow!

Prof. C.

NO meeting tomorrow! (Tues. Nov. 30) & court observation assignment

Hello Students!

I hope you all enjoyed a happy and safe Thanksgiving and long weekend.  Just a reminder, we will NOT meet for class tomorrow!!  (Tues. Nov. 30)  In place of that class, I’ll meet with each of you at times we’ve scheduled between tomorrow (Tues.) and Thursday to discuss your summons and complaint assignment.

I also hope you enjoyed our visit to the Appellate Division Second Department last week!  I sure did.  To satisfy the “court observation” requirement for 5% of your LAW 1101 grade, by the end of this week, please write a post of about one paragraph (100-200 words) or more, reflecting on the experience.  For example, what did you find interesting, or surprising; what would you like to understand better; how did the experience affect your views of the legal practice, or your career goals; or anything else!  You may address the cases themselves, or the actions and interactions among the lawyers and judges, or our interactions with court personnel and judges, even our visit to the farmers’ market!  Anything that left an impression on you.  Please choose “court observation!” as the category.

Enjoy your Tuesday and Wednesday, see you in class Thursday!

Cheers,

Prof. C.