I think both are effective. He tried to show photographs of things that are uncommon. He showed photographs of people who were not living the American dream that many people dreamed of. Nobody had any interest in it because it was different. But I think because it was different, it was more effective to me. All Frank did was photograph non stop and didn’t care if people was staring or not. He was not discouraged when people did not like his book, instead he got it published elsewhere. I think because Frank took pictures of all the African Americans, his pictures were more general. He did not limit it to just females or just males. Count’s new photograph also is effective because you can clearly see the facial expression of Hazel. You can see through her expression that she is really disgusted having Elizabeth in her school. I think although many know this is happening, for it to be captured is another feeling.
Contact Information
Professor Sandra Cheng
Office: Namm 602B
Office Hours: Tu/Th 9-10 am or
by appointment
Office Tel: 718-260-5003
Email: scheng@citytech.cuny.eduHelpful Links
New York Times Arts
Blogroll
-
Recent Posts
- Re: Photographing the Beginning of the Civil Rights Movement
- Re:Discussion Topic: Street Art, Photography, and the Inside Out Project in Times Square
- Re: Tim Hetherington and Modern-day War Photography
- Response to: Tim Hetherington and Modern-day War Photography
- Photographing the Beginning of the Civil Rights Movement
Recent Comments
- Michael Lorenzo on Discussion Topic: Street Art, Photography, and the Inside Out Project in Times Square
- Michael Lorenzo on Discussion Topic: Tim Hetherington and Modern-day War Photography
- Michael Lorenzo on Discussion Topic: The Greatest War Photograph and Robert Capa
- Phalenta Pamphile on Discussion Topic: Street Art, Photography, and the Inside Out Project in Times Square
- Shantel on Discussion Topic: Photographing the Beginning of the Civil Rights Movement
Archives
Categories
Meta