I believe that one of the main reasons any “kind” of art is created is to create some sort of reaction, to give the viewer the freedom to interpret it as they wish to. Even though I get the point that this was the intention in having Miss Tilda Swinton sleeping at MoMA, I strongly do NOT believe that “Sleep” should be considered a subject of art. In my opinion this “display” of art just seems effortless and meaningless. As I see it, art should be created under some kind of effort, it should be hand made or made using some kind of tool so to call a person sleeping in a museum a “piece of art” just seems a little silly to me. However I do consider Mr. Sergio Clavijo sleeping figures very artistic and clever. Since his creation has a good cause behind it I can very much appreciate it. The only good side I see in the MoMA presentation is the fact that we can see a person’s pure and real facial expressions when they are asleep.
Contact Information
Professor Sandra Cheng
Office: Namm 602B
Office Hours: Tu/Th 9-10 am or
by appointment
Office Tel: 718-260-5003
Email: scheng@citytech.cuny.eduHelpful Links
New York Times Arts
Blogroll
-
Recent Posts
- Re: Photographing the Beginning of the Civil Rights Movement
- Re:Discussion Topic: Street Art, Photography, and the Inside Out Project in Times Square
- Re: Tim Hetherington and Modern-day War Photography
- Response to: Tim Hetherington and Modern-day War Photography
- Photographing the Beginning of the Civil Rights Movement
Recent Comments
- Michael Lorenzo on Discussion Topic: Street Art, Photography, and the Inside Out Project in Times Square
- Michael Lorenzo on Discussion Topic: Tim Hetherington and Modern-day War Photography
- Michael Lorenzo on Discussion Topic: The Greatest War Photograph and Robert Capa
- Phalenta Pamphile on Discussion Topic: Street Art, Photography, and the Inside Out Project in Times Square
- Shantel on Discussion Topic: Photographing the Beginning of the Civil Rights Movement
Archives
Categories
Meta