Seeing the picture of Tsarnaev on the front page of a Rolling Stones magazine definitely brings up some controversy considering you’d see a picture of a celebrity on the front page instead. When the article mentioned that the same picture was used at a New York Times magazine and didn’t receive the same backlash as the Rolling Stone edition, that’s because you expect a news article to use the photos as a means of getting word out to the public about the catastrophe that happened. I guess you can say there is somewhat of a double-standard at play since Rolling Stones is considered to have pictures and interviews of celebrities and if they strayed away from that it would seem out of place. Sort of what happened when they decided to release this issue of a terrorist’s âselfieâ and publishing it thinking that it wouldn’t strike their viewers as odd or out of place. And yes they are glamorizing the photo since the editors decided to put the company’s name over Tsarnaev’s hair, making it look like they’re âendorsing himâ as the article put it. After looking at the the Rolling Stone’s âMarilyn Mansonâ 1970 issue, the photo strikes me as more of a news article since you only see the picture of Manson with only a few words about him. You donât see him alongside the headline of a musician or the latest celebrity gossip.
Contact Information
Professor Sandra Cheng
Office: Namm 602B
Office Hours: Tu/Th 9-10 am or
by appointment
Office Tel: 718-260-5003
Email: scheng@citytech.cuny.eduHelpful Links
New York TImes Arts
Blogroll
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Filmmaking Plan on Discussion Topic: Photography and Special Effects in Early Film
- In the Spotlight Archive: Fall 2013 | The Open Road on Discussion Topic: Is a Selfie Art?
- Sixto Vaquero on Discussion Topic: Beauty in Decay-Photos of Detroit
- Sixto Vaquero on Discussion Topic: The 2013 Year in Photography
- Sixto Vaquero on Discussion Topic: The Art of Food Photography
Archives
Categories
Meta