In “The Commuter,” Dick presents a world where individuals can travel to alternate realities through a train station. As he investigates different real factors, Ed Jacobson, the principal character, battles with the impacts of changing his own life. The idea of the real world and the impact of our choices on how we see the rest of the world are both addressed in the story. It infers that the truth is inconsistent and alterable, leaving users to consider what their decisions might mean for their own lives.
On the other hand, “The Veldt” transports readers to a cutting-edge home equipped with a virtual reality nursery. Bradbury’s story centers around the dangers of intemperate innovation and what it means for family ties. The young children in the story get charmed in a virtual African veldt, which ultimately assumes control over things they wanted and contemplations and results in a shocking end. Bradbury utilizes a preventative story to represent the conceivable adverse consequences of allowing innovation to assume control over our lives and cause us to become completely distracted.
In spite of the way that the two stories manage equal aspects, their implications are essentially unique in relation to each other. By thinking about individual choices and the alterability of the real world, “The Commuter” requests that readers reconsider their perspectives. On the other hand, “The Veldt” cautions against the dangers of innovation and the likely outcomes of losing contact with the real world.
Eventually, by inciting contemplation of the impacts of innovation and the consequences of choices made, these stories change readers’ views of the real world. Readers are provoked to think about the association of choices and the presence being temporary. Conversely, “The Veldt” is an reproach on the dangers of innovation and what it means for family connections. A horrible end results from the children involving computer-generated reality as a delivery for their repressed belief and needs. By focusing on the potential dangers of losing contact with this present reality, Bradbury’s story alerts us against the unrestrained joining of innovation into our lives.
Handouts
Readings
- Aldiss, Brian–Supertoys Last all Summer
- Bacigalupi, Paulo–The People of Sand and Slag
- Bear, Greg–Shrodinger's Plague
- Bradbury, Ray–The Veldt
- Bradbury, Ray–There Will Come Soft Rains
- Butler, Octavia–Bloodchild
- Chiang, Ted–Lifecycle of Software Objects (long)
- Chiang, Ted–The Story of Your Life
- Dick, Philip K.–Autofac
- Dick, Philip K.–The Commuter
- Dick, Philip K.–We Can Remember it for You Wholesale
- Ellison, Harlan–I Have no Mouth and I Must Scream
- Forster, E.M.–The Machine Stops
- Hodgson, William–The Voice in the Night
- Kafka, Franz–In the Penal Colony
- LeGuin, Ursula–The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas
- LeGuin–American Sci Fi and the Other
- LeGuin–Introduction to Science Fiction
- Lovecraft, H.P. –"From Beyond"
- Sterling, Bruce–The Bicycle Repairman
- Tiptree, James (Alice Sheldon)–The Girl Who Was Plugged in
- Tiptree, James (Alice Sheldon)–The Women Men Don't See
- Vinge, Vernor–The Blabber (long)
Members
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Robert Lestón on BP#11: We Can Remember it for You Wholesale
- Robert Lestón on BP 11 – Joshua Caesar
- isaiah2099 on Alexis Xinol Morales – BP 11
- isaiah2099 on BP 11 – Khalil Issa
- isaiah2099 on BP#11: We Can Remember it for You Wholesale
Categories
Meta
Good emphasis on being able to separate both stories with proper punctuation and wording in your paragraphs but make sure to separate them so as to better format your work
Your summary of “The Commuter” was very simple and still managed to explain the overall theme and plot of the story very well, great job.
Jacobson is not the primary character. “Intemperate innovation?” “Bradbury utilizes a preventative story to represent the conceivable adverse consequences of allowing innovation to assume control over our lives.” Utilizes a preventative story? The commuter requests that readers? By inciting contemplation?