Fall 2016 - Professor Kate Poirier

Category: Assignments (Page 2 of 7)

Project #3: Maple Anything – due Tuesday, November 29

We’ve already discussed guidelines for your Maple project. They are collected here and will be updated should the need arise.

You have complete freedom with respect to mathematical content. You have almost complete freedom with respect to your use of the tool; your project is to use the tool to help your audience understand the mathematical content and must satisfy the following two conditions:

  1. It must demonstrate knowledge and/or skills in the software itself. (For example, it must use both the computation and typesetting features, not just one or the other.) Why are you using this tool instead of another one?
  2. It must use Maple in a “pedagogical” way. How does your use of the tool help your audience understand the mathematical content?

The project itself consists of three components:

  • Your Maple file(s)
    • Optional: other documents you use for your project (for example, PowerPoint slides)
  • A written description of what your project is all about:
    • Who is your audience?
    • What knowledge are you assuming your audience knows?
    • How is the content delivered?
    • Why is Maple an appropriate tool for this content and this delivery?
  • A 5-minute presentation explaining what your project is about; include your Maple file(s) and/or screenshots of them.

Your Maple files will be collected over email and/or via USB stick in class. Your written description is to be submitted on the OpenLab (don’t forget to add the category “Project#3: Maple Anything” to your post). Your presentation will be given in class and will be scored by your peers according to our standard rubric and form.

Ideas:

  • lesson (like Project #1)
  • In-class activity (like Project #2)
  • Homework assignment
  • In-class assessment
  • Something completely outside the traditional school/classroom model (see, for example, the project described in the TED talk video from Homework #10)

Due date: Tuesday, November 29

Homework #10: Article and video review – due Tuesday, November 22

Read this article and the video of the TED Talk mentioned in the article.

Both the article and the video discuss a possible future of education based on technology; the article questions the role of teachers in this future. Respond to both the article and the video by posting your own OpenLab post. Do you agree with the assertions in the article? Why or why not? Does the article make you feel depressed? Hopeful? It’s impossible to know exactly what the future holds, but a teacher that is adaptable has a better chance of surviving and thriving during a major change in the field; consider ways in which you think technology may change the field of education during your career. What do you think are the best ways to equip yourself for changes caused by technology?

Don’t forget to select the HW#10 category to your post. Your review should be at least 3 paragraphs long and can be as long as you like.

PS, The video focuses on how technology can change learning, not just formal classroom education. You may like to consider this as you prepare your Maple Project…is there a way to use the tool that allows students to take charge of their own learning as they do in the video?

 

[Abdelmajid.Ihda][Ptolemy Theorem]2

” In Euclidean Geometry, Ptolemy theorem is a relationship between the four sides and the two diagonals of a cyclic quadrilateral who’s vertices lie on a common circle”

“if the quadrilateral is given with its four vertices as follows B,C,D,E then the product of the measure of its diagonals is equal to the sum of the product of the opposite pair sides”

BD*CE=CB*ED+CD*BE

Simson’s Theorem [Zhu, Mei]

“Simson’s Theorem: A line that contains the feet of three perpendiculars from a point P to the triangle ABC is called a Simson line for triangle ABC. The point P is the pole of the Simson line.” In other words, given a triangle, a point P outside of the triangle, we will be able to construct the perpendiculars from the point P to the sides of the triangle. The feet of the perpendiculars will lie on a line, which we call it Simson line.

Hi, everyone, I hope my worksheet will help you understand the theorem. To be honest to all of you, the actual work  took for me to finish this was not easy. I almost lost all my work when I tried to make some changes of the wording. I even tried to reproduce the worksheet online, but the internet was off when I tried to save. Fortunately, I finished it. Please find the link below and give me some suggestions on this. Thank you very much for your attention. :)))

 

Project #2: Rubric and feedback form and HW#9

On Thursday, we’ll begin going through everyone’s dynamic worksheets. Once again, you’ll submit scores and feedback for your classmates’ work. We’ll refer to the same rubric as we did for Project #1 (though keep in mind that “presentation” means something slightly different now than it did for that project). The feedback form has been modified slightly, so make sure to read the descriptors for each category.

It will take around 10 minutes to review each project, so we will not finish during Thursday’s class. Homework #9 is to finish submitting feedback for all the projects. Your forms must be submitted by 11:59pm on Monday, October 31 (this is instead of the usual Tuesday deadline, so that I can compile responses so we can discuss them during Tuesday’s class).

GeoGebra construction steps slideshow

Recall our sample GeoGebra dynamic worksheet on Ceva’s Theorem. When you open the worksheet, it automatically takes you to slide 25/25 in the slideshow, but you can jump to slide 1 and scroll through them one by one. What you’re seeing is actually the construction of a single dynamic worksheet, one object at a time. (In this case, I think it is extremely helpful to see the dynamic worksheet built up like this, rather than just seeing the end result.)

If you’d like to add this feature to your own dynamic worksheet, all you have to do is turn on the Navigation Bar for Construction Steps.

In the desktop app:

  1. Click on the View menu
  2. Select Layout
  3. Select Preferences – Graphics from the top of the window (the icon is the overlapping green circle and blue triangle)
  4. Under Navigation Bar for Construction Steps, select Show (you can include the play button too if you’d like to automate the slideshow)

Then, when you upload your GeoGebra applet to the online GeoGeobra worksheet that you’re constructing, the navigation bar will appear as it does in the Ceva sample linked above.

I hope this helps with your GeoGebra projects. I can’t wait to see them!

Project #2 – GeoGebra Dynamic Worksheet – due Thursday, October 27

Due date: Thursday, October 27, 2:30pm

Individual are assigned below. You may trade topics with a classmate if you wish.

Your assignment is to include the following two items in an OpenLab post:

  1. The statement of the theorem/result that you have been assigned, written in LaTeX, in the body of the post. You may copy this statement word-for-word from the text, or paraphrase it. Either way, it must be complete and precise.
  2. A link to a GeoGebra dynamic worksheet (uploaded to GeoGebra Tube) that helps students understand the statement in your post. The dynamic worksheet should be completely self contained. Think of the worksheet as playing the following role: You are teaching a geometry course and will be absent for one class. The lesson for that day is the topic you have been assigned for this project. The substitute teacher assigned to cover your class does not have a background in geometry, so your students will have to learn the topic exclusively from your dynamic worksheet. Your worksheet must take advantage of the benefits GeoGebra has over traditional paper worksheets (for example, you can make use of the drag test).

You may also include extra details either in the body of your post or in the dynamic worksheet, if you think they will be helpful. For example, you may include hints for the proof of your statement (why is the statement true?) or you may include helpful applications. These are optional and should only be included if they help students understand the statement.

Add the category “Project #2: GeoGebra Dynamic Worksheet” to your post.

There are many resources available online for help creating dynamic worksheets. Here’s one. Read Chapter 3 of the Venema text for other helpful tips. As a sample, here is the dynamic worksheet on Ceva’s theorem that we explored in class.

Once again, your classmates will be asked to score your worksheet and offer detailed feedback. This will be similar to the rubric and feedback form for the Desmos mini-project. Details will be announced later.

Topic assignments:

  • JODEL: The theorem of Menelaus (Venema Chapter 9)
  • MEI: Simpson’s theorem (Venema 11.6)
  • MAJID: Ptolemy’s theorem (Venema 11.7)
  • JOSIEL: Napoleon’s theorem and the Napoleon point (Venema 12.1)
  • GARY: Morley’s theorem (Venema 12.6)
  • SONAM: Circumscribed circle and circumcenter (Venema 4.1)
  • EVE: Extended law of sines (Venema 4.1)
  • TYNIQUA: Angle bisector concurrence theorem (Venema 4.2)
  • LUIS: The medial triangle (Venema Exercises 5.1.1 to 5.1.4)
  • ARMANDO: Desargue’s theorem (Venema 11.2)
  • JOSUE: TBA

 

 

 

Welcome back/reminders/updates

I hope you all had a good break from your Tuesday/Thursday classes and are ready to get back to them!

My surgery last week was successful and I’m recovering well. I’m not ready to come back to campus just yet, so Professor Thiel has prepared two excellent lectures to give you this Thursday and Friday. I should be back by next week, and things can start getting back to normal.

Don’t forget that HW#8 is due tomorrow.

I still owe you instructions for your GeoGebra project…I’m not forgetting! The instructions, along with my sample project, will be posted this week and you’ll have a week or so to complete the project. (The original due date was next Tuesday, but that has changed.) Stay tuned!

 

[HW#3/ Note Taking as Stenography]

This article by Jay Sterling Silver (Law professor at St Thomas University School of Law) “Note taking as stenography” from Inside Highered is about why laptops are prohibited in classrooms. The author focuses on notes taking in class by students using laptops and how that affect their learning process. The author talked about the MIT research that went against using laptops in classrooms, He said “The institute of technology finding that students-unable to resists the sirens of the internet during class performed better when laptops were not permitted in the classrooms” At first, professor Jay supports using laptops in classrooms witch is against the MIT research, he thought that laptops will accelerate the notes taking and the learning process of students. But then by experience, he found out that students don’t remember their notes, instead they just write them in their laptops.

I have picked this article because now days laptops and tablets are this current generation most used devices, and of course educators are debating weather to use them or not. Education have gone digital. Now colleges and universities are offering online courses, in addition most of the schools expect all the students to have some sort of a similar device. But the issue is it this technology is beneficial or not in the learning process and this article have a good point about that matter.

I agree with the author and the MIT research about prohibiting laptops in the classrooms, because laptops can be distraction to students. Everyone admit that laptops are effective when it comes to taking notes, they are easy to save access and reviewed, students can type almost everything the teacher say. But the problem is laptops most of the time prevent students from paying attention due to increasingly of social media. In addition, Students don’t usually think about what they type, according to the Author “My best Guess is that today students keyboard skills are sufficient to allow them to mindlessly record what’s said in the class, like a secretary too hurried taking dictation to think about what’s actually been said.”  When I first started college, I debated whether I buy a laptop so I can bring it to class and take notes. But After I asked many of my classmates, I came up to a conclusion that laptop can be a distraction in class. I know that I am on the social media most of the time like everyone else. In addition, a lot of the time when I try to type something in the computer (psychology lab in a psychology class last semester as an example) I always miss what professor says next because my mind is too busy looking and typing in the keyboard”.

So in my opinion I think that laptops can be useful in classroom only if students will work on a software like Maple Geoggebra or programing like in computer science. And right now most of the classrooms that requires that software’s have computers so I don’t think students should bring laptops to classrooms.

Hw#7: Study: Emerging Technology has Positive Impact in Classrooms

The article Study: Emerging Technology has Positive Impact in Classrooms by Ryan Lytle from the U.S news discusses the many pros  and repercussions of technology in a classroom. In the article Lytle interviews teachers and asks them why do they need technology in order to teach? One teacher replied it was an effective tool to help students do there their classwork at home and come in with questions about the work in the day. She mentions the fact that technology should be used in a way as not for experimentation but, for those who desperately needed it. Lytle points out the fact that many schools are given the budget for technology such as mac computers, tablets and do not use them to there full ability. In the article teachers share strategies for use of technology ranging from delivering lectures online to developing information systems which, would allow students access to a library wherever they go around the campus. Lytle raises an important question when he asks about the expenses towards lower income schools? Generally schools with staggeringly low income areas hardly receive the help needed and adding technology will only lower the budget for other things such as textbooks, school materials. He also raises the question using an example such as if a school district has 500,000 students  in 64 schools and obtains only 100,00 computers who than gets them? The repercussions are great when experimenting with a method not knowing if the results are good or bad. Lytle also mentions that while having technology can be both good and bad in some cases no one stops and asks the teachers about their opinion. One teacher says that instead of using large amounts of money on a approach that may not work to use it to better train teachers which are the source of learning.

My ideals about technology are similar to those of this article. In a way i say if you are effective with the technological object then yes you deserve it but, to give schools all these different techs and expect great results is just obscene . I have worked in classrooms using cubes, shapes, compasses and have received knowledgeable results on my part.  The controversy stems from  many sides with beliefs that students are growing up with more gadgets than the generation before so we should teach them with new “mac computers”.  Yes many fields require computer programs so give those schools the necessary means. I am not imposing on the basis of not having technology though it may seem like it. I agree with giving schools resources because i would want it in my classroom as well.  I think smart boards , projectors are useful tools in a teachers belt. I am considering providing lectures online for my students and doing the homework in class as a experiment. For that i need all my students to obtain access to the social web.

« Older posts Newer posts »