Whether the death penalty should be abolished or used as a form of punishment still lingers in debates today. In my opinion the act of taking someone life can never be repaid by giving someone the death penalty. I say this because the lost of a life in all situations are perceived as horrible events. On the one hand we seek justice by giving someone the death penalty for horrible crimes but on the other hand the judicial preform horrible acts by taking someones life. Thus killing someone for committing a horrible crime is not the answer, the death penalty will never bring about justice for anyone.
If we consider the pros and cons for having the death penalty on the books it is resemble to say viscous criminals are punished, but in-return the judicial system ends up being the lawbreakers. When the legal system takes someone life by administrating the death penalty someone is being murdered and this is a crime. Although families and people being harmed by cold-blooded killers get to witness justice, heartless murderers become prey for the legal system. The cons out weight the pros in this case, thus the death penalty should be abolished.
As an alternative for giving the death penalty the legal system can put a program together that deals with the specific issues causing someone to commit murder and allow homicidal individuals to partake in this program. Also establishing an area with expert doctors and researchers working on solutions to resolve homicidal tendencies would help both the community and the murderers. Killing someone for merciless crimes won’t solve the issue but rehabilitating and offering support may decrease the chances of someone committing murder. It is our society and we decide the rules and regulations to live with so leave a comment and get involved. Thanks for checking out this post.
Down below is a video that gives an account of information on the death penalty, check it out and post a comment thanks for watching and reading this post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1htDY230jx4
